Abstract
Drought stress is one of the most ruthless environmental factors restricting crop yield efficiency as most crop plants are susceptible to drought stress. Due to the global climatic variations, the environmental conditions are deteriorating continuously. As a result, a wide range of transformation and stress relief strategies are needed to adapt to such a stressful situation. Since long ago, breeding of drought-tolerant plants for developing drought-resistant crops and other physical methods like regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), partial root-zone drying (PRD), etc., have also been attempted to overcome drought stress. Nonetheless, such conventional and physical techniques are time-consuming and cost escalated; there is a need to fill out some simple and low-cost strategies and utilize a momentary premise for drought stress management. Recently, potential PGPR boosting growth and productivity of plants under drought stress has been explored. PGPR confer drought tolerance by producing phytohormones, exopolysaccharides, 1‑aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, osmolytes, volatile compounds, regulation of antioxidant system and stress-responsive gene expressions, and alteration in root system architecture that help plants adapt to dry conditions. Thus, drought tolerant-PGPR can be an efficient tool for a sustainable agroecosystem. In this review, the effects and responses in plants under drought stress are discussed. Apart from this, particular emphasis is given to discuss the PGPR-mediated mechanisms of drought amelioration and tolerance responses in crop plants with a future research perspective.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdelaal K, AlKahtani M, Attia K et al (2021) The role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in alleviating the adverse effects of drought on plants. Biology (Basel) 10:520. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060520
Abdelaal K, Alsubeie MS, Hafez Y et al (2022) Physiological and biochemical changes in vegetable and field crops under drought, salinity and weeds stresses: control strategies and management. Agriculture 12:2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122084
Abdelaal KAA, Mazrou YSA, Hafez YM (2020) Silicon foliar application mitigates salt stress in sweet pepper plants by enhancing water status, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activity and fruit yield. Plants 9:733. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060733
Abobatta WF (2019) Drought adaptive mechanisms of plants—a review. Adv Agric Environ Sci 2:42–45. https://doi.org/10.30881/aaeoa.00021
Ahanger MA, Tomar NS, Tittal M et al (2017) Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23:731–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0462-7
Al-Shaheen MR, Soh A (2016) Effect of proline and Gibberellic Acid on the qualities and qualitative of Corn (Zea mays L.) under the influence of different levels of the water stress. Int J Sci Res Publ 6:752–756
Ambati D, Prasad SVS, Singh JB et al (2022) HI 8802 (Pusa Wheat 8802) a high yielding, drought tolerant and biofortifed durum wheat variety for peninsular India. J Cereal Res. https://doi.org/10.25174/2582-2675/2022/117107
Anantha MS, Patel D, Quintana M et al (2016) Trait combinations that improve rice yield under drought: Sahbhagi Dhan and new drought-tolerant varieties in South Asia. Crop Sci 56:408–421. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0344
Anirudh KVS, Chakraborty T, Srivastava RK, Akhtar N (2020) Effect of drought and salt stress on cereal crop plants and their proteomic and physiological studies. J Biotechnol Biomed Sci. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2576-6694.jbbs-20-3525
Anjum SA, Ashraf U, Tanveer M et al (2017) Drought induced changes in growth, osmolyte accumulation and antioxidant metabolism of three maize hybrids. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00069
Arshad M, Shaharoona B, Mahmood T (2008) Inoculation with Pseudomonas spp. Containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of drought stress on growth, yield, and ripening of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pedosphere 18:611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60055-7
Arzanesh MH, Alikhani HA, Khavazi K et al (2011) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth enhancement by Azospirillum sp. under drought stress. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0444-1
Ashraf M, Iram A (2005) Drought stress induced changes in some organic substances in nodules and other plant parts of two potential legumes differing in salt tolerance. Flora 200:535–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2005.06.005
Aslam MM, Rashid MAR, Siddiqui MA et al (2022) Recent insights into signaling responses to cope drought stress in rice. Rice Sci 29:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.08.001
Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G et al (2018) Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and Roadmap to commercialization of Biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473
Basu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A (2016) Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Res 5:1554. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7678.1
Beetge L, Krüger K (2019) Drought and heat waves associated with climate change affect performance of the potato aphid Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Sci Rep 9:3645. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37493-8
Belimov AA, Dodd IC, Hontzeas N et al (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria containing 1‑aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. New Phytol 181:413–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02657.x
Bond NR, Burrows RM, Kennard MJ, Bunn SE (2019) Water scarcity as a driver of multiple stressor effects. In: Multiple stressors in river ecosystems. Elsevier, pp 111–129
Bota J, Medrano H, Flexas J (2004) Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01056.x
Casanovas EM, Barassi CA, Sueldo RJ (2002) Azospirillum inoculation mitigates water stress effects in maize seedlings. Cereal Res Commun. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03543428
Cassán F, Maiale S, Masciarelli O et al (2009) Cadaverine production by Azospirillum brasilense and its possible role in plant growth promotion and osmotic stress mitigation. Eur J Soil Biol 45:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.08.003
Chandra D, Srivastava R, Gupta VVSR et al (2019) Evaluation of ACC-deaminase-producing rhizobacteria to alleviate water-stress impacts in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Can J Microbiol 65:387–403. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2018-0636
Chen THH, Murata N (2008) Glycinebetaine: an effective protectant against abiotic stress in plants. Trends Plant Sci 13:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.007
Chu Y, Huang Q, Zhang B et al (2014) Expression and molecular evolution of two DREB1 genes in black poplar (Populus nigra). PLoS One 9:e98334. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098334
Cohen AC, Travaglia CN, Bottini R, Piccoli PN (2009) Participation of abscisic acid and gibberellins produced by endophytic Azospirillum in the alleviation of drought effects in maize. Botany 87:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1139/B09-023
Cruz de Carvalho MH (2008) Drought stress and reactive oxygen species. Plant Signal Behav 3:156–165. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.3.5536
Dalla Costa L, Delle Vedove G, Gianquinto G et al (1997) Yield, water use efficiency and nitrogen uptake in potato: influence of drought stress. Potato Res 40:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02407559
Dani ARH, Siswoyo TA (2019) Impact of drought stress during germination on antioxidant capacities and antioxidant enzymes activities of Madura local maize (Zea mays) seeds. Agric Sci 10:1506–1516. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2019.1011111
Das K, Roychoudhury A (2014) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053
Dey N, Bhattacharjee S (2020) Accumulation of polyphenolic compounds and osmolytes under dehydration stress and their implication in redox regulation in four indigenous aromatic rice cultivars. Rice Sci 27:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2020.05.008
Du H, Ma T, Guo S et al (2017) Response of root morphology and leaf osmoregulation substances of seedling in barley genotypes with different heights to PEG stress. Sci Agric Sin 50:2423–2432. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.002
Dvojković K, Plavšin I, Novoselović D et al (2023) Early antioxidative response to desiccant-stimulated drought stress in field-grown traditional wheat varieties. Plants 12:249. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020249
Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U et al (2017) Crop production under drought and heat stress: Plant responses and management options. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N et al (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185–212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Friedli CN, Abiven S, Fossati D, Hund A (2019) Modern wheat semi-dwarfs root deep on demand: response of rooting depth to drought in a set of Swiss era wheats covering 100 years of breeding. Euphytica 215:85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2404-7
Gagné-Bourque F, Mayer BF, Charron J‑B et al (2015) Accelerated growth rate and increased drought stress resilience of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon colonized by bacillus subtilis B26. PLoS ONE 10:e130456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130456
Gao WR, Wang XS, Liu QY et al (2008) Comparative analysis of ESTs in response to drought stress in chickpea (C. arietinum L.). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.030
García JE, Maroniche G, Creus C et al (2017) In vitro PGPR properties and osmotic tolerance of different Azospirillum native strains and their effects on growth of maize under drought stress. Microbiol Res 202:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.04.007
Ghafoor R, Akram NA, Rashid M et al (2019) Exogenously applied proline induced changes in key anatomical features and physio-biochemical attributes in water stressed oat (Avena sativa L.) plants. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 25:1121–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-019-00683-3
Gontia-Mishra I, Sapre S, Sharma A, Tiwari S (2016) Amelioration of drought tolerance in wheat by the interaction of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 18:992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12505
Gou W, Tian L, Ruan Z et al (2015) Accumulation of choline and glycinebetaine and drought stress tolerance induced in maize (Zea mays) by three plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains. Pak J Bot 47(2):581–586
Govindasamy V, George P, Kumar M et al (2020) Multi-trait PGP rhizobacterial endophytes alleviate drought stress in a senescent genotype of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. 3 Biotech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-2001-4
Gowda VRP, Henry A, Yamauchi A et al (2011) Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. F Crop Res 122:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.001
Grover M, Madhubala R, Ali SZ et al (2014) Influence of Bacillus spp. strains on seedling growth and physiological parameters of sorghum under moisture stress conditions. J Basic Microbiol 54:951–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201300250
Gururani MA, Upadhyaya CP, Baskar V et al (2013) Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria enhance abiotic stress tolerance in Solanum tuberosum through inducing changes in the expression of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improved photosynthetic performance. J Plant Growth Regul 32:245–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-012-9292-6
Hai NN, Chuong NN, Tu NHC et al (2020) Role and regulation of Cytokinins in plant response to drought stress. Plants 9:422. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9040422
Henry A, Gowda VRP, Torres RO et al (2011) Variation in root system architecture and drought response in rice (Oryza sativa): Phenotyping of the OryzaSNP panel in rainfed lowland fields. F Crop Res 120:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.003
Hund A, Ruta N, Liedgens M (2009) Rooting depth and water use efficiency of tropical maize inbred lines, differing in drought tolerance. Plant Soil 318:311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9843-6
Hussain HA, Hussain S, Khaliq A et al (2018) Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: Implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00393
Hussain MB, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Asgher M (2014) Can catalase and exopolysaccharides producing rhizobia ameliorate drought stress in wheat? Int J Agric Biol 16(1):3–13
Jain M, Tiwary S, Gadre R (2010) Sorbitol-induced changes in various growth and biochemical parameters in maize. Plant Soil Environ. https://doi.org/10.17221/233/2009-pse
Jochum MD, McWilliams KL, Borrego EJ et al (2019) Bioprospecting plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that mitigate drought stress in grasses. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02106
Joshi S, Choukimath A, Isenegger D et al (2019) Improved wheat growth and yield by delayed leaf senescence using developmentally regulated expression of a Cytokinin biosynthesis gene. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01285
Kanchiswamy CN, Malnoy M, Maffei ME (2015) Chemical diversity of microbial volatiles and their potential for plant growth and productivity. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00151
Kang J, Peng Y, Xu W (2022) Crop root responses to drought stress: molecular mechanisms, nutrient regulations, and interactions with microorganisms in the Rhizosphere. Int J Mol Sci 23:9310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169310
Kang S‑M, Radhakrishnan R, Khan AL et al (2014) Gibberellin secreting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas putida H‑2‑3 modulates the hormonal and stress physiology of soybean to improve the plant growth under saline and drought conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem 84:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.09.001
Kapoor D, Bhardwaj S, Landi M et al (2020) The impact of drought in plant metabolism: how to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl Sci 10:5692. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165692
Karmakar J, Goswami S, Pramanik K et al (2021) Growth promoting properties of Mycobacterium and Bacillus on rice plants under induced drought. Plant Sci Today 8:49–57. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2021.8.1.965
Kasim WA, Osman ME, Omar MN et al (2013) Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J Plant Growth Regul 32:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-012-9283-7
Kaushal M, Wani SP (2016a) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria: drought stress alleviators to ameliorate crop production in drylands. Ann Microbiol 66:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-015-1112-3
Kaushal M, Wani SP (2016b) Rhizobacterial-plant interactions: Strategies ensuring plant growth promotion under drought and salinity stress. Agric Ecosyst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.031
Kebede A, Kang MS, Bekele E (2019) Advances in mechanisms of drought tolerance in crops, with emphasis on barley, pp 265–314
Khan N, Bano A (2019) Exopolysaccharide producing rhizobacteria and their impact on growth and drought tolerance of wheat grown under rainfed conditions. PLoS ONE 14:e222302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222302
Khan A, Pan X, Najeeb U et al (2018a) Coping with drought: stress and adaptive mechanisms, and management through cultural and molecular alternatives in cotton as vital constituents for plant stress resilience and fitness. Biol Res 51:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-018-0198-z
Khan N, Bano A, Zandi P (2018b) Effects of exogenously applied plant growth regulators in combination with PGPR on the physiology and root growth of chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) and their role in drought tolerance. J Plant Interact 13:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1471527
Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA et al (2019) Comparative physiological and metabolic analysis reveals a complex mechanism involved in drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) induced by PGPR and PGRs. Sci Rep 9:2097. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38702-8
Khan SU, Gurmani AR, Din J‑U et al (2015) Exogenously applied gibberellic acid, Indole acetic acid and kinetin as potential regulators of source-sink relationship, physiological and yield attributes in rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes under water deficit conditions. Int J Agric Biol 18:139–145. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0078
Kiani SP, Talia P, Maury P et al (2007) Genetic analysis of plant water status and osmotic adjustment in recombinant inbred lines of sunflower under two water treatments. Plant Sci 172:773–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.12.007
Kim Y, Chung YS, Lee E et al (2020) Root response to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Mol Sci 21:1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041513
Konwar PB, Das R, Kalita P (2020) Drought tolerant of rice (Oryza sativa L) implication through antioxidant defense mechanism. Biotech Today 10:29. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0996.2020.00002.2
Kumar S, Tripathi S, Singh SP et al (2021) Rice breeding for yield under drought has selected for longer flag leaves and lower stomatal density. J Exp Bot 72:4981–4992. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab160
Kurepa J, Shull TE, Smalle JA (2019) Antagonistic activity of auxin and cytokinin in shoot and root organs. Plant Direct 3:e121. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.121
Lahuta LB, Szablińska-Piernik J, Horbowicz M (2022) Changes in metabolic profiles of pea (Pisum sativum L.) as a result of repeated short-term soil drought and subsequent re-watering. Int J Mol Sci 23:1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031704
Lamaoui M, Jemo M, Datla R, Bekkaoui F (2018) Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Front Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00026
Lata C, Prasad M (2011) Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err210
Lenka SK, Lohia B, Kumar A et al (2009) Genome-wide targeted prediction of ABA responsive genes in rice based on over-represented cis-motif in co-expressed genes. Plant Mol Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-008-9423-4
Li Z, Lu GY, Zhang XK et al (2010) Improving drought tolerance of germinating seeds by exogenous application of gibberellic acid (GA3) in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Seed Sci Technol 38:432–440. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2010.38.2.16
Lim J‑H, Kim S‑D (2013) Induction of drought stress resistance by multi-functional PGPR bacillus licheniformis K11 in pepper. Plant Pathol J 29:201–208. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.SI.02.2013.0021
Liu X‑M, Zhang H (2015) The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00774
Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2010) Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 37:147. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09121
Mao H, Li S, Wang Z et al (2020) Regulatory changes in TaSNAC8-6A are associated with drought tolerance in wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnol J 18:1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13277
Mattos LM, Moretti CL (2016) Oxidative stress in plants under drought conditions and the role of different enzymes. Enzym Eng. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6674.1000136
Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomatoes and peppers. Plant Sci 166:525–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.025
Meenakshi, Annapurna K, Govindasamy V et al (2019) Mitigation of drought stress in wheat crop by drought tolerant endophytic bacterial isolates. Vegetos 32:486–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-019-00060-1
Miri M, Ghooshchi F, Tohidi-Moghadam HR et al (2021) Ameliorative effects of foliar spray of glycine betaine and gibberellic acid on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) yield affected by drought stress. Arab J Geosci 14:830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07228-7
Moumita, Al Mahmud Mahmud J, Biswas PK et al (2019) Exogenous application of gibberellic acid mitigates drought-induced damage in spring wheat. Acta Agrobot. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1776
Nahar S, Vemireddy LR, Sahoo L, Tanti B (2018) Antioxidant protection mechanisms reveal significant response in drought-induced oxidative stress in some traditional rice of assam, India. Rice Sci 25:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.06.002
Narayanasamy S, Thangappan S, Uthandi S (2020) Plant growth-promoting bacillus sp. Cahoots moisture stress alleviation in rice genotypes by triggering antioxidant defense system. Microbiol Res 239:126518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126518
Naseem H, Bano A (2014) Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize. J Plant Interact 9:689–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.902125
Nasrin S, Saha S, Begum HH, Samad R (2020) Impacts of drought stress on growth, protein, proline, pigment content and antioxidant enzyme activities in rice (Oryza sativa L. var. BRRI dhan-24). Dhaka Univ J Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v29i1.46537
Ngumbi E, Kloepper J (2016) Bacterial-mediated drought tolerance: Current and future prospects. Appl Soil Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.009
Niu X, Song L, Xiao Y, Ge W (2017) Drought-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with foxtail millet in a semi-arid agroecosystem and their potential in alleviating drought stress. Front Microbiol 8:2580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02580
Novák V (2009) Physiological drought—How to quantify it? In: Bioclimatology and natural hazards. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–95
Nxele X, Klein A, Ndimba BK (2017) Drought and salinity stress alters ROS accumulation, water retention, and osmolyte content in sorghum plants. S Afr J Bot 108:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.11.003
Obidiegwu JE (2015) Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00542
de Oliveira AB, Mendes Alencar NL, Gomes-Filho E (2013) Comparison between the water and salt stress effects on plant growth and development. In: Responses of organisms to water stress. InTech,
Omar SA, Fetyan NAH, Eldenary ME et al (2021) Alteration in expression level of some growth and stress-related genes after rhizobacteria inoculation to alleviate drought tolerance in sensitive rice genotype. Chem Biol Technol Agric 8:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-021-00237-4
Osmolovskaya N, Shumilina J, Kim A et al (2018) Methodology of drought stress research: experimental setup and physiological characterization. Int J Mol Sci 19:4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19124089
Padmavathi TAV, Rao DM (2013) Differential accumulation of osmolytes in 4 cultivars of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought stress. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 16:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0102-2
Pallai R, Hynes RK, Verma B, Nelson LM (2012) Phytohormone production and colonization of canola (Brassica napus l.) roots by Pseudomonas fluorescens 6–8 under gnotobiotic conditions. Can J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1139/W11-120
Paper C (2018) Drought stress due to climate change, pp 1–4
Pastor V, Luna E, Mauch-Mani B et al (2013) Primed plants do not forget. Environ Exp Bot 94:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.02.013
Paul S, Wildhagen H, Janz D, Polle A (2018) Drought effects on the tissue- and cell-specific cytokinin activity in poplar. Aob Plants. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx067
Peleg Z, Reguera M, Tumimbang E et al (2011) Cytokinin-mediated source/sink modifications improve drought tolerance and increase grain yield in rice under water-stress. Plant Biotechnol J 9:747–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00584.x
Qin H, Gu Q, Zhang J et al (2011) Regulated expression of an isopentenyltransferase gene (IPT) in peanut significantly improves drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 52:1904–1914. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr125
Rady MM, Boriek SHK, Abd El-Mageed TA et al (2021) Exogenous gibberellic acid or dilute bee honey boosts drought stress tolerance in Vicia faba by rebalancing osmoprotectants, antioxidants, nutrients, and phytohormones. Plants 10:748. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040748
Raheem A, Shaposhnikov A, Belimov AA et al (2018) Auxin production by rhizobacteria was associated with improved yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress. Arch Agron Soil Sci 64:574–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1362105
Ramachandran M, Arulbalachandran D, Ramya S (2022) Exogenous foliar application of abscisic acid on polyethylene glycol induced drought by improving the morphological and biochemical characters of four rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Plant Sci Today. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.1396
Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood S et al (2019) Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: a review. Plants 8:34. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8020034
Reguera M, Peleg Z, Abdel-Tawab YM et al (2013) Stress-induced cytokinin synthesis increases drought tolerance through the coordinated regulation of carbon and nitrogen assimilation in rice. Plant Physiol 163:1609–1622. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.227702
Rodrigues J, Inzé D, Nelissen H, Saibo NJM (2019) Source-sink regulation in crops under water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 24:652–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.04.005
Rodríguez-Salazar J, Suárez R, Caballero-Mellado J, Iturriaga G (2009) Trehalose accumulation in Azospirillum brasilense improves drought tolerance and biomass in maize plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01614.x
Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J (2016) Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00571
Saha I, De AK, Sarkar B et al (2018) Cellular response of oxidative stress when sub1A QTL of rice receives water deficit stress. Plant Sci Today 5:84–94. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2018.5.3.387
Saikia J, Sarma RK, Dhandia R et al (2018) Alleviation of drought stress in pulse crops with ACC deaminase producing rhizobacteria isolated from acidic soil of Northeast India. Sci Rep 8:3560. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21921-w
Saleem AR, Brunetti C, Khalid A et al (2018) Drought response of Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. inoculated with ACC deaminase and IAA producing rhizobacteria. PLoS ONE 13:e191218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191218
Salehi-Lisar SY, Bakhshayeshan-Agdam H (2016) Drought stress in plants: causes, consequences, and tolerance. In: Drought stress tolerance in plants, vol 1. Springer, Cham, pp 1–16
Salekjalali M, Jafari B (2011) Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during reproductive stages of barley under drought stress. J Ecobiotechnol 3:40–47
Salomon MV, Bottini R, de Souza Filho GA et al (2014) Bacteria isolated from roots and rhizosphere of Vitis vinifera retard water losses, induce abscisic acid accumulation and synthesis of defense-related terpenes in in vitro cultured grapevine. Physiol Plant 151:359–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12117
Sandhya V, Ali SZ, Grover M et al (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 62:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9479-4
Saradadevi R, Palta JA, Siddique KHM (2017) ABA-mediated stomatal response in regulating water use during the development of terminal drought in wheat. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01251
Saravanakumar D, Kavino M, Raguchander T et al (2011) Plant growth promoting bacteria enhance water stress resistance in green gram plants. Acta Physiol Plant 33:203–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0539-1
Sarma RK, Saikia R (2014) Alleviation of drought stress in mung bean by strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa GGRJ21. Plant Soil 377:111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1981-9
Selim S, Hassan YM, Saleh AM et al (2019) Actinobacterium isolated from a semi-arid environment improves the drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 142:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.06.029
Shafiq S, Akram NA, Ashraf M et al (2021) Influence of glycine betaine (natural and synthetic) on growth, metabolism and yield production of drought-stressed maize (Zea mays L.). Plants Plants 10:2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112540
Sharma L, Dalal M, Verma RK et al (2018) Auxin protects spikelet fertility and grain yield under drought and heat stresses in rice. Environ Exp Bot 150:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.02.013
Sharma P, Jha AB, Dubey RS, Pessarakli M (2012) Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J Bot 2012:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/217037
Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl164
Shukla N, Awasthi RP, Rawat L, Kumar J (2012) Biochemical and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.02.001
da Silva E, Nogueira R, da Silva M, de Albuquerque M (2011) Drought stress and plant nutrition. Plant Stress 5(1):32–41
Singh DP, Singh V, Gupta VK et al (2020) Microbial inoculation in rice regulates antioxidative reactions and defense related genes to mitigate drought stress. Sci Rep 10:4818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61140-w
Stikić R, Jovanović Z, Prokić L (2014) Mitigation of plant drought stress in a changing climate. Bot Serbica 38:35–42
Suárez R, Wong A, Ramírez M et al (2008) Improvement of drought tolerance and grain yield in common bean by overexpressing trehalose-6-phosphate synthase in rhizobia. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21:958–966. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-7-0958
Timmusk S, Abd El-Daim IA, Copolovici L et al (2014) Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. Plos One 9:e96086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096086
Tiwari S, Lata C, Chauhan PS, Nautiyal CS (2016) Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiol Biochem 99:108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.11.001
Tiwari S, Prasad V, Chauhan PS, Lata C (2017) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens confers tolerance to various abiotic stresses and modulates plant response to phytohormones through osmoprotection and gene expression regulation in rice. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01510
Tsukanova KA, Chеbоtаr V, Meyer JJM, Bibikova TN (2017) Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on plant hormone homeostasis. S Afr J Bot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.007
Turner NC, Wright GC, Siddique KHM (2001) Adaptation of grain legumes (pulses) to water-limited environments. In: Advances in agronomy, pp 193–231
Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S et al (2013) Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nat Genet 45:1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2725
Ullah A, Manghwar H, Shaban M et al (2018) Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: a coping strategy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:33103–33118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3364-5
Vaishnav A, Choudhary DK (2019) Regulation of drought-responsive gene expression in Glycine max L. Merrill is mediated through Pseudomonas simiae strain AU. J Plant Growth Regul 38:333–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-018-9846-3
Vaishnav A, Varma A, Tuteja N, Choudhary DK (2016) PGPR-mediated amelioration of crops under salt stress. In: Plant-microbe interaction: an approach to sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 205–226
Vardharajula S, Zulfikar Ali S, Grover M et al (2011) Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp.: effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. J Plant Interact 6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2010.535178
Venuprasad R, Shashidhar HE, Hittalmani S, Hemamalini GS (2002) Tagging quantitative trait loci associated with grain yield and root morphological traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under contrasting moisture regimes. Euphytica 128:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021281428957
Vijayaraghavareddy P, Lekshmy SV, Struik PC et al (2022) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species confer to differential sensitivity of rice and wheat to drought stress. Crop Environ 1:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2022.03.010
Vojta P, Kokáš F, Husičková A et al (2016) Whole transcriptome analysis of transgenic barley with altered cytokinin homeostasis and increased tolerance to drought stress. N Biotechnol 33:676–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.01.010
Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, Sk ZA (2016a) Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 184:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003
Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, Sk ZA (2016b) Multifunctional Pseudomonas putida strain FBKV2 from arid rhizosphere soil and its growth promotional effects on maize under drought stress. Rhizosphere 1:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2016.07.005
Wang C‑JC, Yang W, Wang C‑JC et al (2012) Induction of drought tolerance in cucumber plants by a consortium of three plant growth-promoting Rhizobacterium strains. PLoS One 7:e52565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052565
Wang X, Mao Z, Zhang J et al (2019) Osmolyte accumulation plays important roles in the drought priming induced tolerance to post-anthesis drought stress in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Environ Exp Bot 166:103804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103804
Wang Z, Li G, Sun H et al (2018) Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biol Open 7:bio35279. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.035279
Wasaya A, Zhang X, Fang Q, Yan Z (2018) Root phenotyping for drought tolerance: a review. Agronomy 8:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8110241
Wei L, Wang L, Yang Y et al (2015) Abscisic acid enhances tolerance of wheat seedlings to drought and regulates transcript levels of genes encoding ascorbate-glutathione biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00458
Xie X, He Z, Chen N et al (2019) The roles of environmental factors in regulation of oxidative stress in plant. Biomed Res Int 2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9732325
Yadav VK, Raghav M, Sharma SK, Bhagat N (2020) Rhizobacteriome: promising candidate for conferring drought tolerance in crops. J Pure Appl Microbiol 14:73–92. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.14.1.10
Yan J, Ninkuu V, Fu Z et al (2023) OsOLP1 contributes to drought tolerance in rice by regulating ABA biosynthesis and lignin accumulation. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163939
Yang X, Lu M, Wang Y et al (2021) Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae 7:50. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7030050
Yanni Y, Zidan M, Dazzo F et al (2016) Enhanced symbiotic performance and productivity of drought stressed common bean after inoculation with tolerant native rhizobia in extensive fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.006
Yogendra SG, Singh US, Sharma AK (2015) Bacterial mediated amelioration of drought stress in drought tolerant and susceptible cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Afr J Biotechnol 14:764–773. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.14405
Yoshida T, Mogami J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2014) ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling in response to osmotic stress in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.07.009
You J, Chan Z (2015) ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01092
Yuan XK, Yang ZQ, Li YX et al (2016) Effects of different levels of water stress on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activities of greenhouse tomato. Photosynthetica 54:28–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0122-5
Yuan Z, Wang C, Li S et al (2014) Effects of different plant hormones or PEG seed soaking on maize resistance to drought stress. Can J Plant Sci 94:1491–1499. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-110
Zargar SM, Gupta N, Nazir M et al (2017) Impact of drought on photosynthesis: Molecular perspective. Plant Gene 11:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2017.04.003
Zhan A, Schneider H, Lynch JP (2015) Reduced lateral root branching density improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiol 168:1603–1615. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00187
Zhang H, Murzello C, Sun Y et al (2010) Choline and osmotic-stress tolerance induced in Arabidopsis by the soil microbe Bacillus subtilis (GB03). Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-8-1097
Zhang Q, Li J, Zhang W et al (2012) The putative auxin efflux carrier OsPIN3t is involved in the drought stress response and drought tolerance. Plant J 72:805–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05121.x
Zhang S‑W, Li C‑H, Cao J et al (2009) Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of Indole-3-acetic acid by TLD1 / osGH3.13 activation. Plant Physiol 151:1889–1901. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.146803
Zhang X, Pang J, Ma X et al (2019) Multivariate analyses of root phenotype and dynamic transcriptome underscore valuable root traits and water-deficit responsive gene networks in maize. Plant Direct 3:e130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.130
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge DBT-Electronic Library Consortium (DeLCON) of Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India for providing access to research articles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A.B.M. Gulzar and P.B. Mazumder declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
The Authors Abu Barkat Md Gulzar and Pranab Behari Mazumder contributed equally to the manuscript.
Availability of data
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature oder sein Lizenzgeber (z.B. eine Gesellschaft oder ein*e andere*r Vertragspartner*in) hält die ausschließlichen Nutzungsrechte an diesem Artikel kraft eines Verlagsvertrags mit dem/den Autor*in(nen) oder anderen Rechteinhaber*in(nen); die Selbstarchivierung der akzeptierten Manuskriptversion dieses Artikels durch Autor*in(nen) unterliegt ausschließlich den Bedingungen dieses Verlagsvertrags und dem geltenden Recht.
About this article
Cite this article
Gulzar, A.B.M., Mazumder, P.B. Coping with Drought: Consequences, Responses, and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Mediated Amelioration Mechanisms in Crop Plants. Gesunde Pflanzen 75, 2227–2245 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00919-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00919-z