Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Harmonization of the Results of Soil Salinity Chemical Study

  • SYSTEMATIC STUDY OF ARID TERRITORIES
  • Published:
Arid Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil salinization is one of the main environmental factors that limits the growth and productivity of many plants. Soil salinity is assessed by different methods in various countries of the world: by the method of water extracts in Russia and a number of other countries and by electrical conductivity of extracts from soil pastes all over the world. These methods are time consuming, thus short-cut methods are used for mass analysis. For example, the salt status of soils is often assessed by the leading toxic ion (chlorine or sodium) in Russia or by electrical conductivity for different soil to water ratios (1 : 1, 1 : 2.5, 1 : 5, and 1 : 10) in a number of other countries. In this work, we compare different methods to substantiate the use of electrical conductivity measured in a suspension 1 : 5. The following approaches are analyzed: 1—determination of the specific electrical conductivity in water suspension (1 : 5); 2—measurement of pNa and pCl in water suspension (1 : 5) by ion-selective electrodes; and 3—determination of sodium in water extract (1 : 5) by atomic absorption spectrometry. Salinization is evaluated in samples of light clay soils of the dry steppe zone mainly of chloride-sodium salinity. The results show the strongest correlation between measurements of the specific electrical conductivity (by conductometer) and sodium activity (by ion-selective electrodes). A rather close relationship between the specific electrical conductivity and the content of sodium ions in water extract has been revealed, and a conversion function of these parameters has been obtained: ЕС1 : 5 = 0.213Na1 : 5 + 0.17 (with a free term) and ЕС1 : 5 = 0.23Na1 : 5 (without a free term). It is proposed to use the following criteria to assess the salinity by electrical conductivity (dS/m) in water suspension (1 : 5): 0–0.4, nonsaline; 0.4–0.6, slightly saline; 0.6–1, medium saline; 1–1.9, strongly saline; and >1.9, very strongly saline. The comparison of different gradations of soil salinity by cross tables, using the chi-square test and the Kappa index, shows statistically significant correlation, which enables the use of various analytical methods to assess soil salinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bakinova, T.I., Vorob’eva, N.P., and Zelenskaya, E.A., Pochvy Respubliki Kalmykiya (Soils of the Republic of Kalmykia), Elista-Rostov-na-Donu: Severo-Kavkazsk. Nauchn. Tsentra Vysshei Shkoly, 1999.

  2. Bazilevich, N.I. and Pankova, E.I., Experience in classifying soils according to the toxic salts and ions content, Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 1972, no. 5, pp. 36–40

  3. Benedetti, F. and Caon, L., Global soil laboratory assessment 2020—Laboratories’ Capacities and Needs, Rome: FAO, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davenport, J.R. and Jabro, J.D., Assessment of hand held ion selective electrode technology for direct measurement of soil chemical properties, Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2001, vol. 32, nos. 19-20, pp. 3077–3085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Developments in Salinity Assessment, Modeling, Mapping, and Monitoring from Regional to Submicroscopic scales, in Developments in Soil Salinity Assessment and Reclamation - Innovative Thinking and Use of Marginal Soil and Water Resources in Irrigated Agriculture, Shahid, S.A., Abdelfattah, M.A., and Taha, F.K., Eds., Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp. 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils: USDA Agriculture Handbook, 1954, no. 60.

  7. Dmitriev, E.A., Matematicheskaya statistika v pochvovedenii (Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science), Moscow: URSS, 2019.

  8. Doskach, A.G., Prirodnoe raionirovanie Prikaspiiskoi polupustyni (Natural Zoning of the Caspian Semi-Desert), Moscow: Nauka, 1979. FAO launches the Russian Network of Soil Laboratories, 2022. www.fao.org/russian-federation/news/detail/ru/c/1512615/. Cited December 25, 2022.

  9. GOST (State Standard) 26 423-85: Soils. Methods for Determining the Specific Electrical Conductivity, pH and the Dense Residue of the Aqueous Extract, 1985a.

  10. GOST (State Standard) 26 427-85: Soils. Method for Determination of Sodium and Potassium in Water Extract, 1985b.

  11. Karadağ, S., Eren, E., Cetinkaya, E., Özen, S., and Deveci, S., Optimization of sodium extraction from soil by using a central composite design (CCD) and determination of soil sodium content by ion selective electrodes, Eurasian J. Soil Sci., 2016, no. 5 (2), pp. 89–96.

  12. Khitrov, N.B., Rukhovich, D.I., Pankova, E.I., Novikova, A.F., Vilchevskaya, E.V., Kalinina, N.V., Koroleva, P.V., Chernousenko, G.I., and Konyushkova, M.V., Salt-Affected Soils of the Russian Federation, in Global Assessment of the Status of Salt-Affected Soils, Rome: FAO, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khitrov, N.B. and Ponizovskii, A.A., Rukovodstvo po laboratornym metodam issledovaniya ionno-solevogo sostava neitral’nykh i shchelochnykh mineral’nykh pochv (Guidelines for Laboratory Methods for Studying the Ion-Salt Composition of Neutral and Alkaline Mineral Soils), Moscow: Pochvennyi Institut im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 1990.

  14. Kopikova, L.P. and Skulkin, V.S., Estimation of soil salinity according to conjugated data of water extracts and extracts from water-saturated pastes, in Usloviya formirovaniya i svoistva trudnomelioriruemykh pochv Dzhizakskoi stepi: Nauchnye trudy Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva (Conditions for Formation and Properties of Hard-to-Reclaim Soils of the Jizzakh Steppe: Proc. V.V. Dokuchaev’s Soil Institute), Moscow, 1990, pp. 74–81.

  15. Landon, J.R., Booker Tropical Soil Manual, Booker Tate Limited, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Minashina, N.G., Toxic salts in soil solution, their calculation and classification of soils according to the degree of salinity, Pochvovedenie, 1970, no. 81971, pp. 92–105.

  17. Muratova, V.S. and Margulis, V.Yu., The content of toxic salts in water extracts and soil solutions of gypsum-bearing soils of the Hungry Steppe, Pochvovedenie, 1971, no. 12. pp. 87–99.

  18. Prokopyeva, K.O., The use of multi-temporal high-resolution satellite images to soil salinity assessment of the solonetzic complex (Republic of Kalmykia), Arid Ecosyst., 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 394–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prokopyeva, K.O., Konyushkova, M.V., Novikova, N.M., and Sobolev, I.V., Digital phytoindication of soil salinity in dry steppes (Republic of Kalmykia), Arid Ecosyst., 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Samsonova, V.P. and Meshalkina, Y.L., Quantitative method for comparing soil maps and cartograms, Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull., 2011, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shamrikova, E.V., Kondratenok, B.M., Tumanova, E.A., Vanchikova, E.V., Lapteva, E.M., Zonova, T.V., Lu-Lyan-Min, E.I., Davydova, A.P., Libohova, Z., and Suvannang, N., Transferability between soil organic matter measurement methods for database harmonization, Geoderma, 2022a, vol. 412, p. 115547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shamrikova, E.V., Vanchikova, E.V., Kondratenok, B.M. et al. Problems and limitations of the dichromatometric method for measuring soil organic matter content: A review, Eurasian Soil Sc., 2022b, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 861–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shirokova, Y., Forkutsa, I., and Sharafutdinova, N., Use of electrical conductivity instead of soluble salts for soil salinity monitoring in Central Asia, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 2000, no. 14, pp. 199–205.

  24. Sonmez, S., Buyuktas, D., Okturen, F., and Citak, S., Assessment of different soil water ratios (1 : 1, 1 : 2.5, 1 : 5) in soil salinity studies, Geoderma, 2008, vol. 144, pp. 361–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sotneva, N.I., Application of express methods for assessing soils by degree of salinity (on the example of soils in the north of the Caspian Lowland), Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2005, no. 57, pp. 68–80.

  26. Zasolennye pochvy Rossii (Saline Soils of Russia), Moscow: Akademkniga, 2006.

  27. Zimovets, B.A. and Kauricheva, Z.N., Determining the degree and type of soil salinization by soil solutions and water extracts in the dry steppe zone of the Lower Volga region, in Oroshaemye pochvy i metody ikh izucheniya (Irrigated Soils and Methods of their Study), Tashkent, 1976, pp. 72–83.

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out at the expense of funding allocated for the operation of the Eurasian Center for Food Security of Moscow State University (Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1736-r of June 26, 2021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    K. O. Prokopyeva & M. V. Konyushkova

Authors
  1. K. O. Prokopyeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. V. Konyushkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. O. Prokopyeva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prokopyeva, K.O., Konyushkova, M.V. Harmonization of the Results of Soil Salinity Chemical Study. Arid Ecosyst 13, 257–266 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096123030095

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096123030095

Keywords:

Search

Navigation