Skip to main content
Log in

Progressive Collapse Performance Evaluation of Shear Tab Connection Subjected to Column Loss

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A shear tab connection is one of the most common simple beam-to-column connections that is widely used in steel structures. In ASCE41-17 (Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017) and DoD (UFC 4-023-03, Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 2009), the plastic rotation capacity of a shear tab connection is purely a function of the connection depth, which is over- and under-estimated, respectively. To address this shortcoming, the present paper tries to provide a better estimation of plastic rotation capacity under the column removal scenario by employing a validated finite element model and conducting a comprehensive parametric study under various effective parameters such as connection depth, adjacent span length, and connection plate thickness. In addition to improving the plastic rotation capacity relationship, since the connection depth and adjacent span length have a significant effect on the plastic rotation capacity of the connection, a new equation has been proposed in terms of these parameters. Also, the axial-shear force–bending moment interaction of the connection is investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CR:

Center of rotation

CRS:

Column removal scenario

DCR:

Demand–capacity ratio

FE:

Finite element

Nu :

Axial force of the beam

Pu :

Applied load

Pu,CA :

Resistance due to catenary action

Pu,FA :

Resistance due to flexural action

θ :

Beam end rotation

θ T :

Maximum total rotation

θ E :

Elastic rotation

θ P :

Maximum plastic rotation

References

  • AISC. (2003). AISC manual of steel construction: Load and resistance factor design (3rd ed.). American Institute of Steel Construction.

  • AISC. (2005). AISC manual of steel construction (13th ed.). American Institute of Steel Construction.

  • Alrubaidi, M., Elsanadedy, H., Abbas, H., Almusallam, T., & Al-Salloum, Y. (2020). Investigation of different steel intermediate moment frame connections under column-loss scenario. Thin-Walled Structures, 154, 106875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE. (2016). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE7-16, 2016. ASCE.

  • ASCE. (2017). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE41-17, 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers.

  • Astaneh, A. (1989). Demand and supply of ductility in steel shear connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 14, 1–19.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Astaneh, A. (2005). Design of shear tab connections for gravity and seismic loads. Structural Steel Educational Council.

  • Astaneh, A., Call, S. M., & McMULLIN, K. M. (1989). Design of single plate shear connections. Engineering Journal, 26, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin Metzger, K. A. (2006). Experimental verification of a new single plate shear connection design model. Virginia Tech.

  • Barmaki, S., Sheidaii, M. R., & Azizpour, O. (2020). Progressive collapse resistance of bolted extended end-plate moment connections. International Journal of Steel Structures, 66, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnam, B., Shojaei, F., & Ronagh, H. R. (2019). Seismic progressive-failure analysis of tall steel structures under beam-removal scenarios. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 13, 904–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caccavale, S. E. (1975). Ductility of single plate framing connections.

  • Construction, A. I. o. S. (2017). Steel construction manual (15th ed). American Institute of Steel Construction.

  • Cortés, G., & Liu, J. (2017). Behavior of conventional and enhanced gravity connections subjected to column loss. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 133, 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creech, D. D. (2005). Behavior of single plate shear connections with rigid and flexible supports.

  • Crocker, J. P., & Chambers, J. J. (2004). Single plate shear connection response to rotation demands imposed by frames undergoing cyclic lateral displacements. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 934–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneshvar, H., & Driver, R. G. (2017). Behaviour of shear tab connections in column removal scenario. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 138, 580–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneshvar, H., & Driver, R. G. (2018). Modelling benchmarks for steel shear connections in column removal scenario. Journal of Building Engineering, 16, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinu, F., Marginean, I., & Dubina, D. (2017). Experimental testing and numerical modelling of steel moment-frame connections under column loss. Engineering Structures, 151, 861–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DoD. (2009). UFC 4-023-03, Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Department of Defense.

  • Elsanadedy, H., Almusallam, T., Alharbi, Y., Al-Salloum, Y., & Abbas, H. (2014). Progressive collapse potential of a typical steel building due to blast attacks. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 101, 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guravich, S. J., & Dawe, J. L. (2006). Simple beam connections in combined shear and tension. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33, 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iranpour, A., Hedayat, A. A., & Afzadi, E. A. (2019). Rotational demand and capacity of conventional single-plate shear connections subjected to gravity loading. Engineering Structures, 184, 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi, A., Koduru, S., & Driver, R. G. (2014). Reliability analysis of shear tab connections under progressive collapse scenario. Structures Congress, 2014, 2151–2161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., & Kim, J. (2015). Progressive collapse of steel moment frames subjected to vehicle impact. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29, 04014172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiakojouri, F., De Biagi, V., Chiaia, B., & Sheidaii, M. R. (2020). Progressive collapse of framed building structures: Current knowledge and future prospects. Engineering Structures, 206, 110061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koduru, S., & Driver, R. (2014). Generalized component-based model for shear tab connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140, 04013041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Wang, W., Chen, Y., & Lu, Y. (2015). Effect of beam web bolt arrangement on catenary behaviour of moment connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 104, 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Wang, W., Teh, L. H., & Chen, Y. (2017). Effects of span-to-depth ratios on moment connection damage evolution under catenary action. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 139, 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, S. L. (1968). Single-angle and single-plate beam framing connections. In Canadian Structural Engineering Conference, Toronto, Ontario, 1968 (pp. 141–162).

  • Main, J. A., & Sadek, F. (2014). Modeling and analysis of single-plate shear connections under column loss. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140, 04013070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, K. (2008). Guidance for progressive collapse analysis: Recommended performance levels for alternate path analysis of blast-damaged steel connections. In Proceedings of the Structures Congress/North American Steel Construction Conference (NASCC), 2008 Nashville, TN.

  • Meng, B., Zhong, W., Hao, J., & Song, X. (2020). Improving anti-collapse performance of steel frame with RBS connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 170, 106119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motallebi, M., Lignos, D. G., & Rogers, C. A. (2018). Behaviour of stiffened extended shear tab connections under gravity induced shear force. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 148, 336–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motallebi, M., Lignos, D. G., & Rogers, C. A. (2019). Full-scale testing of stiffened extended shear tab connections under combined axial and shear forces. Engineering Structures, 185, 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourid, E. H., Mamouri, S., & Ibrahimbegovic, A. (2020). Progressive collapse of 2D reinforced concrete structures under sudden column removal. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 14, 1387–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhof, S., & Driver, R. (2012). Performance of steel shear connections under combined moment, shear, and tension. Structures Congress, 2012, 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantidis, P., & Gerasimidis, S. (2018). Progressive collapse of 3D steel composite buildings under interior gravity column loss. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 150, 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, H., Chen, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, C. (2020). Experimental study on beam-to-column connections with reduced beam section against progressive collapse. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 175, 106358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnavard, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2018). Numerical evaluation of the effects of fire on steel connections; Part 1: Simulation techniques. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 12, 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnavard, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2019). Numerical evaluation of the effects of fire on steel connections; Part 2: Model results. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 13, 100361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmasi, A., Sheidaii, M. R., Saghaie Sahebalzaman, M., & Tariverdilo, S. (2020). Effect of fully restrained beam-to-column connection on the progressive collapse strength of steel moment frames. Advances in Structural Engineering, 23, 1656–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, B. I. & Sezen, H. (2009). Evaluation of an existing steel frame building against progressive collapse. In Structures Congress 2009: Don't Mess with Structural Engineers: Expanding Our Role (pp. 1–8).

  • Song, X. (2021). Probabilistic calibration for rotation capacity models of shear tab connection under column loss scenarios. Engineering Structures, 229, 111592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subki, N. E. A., Mansor, H., Hamid, Y. S., & Parke, G. A. (2021). The development of a moment-rotation model for progressive collapse analysis under the influence of tensile catenary action. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 187, 106960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Systèmes, D. (2014). ABAQUS Version 6.14. User Documentation.

  • Tabaeye Izadi, I., & Ranjbaran, A. (2012). Investigation on a mitigation scheme to resist the progressive collapse of reinforced concrete buildings. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 6, 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., Driver, R. G., Oosterhof, S. A., & Callele, L. (2017). Full-scale tests of stabilized and unstabilized extended single-plate connections. Structures, 10, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2009). Axial, shear and moment interaction of single plate. Shear tab connections Master’s Thesis. Milwaukee School of Engineering.

  • Wang, F., Yang, J., & Pan, Z. (2020a). Progressive collapse behaviour of steel framed substructures with various beam-column connections. Engineering Failure Analysis, 109, 104399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Yang, B., Chen, K., & Elchalakani, M. (2020b). Parametric analysis and simplified approach for steel-framed subassemblies with reverse channel connection under falling-debris impact. Engineering Structures, 225, 111263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Fang, C., Qin, X., Chen, Y., & Li, L. (2016). Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse. Engineering Structures, 106, 332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Hu, X., Gong, S., Wu, J., Zhu, W., & Ren, C. (2021). Experimental investigation of steel-concrete composite beam to reinforced-concrete column joints with single plate shear connection. Engineering Structures, 245, 112906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, W., Meng, B., & Hao, J. (2017). Performance of different stiffness connections against progressive collapse. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 135, 162–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. MRS: Conceptualization, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Sheidaii.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghalejoughi, M., Sheidaii, M.R. Progressive Collapse Performance Evaluation of Shear Tab Connection Subjected to Column Loss. Int J Steel Struct 23, 1387–1398 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00777-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00777-5

Keywords

Navigation