Skip to main content
Log in

An improved online replenishment policy and its competitive ratio analysis for a purchase-to-order seller

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a purchase-to-order seller, there is no inventory and the seller has to purchase goods to fulfill orders already placed. For each purchase, there is a constant ordering cost. For each order, delay cost will be incurred if it is not fulfilled timely. Consequently, there is a tradeoff between the ordering cost and the delay cost for the seller to make replenishment decisions minimizing the total cost. In practice it is impossible or difficult for the seller to know demand information about future orders in advance, and thus this decision-making problem is of an online fashion. In the previous work, this online problem is classified into three cases according to capacity limit and demand quantity, and a 10-competitive online policy is proposed for the general case. In the present paper, an improved 4-competitive online policy is proposed. Besides, an asymptotic lower bound of 2 is derived for this online decision-making problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

My manuscript has no associated data.

References

  • Ahlroth L, Schumacher A, Haanpää H (2010) On the power of lookahead in online lot-sizing. Oper Res Lett 38(6):522–526

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Albers S (2003) Online algorithms: a survey. Math Program 97(1–2):3–26

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aloulou MA, Dolgui A, Kovalyov MY (2014) A bibliography of non-deterministic lot-sizing models. Int J Prod Res 52(8):2293–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Thiele A (2006) A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Oper Res 54(1):150–168

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Borodin A, El-Yaniv R (1998) Online computation and competitive analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buchbinder N, Kimbrel T, Levi R, Makarychev K, Sviridenko M (2013) Online make-to-order joint replenishment model: primal dual competitive algorithms. Oper Res 61(4):1014–1029

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Darwish MA, Alkhedher M, Alenezi A (2019) Reducing the effects of demand uncertainty in single-newsvendor multi-retailer supply chains. Int J Prod Res 57(4):1082–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Smet N, Aghezzaf EH, Desmet B (2019) Optimising installation (R, Q) policies in distribution networks with stochastic lead times: a comparative analysis of guaranteed- and stochastic service models. Int J Prod Res 57(13):4148–4165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego G, Moon I (1993) The distribution free newsboy problem: review and extensions. J Oper Res Soc 44(8):825–834

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Godichaud M, Amodeo L (2019) EOQ inventory models for disassembly systems with disposal and lost sales. Int J Prod Res 57(18):5685–5704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson L, Olsson F (2017) Quantifying sustainable control of inventory systems with non-linear backorder costs. Ann Oper Res 259(1–2):217–239

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • KırcıM Biçer I, Seifert RW (2019) Optimal replenishment cycle for perishable items facing demand uncertainty in a two-echelon inventory system. Int J Prod Res 57(4):1250–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen KS, Wøhlk S (2010) Competitive analysis of the online inventory problem. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):685–696

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moon I, Gallego G (1994) Distribution free procedures for some inventory models. J Oper Res Soc 45(6):651–658

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ni G (2020) Replenishment policy for a purchase-to-order seller: a tradeoff between ordering cost and delay cost. Int J Prod Res 58(4):1239–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perakis G, Roels G (2008) Regret in the newsvendor model with partial information. Oper Res 56(1):188–203

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Priore P, Ponte B, Rosillo R, de la Fuente D (2019) Applying machine learning to the dynamic selection of replenishment policies in fast-changing supply chain environments. Int J Prod Res 57(11):3663–3677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See C, Sim M (2010) Robust approximation to multi-period inventory management. Oper Res 58(3):583–594

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tempelmeier H, Herpers S (2011) Dynamic uncapacitated lot sizing with random demand under a fillrate constraint. Eur J Oper Res 212(3):497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel W, Wagelmans APM (2010) Worst case analysis for a general class of on-line lot-sizing heuristics. Oper Res 58(1):59–67

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner MR (2010) Fully distribution-free profit maximization: the inventory management case. Math Oper Res 35(4):728–741

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner MR (2011) Online lot-sizing problems with ordering, holding and shortage cost. Oper Res Lett 39(2):144–149

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JL, Chen J, Lee CY (2012) Coordinated pricing and inventory control problems with capacity constraints and fixed ordering cost. Nav Res Log 59(5):376–383

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is partially supported by Special Funds of Taishan Scholar Project and Startup Program of Doctor Scientific Research in Shandong University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanqun Ni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ni, G. An improved online replenishment policy and its competitive ratio analysis for a purchase-to-order seller. J Comb Optim 46, 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01079-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01079-6

Keywords

Navigation