Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial and Temporal Variation of Large Wood in a Coastal River

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large wood (LW) is a critical habitat-forming feature in rivers, but our understanding of its spatial and temporal dynamics remains incomplete due to its historical removal from waterways. Few studies have the necessary spatial and temporal extent and resolution to assess wood dynamics over long time periods or in response to flood disturbance. We used an exceptional dataset from 65 km of a free-flowing coastal river in Oregon, USA, to characterize LW dynamics over a 12-year period (1989–2000). Our objectives were to assess the spatial dynamics of LW over multiple spatial scales and characterize changes in these patterns in response to a major flood in November 1996. Higher LW densities were found in the tributaries, and higher temporal variation of density existed in the main stem. Within years and among reaches, LW density varied by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude across the river. Patterns of LW accumulation across the river were not comparably different when considered at spatial resolutions < 6 km. A large flood in 1996 homogenized the wood distribution across the system, particularly at fine spatial scales (that is, 1.5–0.1 km scales), but considerable heterogeneity was reestablished within 2–3 years post disturbance. At the habitat unit scale, LW tended to accumulate in locations with narrow channel widths, and to a lesser extent, in shallow reaches. These data highlight the dynamic nature of the natural wood regime in coastal rivers that is produced by continuous recruitment and transport through the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are not publicly available; contact the corresponding author and the University of Washington for further information.

References

  • Acker SA, Gregory SV, Lienkaemper G, McKee WA, Swanson FJ, Miller SD. 2003. Composition, complexity, and tree mortality in riparian forests in the central Western Cascades of Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management 173:293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beechie TJ, Sibley TH. 2011. Relationships between channel characteristics, woody debris, and fish habitat in Northwestern Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda LE, Sias JC. 2003. A quantitative framework for evaluating the mass balance of in-stream organic debris. Forest Ecology and Management 172:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke AC, Wallace JB. 2010. Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM, editors. The ecology and management of wood in world rivers. American Fisheries Society Symposium 37. pp 149–77

  • Bisson PA, Nielsen JL, Palmason RA, Grove LE. 1982. A system of naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low streamflow. Armantrout NB, editor. Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information. American Fisheries Society, Western Division, Bethesda, MD. pp 62–73

  • Brennan SR, Schindler DE, Cline TJ, Walsworth TE, Buck G, Fernandez DP. 2019. Shifting habitat mosaics and fish production across river basins. Science 364:783–786.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buffington JM, Montgomery DR. 1997. A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel-bedded rivers. Water Resources Research 33:1993–2029.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett KM, Reeves GH. 2006. Comparing riparian and catchment influences on stream habitat in a forested, montane landscape. American Fisheries Society Symposium 48:175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett KM. 2001. Relationships among juvenile anadromous salmonids, their freshwater habitat, and landscape characteristics over multiple years and spatial scales in the Elk River, Oregon. Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University.

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference: A practical information-theoretical approach (2nd ed). Springer, New York.

  • Carbonneau P, Fonstad MA, Marcus WA, Dugdale SJ. 2012. Making riverscapes real. Geomorphology 137:74–86.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BD, Montgomery DR, Fetherston KL, Abbe TB. 2012. The floodplain large-wood cycle hypothesis: A mechanism for the physical and biotic structuring of temperate forested alluvial valleys in the North Pacific coastal ecoregion. Geomorphology 139:460–470.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RM. 2005. Estimates of peak discharges for rural, unregulated streams in western Oregon, U.S. Geological Survey Science Investigations Report 2005–5116.

  • Díez JR, Larrañaga S, Elosegi A, Pozo J. 2000. Effect of removal of wood on streambed stability and retention of organic matter. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon SJ, Sear DA. 2014. The influence of geomorphology on large wood dynamics in a low gradient headwater stream. Water Resources Research 50:9194–9210.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Northcote TG. 1992. Large woody debris and salmonid habitat in a small coastal British Columbia stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:682–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52:483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galia T, Tichavský R, Wyżga B, Mikuś P, Zawiejska J. 2022. Assessing patterns of spatial distribution of large wood in semi-natural, single-thread channels of Central Europe. CATENA 215:106315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granato GE. 2009. Computer programs for obtaining and analyzing daily mean steamflow data from the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System Web Site: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1362, CD-ROM, appendix 3 of 5. pp 123.

  • Gurnell AM. 2013. Wood in fluvial systems. Schroder JF, editor. Treatise on Geomorphology. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA. pp 163–88.

  • Hankin DG, Reeves GH. 1988. Estimating total fish abundance and total habitat area in small streams based on visual estimation methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45:834–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GR, Cromack K, Cummins KW. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15:133–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch RM. 1982. A comparison of four streamflow record extension techniques. Water Resources Research 18:1081–1088.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Iskin EP, Wohl E. 2021. Wildfire and the patterns of floodplain large wood on the Merced River, Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Geomorphology

  • Keim RF, Skaugset AE, Bateman DS. 2000. Dynamics of coarse woody debris placed in three Oregon streams. Forest Science 46:13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershner JL, Roper BB, Bouwes N, Henderson R, Archer E. 2004. An analysis of stream habitat conditions in reference and managed watersheds on some federal lands within the Columbia River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:1363–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer N, Wohl E. 2017. Rules of the road: A qualitative and quantitative synthesis of large wood transport through drainage networks. Geomorphology 279:74–97.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lienkaemper GW, Swanson FJ. 1987. Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17:150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lininger KB, Hilton S. 2021. Large wood in small channels: A 20-year study of budgets and piece mobility in two redwood streams. Water Resources Research 58:e2022WR033047.

  • MacVicar B, Piégay H. 2012. Implementation and validation of video monitoring for wood budgeting in a wandering piedmont river, the Ain River (France). Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37:1272–1289.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire M. 2001. Elk River watershed assessment. South Coast Watershed Council, Gold Beach, OR

  • McHugh, MH. 1986. Landslide occurrence in the Elk and Sixes River basins, southwest Oregon. Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University.

  • Millington CE, Sear DA. 2007. Impacts of river restoration on small-wood dynamics in a low-gradient headwater stream. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32:1204–1218.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Collins BD, Buffington JM, Abbe TB. 2003. Geomorphic effects of wood in rivers. Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM, editors. The ecology and management of wood in world rivers. American Fisheries Society Symposium 37:21–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Beechie TJ, Benda LE, Berg, DR, Bisson PA, MacDonald LH, O’Connor MD, Olson PL, Steel EA. 1992. Naiman RJ, editor. Fundamental elements of ecologically healthy watersheds in the Pacific Northwest coastal ecoregion. Watershed management: balancing sustainability and environmental change. Springer, New York. pp 127–88.

  • Nakamura F, Swanson FJ. 1993. Effects of coarse woody debris on morphology and sediment storage of a mountain stream system in western Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 18:43–61.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Osei NA, Gurnell AM, Harvey GL. 2015. The role of large wood in retaining fine sediment, organic matter and plant propagules in a small, single-thread forest river. Geomorphology 235:77–87.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Picco L, Scalar C, Iroumé A, Mazzorana B, Andreoli A. 2021. Large wood load fluctuations in an Andean basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 46:371–384.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravazzolo D, Mao L, Picco L, Sitzia T, Lenzi MA. 2015. Geomorphic effects of wood quantity and characteristics in three Italian gravel-bed rivers. Geomorphology 246:79–89.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves GH, Everest FH, Sedell JR. 1993. Diversity of juvenile anadromous salmonid assemblages in coastal Oregon basins with different levels of timber harvest. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122:309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves GH, Burnett KM, McGarry EV. 2003a. Sources of large wood in the main stem of a fourth-order watershed in coastal Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:1363–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves GH, Hohler DB, Larsen DP, Busch DE, Kratz K, Reynolds K, Stein KF, Atzet T, Hays P, Tehan M. 2003b. Aquatic and riparian effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan. General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-577, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, PNW Research Station, Portland, Oregon.

  • RStudio Team. 2019. RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Villanueva V, Wyżga B, Zawiejska J, Hajdukiewicz M, Stoffel M. 2016. Factors controlling large-wood transport in a mountain river. Geomorphology 272:21–31.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions American Geophysical Union 38:913–920.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson FJ, Gregory SV, Iroumé A, Ruiz-Villanueva V, Wohl E. 2021. Reflections on the history of research on large wood in rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 46:55–66.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Torgersen CE, Le Pichon C, Fullerton AH, Dugdale SJ, Duda JJ, Giovannini F, Tales É, Belliard J, Branco P, Bergeron NE, Roy ML, Tonolla D, Lamouroux N, Capra H, Baxter CV. 2022. Riverscape approaches in practice: perspectives and applications. Biological Reviews 97:481–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 1998. Elk River watershed analysis iteration 2.0, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Portland, OR, USA.

  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2016. National Water Information System data available on the World Wide Web (USGS Water Data for the Nation). http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/. Last Accessed 01 May 2020

  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2019a. topoView—A USGS topographic map viewer and data download application: U.S. Geological Survey National Geologic Map Database. U.S. Geological Survey.

  • U.S. Geological Survey. 2019b. National Hydrography Dataset. https://www.usgs.gov/national-hydrography/access-national-hydrography-products. Last Accessed 01 September 2019

  • Vogel RM, Stedinger JR. 1985. Minimum variance streamflow record augmentation procedures. Water Resources Research 21:715–723.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallington TJ, Hobbs RJ, Moore SA. 2005. Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: a review of the salient issues. Ecology and Society 10:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welty EZ, Torgersen CE, Brenkman SJ, Duda JJ, Armstrong JB. 2015. Multiscale analysis of river networks using the R Package linbin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 4:802–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385–397.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberly MC, Spies TA, Long CJ, Whitlock C. 2000. Simulating historical variability in the amount of old forests in the Oregon Coast Range. Conservation Biology 14:167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Beckman N. 2014. Controls on the longitudinal distribution of channel-spanning logjams in the Colorado Front Range, USA. River Research and Applications 30:112–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Cadol D. 2011. Neighborhood matters: patterns and controls on wood distribution in old-growth forest streams of the Colorado Front Range, USA. Geomorphology 125:132–146.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Jaeger K. 2009. A conceptual model for the longitudinal distribution of wood in mountain streams. Earth Surface Processes Landforms 34:329–344.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Scott DN. 2017. Wood and sediment storage and dynamics in river corridors. Earth Surface Processes Landforms 42:5–23.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Cadol D, Pfeiffer A, Jackson K, Laurel D. 2018. Distribution of large wood within river corridors in relation to flow regime in the semiarid western U.S. Water Resources Research 54:1890–1904.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Hinshaw SK, Scamardo JE, Gutiérrez-Fonseca PE. 2019a. Transient organic jams in Puerto Rican mountain streams after hurricanes. River Research and Applications 35:280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Kramer N, Ruiz-Villanueva V, Scott DN, Comiti F, Gurnell AM, Piegay H, Lininger KB, Jaeger KL, Walters DM, Fausch KD. 2019b. The natural wood regime in rivers. BioScience 69:259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Uno H, Dunn SB, Kemper JT, Marshall A, Means-Brous M, Scamardo JE, Triantafillou SP. 2023. Why wood should move in rivers. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

K. Christiansen of the Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, provided assistance with data transfer. L. Ellenberg, B. Hansen, and K. Burnett were integral to the collection of the field data. We thank K. Jaeger from the U.S. Geological Survey and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, the University of Washington, and the Ford Foundation. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel E. Schindler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 747 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yazzie, K.C., Torgersen, C.E., Schindler, D.E. et al. Spatial and Temporal Variation of Large Wood in a Coastal River. Ecosystems 27, 19–32 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-023-00870-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-023-00870-0

Keywords

Navigation