Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Iranian Applied Linguists (mis) Conceptions of Ethical Issues in Research: A Mixed-Methods study

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study used quantitative and qualitative measures to examine Iranian applied linguists’ (mis-) conceptions of ethical issues in research. For this purpose, one hundred and twelve applied linguists completed a research ethics questionnaire constructed and validated by the researchers. In the follow-up qualitative phase, 15 applied linguists who were faculty members participated in semi-instructed interviews. Data were analyzed using exploratory factors analyses for the first phase and theme analyses for the second phase. Quantitative results showed that the most important misconceptions among Iranian applied linguists lingered on working with data (data collection and data analyses). For example, removing an outlier was a prevalent act conducted by applied linguists in the present study. Teachers using their students as participants of their own research as well as how they treated those students after a study were other controversial issues. The qualitative results revealed several themes including lack of knowledge, conflict with real-world practices, a product-oriented approach to education and a publish or perish mentality as the reasons for misconceptions of ethics in applied linguistics among Iranian researchers. On general terms, there was an implicit agreement regarding the lack of training on research ethics among Iranian applied linguists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Data related to the present study are available per request.

References

  • Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Artino, A. R., Jr., La Rochelle, J. S., Dezee, K. J., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE guide No. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atai, M. R., Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2018). Conceptions of research publication among Iranian doctoral students of applied linguistics: Cherish the wish to publish or rush to perish. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 29–65. http://ijal.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2852-en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism Among Iranian Graduate Students of Language Studies: Perspectives and Causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1138864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2004). Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 476–500). Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2011). Quantitative research in second language studies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 190–206). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2015). Prying into safe houses. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 195–217). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Çelik, Ö., & Razı, R. (2023). From transgressors to authors promoting EFL writing through academic integrity integrated instruction. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., & Elder, C. (2004). The handbook of applied linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I. (Ed.). (2015). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. Routledge.

  • De Costa, P. I. (2016). Situating aff ect, ethics, and policy in LTI research. In Reflections on language teacher identity research (pp. 166–171). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Costa, P. I., Sterling, S., Lee, J., Li, W., & Rawal, H. (2021). Research tasks on ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 54(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farangi, M. R., Kamyab, J., Izanlu, M., & Ghodrat, N. (2017). The effect of using SMS as a post task activity on Iranian EFL learners’ grammar knowledge. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.17507/JLTR.0802.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farangi, M. R., & Mehrpour, S. (2022a). Iranian preschoolers vocabulary development: Background television and socio-economic status. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984211073653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farangi, M. R., & Mehrpour, S. (2022b). Preschool minority children’s persian vocabulary development: A language sample analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 761228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.761228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, L. M., Yonge, O., & Myrick, F. (2004). Students’ involvement in faculty research: Ethical and methodological issues. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(4), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2021). Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching, 54(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, H., & Brinkworth, M. E. (2011). Measure twice, cut down error: A process for enhancing the validity of survey scales. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 380–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanami, Y., Putra, I. E., Relintra, M. A., & Syahlaa, S. (2023). Questioning Scientific Publications: Understanding how Indonesian Scholars Perceive the Obligation to Publish and its Ethical Practices. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09475-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. A. (2020). We need to value research quality more than quantity. Spinal Cord, 58, 1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00543-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Zhou, Y., & Sheeran, T. (2020). Educational researchers’ ethical responsibilities and human subjects’ ethical awareness: Implications for research ethics education in China. Ethics & Behavior, 31(5), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1740885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. C., & Gallant, T. B. (2016). Infusing ethics and ethical decision making into the curriculum. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, D., Brown, D., Chan, M., Derrick, D., Ghanem, R., Gutiérrez Arvizu, M. N., Schnur, E., Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022). Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics. Modern Language Journal, 106(1), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. R., Deans, Z., Ampollini, I., Breit, E., Bucchi, M., Seppel, K., Jørgen Vie, K., & Meulen, R. (2023). “It is very difficult for us to separate ourselves from this system”: Views of European researchers, research managers, administrators and governance advisors on structural and institutional influences on research integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09469-x

  • Kitchener, K. S. (1992). Psychologist as teacher and mentor: Affirming ethical values throughout the curriculum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(3), 190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouritzin, S., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Toward a non-extractive research ethics for transcultural, translingual research: Perspectives from the coloniser and the colonised. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(8), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1427755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00784.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R. (2019). Confronting epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, T., & Singer, P. (1998). Bioethics for clinicians: Conflicts of interest in research, education, and patient care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159(8), 960–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, E. (2012). Students’ Ethical Awareness and Conceptions of Research Ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 22(5), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.679136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J. F., Wood, M. L., Kotecki, J. E., Clark, J. K., & Brey, R. A. (1999). Establishing content validity: Using qualitative and quantitative steps. American Journal of Health Behavior, 23(4), 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., & Bersoff, D. M. (1998). The role of liking in perceptions of the moral responsibility to help: A cultural perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejadghanbar, H., Hu, G., & Jahangiri Babadi, M. (2023). Publishing in predatory language and linguistics journals: Authors’ experiences and motivations. Language Teaching, 56(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.2005.00315.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2022). Critical applied linguistics in the 2020s. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 19(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2030232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, F. L. (2011). Research in applied linguistics. Becoming a discerning consumer (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, L., & Creswell, J. W. (2014). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashed, F., Mirhosseini, S., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2023). Write in their tongue: Iranian higher education policies of publishing in English. LRR, 14(1), 63–87. http://lrr.modares.ac.ir/article-14-59495-en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2018). The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rezanejad, A., & Rezaei, S. (2013). Academic dishonesty at universities: The case of plagiarism among Iranian language students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9193-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, U., & van den Besselaar, P. (2016). Quantity and/or quality? The importance of publishing many papers. PLoS ONE, 11(11), e0166149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J. E. (2004). Empirical research on research ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 14(4), 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 829–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics research. System, 70, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S., Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2015). Training in research ethics among applied linguistics and SLA researchers. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 15–37). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S., Winke, P., Gass, S., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). Training in research ethics among applied linguistics and SLA researchers. Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives (pp. 15–37). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surmiak, A., Bielska, B., & Kalinowska, K. (2022). Social researchers’ approaches to research ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 17(1–2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211055056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. (2009). Ethical issues in the study of second language acquisition: Resources for researchers. Second Language Research, 25(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. B., & Miller, K. (2011). Cross-cultural cognitive interviewing: Seeking comparability and enhancing understanding. Field methods, 23(4), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaw, K., Plonsky, L., Larsson, T., Sterling, S., & Kytö, M. (2023). Research ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000010

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful of the respected participants who agreed to share their experiences with us.

Funding

No funding was received in this study in any stage of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Languages and Linguistics, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

    Mohamad Reza Farangi

  2. Applied Linguistics, Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch, Iran

    Mohamad Khojastemehr

Authors
  1. Mohamad Reza Farangi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohamad Khojastemehr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mohamad Reza Farangi: Conceptual model, Data analyses, Writing, Revising and Editing. Mohamad Khojaste Mehr: Data collection, Data analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamad Reza Farangi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of financial of non-financial interests between the authors in the conception or writing the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farangi, M.R., Khojastemehr, M. Iranian Applied Linguists (mis) Conceptions of Ethical Issues in Research: A Mixed-Methods study. J Acad Ethics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09489-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09489-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation