Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T17:08:53.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arctic adventure cruise shipping network: Itinerary characteristics and spatial structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2023

Zukun Long
Affiliation:
School of Business, Xiangtan University, Hunan Xiangtan, China
Xiaoyun Ren
Affiliation:
School of Business, Xiangtan University, Hunan Xiangtan, China
Xumao Li*
Affiliation:
Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing, China School of Transportation, Southeast University, Jiangsu Nanjing, China
*
Corresponding author: Xumao Li; Email: lixumao2018@126.com

Abstract

The frigid geographical environment in the Arctic has shaped the exploration attribute of the polar cruise shipping network. In this study, the typical characteristics and special structure of the Arctic adventure cruise shipping network are investigated by using the network analysis method based on the data of 172 adventure cruise itineraries in the Arctic. It is found that the Arctic adventure cruise itineraries are dominated by 8–17 days of medium itineraries, and the ratio of one-way itineraries to round-trip itineraries is about 1:1. There are differences in the centrality of different ports, forming two core ports Reykjavík and Longyearbyen and a sub-core port Kangerlussuaq. The overall contact strength of the Arctic adventure cruise shipping network is low. Under the joint influence of such factors as centrality and contact strength, the Arctic constitutes the dual-core clusters of Iceland and Svalbard Islands and a sub-core cluster of Greenland.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Co-first author.

References

Ahmed, W., Bertsch, P. M., Angel, N., Bibby, K., Bivins, A., Dierens, L., … & Mueller, J. F. (2020). Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in commercial passenger aircraft and cruise ship wastewater: A surveillance tool for assessing the presence of COVID-19 infected travellers. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(5), taaa116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alves, R. L., & Santos, T. A. (2022). Cruise ship itinerary design considering port attractiveness for passengers. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, M., Collard, F., Fabres, J., Gabrielsen, G. W., Provencher, J. F., Rochman, C. M., … & Tekman, M. B. (2022). Plastic pollution in the Arctic. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(5), 323337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bystrowska, M. (2019). The impact of sea ice on cruise tourism on Svalbard. Arctic, 72(2), 151165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cajaiba-Santana, G., Faury, O., & Ramadan, M. (2020). The emerging cruise shipping industry in the arctic: Institutional pressures and institutional voids. Annals of Tourism Research, 80, 102796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Lau, Y. Y., Ge, Y. E., Dulebenets, M. A., Kawasaki, T., & Ng, A. K. (2021). Interactions between Arctic passenger ship activities and emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97, 102925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, D., & Jóhannsdóttir, L. (2021). Impacts, systemic risk and national response measures concerning COVID-19—The island case studies of Iceland and Greenland. Sustainability, 13(15), 8470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J., Johnston, M., & Stewart, E. (2017). The unintended consequences of regulatory complexity: The case of cruise tourism in Arctic Canada. Marine Policy, 76, 7178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteve-Pérez, J., & del Río-González, M. (2022). Assessment of the centrality of the Cruise Ship navigation networks in Southern Europe through the application of social network analysis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(8), 1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridriksson, J., Wise, N., & Scott, P. (2020). Iceland’s bourgeoning cruise industry: An economic opportunity or a local threat? Local Economy, 35(2), 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, S., Yu, Y., Chen, J., Xi, Y., & Zhang, M. (2022). A framework for quantitative analysis of the causation of grounding accidents in arctic shipping. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 226, 108706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. A., Lynch, A. H., Yan, R., Veland, S., & Talleri, W. (2022). Economic viability and emissions of multimodal transportation infrastructure in a changing Arctic. Weather, Climate, and Society, 14(3), 861879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, W. D., Le Baron, N., Citta, J. J., Dawson, J., Doniol-Valcroze, T., Ferguson, M., … & Insley, S. J. (2022). Overlap between bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) and vessel traffic in the North American Arctic and implications for conservation and management. Biological Conservation, 276, 109820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helle, I., Mäkinen, J., Nevalainen, M., Afenyo, M., & Vanhatalo, J. (2020). Impacts of oil spills on Arctic marine ecosystems: A quantitative and probabilistic risk assessment perspective. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(4), 21122121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermann, R. R., Lin, N., Lebel, J., & Kovalenko, A. (2022). Arctic transshipment hub planning along the Northern Sea Itinerary: A systematic literature review and policy implications of Arctic port infrastructure. Marine Policy, 145, 105275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, H., Hanaoka, S., & Sugishita, K. (2022). Structural changes in the cruise network by ship size in Northeast Asia. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(4), 207221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S., & Bastian, M. (2014). ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PloS One, 9(6), e98679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, L., Olsen, L. S., & Karlsdóttir, A. (2020). Sustainability and cruise tourism in the arctic: Stakeholder perspectives from Ísafjörður, Iceland and Qaqortoq, Greenland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(9), 14251441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsdottir, L., Cook, D., & Arruda, G. M. (2021). Systemic risk of cruise ship incidents from an Arctic and insurance perspective. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 9(1), 00009.Google Scholar
Kanrak, M., Lau, Y. Y., Zhou, J., Ge, J., & Traiyarach, S. (2023). Empirical analysis of the Cruise shipping network in Asia. Sustainability, 15(3), 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, B., Khan, F., & Veitch, B. (2020). A dynamic Bayesian network model for ship-ice collision risk in the Arctic waters. Safety Science, 130, 104858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koçak, S. T., & Yercan, F. (2021). Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of Arctic and international shipping itineraries: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Transport Policy, 114, 147164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kseniia, N., Khan, M. I., & Chang, Y. C. (2021). Legal issues regarding Arctic cruise shipping in the Russian federation. Sustainability, 13(13), 7016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Y. Y., Sun, X., Yang, W., & Kanrak, M. (2022). Chinese Cruisers’ preference, travel constraints, and behavioural intention: Experience from the Arctic Cruise market. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(2), 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloret, J., Carreño, A., Carić, H., San, J., & Fleming, L. E. (2021). Environmental and human health impacts of cruise tourism: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 173, 112979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mudryk, L. R., Dawson, J., Howell, S. E., Derksen, C., Zagon, T. A., & Brady, M. (2021). Impact of 1, 2 and 4 C of global warming on ship navigation in the Canadian Arctic. Nature Climate Change, 11(8), 673679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radic, A., Law, R., Lück, M., Kang, H., Ariza-Montes, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., & Han, H. (2020). Apocalypse now or overreaction to coronavirus: The global cruise tourism industry crisis. Sustainability, 12(17), 6968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, C., James, L., Pashkevich, A., & Hoarau-Heemstra, H. (2021). Cruise trouble. A practice-based approach to studying Arctic cruise tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 40, 100901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, U. A. L., Park, S. H., Kim, D. M., & Yeo, G. T. (2021). A social network analysis of interconnections among cruise ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(2), 174183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, C. A., Daigle, R. M., & Hausner, V. H. (2020). Quantifying tourism booms and the increasing footprint in the Arctic with social media data. PLoS One, 15(1), e0227189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saviolidis, N. M., Cook, D., Davíðsdóttir, B., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Ólafsson, S. (2021). Challenges of national measurement of environmental sustainability in tourism. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shijin, W., Yaqiong, M., Xueyan, Z., & Jia, X. (2020). Polar tourism and environment change: Opportunity, impact and adaptation. Polar Science, 25, 100544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, X. D., & Lin, B. J. (2020). Who is the leader? Network structure and regional differentiation of global cruise itineraries. Tourism Tribune/Lvyou Xuekan, 35(11), 115–128.Google Scholar
Theocharis, D., Pettit, S., Rodrigues, V. S., & Haider, J. (2018). Arctic shipping: A systematic literature review of comparative studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 112128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidbury, H., Taylor, N., van der Molen, J., Garcia, L., Posen, P., Gill, A., … & Hyder, K. (2020). Social network analysis as a tool for marine spatial planning: Impacts of decommissioning on connectivity in the North Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(3), 566577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, P. H., & Cullinane, K. (2018). Key criteria influencing the choice of Arctic shipping: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(4), 422438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viken, A., Höckert, E., & Grimwood, B. S. (2021). Cultural sensitivity: Engaging difference in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 89, 103223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajahat, A., Nazir, A., Akhtar, F., Qureshi, S., Razaque, F., & Shakeel, A. (2020). Interactively visualize and analyze social network Gephi. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan, 19: IEEE.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Zong, Z., Lu, P., Zhang, G., & Li, Z. (2021). Probabilistic estimation of level ice resistance on ships based on sea ice properties measured along summer Arctic cruise paths. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 189, 103336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Wang, K., Zhen, L., & Qu, X. (2017). Cruise itinerary schedule design. IISE Transactions, 49(6), 622641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., He, X., Wang, M., Feng, F., & Chua, T. S. (2019). Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Association for Computing Machinery, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C. Y., Hsieh, C. H., & Su, D. T. (2020). Effects of new shipping itineraries on the operational resilience of container lines: potential impacts of the Arctic Sea Itinerary and the Kra Canal on the Europe-Far East seaborne trades. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 22, 308325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Zhang, D., Zhang, M., Lang, X., & Mao, W. (2020). An integrated risk assessment model for safe Arctic navigation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 142, 101114.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Shang, R., & Jiao, L. (2023). Large-scale community detection based on core node and layer-by-layer label propagation. Information Sciences, 632, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, S., Fu, X., Ng, A. K., Luo, M., & Ge, Y. E. (2018). The environmental costs and economic implications of container shipping on the Northern Sea Itinerary. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(4), 456477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar