Abstract
Using pulsed management in drip irrigation systems has become popular as a technique that improves soil water distribution patterns and increases water productivity (WP). Pulsed irrigation consists of on–off cycles, which continue until applying the entire irrigation depth. A two-growing season field experiment was conducted to examine the combined effects of pulsed drip irrigation and its off-time duration on the silage maize yield and WP in Varamin, Iran using a randomized complete block with a split-plot design and three replications. The pulsed management included four levels, applying the irrigation volume in one, two, three, and four pulses (P1, P2, P3, and P4) and off-time duration consisting of one and three, times the on-time duration in a pulse (T1, T3). The results indicated that the interaction of the various treatments on the yield, yield components, and WP of the silage maize was significant (P < 0.01). Increasing off-time duration from T1 to T3 resulted in a 6.5% increase in plant height and stem diameter, a 13.9% increase in 1000-grain weight, and an 11.6% average increase in crop yield and WP over two growing seasons in P4 treatment. Investigating soil water content in the crop root zone demonstrated that increasing the number of pulses and off-time duration and, thus, increasing the time for the infiltration process and soil moisture redistribution improved water distribution in the soil profile, crop yield, and WP. Therefore, with similar soil texture and a high discharge rate of emitters, it is recommended to increase the number of pulses and off-time duration to enhance water redistribution in the soil.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on request.
References
Abdelraouf RE, Abou-Hussein SD, Refaie KM, El-Metwally IM (2012) Effect of pulse irrigation on clogging emitters, application efficiency and water productivity of potato crop under organic agriculture conditions. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 6:807–816
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food Agric Organ UN Rome 1:326
Almeida WFD, Lima LA, Pereira GM (2015) Drip pulses and soil mulching effect on American crisphead lettuce yield. Eng Agríc 35:1009–1018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n6p1009-1018/2015
Almeida WFD, Paz VPDS, de Jesus AP, Silva JSD, Gonçalves KS, Oliveira ASD (2018) Yield of green beans subjected to continuous and pulse drip irrigation with saline water. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 22:476–481. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n7p476-481
Cote CM, Bristow KL, Charlesworth PB, Cook FJ, Thorburn PJ (2003) Analysis of soil wetting and solute transport in subsurface trickle irrigation. Irrig Sci 22:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0080-8
Djaman K, O’Neill M, Owen CK, Smeal D, Koudahe K, West M, Allen S, Lombard K, Irmak S (2018) Crop evapotranspiration, irrigation water requirement and water productivity of maize from meteorological data under semiarid climate. Water 10:405. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040405
Eid AR, Bakry BA, Taha MH (2013) Effect of pulse drip irrigation and mulching systems on yield, quality traits and irrigation water use efficiency of soybean under sandy soil conditions. Agric Sci 4:249–261. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.45036
El-Abedin TZ (2006) Effect of pulse drip irrigation on soil moisture distribution and maize production in clay soil. New Trends Agric Eng 22:1032–1050
El-Mogy MM, Abuarab ME, Abdullatif AL (2012) Response of Green bean to pulse surface drip irrigation. J Hortic Sci Ornam Plants 4:329–334
Elnesr MN, Alazba AA (2015) The effects of three techniques that change the wetting patterns over subsurface drip-irrigated potatoes. Span J Agric Res 3:e1204. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015133-7102
FAO (2021) Production: crops and livestock products. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Accessed 10 Apr 2022
Gendron L, Létourneau G, Cormier J, Depardieu C, Boily C, Levallois R, Caron J (2018) Using pulsed water applications and automation technology to improve irrigation practices in strawberry production. HortTechnology 28:642–650. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04001-18
Gheysari M, Pirnajmedin F, Movahedrad H, Majidi MM, Zareian MJ (2021) Crop yield and irrigation water productivity of silage maize under two water stress strategies in semi-arid environment: two different pot and field experiments. Agric Water Manag 255:106999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106999
Gu L, Hu Z, Yao J, Sun G (2017) Actual and reference evapotranspiration in a cornfield in the Zhangye oasis, northwestern China. Water 9:499. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070499
Irmak S (2005) Crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of Viburnum odoratissimum (Ker.-Gawl). Appl Eng Agric 21:371–381. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.18456
Ismail SM, EL-Abdeen TZ, Omara AA, Abdel-Tawab E (2014) Modeling the soil wetting pattern under pulse and continuous drip irrigation. Am Euras J Agric Environ Sci 14:913–922. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2014.14.09.12404
Kandelous MM, Šimůnek J, Van Genuchten MT, Malek K (2011) Soil water content distributions between two emitters of a subsurface drip irrigation system. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:488–497. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0181
Karmeli D, Peri G (1974) Basic principles of pulse irrigation. J Irrig Drain Div 100:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0000988
Kim DH, Kim JS, Kwon SH, Park JM, Choi WS (2021) Simulation of soil water movement in upland soils under pulse irrigation using HYDRUS-2D. J Biosyst Eng 46:508–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-021-00123-9
Létourneau G, Caron J (2019) Irrigation management scale and water application method to improve yield and water productivity of field-grown strawberries. Agronomy 9:286. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060286
Li C, Xiong Y, Cui Z, Huang Q, Xu X, Han W, Huang G (2020) Effect of irrigation and fertilization regimes on grain yield, water and nitrogen productivity of mulching cultivated maize (Zea mays L.) in the Hetao Irrigation District of China. Agric Water Manag 232:106065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106065
Lozano D, Ruiz N, Baeza R, Contreras JI, Gavilán P (2020) Effect of pulse drip irrigation duration on water distribution uniformity. Water 12:2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082276
Madane DA, Mane MS, Kadam US, Thokal RT, Patil ST, Nandgude SB, Dhekale JS (2018) Effect of pulse irrigation (drip) influencing different irrigation levels on growth and yield parameters of white onion (Allium cepa L.). Adv Agric Res Technol J 2:228–234
Ors S, Sahin U, Kiziloglu FM (2015) Yield, quality and irrigation water use of drip-irrigated silage maize with different irrigation techniques. Pak J Agric Sci 52:595–607
Phogat V, Mahadevan M, Skewes M, Cox JW (2012) Modelling soil water and salt dynamics under pulsed and continuous surface drip irrigation of almond and implications of system design. Irrig Sci 30:315–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0284-2
Wang Y, Li S, Cui Y, Qin S, Guo H, Yang D, Wang C (2021) Effect of drip irrigation on soil water balance and water use efficiency of maize in northwest China. Water 13:217. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020217
Yoder RE, Odhiambo LO, Wright WC (2005) Effects of vapor-pressure deficit and net-irradiance calculation methods on accuracy of standardized Penman-Monteith equation in a humid climate. J Irrig Drain Eng 131:228–237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:3(228)
Yolcu R, Cetin O (2015) Nitrogen fertigation to improve nitrogen use efficiency and crude protein on silage corn. Turk J Field Crops 20:233–241. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.58656
Zamora VR, da Silva MM, Santos Júnior JA, da Silva GF, Menezes D, de Almeida CD (2021) Assessing the productivity of coriander under different irrigation depths and fertilizers applied with continuous and pulsed drip systems. Water Supply 21:2099–2108. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.008
Zhang T, Zou Y, Kisekka I, Biswas A, Cai H (2021) Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize’s yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area. Agric Water Manag 243:106497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106497
Acknowledgements
Partial financial support was received from the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) (project No. 96012623) and Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All Authors contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammadi, S., Mirlatifi, S.M., Homaee, M. et al. Evaluation of silage maize production under pulsed drip irrigation in a semi-arid region. Irrig Sci 42, 269–283 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00880-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00880-9