Skip to main content
Log in

Tight bounds for the price of anarchy and stability in sequential transportation games

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze a transportation game first introduced by Fotakis, Gourvès, and Monnot in 2017, where players want to be transported to a common destination as quickly as possible and, to achieve this goal, they have to choose one of the available buses. We introduce a sequential version of this game and provide bounds for the Sequential Price of Stability and the Sequential Price of Anarchy in both metric and non-metric instances, considering three social cost functions: the total traveled distance by all buses, the maximum distance traveled by a bus, and the sum of the distances traveled by all players (a new social cost function that we introduce). Finally, we analyze the Price of Stability and the Price of Anarchy for this new function in simultaneous transportation games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availibility

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Notes

  1. More specifically, Uber Pool, where different users share the same car to reduce costs and, thus, the vehicle must pick up and deliver users in different locations.

  2. The largest cost of a user is, in fact, the largest distance traveled by a bus.

  3. By unbounded we mean that one can find a sequence of instances with a fixed number of players and buses where the ratio between the social cost of the best SPE and the optimal social cost goes to infinity.

  4. That is, player 1 chooses bus 1, player 2 chooses bus 1 in the subgame where player 1 chooses bus 1, and chooses bus 2 in the subgame where player 2 chooses bus 2, and so on.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was partially supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grants 2015/11937-9, 2016/01860-1, and 2017/05223-9; and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) grants 308689/2017-8, 425340/2016-3, 314366/2018-0, 425806/2018-9, 311039/2020-0 and 313146/2022-5. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. M. da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, F.J.M.d., Miyazawa, F.K., Romero, I.V.F. et al. Tight bounds for the price of anarchy and stability in sequential transportation games. J Comb Optim 46, 10 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01073-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01073-y

Keywords

Navigation