Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When active representation is not enough: ethnic minority street-level workers in a divided society and policy entrepreneurship

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can street-level workers from an ethnic minority in a divided society act as policy entrepreneurs and affect policy design? How their shared values with the homogeneous local government play a role in enabling policy entrepreneurship? Active representation refers to bureaucrats promoting the interests of the clients with whom they share the same characteristics or background. The assumption is that the behaviour of the bureaucrats—rather than their background, per se—affects citizens’ responses. However, in such cases, although they are active, street-level workers are fighting to change outcomes within institutions established by others. With regard to Arab social workers in Israel, we provide a new perspective on how ethnic minority street-level workers in a divided society may go beyond active representation in an attempt to directly influence policy design as entrepreneurs. We also identify the conditions that drive policy entrepreneurship and the strategies used to accomplish these goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACOSS (2010). National compact between the Australian Government and third sector. Consultation Report, February 2010. Retrieved from, https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2010/02/apo-nid20521-1193981.pdf

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Walker, R. M. (2005). Representative bureaucracy, organizational strategy, and public service performance: An empirical analysis of English local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G. (2015). Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17(3), 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G. (2021). Distinguishing the street-level policy entrepreneur. Public Administration, 99(3), 439–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, D. N., & Wilkins, V. M. (2013). Going beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic: The effects of teacher representation on teen pregnancy rates. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad-Elias, J., & Nouman, H. (2023). Policy practice in non-profit ethnic minority organisations: Tension axes and supportive intra-organisational conditions. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azaiza, F. (2013). Processes of conservation and change in Arab society in Israel: Implications for the health and welfare of the Arab population. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, M. P. (1992). The myth of discretion. In K. Hawkins (Ed.), The uses of discretion (pp. 129–161). Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeri-Sulitzeanu, A., & Darawshe, M. (2013). NGOs and civic organizations in Arab society. In the information Dossier of the Civic Society in Israel (Ch. 12). Abraham Fund Initiative, Hebrew. Retrieved from, https://www.abrahamfund.org

  • Blackburn, R., & Ram, M. (2006). Fix or fixation? The contributions and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, M. D., & Kellough, J. E. (2008). Representative bureaucracy: Exploring the potential for active representation in local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, E. Z. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. (2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. (2021). Policy entrepreneurship at the street level: Understanding the effect of the individual. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N., & Klenk, T. (2019). Policy re-design from the street level. In H. Peter (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 209–222). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., OSullivan, S., & Sol, E. (2015). Getting welfare to work: Street-level governance in Australia, the UK, and the Netherlands. OUP Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. (2011). Forward to the past: Can the UK black and minority ethnic third sector survive? Voluntary Sector Review, 2(3), 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, V. (2010). The bureaucrat and the poor: Encounters in French welfare offices. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durose, C. (2007). Beyond ‘street level bureaucrats’: Re-interpreting the role of front line public sector workers. Critical Policy Analysis, 1(2), 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch-Aviram, N., Beeri, I., & Cohen, N. (2021). How policy entrepreneurship training affects policy entrepreneurship behavior among street-level bureaucrats: A randomized field experiment. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(5), 698–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gade, D. M., & Wilkins, V. M. (2012). Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, J., Shavit, M., & Bleikh, H. (2017). The budget for the welfare services in local authorities. Status report on the state 2017, Jerusalem. Taub Center for Social Policy Research in Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2015). The ‘why’ and the ‘how’ of policy practice: An eight-country comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 45(4), 1083–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2018). Qualitative methods for health research. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grissom, J. A., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2009). Race, region, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 911–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2010). A contingency approach to representative bureaucracy: Power, equal opportunities and diversity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrits, G. S., & Møller, M. Ø. (2014). Prevention at the front line: How home nurses, pedagogues, and teachers transform public worry into decisions on special efforts. Public Management Review, 16(4), 447–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, V., Thompson, L., & Stedman, T. (2008). The indigenous experience of Australian civil society: Making sense of historic and contemporary institutions. Social Alternatives, 27(1), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A. (2017). Arab civil society in Israel: New elites, social capital, and oppositional consciousness, Hebrew, Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad-Kav Adom.

  • Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., & Holland, C. A. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, E., & Cohen, N. (2019). How street-level bureaucrats become policy entrepreneurs: The case of urban renewal. Governance, 32(3), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, E., Cohen, N., & Nouman, H. (2018). Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats’ engagement in policy design. Public Administration, 96(2), 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavie, E. (2016). Arab-Palestinian society in the State of Israel: Time for a strategic change in the processes of integration and equality. The Institute of National Security Studies, Tel Aviv (Hebrew).

  • Levy, G., & Massalha, M. (2010). Yaffa: A school of their choice? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Epstein, N., & Semyonov, M. (1992). Local labor markets, ethnic segregation, and income inequality. Social Forces, 70(4), 1101–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotta, G., & Pires, R. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and social inequality. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 86–101). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2009). The potential of migrant and refugee community organisations to influence policy. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajne, I. (2018). The development of social services for the Palestinian minority under Israeli state policies. In M. Mohanad (Ed.), 70 years of Nakbah (pp. 98–116). Haifa, Mada al-Carmel–Arab Center for Applied Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajne, I., Allassad Alhuzail, N., & Bar-On, A. (2021). Challenges facing social work in the indigenous Arab minority in Israel: Voices from the field. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, W. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J. (2019). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, K. J., & Morton, T. S. M. (2015). Representative bureaucracy in a cross-national context: Politics, identity, structure and discretion. In B. G. Peters, P. Von Maravic, & E. Schröter (Eds.), The politics of representative bureaucracy: Power, legitimacy, performance (pp. 94–112). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, A. L. (2016). A manager is a manager is a manager? Race and managerial impact on organizational performance. Public Organization Review, 16(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, M. Ø., & Stone, D. (2013). Disciplining disability under Danish active labour market policy. Social Policy & Administration, 47(5), 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, K. (2008). Independent legal analysis of the compact code of good practice on relations with 'BME' voluntary and community organizations. Matrix Chambers. Retrieved from, http://www.voice4changeengland.co.uk

  • Mosher, F. C. (1982). Democracy and the public service. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, C., & Bent-Goodley, T. (2014). African-American social workers and social policy. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, B. (2007). Education for democracy in Israel: Structural impediments and basic dilemmas. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(3), 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Crotty, S., Grissom, J. A., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Redding, C. (2016). Disentangling the causal mechanisms of representative bureaucracy: Evidence from assignment of students to gifted programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 745–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Will more black cops matter? Officer race and police-involved homicides of black citizens. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 206–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouman, H., & Azaiza, F. (Accepted). Raising Their Voices”: Explaining the Policy Practice of Minority Social Workers. International Social Work.

  • Nouman, H., & Azaiza, F. (2021). Challenges underlying the involvement of social workers from minority groups in policy practice. Australian Social Work, 75(4), 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouman, H., Levin, L., & Lavee, E. (2019). Working through barriers: Shaping social workers’ engagement in policy practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(4), 1107–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey, R., Williams, J., & Carter, Y. H. (2008). From street-level bureaucrats to street-level policy entrepreneurs? Central policy and local action in lottery-funded community cancer care. Social Policy & Administration, 42(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portillo, S. (2012). The paradox of rules: Rules as resources and constraints. Administration & Society, 44(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaphorst, N., & Groeneveld, S. (2019). Discrimination and representation in street-level bureaucracies. In H. Peter (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 116–127). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2018). Do tax officials use double standards in evaluating citizen-clients? A policy-capturing study among Dutch frontline tax officials. Public Administration, 96(1), 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Lavena, C. F. (2014). Representative bureaucracy in policing: Does it increase perceived legitimacy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 537–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Li, H. (2016). Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: An experimental study. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roch, C. H., Pitts, D. W., & Navarro, I. (2010). Representative bureaucracy and policy tools: Ethnicity, student discipline, and representation in public schools. Administration & Society, 42(1), 38–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, R. R., & Hawes, D. P. (2009). Racial diversity, representative bureaucracy, and equity in multiracial school districts. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 326–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sætren, H. (2016). From controversial policy idea to successful program implementation: The role of the policy entrepreneur, manipulation strategy, program design, institutions and open policy windows in relocating Norwegian central agencies. Policy Sciences, 49(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, F., Thomann, E., Zollinger, C., van der Heiden, N., & Mavrot, C. (2014). Street-level bureaucrats and new modes of governance: How Conflicting roles affect the implementation of the Swiss ordinance on veterinary medicinal products. Public Management Review, 16(4), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social construction and public policy. State University of New York Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of the representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Abstract of Israel (2019). Retrieved from, https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/DocLib/2018/2.%20ShnatonPopulation/st02_01.pdf

  • Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox and political reason. Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier, R., Abu-Rayya, H. M., & Shwartz-Ziv, T. (2021). Social services in ethnically mixed cities: Street-level bureaucracy at the crossroads of ethno-national conflict. Administration & Society, 53(8), 1203–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Galilee Association (2018). The Palestinians in Israel: The fifth socio-economic review—2017, Shefaraam, The Galilee Association.

  • The Ministry of Welfare and Social Affairs. (2021). (Hebrew). Retrieved from, https://www.gov.il/he/departments/policies/molsa-social-regulations

  • Theobald, N. A., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2009). Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomann, E., & Rapp, C. (2018). Who deserves solidarity? Unequal treatment of immigrants in Swiss welfare policy delivery. Policy Studies Journal, 46(3), 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L. (2011). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: A policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L. (2012). Policy alienation of public professionals: The construct and its measurement. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 516–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V4C (Voice4Change), (2011). The compact and you—A guide for the black & minority ethnic voluntary & community sector, England. 1/The-Compact-and-You-A-guide-for-the-Black-Minority-Ethnic-voluntary-and-community-sector.pdf

  • Watkins-Hayes, C. (2009). The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory., 21(Suppl_2), 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, V. M., & Keiser, L. R. (2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, V. M., & Williams, B. N. (2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmeck, M., Rochester, C., & Rushbrooke, B. (2011). Use it or lose it: A summative evaluation of the Compact, London, England: Commission for the Compact.

Download references

Funding

Israel Science Foundation, Grant Number: 431\17.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Hani Nouman

  2. The Department of Public Administration and Policy, School of Political Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Nissim Cohen

Authors
  1. Hani Nouman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nissim Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nissim Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nouman, H., Cohen, N. When active representation is not enough: ethnic minority street-level workers in a divided society and policy entrepreneurship. Policy Sci 56, 777–795 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09513-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-023-09513-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation