Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Study on Shear Strength of Indirect Joint Strengthened by Steel Moment Frames

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the seismic performance of buildings reinforced by steel moment frames using built-in or external indirect joints, shear strength of indirect joints to be applied to computer-aided structural numerical models is required. However, Korea’s earthquake provisions do not provide the specified shear strength of indirect joints of specific seismic strengthened methods. In this study, an experiment was conducted to investigate the shear strength of indirect joints in the built-in and external seismic strengthened methods with specific indirect joints. It was confirmed that the shear strength of the indirect joint was determined to be a conservative value among the interfacial shear force of the post-installed anchor and the shear strength of the load transfer part. It was also confirmed that the indirect joint exhibited the same shear strength regardless of the type of seismic reinforcement, and the shear strength of the indirect joint was provided. In addition, a method of calculating the shear strength depending on the number of load transfer parts and the thickness of indirect joints was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI. (2006). Committee 374, 374.1-05: Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames based on Structural Testing and Commentary. American Concrete Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI. (2014). Committee 318, 318–14: Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Shou, W., & Cui, S. (2019). Seismic performance of non-ductile R.C. frames strengthened with CFRP. Composite Structures, 221, 110870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1992). NEHRP handbook of techniques for the seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2006). Techniques for the seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • HILTI Corporation. (2012). Operating instruction HILTI HIT-CT 1 with HIT-V. HILTI Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, B., Lv, H. L., & Kundu, T. (2019). Experimental study on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame in primary and middle schools with different strengthening methods. Construction and Building Materials, 217, 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA). (2017). Japanese seismic design code and guidelines of seismic retrofit and commentary of existing reinforced concrete buildings. JBDPA. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2021a). Seismic retrofitting effect of R.C. buildings using perimeter steel moment frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 21, 757–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2021b). Shear strength investigation of connections between RC and strengthened steel frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 21, 1845–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korean Education Development Institute (KEDI). (2011). Development of guideline for seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of existing school buildings in Korea (CR2011-41). KEDI. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Ministry of Education (KMOE). (2020). Seismic Design Code of Korean School Facilities (KME Notice No. 2020–223). KME. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Ministry of Education (KMOE). (2019). Manual of seismic performance evaluation and retrofit of Korean school facilities. KME. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Ministry of Land, & Infrastructure and Transport (KMOLIT). (2019). Korean design standard: KDS 41. KMOLIT. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Ministry of the Interior and Safety (KMOIS). (2018). Establishment of master plan for Korean seismic design and retrofit. KMOIS. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H., Ryu, J., Kim, D. H., & Ju, Y. K. (2018). Improving seismic performance of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames through the combined behavior of friction and metallic dampers. Engineering Structures, 172, 304–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Union Corporation. (2017). Union Grout PAD·EM·GM·HS·JM-CAT.NO.9:94.07, Union Corporation (in Korean).

  • Zahrai, S. M., & Cherahi, A. (2017). Reducing seismic vibrations of typical steel buildings using new multi-level yielding pipe damper. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(3), 983–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was provided by the 2022 Youngsan University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seonwoong Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S. Experimental Study on Shear Strength of Indirect Joint Strengthened by Steel Moment Frames. Int J Steel Struct 23, 1329–1342 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00771-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00771-x

Keywords

Navigation