Abstract
One of the dominant narratives about pastoral systems is that livestock populations have the potential to grow exponentially and destroy common-pool grazing resources. However, longitudinal, interdisciplinary research has shown that pastoralists are able to sustainably manage common-pool resources and that livestock populations are not growing exponentially. The common explanation for limits on livestock population growth is that reoccurring droughts, diseases, and other disasters keep populations in check. However, we hypothesize that coupled demographic processes at the level of the household also may keep livestock population growth in check. Our hypothesis is that two mechanisms at the herd-household level explain why livestock populations grow much slower in pastoral systems than predicted by conventional Malthusian models. The two mechanisms are: (1) the domestic cycle of the household, and (2) the effects of scale and stochasticity. We developed an agent-based model of a pastoral system to evaluate the hypothesis. The results from our simulations show that the couplings between herd and household do indeed constrain the growth of both human and livestock populations. In particular, the domestic cycle of the household limits herd growth and ultimately constrains the growth of livestock populations. The study shows that the misfortunes that affect individual households every day cumulatively have a major impact on the growth of human and livestock populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
The agent-based model is available in the Computational Model Library of the CoMSES Network at: https://www.comses.net/codebases/4db826be-85aa-47c0-93b1-5fcec2bef057/releases/1.0.0/.
References
Aktipis, C. A., Cronk, L., & Aguiar, R. (2011). Risk-Pooling and Herd Survival: An Agent-Based Model of a Maasai Gift-Giving System. Human Ecology, 39(2), 131–140.
Barfield, T. J. (1993). The nomadic alternative. Prentice Hall.
Barth, F. (1961). Nomads of South Persia: the Basseri tribe of the Khamseh confederacy. Boston (MA): Little, Brown and Company.
Bollig, M. (1998). Moral economy and self-interest: kinship, friendship, and exchange among the Pokot (N.W. Kenya). In Kinship, networks, and exchange, edited by T. Schweizer and D. R. White. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M., & Sellen, D. W. (1994). Pastoralist decisionmaking: a behavioral ecological perspective. In African pastoralists systems: an integrated approach, edited by E. Fratkin, K. A. Galvin and E. A. Roth. Boulder (CO): Lynne Rienner publishers.
Bouissou, M. F., Boissy, A., Neindre, P. L., & Veissier, I. (2001). The Social Behaviour of Cattle. In Social behaviour in farm animals, edited by L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou. Wallingford (UK): CABI.
Bradburd, D. A. (1982). Volatility of animal wealth among southwest Asian pastoralists. Human Ecology, 10(1), 85–106.
Bradburd, D. A. (1989). Producing their fates: Why poor Basseri settled but poor Komachi and Yomut did not. American Ethnologist, 16(3), 502–518.
Bradburd, D. A. (1990). Ambiguous relations: kin, class, and conflict among Komachi pastoralists. Edited by W. L. I. K. Merrill, Smithsonian Series in Ethnographic Inquiry. Washington (D.C.): Smithsonian Institution Press.
Chang, C., & Koster, H. A. (1994). Introduction. In Pastoralists at the periphery: herders in a capitalist world, edited by C. Chang and H. A. Koster. Tucson (AZ): The University of Arizona Press.
Coughenour, M. B., Ellis, J. E., Swift, D. M., Coppock, D. L., Galvin, K., McCabe, T., & Hart, C. (1985). Energy extraction and use in a nomadic pastoral ecosystem. Science, 230(4726), 619–625.
Ellis, J. E., & Swift, D. M. (1988). Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: Alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management, 41(6), 450–459.
Fratkin, Elliot, and Eric Abella Roth. 1996. Who survives drought? Measuring winners and losers among the Ariaal Rendille pastoralists of Kenya. In Case studies in human ecology, edited by D. G. Bates and S. H. Lees. New York: Plenum Press.
Fratkin, E., & Roth, E. A. (1990). Drought and economic differentiation among Ariaal pastoralists of Kenya. Human Ecology, 18(4), 385–402.
Gilles, J. L., & Jamtgaard, K. (1982). The commons reconsidered. Rangelands, 4(2), 51–54.
Grandin, B. E. (1989). Labor sufficiency, livestock management, and time allocation on Maasai group ranches. Research in Economic Anthropology, 11, 143–178.
Grimm, V., Railsback, S. F., Vincenot, C. E., Berger, U., Gallagher, C., DeAngelis, D. L., ... & Ayllón, D. (2020). The ODD Protocol for Describing Agent-Based and Other Simulation Models: A Second Update to Improve Clarity, Replication, and Structural Realism. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 23(2).
Hall, S. J. G. (1989). Chillingham cattle: Social and maintenance behaviour in an ungulate that breeds all year round. Animal Behaviour, 38(2), 215–225.
Hall, S. J. G., & Moore, G. F. (1986). Feral cattle of Swona, Orkney Islands. Mammal Review, 16(2), 89–96.
Hampshire, K. (1998). Fulani mobility: Causes, constraints and consequences of population movements in Northern Burkina Faso. University of London, London.
Hill, A. G. (Ed.). (1985). Population, health and nutrition in the Sahel: Issues in the welfare of selected West African communities. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hunter, C. E., Peart, D. C., Buffington, A., Yoak, A. J., Hamilton, I. M., & Moritz, M. (2023). Coupled demographic dynamics of herd and household in pastoral systems. Agent-based model. Published in CoMSES Computational Model Library. https://www.comses.net/codebases/4db826be-85aa-47c0-93b1-5fcec2bef057/releases/1.0.0/
Lazo, A. (1994). Social segregation and the maintenance of social stability in a feral cattle population. Animal Behaviour, 48(5), 1133–1141.
Little, M. A., & Leslie, P. W. (Eds.). (1999). Turkana herders of the dry savanna: Ecology and biobehavioral response of nomads to an uncertain environment, Research monographs on human population biology. Oxford University Press.
Loftsdóttir, K. (2008). The bush is sweet: Identity, power, and development among WoDaaBe Fulani in Niger. Uppsala (Sweden): Nordiska Afrikainstituted.
Lybbert, T., Barrett, C., Desta, S., & Coppock, L. (2005). Stochastic wealth dynamics and risk management among a poor population. Economic Journal, 114, 750–777.
McCabe, J. T. (1990). Turkana pastoralism: A case against the Tragedy of the Commons. Human Ecology, 18(1), 81–103.
Moritz, M. (2003). Commoditization and the pursuit of piety: the transformation of an African pastoral system. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Moritz, M. (2010). Crop-Livestock Interactions in Agricultural and Pastoral systems in West Africa. Agriculture and Human Values, 27(2), 119–128.
Moritz, M. (2012a). Pastoral Intensification in West Africa: Implications for sustainability. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(2), 418–438.
Moritz, M. (2012b). Individualization of Livestock Ownership in Fulbe Family Herds: The Effects of Pastoral Intensification and Islamic Renewal. In Who owns the stock? Collective and multiple forms of property in animals, edited by A. Khazanov and G. Schlee. Oxford (UK): Berghahn.
Moritz, M. (2013). Livestock Transfers, Risk Management, and Human Careers in a West African Pastoral System. Human Ecology, 41(2), 205–219.
Moritz, M., Buffington, A., Yoak, A. J., Hamilton, I. M., Garabed, R., & Mortiz, M. (2017). Family Herd Model (version 1). CoMSES Computational Model Library.
Moritz, M., Buffington, A., Yoak, A., Hamilton, I. M., & Garabed, R. (2017). No magic number: An examination of the herd-size threshold in pastoral systems using agent-based modeling. Human Ecology, 45(4), 525–532.
Moritz, M., Cross, B., & Hunter, C. (2023). Artificial Pastoral Systems: A Review of Agent-Based Modeling Studies of Pastoral Systems. Manuscript for submission to Pastoralism.
Moritz, M., Garcia, V., Buffington, A., & Ahmadou, M. (2019). Pastoralist Refugee Crisis tests the Resilience of Open Property Regime in the Logone Floodplain. Cameroon. Land Use Policy, 86(2019), 31–42.
Moritz, M., Hamilton, I. M., Chen, Y.-J., & Scholte, P. (2014a). Mobile pastoralists in the Logone Floodplain distribute themselves in an Ideal Free Distribution. Current Anthropology, 55(1), 115–122.
Moritz, M., Hamilton, I. M., Scholte, P., & Chen, Y.-J. (2014b). Ideal Free Distributions of Mobile Pastoralists within Multiple Seasonal Grazing Areas. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 67(6), 641–649.
Mulder, B., & Monique. (1992). Demography of Pastoralists: Preliminary Data on the Datoga of Tanzania. Human Ecology, 20(4), 383–405.
Mulder, B., Monique, I. F., Irons, W., McElreath, R. L., Bowles, S., Bell, A., Hertz, T., & Hazzah, L. (2010). Pastoralism and Wealth Inequality. Current Anthropology, 51(1), 35–48.
Netting, R. M. (1972). Of Men and Meadows: Strategies of Alpine Land Use. Anthropological Quarterly, 45(3), 132.
Netting, R. M. (1981). Balancing on an Alp: Ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. Cambridge University Press.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2012). Agent-based and Individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.
Randall, S. C. (1984). The demography of three Sahelian populations. University of London, London.
Randall, S. (2008). African pastoralist demography. In Ecology of African pastoralist societies, edited by K. Homewood. Oxford (UK): James Currey.
Roth, E. A. (2000). On Pastoralist Egalitarianism: Consequences of Primogeniture among the Rendille. Current Anthropology, 41(2), 269–271.
Salzman, P. C. (1999). Is inequality universal? Current Anthropology, 40(1), 31–61.
Sandford, S. (2006). Too many people, too few livestock: the crisis affecting pastoralists in the Greater Horn of Africa. http://www.future-agricultures.org/pdf%20files/Sandford_thesis.pdf
Sieff, D. F. (1999). The effects of wealth on livestock dynamics among the Datoga pastoralists of Tanzania. Agricultural Systems, 59, 1–25.
Sperling, L. (1987). Wage employment among Samburu pastoralists of northcentral Kenya. Research in Economic Anthropology, 9, 167–190.
Stenning, D. J. (1958). Household viability among the pastoral Fulani. In The development cycle in domestic group, edited by J. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston (IL): Center for Connected Learning and Computer−Based Modeling, Northwestern University.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (BCS-1546061, BCS 1946258).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MM and CH wrote the manuscript. CH, DP, AB, AY, and MM developed the agent-based model. CH ran the simulations, analyzed the data, and created the figures. MM, RG, JT, and IH designed the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable. No humans or cattle were harmed in this artificial pastoral system.
Competing Interests
There are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
One-sentence summary: Agent-based modeling simulations show that couplings between demographic dynamics of herd and household constrain the growth of human and cattle populations in pastoral systems.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Moritz, M., Hunter, C.E., Peart, D.C. et al. Coupled Demographic Dynamics of Herds and Households Constrain Livestock Population Growth in Pastoral Systems. Hum Ecol 51, 641–653 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00431-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-023-00431-y