Abstract
Engineers contribute to large-scale socio-technical challenges, and human-centered design offers a design thinking approach that helps engineers develop a thorough understanding of the socio-technical effects of their design work. Thus, effective strategies for assessing and teaching human-centered design are needed. This study aimed to identify course characteristics that influence how students experience human-centered design in an introductory systems engineering design course. First, we categorized open-ended written reflections to understand the degree to which students experienced human-centered design. Second, we performed a thematic analysis to characterize salient course experiences for two groups of students: (1) students who experienced human-centered design in a technology-centered (i.e., non-human-centered) way and (2) students who used user input to guide their design thinking and thus experienced design in a human-centered way. Finally, we identify commonalities in course experiences across these two groups of students. Our analysis suggested that most students did not prioritize human-centered design approaches during the course. Most students strived for technical perfectionism, centered CAD competencies, fixated on novel design, and prioritized design decision-making tools. However, students who demonstrated human-centered design approaches integrated user research into their design process, valued communication, and expressed feeling a tension between user information and course requirements. While students may complete the same design course, their design experiences will vary. We provide a heuristic that we encourage instructors to utilize to identify students’ ways of experiencing design. Moreover, we encourage instructors to extend study findings to help non-human-centered designers bridge the divide between social and technical knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, R. S., Daly, S. R., Mann, L. M., & Dall’Alba, G. (2011). Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being. Design Studies, 32(6), 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.004
Adams, R. S., & Turns, J. (2020). The work of educational innovation: Exploring a personalized interdisciplinary design playbook assignment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2), 541–555.
Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00056-X
Altay, B. (2014). User-centered design through learner-centered instruction. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827646
Altay, B., & Demirkan, H. (2014). Inclusive design: Developing students’ knowledge and attitude through empathic modelling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.764933
Åman, P., Andersson, H., & Hobday, M. (2017). The scope of design knowledge: Integrating the technically rational and human-centered dimensions. Design Issues, 33(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00439
Bairaktarova, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Reid, T., & Ramani, K. (2016). Beyond surface knowledge: An exploration of how empathic design techniques enhances engineers understanding of users’ needs. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1(A)), 111–122.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, pp. 84–92.
Buchanan, R. (2001). Human dignity and human rights: Thoughts on the principles of human-centered design. Design Issues, 17(3), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357178
Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305
Coso, A., & Pritchett, A. (2014). The development of a rubric to evaluate and promote students’ integration of stakeholder considerations into the engineering design process. 2014 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, pp. 24–1196 https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--23129
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Springer.
Csavina, K., Nethken, C., & Carberry, A. (2016). Assessing student understanding of reflection in engineering education. 2016 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, p. 26306. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26306
Cummings, A., Zoltowski, C., Hsu, M.-C., Cardella, M., & Oakes, W. (2014). Immersive experience impact on students’ understanding of design. 2014 ASEE Annual conference & exposition proceedings, pp. 24–690. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20582
Daly, S. R., Adams, R. S., & Bodner, G. M. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x
de Figueiredo, A. D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of engineering. Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, 2008, 94–95.
de Figueiredo, M. D. (2021). Design is cool, but … A critical appraisal of design thinking in management education. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100429
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
dos Santos, F. A., & Tiradentes Souto, V. (2019). Graphic design and user-centred design: Designing learning tools for primary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(5), 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9480-1
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Exter, M. E., Gray, C. M., & Fernandez, T. M. (2020). Conceptions of design by transdisciplinary educators: Disciplinary background and pedagogical engagement. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(4), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09520-w
Gasson, S. (2003). Human-centered vs. User-centered design approaches to information systems design. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(2), 29–46.
Giacomin, J. (2014). What is human centred design? The Design Journal, 17(4), 606–623. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480186
Godwin, A. (2016). The development of a measure of engineering identity. 2016 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, p. 26122. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26122
Hess, J. L., Fila, N. D., Kim, E., & Purzer, S. (2021). Measuring empathy for users in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(3), 733–743.
Ho, D. K., Ma, J., & Lee, Y. (2011). Empathy @ design research: A phenomenological study on young people experiencing participatory design for social inclusion. CoDesign, 7(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609893
Hosking, I., Cornish, K., Bradley, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2015). Empathic engineering: Helping deliver dignity through design. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 39(7), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2015.1088090
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500
Jordan, S., & Lande, M. (2012). Practicing needs-based, human-centered design for electrical engineering project course innovation. 2012 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21808
Kim, D., Hess, J. L., & Fila, N. D. (2020). Experiencing ethical engineering practice. 2020 ASEE virtual annual conference content access proceedings, p. 34632. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34632
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902875033
Loweth, R., Daly, S., Sienko, K., Hortop, A., & Strehl, E. (2019). Student designers’ interactions with users in capstone design projects: A comparison across teams. 2019 ASEE annual conference & exposition proceedings, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33291
Matheson, G. O., Pacione, C., Shultz, R. K., & Klügl, M. (2015). Leveraging human-centered design in chronic disease prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(4), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.014
Mattelmäki, T., Vaajakallio, K., & Koskinen, I. (2014). What happened to empathic design? Design Issues, 30(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00249
Melton, R. B., Cardella, M. E., Oakes, W. C., & Zoltowski, C. B. (2012). Development of a design task to assess students’ understanding of human-centered design. Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462469
Menekse, M., Stump, G. S., Krause, S., & Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Differentiated overt learning activities for effective instruction in engineering classrooms: Differentiated overt learning activities. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20021
Mohedas, I., Sienko, K. H., Daly, S. R., & Cravens, G. L. (2020). Students’ perceptions of the value of stakeholder engagement during engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(4), 760–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20356
Norman, D. A., & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00250
Paretti, M. (2005). Using project portfolios to assess design in materials science. 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--14814
Pawley, A. L. (2019). “Asking questions, we walk”: How should engineering education address equity, the climate crisis, and its own moral infrastructure? Journal of Engineering Education, 108(4), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20295
Royalty, A., Chen, H., & Sheppard, S. (2018). Reflective design practice: A novel assessment of the impact of design-based courses on students. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2018, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8659162
Sanders, E. A., Goldstein, M., & Hess, J. L. (2021). Assessing ways of experiencing human-centered design via student reflections. 2021 asee virtual annual conference content access proceedings, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36724
Sanders, E.B.-N. (2006). Design research in 2006. Design Research Quarterly, 1(1), 1–8.
Sanders, E.B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Sanders, E.B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
Steen, M. (2011). Tensions in human-centred design. CoDesign, 7(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.563314
van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., & Dorst, K. (2017). Advancing the strategic impact of human-centred design. Design Studies, 53, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.003
Wallisch, A., & Briede-Westermeyer, J. C. (2021). Fostering user-empathy skills of engineering students by collaborative teaching. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(1), 223–243.
Walther, J., Sochacka, N. W., & Kellam, N. N. (2013). Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study: Quality in interpretive engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 626–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20029
Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00040.x
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge all students who participated in the Introductory Systems Engineering Course and extend our gratitude to those who agreed to participate in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sanders, E.A., Goldstein, M.H. & Hess, J.L. Course experiences that promote and inhibit human-centered design. Int J Technol Des Educ 34, 783–808 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09834-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09834-w