Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gordon Tullock and the economics of slavery

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates Gordon Tullock’s unpublished manuscripts that proposed a public choice interpretation of American slavery. Drafted in response to Conrad and Meyer’s seminal 1958 article on the economics of slavery, Tullock’s writings influenced the early debate over slavery through his University of Virginia colleague John E. Moes. This paper uses Tullock’s surviving writings to map out his theory of slavery and situate it in the broader economic analysis of the institution and identify the links between the economics of slavery and the public choice research tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The letter is not dated, but it is clearly from 1958.

  2. Tullock (1967) was written for Murray Rothbard’s libertarian journal Left and Right. It was solicited by its editor who described Tullock as “the greatest expert on the economics of slavery that I know of.” Rothbard’s correspondence further indicated that Tullock “been working on the economics of slavery for some time” but “never before had an opportunity to put [his] conclusions in writing,” suggesting his awareness of the earlier exchanges with Conrad and Meyer (Rothbard 1966, 1967).

  3. See Engerman (2017), Hilt (2017), Olmstead and Rhode (2018), and Wright (2020, 2022) for evaluations of this literature.

  4. See Weinstein (2019) for a brief and accessible discussion of Smith’s work on slavery.

  5. See Goldin (1973) for an early quantitative study of urban slavery.

  6. Meyer to Tullock, August 20, 1958, pp. 1–2.

  7. See Levy (2005).

  8. See Magness (2014) for a further discussion of the economics of colonization.

References

  • Baptist, E. E. (2014). The half has never been told: slavery and the making of american capitalism. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. (1977). An economic analysis of slavery. Journal of Law and Economics, 20(1), 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C. A. (1913). An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, S., & Rockman, S. (Eds.). (2016). Slavery’s capitalism: A new history of american economic development. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellani, L., Hager, A., & Maurer, S. E. (2022). The long shadow of slavery: The persistence of slave owners in southern lawmaking. Journal of Economic History, 82(1), 250–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhorn, H. (2011). Manumission in nineteenth-century Virginia. Cliometrica, 5(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P., & Kroencke, J. (2020). The real purpose of the program: A case study in James M. Buchanan’s efforts at academic entrepreneurship to “save the books” in economics. Public Choice, 183, 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brough, T. J., & Simmons, R. T. (2023). Economics as moral exchange: James Buchanan meets Martin Buber. Public Choice, 194, 395–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairnes, J. E. (1862). The Slave Power: Its Character, Career, and Probable Designs: Being an Attempt to explain the Real Issues involved in the American Conflict. Carleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carden, A., Magness, P. W., Meadowcroft, J., Murtazashvili, I. (2022). Slavery. Elgar Encyclopedia of Public Choice. [Working Paper]

  • Conrad, A. H., & Meyer, J. R. (1958a). The economics of slavery in the ante bellum south. Journal of Political Economy, 66(2), 95–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, A. H., & Meyer, J. R. (1958b). The economics of slavery in the ante bellum south: Reply. Journal of Political Economy, 66(5), 442–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. W., Harris, L. C., HoSang, D. M., & Lipsitz, G. (2019). Introduction. In K. W. Crenshaw, L. C. Harris, D. M. HoSang, & G. Lipsitz (Eds.), Seeing Race Again: Countering Colorblindness Across the Disciplines (pp. 1–19). University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dari-Mattiacci, G. (2013). Slavery and information. Journal of Economic History, 73(1), 79–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, K. L., & Heckelman, J. C. (2008). Voting on slavery at the constitutional convention. Public Choice, 136, 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, D. F. (1958). The economics of slavery in the ante bellum south: A comment. Journal of Political Economy, 66(5), 440–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S. L. (2017). Review of The Business of Slavery and the Rise of American Capitalism, 1815–1860 by C. Schermerhorn and The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism by E. E. Baptist. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(2), 637–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, B. T., Payne, J. E., Thornton, M., & Yanochik, M. A. (2002). Price transmission in the antebellum slave markets: A time series analysis. Review of Regional Studies, 32(2), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenoaltea, S. (1984). Slavery and supervision in comparative perspective: A model. Journal of Economic History, 44(3), 635–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, R. (1975). Slavery, incentives, and manumission: A theoretical model. Journal of Political Economy, 83(5), 923–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh, G. (1854). Sociology for the South. Or the Failure of a Free Society. A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. W. (1989). Without consent or contract. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. W., & Engerman, S. (1974). Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Little, Brown, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. D. (1973). The economics of emancipation. Journal of Economic History, 33(1), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grynaviski, J. D., & Munger, M. (2014). Did southerners favor slavery? Inferences from an analysis of prices in New Orleans, 1805–1860. Public Choice, 159, 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1977). Competition and Coercion: Blacks in the American Economy, 1865–1914. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilt, E. (2017). Economic history, historical analysis, and the “new history of capitalism.” Journal of Economic History, 77(2), 511–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J. R. (2012). Deadweight loss the American Civil War: The political economy of slavery, secession, and emancipation. San Jose State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, J. R. (2013). Emancipating slaves, enslaving free men: A history of the American Civil War (2nd ed.). Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, W. H. (1964). The economics of the colour bar. Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. (2005). The first emancipator. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. D. (2020). Do Black politicians matter? Evidence from Reconstruction. Journal of Economic History, 80(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. D. (2023). Whitelashing: Black politicians, taxes, and violence. Journal of Economic History, 83(2), 538–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magness, P. (2014). The American system and the political economy of black colonization. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 37(2), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magness, P. W. (2018b). A paradox of secessionism: The political economy of slave enforcement and the union. In J. C. Hall & M. Witcher (Eds.), Public Choice Analyses of American Economic History (pp. 53–68). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magness, P. W. (2020). The anti-discriminatory tradition in Virginia school public choice theory. Public Choice, 183(3), 417–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magness, P. W. (2018a). Slavery, abolition, and classical liberalism [Lecture]. University of the Bahamas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1SGYhDFWHw

  • Mancini, M. J. (1996). One Dies, Get Another: Convict Leasing in the American South, 1866–1928. University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. A. (2003). To form a more perfect union: A new economic interpretation of the United States Constitution. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. A. (2018). North-South alliances during the drafting of the constitution: The costs of compromise. In J. C. Hall & M. Witcher (Eds.), Public Choice Analyses of American Economic History (pp. 13–51). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2020). Buchanan at the American founding: The constitutional political economy of a republic of equals and unequals. Public Choice, 183, 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. R. (1958a). John R. Meyer to Gordon Tullock. August 20, 1958a. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution

  • Meyer, J. R. (1958b). John R. Meyer to Gordon Tullock. September 25, 1958b. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

  • Moes, J. E. (1960). The economics of slavery in the ante bellum south: Another comment. Journal of Political Economy, 68(2), 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moes, J. E. (1961). The absorption of capital in slave labor in the ante-bellum south and economic growth. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 20(5), 535–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moes, J. E. (1962). Comment. In Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Aspects of Labor Economics (pp. 247–56). Princeton University Press.

  • Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101, 3221–3252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, A. L., & Rhode, P. W. (2018). Cotton, slavery, and the new history of capitalism. Explorations in Economic History, 67, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, U. B. (2004). American Negro slavery: A survey of the supply, employment, and control of Negro labor, as determined by the plantation regime. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11490/pg11490-images.html

  • Roback, J. (1988). W. H. Hutt’s the economics of the colour bar. Managerial and Decision Economics, 9(5), 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roback, J. (1989). Racism as rent seeking. Economic Inquiry, 27(4), 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, R. (2013). Slavery: a dual-equilibrium model with some historical examples. Public Choice 155(3–4), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, C. (2018). Accounting for slavery. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. N. (1966). Murray N. Rothbard to Gordon Tullock. July 11, 1966. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

  • Rothbard, M. N. (1967). Murray N. Rothbard to Gordon Tullock. February 9, 1967. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

  • Skarbek, D. (2011). Governance and prison gangs. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 702–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarbek, D. (2014). The social order of the underworld: How prison gangs govern the American penal system. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1982). Lectures on jurisprudence. Liberty Fund.

  • Sowell, T. (1981). Markets and minorities. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. (1994). Slavery, profitability, and the market process. Review of Austrian Economics, 7(2), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. (2019). Rothbard on the Economics of Slavery. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 22(4), 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (n.d.) Gordon Tullock to Alfred H. Conrad and John R. Meyer. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The economics of slavery. Left and Right, 3(2), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1997). On Voting: A Public Choice Approach. Edward Elgar and Locke Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1958). Gordon Tullock to John R. Meyer. September 4, 1958. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

  • Tullock, Gordon. (1960). Gordon Tullock to John R. Meyer. June 7, 1960. Letter. Gordon Tullock Archives at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

  • Weinstein, J. R. (2019). Adam Smith on slavery. Adam Smith Works. https://www.adamsmithworks.org/documents/adam-smith-on-slavery

  • Wright, R. E. (2017). The poverty of slavery: How unfree labor pollutes the economy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (2020). Slavery and Anglo-American capitalism revisited. Economic History Review, 73(2), 353–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (2022). Slavery and the rise of the nineteenth-century American economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(2), 123–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanochik, M. A., Ewing, B. T., & Thornton, M. (2001). A new perspective on antebellum slavery: Public policy and slave prices. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29(3), 330–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanochik, M. A., Ewing, B. T., & Thornton, M. (2009). Slave families and the hardscrabble shift: A note on slave prices and families in the domestic slave trade. Journal of Family History, 34(4), 420–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

American Institute for Economic Research, Institute for Humane Studies,George Mason University

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. American Institute for Economic Research, Great Barrington, USA

    Phillip W. Magness & Art Carden

  2. Brock School of Business, Samford University, 800 Lakeshore Drive, Birmingham, AL, 35229, USA

    Art Carden

  3. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA

    Ilia Murtazashvili

Authors
  1. Phillip W. Magness
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Art Carden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilia Murtazashvili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Art Carden.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magness, P.W., Carden, A. & Murtazashvili, I. Gordon Tullock and the economics of slavery. Public Choice 197, 185–199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01100-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01100-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation