Skip to main content
Log in

Coupled Demographic Dynamics of Herds and Households Constrain Livestock Population Growth in Pastoral Systems

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the dominant narratives about pastoral systems is that livestock populations have the potential to grow exponentially and destroy common-pool grazing resources. However, longitudinal, interdisciplinary research has shown that pastoralists are able to sustainably manage common-pool resources and that livestock populations are not growing exponentially. The common explanation for limits on livestock population growth is that reoccurring droughts, diseases, and other disasters keep populations in check. However, we hypothesize that coupled demographic processes at the level of the household also may keep livestock population growth in check. Our hypothesis is that two mechanisms at the herd-household level explain why livestock populations grow much slower in pastoral systems than predicted by conventional Malthusian models. The two mechanisms are: (1) the domestic cycle of the household, and (2) the effects of scale and stochasticity. We developed an agent-based model of a pastoral system to evaluate the hypothesis. The results from our simulations show that the couplings between herd and household do indeed constrain the growth of both human and livestock populations. In particular, the domestic cycle of the household limits herd growth and ultimately constrains the growth of livestock populations. The study shows that the misfortunes that affect individual households every day cumulatively have a major impact on the growth of human and livestock populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The agent-based model is available in the Computational Model Library of the CoMSES Network at: https://www.comses.net/codebases/4db826be-85aa-47c0-93b1-5fcec2bef057/releases/1.0.0/.

References

  • Aktipis, C. A., Cronk, L., & Aguiar, R. (2011). Risk-Pooling and Herd Survival: An Agent-Based Model of a Maasai Gift-Giving System. Human Ecology, 39(2), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, T. J. (1993). The nomadic alternative. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1961). Nomads of South Persia: the Basseri tribe of the Khamseh confederacy. Boston (MA): Little, Brown and Company.

  • Bollig, M. (1998). Moral economy and self-interest: kinship, friendship, and exchange among the Pokot (N.W. Kenya). In Kinship, networks, and exchange, edited by T. Schweizer and D. R. White. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Sellen, D. W. (1994). Pastoralist decisionmaking: a behavioral ecological perspective. In African pastoralists systems: an integrated approach, edited by E. Fratkin, K. A. Galvin and E. A. Roth. Boulder (CO): Lynne Rienner publishers.

  • Bouissou, M. F., Boissy, A., Neindre, P. L., & Veissier, I. (2001). The Social Behaviour of Cattle. In Social behaviour in farm animals, edited by L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou. Wallingford (UK): CABI.

  • Bradburd, D. A. (1982). Volatility of animal wealth among southwest Asian pastoralists. Human Ecology, 10(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburd, D. A. (1989). Producing their fates: Why poor Basseri settled but poor Komachi and Yomut did not. American Ethnologist, 16(3), 502–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburd, D. A. (1990). Ambiguous relations: kin, class, and conflict among Komachi pastoralists. Edited by W. L. I. K. Merrill, Smithsonian Series in Ethnographic Inquiry. Washington (D.C.): Smithsonian Institution Press.

  • Chang, C., & Koster, H. A. (1994). Introduction. In Pastoralists at the periphery: herders in a capitalist world, edited by C. Chang and H. A. Koster. Tucson (AZ): The University of Arizona Press.

  • Coughenour, M. B., Ellis, J. E., Swift, D. M., Coppock, D. L., Galvin, K., McCabe, T., & Hart, C. (1985). Energy extraction and use in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem. Science, 230(4726), 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. E., & Swift, D. M. (1988). Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: Alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management, 41(6), 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fratkin, Elliot, and Eric Abella Roth. 1996. Who survives drought? Measuring winners and losers among the Ariaal Rendille pastoralists of Kenya. In Case studies in human ecology, edited by D. G. Bates and S. H. Lees. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Fratkin, E., & Roth, E. A. (1990). Drought and economic differentiation among Ariaal pastoralists of Kenya. Human Ecology, 18(4), 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, J. L., & Jamtgaard, K. (1982). The commons reconsidered. Rangelands, 4(2), 51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, B. E. (1989). Labor sufficiency, livestock management, and time allocation on Maasai group ranches. Research in Economic Anthropology, 11, 143–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, V., Railsback, S. F., Vincenot, C. E., Berger, U., Gallagher, C., DeAngelis, D. L., ... & Ayllón, D. (2020). The ODD Protocol for Describing Agent-Based and Other Simulation Models: A Second Update to Improve Clarity, Replication, and Structural Realism. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 23(2).

  • Hall, S. J. G. (1989). Chillingham cattle: Social and maintenance behaviour in an ungulate that breeds all year round. Animal Behaviour, 38(2), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. J. G., & Moore, G. F. (1986). Feral cattle of Swona, Orkney Islands. Mammal Review, 16(2), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, K. (1998). Fulani mobility: Causes, constraints and consequences of population movements in Northern Burkina Faso. University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. G. (Ed.). (1985). Population, health and nutrition in the Sahel: Issues in the welfare of selected West African communities. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C. E., Peart, D. C., Buffington, A., Yoak, A. J., Hamilton, I. M., & Moritz, M. (2023). Coupled demographic dynamics of herd and household in pastoral systems. Agent-based model. Published in CoMSES Computational Model Library. https://www.comses.net/codebases/4db826be-85aa-47c0-93b1-5fcec2bef057/releases/1.0.0/

  • Lazo, A. (1994). Social segregation and the maintenance of social stability in a feral cattle population. Animal Behaviour, 48(5), 1133–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M. A., & Leslie, P. W. (Eds.). (1999). Turkana herders of the dry savanna: Ecology and biobehavioral response of nomads to an uncertain environment, Research monographs on human population biology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftsdóttir, K. (2008). The bush is sweet: Identity, power, and development among WoDaaBe Fulani in Niger. Uppsala (Sweden): Nordiska Afrikainstituted.

  • Lybbert, T., Barrett, C., Desta, S., & Coppock, L. (2005). Stochastic wealth dynamics and risk management among a poor population. Economic Journal, 114, 750–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, J. T. (1990). Turkana pastoralism: A case against the Tragedy of the Commons. Human Ecology, 18(1), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M. (2003). Commoditization and the pursuit of piety: the transformation of an African pastoral system. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles.

  • Moritz, M. (2010). Crop-Livestock Interactions in Agricultural and Pastoral systems in West Africa. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(2), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M. (2012a). Pastoral Intensification in West Africa: Implications for sustainability. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(2), 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M. (2012b). Individualization of Livestock Ownership in Fulbe Family Herds: The Effects of Pastoral Intensification and Islamic Renewal. In Who owns the stock? Collective and multiple forms of property in animals, edited by A. Khazanov and G. Schlee. Oxford (UK): Berghahn.

  • Moritz, M. (2013). Livestock Transfers, Risk Management, and Human Careers in a West African Pastoral System. Human Ecology, 41(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M., Buffington, A., Yoak, A. J., Hamilton, I. M., Garabed, R., & Mortiz, M. (2017). Family Herd Model (version 1). CoMSES Computational Model Library.

  • Moritz, M., Buffington, A., Yoak, A., Hamilton, I. M., & Garabed, R. (2017). No magic number: An examination of the herd-size threshold in pastoral systems using agent-based modeling. Human Ecology, 45(4), 525–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M., Cross, B., & Hunter, C. (2023). Artificial Pastoral Systems: A Review of Agent-Based Modeling Studies of Pastoral Systems. Manuscript for submission to Pastoralism.

  • Moritz, M., Garcia, V., Buffington, A., & Ahmadou, M. (2019). Pastoralist Refugee Crisis tests the Resilience of Open Property Regime in the Logone Floodplain. Cameroon. Land Use Policy, 86(2019), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M., Hamilton, I. M., Chen, Y.-J., & Scholte, P. (2014a). Mobile pastoralists in the Logone Floodplain distribute themselves in an Ideal Free Distribution. Current Anthropology, 55(1), 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz, M., Hamilton, I. M., Scholte, P., & Chen, Y.-J. (2014b). Ideal Free Distributions of Mobile Pastoralists within Multiple Seasonal Grazing Areas. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 67(6), 641–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, B., & Monique. (1992). Demography of Pastoralists: Preliminary Data on the Datoga of Tanzania. Human Ecology, 20(4), 383–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, B., Monique, I. F., Irons, W., McElreath, R. L., Bowles, S., Bell, A., Hertz, T., & Hazzah, L. (2010). Pastoralism and Wealth Inequality. Current Anthropology, 51(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M. (1972). Of Men and Meadows: Strategies of Alpine Land Use. Anthropological Quarterly, 45(3), 132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. M. (1981). Balancing on an Alp: Ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2012). Agent-based and Individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, S. C. (1984). The demography of three Sahelian populations. University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, S. (2008). African pastoralist demography. In Ecology of African pastoralist societies, edited by K. Homewood. Oxford (UK): James Currey.

  • Roth, E. A. (2000). On Pastoralist Egalitarianism: Consequences of Primogeniture among the Rendille. Current Anthropology, 41(2), 269–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman, P. C. (1999). Is inequality universal? Current Anthropology, 40(1), 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, S. (2006). Too many people, too few livestock: the crisis affecting pastoralists in the Greater Horn of Africa. http://www.future-agricultures.org/pdf%20files/Sandford_thesis.pdf

  • Sieff, D. F. (1999). The effects of wealth on livestock dynamics among the Datoga pastoralists of Tanzania. Agricultural Systems, 59, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, L. (1987). Wage employment among Samburu pastoralists of northcentral Kenya. Research in Economic Anthropology, 9, 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, D. J. (1958). Household viability among the pastoral Fulani. In The development cycle in domestic group, edited by J. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston (IL): Center for Connected Learning and Computer−Based Modeling, Northwestern University.

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (BCS-1546061, BCS 1946258).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM and CH wrote the manuscript. CH, DP, AB, AY, and MM developed the agent-based model. CH ran the simulations, analyzed the data, and created the figures. MM, RG, JT, and IH designed the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Moritz.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable. No humans or cattle were harmed in this artificial pastoral system.

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

One-sentence summary: Agent-based modeling simulations show that couplings between demographic dynamics of herd and household constrain the growth of human and cattle populations in pastoral systems.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 342 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moritz, M., Hunter, C.E., Peart, D.C. et al. Coupled Demographic Dynamics of Herds and Households Constrain Livestock Population Growth in Pastoral Systems. Hum Ecol 51, 641–653 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00431-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00431-y

Keywords

Navigation