1 Introduction

Zhu’s [1] 2012 re-evaluation of earth-abundant poly-[M1x(M2-ett)][2] complexes (ett = 1,1,2,2-ethenetetrathiolate; M1 = Na, K; M2 = Ni, Cu; typically with x = 0.02–0.25, but as high as 0.6, Scheme 1) as thermoelectric (TE) materials has generated wide interest. This is as a result of their high potential for use in sustainable heat-to-power energy harvesting devices [3,4,5,6]. In particular, the excellent TE performance of poly-[Kx(Ni-ett)] is attractive, because of its high air stability, which is rare in n-type carriers [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, two significant limitations of such materials exist: their poor solubility and potential to form diverse (unpredictable) microstructures hindering their use. Poly-[M1x(M2-ett)] materials precipitate very rapidly when their in situ reaction precursors are exposed to air (Scheme 1). This leads to a distribution of material compositions and particle sizes that is dependent on the reaction micro-conditions. Variation in TE performance for samples nominally prepared under identical conditions can result. The complete insolubility of poly-[M1x(M2-ett)] complexes also prevents subsequent solution-based purification and re-processing and hinders chemical characterisation of the materials. Poly-[M1x(M2-ett)] complexes are typically represented as 1D ladder polymers containing structural motif A (Scheme 1) in the literature, but this is a significant simplification. Recent XPS studies led to the realisation that both hydrated (B) and oxidised ett (C) polymer forms can also be present [16]. Based on their elemental analyses, additional (presently poorly characterised) impurities can also be present within poly-[M1x(M2-ett)] samples. Finally, full characterisation of the materials is further complicated by the redox-active nature of the ett ligand itself (i.e. its ability to provide oxidised tetrathiooxalate units in situ) [17]. These factors make rational design of new metal-ett TE materials presently challenging.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Preparation and thermoelectric properties of Zhu’s[1] original M1x[M2(ett)] species: σrt, αrt, and PFrt are the room temperature electrical conductivity, Seebeck coefficient and Power Factor respectively. The empirical formulae presented are the best (linear least squares) fits attained to the bulk material C, H and metal elemental analysis data provided by Zhu[1] (ΔC%error 0.1–3.3%, ΔH% error 0.1–0.7, ΔM1/M2%error 0.2–3.3. TPD = 1,3,4,6-tetrathiapentalene-2,5-dione

Colloidal suspensions of poly-[Kx(Ni-ett)] can sometimes be used to prepare film devices which show a range of TE properties (Table 1) [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Aqueous ethylene glycol micro suspensions currently offer the best approach (Table 1, fourth entry) [21]. However, a truly homogeneous form of ‘Ni(ett)’ would be attractive, as this would allow improved characterisation, film casting and ink-jet printing approaches to device fabrication. Only extruded pastes or suspensions of Ni-ett materials are presently used to prepare simple TE modules (Table 1) [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. As opportunities to modify the structure of the ett ligand itself (to improve solubility) are not available, we considered a new strategy to solubilise ‘Ni-ett’ species through use of barium carboxylate salts. Barium is the most sustainable of the heavy elements in the periodic table [25, 26] and, potentially offers additional opportunities for improving thermoelectric performance by a range of effects, such as carrier filtering, as has been observed in some related non-composite materials [27].

Table 1 Comparative thermoelectric performance of known ‘Ni-ett’ formulated films

2 Experimental

Full experimental details of all materials prepared and their characterisation are described in the Supporting Information.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Synthesis and Characterisation

We began our studies by identifying an appropriate barium-based carboxylate with which to carry out the hydrolysis of TPD (Scheme 2, TPD = 1,3,4,6-tetrathiapentalene-2,5-dione), as this is commonly used to access ett. Preliminary studies revealed that pre-mixture of Ba(OH)2 and equimolar amounts of EtCO2H provided the best hydrolysis conditions. Unexpectedly, such mixtures do not remain as separate distinct phases but react overnight to form previously unrecognised [(EtCO2)BaOH]⋅H2O (2). We make this assignment on the basis of the shift of the IR carbonyl (C = O) stretching frequency from 1708 cm−1 in propionic acid to 1535 cm−1 in [(EtCO2)BaOH]⋅H2O (2), which is expected upon barium coordination of the carboxylate [28]. Power X-ray diffraction confirms that Ba(OH)2 is absent (against authentic samples) and that a new crystalline phase attributed to [(EtCO2)BaOH]⋅H2O (2) is present in the solid state. Finally, [(EtCO2)BaOH]⋅H2O (2) is completely soluble in methanol-d4 (unlike barium hydroxide propionic acid mixtures) and its 13C NMR carbonyl resonance (183.5 ppm) is significantly shifted from propionic acid (178.7 ppm) in the same solvent. The carboxylate peak for (2) is also reproducibly shifted + 0.2 ppm higher than that of authentic, independently prepared, Ba(O2CEt)2 recorded under identical conditions (see Supporting Information). All of these facts indicate (2) is a separate phase, not simple admixture of Ba(OH)2 and Ba(O2CEt)2. We believe the reason (2) has remained unrecognised is that its elemental analysis and that of a simple 1:1 admixture of the starting materials give identical values. Attempts to remove the water of crystallisation from (2) at 80 °C for 16 h led to ca. 18% BaO formation based of the CHN analyses of such samples. Barium metal analyses of (2) are also consistent with the proposed formulation.

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Partial hydrolysis of TPD with (EtCO2)BaOH (2) in methanol at 65 °C and reaction of the intermediate (2/3) mixture to form compound 4 though further hydrolysis and aerial oxidation in the presence NiCl2. The blue text, within the (2/3) structures show the 13C NMR signals (ppm) observed after 16 h. TPD = 1,3,4,6-tetrathiapentalene-2,5-dione

We used freshly prepared (2) to hydrolyse TPD (Scheme 2), in place of M1OH (M = Na, K). A 3.7:1 ratio of (2): TPD was employed in order to be sure that all of the barium carboxylate was consumed, so that no unreacted excesses of barium carboxylates are present to complicate the analysis of the final nickel material. Overnight heating (16 h) at 65 °C led to complete consumption of the TPD, as monitored by 13C NMR. Based on the work of Tkachov [13], we assign the remaining signals observed in the 13C NMR spectrum (188.5, 185.1, 158.0, 116.2, 32.4, and 11.0 ppm) of the reaction mixture to the species given in Scheme 2. Subsequent addition of anhydrous NiCl2 causes the reaction solution to become very dark. After additional heating (65 °C, 24 h) the TPD-intermediate 3 and unreacted 2 are completely consumed leading to fine black precipitate that was initially ascribed to 'poly-[(EtCO2Ba)x(Ni-ett)]' (4). This is easily isolated after addition of water and filtration in air (Scheme 2).

Material (4) was analysed by CHN combustion analysis, supported by barium and nickel metal analyses by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). These data were used to attain best fits (linear regression) to the stoichiometry coefficients a-e shown in the box in Scheme 2. The data are in accord with a composition [(EtCO2Ba)4(ett)5O60Ni8]⋅22H2O for (4). The presence of the initially unexpectedly high O:S ratio is confirmed by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (EDX) studies of pressed pellets of (4) (1000 bar, 5 min) (Supporting Information) which also support the proposed formulation. No chlorine signal is seen in the EDX spectrum of (4), indicating complete substitution of NiCl2 (Fig. 1.). Consistent with this picture (4), digested in HNO3, gives a negative chloride test with AgNO3. Solid-state FTIR studies of (4), as isolated, reveal the presence of new strong bands at 1422 and 1078 cm−1. Typically organosulfonyl RSO3 units show strong asymmetric/symmetric νS=O stretches at 1200–1400 cm−1 and around 1050 cm−1 respectively [29,30,31]. Overall, these observations indicate that extensive aerial oxidation takes place during the isolation of 4 in air causing all of the ett thiols to become converted to [(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2]4−. The latter ligand has been described once in the literature, during CO2 reduction studies as its tetrasodium salt [32], but its IR spectrum is not described. Our elemental H, C, Ni, O, S and Ba analyses of (4) are in good agreement with formulation as [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5]⋅22H2O (see Supporting Information). We attribute the aerobic thiol oxidation behaviour to the presence of our soluble barium intermediates, as completely insoluble poly-[Kx(Ni-ett)] is only oxidised slowly in the solid state under vigorous conditions (200 °C) after its isolation [16]. In control reactions when we hydrolysed TPD with Ba(OH)2 alone and this led only to poorly characterisable insoluble materials, completely unrelated to (4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A representative electron microscopy image of [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5]⋅22H2O (4) pressed pellet and its associated EDX spectrum

In agreement with its polar formulation, unlike the species AC (Scheme 1), (4) is fully soluble in DMSO and partially in other polar solvents. UV–vis-NIR spectra of (4) (DMSO 10–4 M) show peaks at λmax = 313 and 375 nm, close to reported literature value for π–π* transition of ett-type ligands, respectively [33, 34]. Two broad peaks 1070 and 1263 nm, the latter trailing off into long wavelength infra-red, beyond the detector range of our instrument (1400 nm) are suggestive of charge transfer events [19]. Using the frequency of the latter peak as an approximate band gap transition energy gives an Eg(opt) estimate for (4) of ≤ 1 eV. This is similar to the values that have been calculated for a range of related nickel conducting oligomers (both known and hypothetical) [35]. The magnetic susceptibility (χg) of material (4), as isolated, gives χg = 3.17 × 10–8 m3 kg−1 by standard Evan’s balance measurements, indicating (4) is paramagnetic. This prevents detection of ett-derived ligands by 13C NMR spectroscopy, but the propionate ethyl groups could be seen in the proton NMR studies, although they were significantly broadened. Quantification against a 1,2-dibromoethane internal standard indicated 4–5 wt% of (4) to be ‘EtCO2’, compared to the 8.5 wt% calculated for the formula: [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5]⋅22H2O (4). However, it was not possible to measure t1 relaxation values for (4) and relaxation differences between the 1,2-dibromoethane standards and paramagnetic (4), are likely to be significant and affect the relative integrals significantly.

As we were unable to grow crystals of (4), we sought to visualise (at least potential) structures for it via space-filling molecular models (see Supporting Information). The linear ‘pentamers’ (4a/b) realised from this are in accord with the elemental analysis and other (composition) data (Scheme 3) observed. We prefer the former of these (4a) as a simple working model, due to the lack of steric clashes. However, both forms did indicate the viability of discrete, soluble, coordination clusters consistent with the analytical data attained (in the absence of crystallographic data). The true nature of (4) is undoubtedly more complex than this simple model and other oligomer lengths and degrees of coordination/oxidation are possible. Our isolated samples of (4) are thus likely a mixture of species, but with cores all related to (4a/b).

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Core of the proposed structure ladder motif in compound 4, free coordination sites are assumed to be water or solvent occupied. Structures with a bridging μ-O sulfate (4a) lead to a planar [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5] units, while motif (4b) was disfavoured, leading to overly close sulfonyl oxygen contacts and deviations from planarity

3.2 Formulation of (4) and thermoelectric properties

The powder form of (4) could be easily pressed into a pellet (diameter 4 mm × 139 μm deep), and its electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient determined by standard means (Table 2; further information on the techniques employed are provided in the Supporting Information). A summary of the approach used to measure the thermoelectric properties is presented in Fig. 2. DMSO solutions of (4, 0.22 M) could also be easily drop cast onto Kapton tape, resulting in films around 10 μm thick. The thermoelectric properties of both the pellets and films were investigated (Table 2). Finally, the surface tension and viscosity of DMSO solutions of (4) are, when co-mixed with n-butanol (BuOH), appropriate for ink-jet printing of thin films, whose headline properties are reported in Table 2 (other mixtures were also investigated, see Supporting Information). Annealing of these thin films was required in all cases to attain n-type TE materials.

Table 2 Thermoelectric properties of pressed pellet vs. drop-cast and ink-jet printed films of [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5]⋅22H2O (4)[a]
Fig. 2
figure 2

Lateral Seebeck measurements of printed lines of PEDOT:PSS and 4, showing a schematic of the experimental setup, b thermoelectric voltage vs. time for 4 and graphs of thermoelectric voltage vs ∆T for c the PEDOT:PSS printed line and d the 4 printed line, both including a linear fits to the data, the gradient of which is equal to -S

Clearly, while the performance of (4) is inferior to the current best ‘Ni-ett’ nanoparticle/PVDF formulations in power factor (PFmax = 58.6 μW m−1K−2, [24] see Table 1), it does afford opportunities for simplifications in multi-junction device preparation. To investigate this, we prepared a 3-junction device using (4) for the n-type and commercial PEDOT-PSS for the p-type material. Printing resolutions of ca. 1 mm are easily attained (Fig. 3) on to PEN (polyethylene naphthalate) as a flexible substrate. For details of the optimisation of the printing conditions and associated Hansen/Jettability plots see the Supporting Information. At a temperature difference of 7.9 °C this simple device delivered an output of -93.1 μV K−1. Microscopy of the printed films revealed some aggregation of material (4) occurs during its drying (see Supporting Information). The resultant minor film defects do have a minor negative (grain boundary) effect on the devices, but in no case do the films fall below their electrical percolation limits.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Three-junction [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5]⋅22H2O (4)/PEDOT-PSS TE device, showing the architecture and optical microscope images of the printed lines

4 Conclusion

Our simple idea that the potassium counter cation in poly-[Kx(Ni-ett)] could be replaced by a barium carboxylate, solubilising the material, has been fulfilled. Compound 4 is, to the best of our knowledge, the first organic coordination oligomer containing barium to have its TE properties extensively investigated [36, 37]. Including EtCO2Ba units provides a 'poly-[(EtCO2Ba)x(Ni-ett)]' material that is soluble in polar solvents (primarily DMSO). Elemental analysis reveals the reason for this to be induced aerobic oxidation of the ett thiols to sulfonic acids and that the isolated material is, in fact, an oligomer of the composition [(EtCO2Ba)4Ni8{(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2}5]⋅22H2O (4). Although only partially related to known Ni-ett species this compound retains n-type behaviour and contains the fortuitously discovered ligand [(O3S)2C = C(SO3)2]4−,[32] whose coordination polymers have not been described before. We propose that the latter has significant potential for use in dimensionally restricted (ladder) TE materials and other electrical conductors, and these we are currently investigating.