Skip to main content
Log in

Multimarket Contact and Market Power Implications in the US Airline Industry

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the impact of multimarket contact on market power. We analyze this question in the U.S. airline industry where concomitant cross-market interactions among competing carriers abound. Collecting data from the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics and exploiting a methodology that allows us to compute the Lerner index (proxy for market power), we find that multimarket contact between carriers has a U-shaped effect on market power. This suggests that there exists a threshold level of multimarket contact for carriers that compete across multiple markets to recognize their interdependences and begin to mutually forbear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Airline Origin and Destination Survey (DB1B) repository, https://www.transtats.bts.gov/DatabaseInfo.asp?QO_VQ=EFI&Yv0x=D.

Notes

  1. The ten mainline passenger carriers include Alaska Airlines, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, Delta Air.

    Lines, Frontier Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue, Southwest Airlines, Spirit Airlines, and United Airlines. See the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report (https://www.gao.gov/assets/670/664060.pdf) on the declining number of competitors in the airline industry.

  2. Our results are not sensitive to airport groupings.

  3. In our sample, online products represent 95 percent of total airline products and 98.7 percent of passengers transported.

  4. Code-sharing constitutes an accord among carriers where a carrier, called the ticketing carrier, is able to market and sell seats on its partner’s plane for flight legs of a route operated by its partner, the operating carrier. The inclusion of codeshare products do not affect our findings, mainly due to their underrepresentation in the U.S. airline industry. See Tables 6 through 10 for results that control for codeshare products and Section 4.2 for results discussion.

  5. For empirical evidence, see Brueckner et al. (2011), Brueckner and Proost (2010), Ito and Lee (2007), Brueckner and Whalen (2000), Brueckner (20012003), and Bamberger et al. (2004).

  6. The nested logit model has the following well-known predicted product share function: \({s}_{j}=\frac{exp\left(\frac{{\delta }_{j}}{1-\sigma }\right)}{{D}_{g}}\times \frac{{D}_{g}^{1-\sigma }}{\left[1+{\sum }_{g=1}^{G}{D}_{g}^{1-\sigma }\right]}\), where \({D}_{g}=\sum_{j\in {G}_{g}}exp\left(\frac{{\delta }_{j}}{1-\sigma }\right)\) and \({G}_{g}\) is the set of products belonging to group \(g\).

  7. The Lerner index is zero under perfect competition, and it approaches one for positive nonzero marginal.

    cost in monopoly case.

  8. The slot-controlled airports are New York Kennedy (JFK), New York LaGuardia (LGA), and Washington National (DCA). For information regarding slot administration, visit the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) website: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/perf_analysis/slot_administration/

  9. See Brueckner et al. (2011), Brueckner and Proost (2010), Ito and Lee (2007), Brueckner and Whalen (2000), Brueckner (20012003), and Bamberger et al. (2004).

References

  • Arie G, Markovich S, Varela M (2017) On the competitive effects of multimarket contact. Eur Econ Rev 100:116–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar J, Marinescu I, Steinbaum M (2020) Labor market concentration. J Hum Resour 57:S167–S199. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.monopsony.1218-9914R1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger GE, Carlton DW, Neumann LR (2004) An empirical investigation of the competitive effects of domestic airline alliances. J Law Econ 47(1):195–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JA, Korn HJ (1999) Dynamics of dyadic competitive interaction. Strateg Manag J 20(3):251–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim BD, Whinston MD (1990) Multimarket contact and collusive behavior. Rand J Econ 21:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry ST (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND J Econ 25:242–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry S, Jia P (2010) Tracing the woes: An empirical analysis of the airline industry. Am Econ J Microecon 2(3):1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica J Econ Soc 63:841–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (2004) Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market. J Polit Econ 112(1):68–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein S (1989) Hubs and high fares: dominance and market power in the US airline industry. RAND J Econ 20:344–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2001) The economics of international codesharing: an analysis of airline alliances. Int J Ind Organ 19(10):1475–1498

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK (2003) International airfares in the age of alliances: The effects of codesharing and antitrust immunity. Rev Econ Stat 85(1):105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilotkach V (2011) Multimarket contact and intensity of competition: evidence from an airline merger. Rev Ind Organ 38(1):95–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK, Lee DN, Singer ES (2011) Alliances, codesharing, antitrust immunity, and international airfares: do previous patterns persist? J Compet Law Econ 7(3):573–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK, Proost S (2010) Carve-outs under airline antitrust immunity. Int J Ind Organ 28(6):657–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner JK, Whalen WT (2000) The price effects of international airline alliances. J Law Econ 43(2):503–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse MR (2000) Multimarket contact and price coordination in the cellular telephone industry. J Econ Manag Strategy 9(3):287–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Gayle PG (2007) Vertical contracting between airlines: an equilibrium analysis of codeshare alliances. Int J Ind Organ 25(5):1046–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberto F, Williams JW (2014) Does multimarket contact facilitate tacit collusion? Inference on conduct parameters in the airline industry. Rand J Econ 45(4):764–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Clougherty JA (2006) The international drivers of domestic airline mergers in twenty nations: integrating industrial organization and international business. Manag Decis Econ 27(1):75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CD (1955) Conglomerate bigness as a source of power. Business concentration and price policy. Princeton University Press, pp 331–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans WN, Kessides IN (1994) Living by the “golden rule”: Multimarket contact in the US airline industry. Q J Econ 109(2):341–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg RM (1985) “Sales-at-risk”: a test of the mutual forbearance theory of conglomerate behavior. J Bus 58:225–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez N, Marin PL (1998) Market power and multimarket contact: Some evidence from the Spanish hotel industry. J Ind Econ 46(3):301–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu WW (2003) Multimarket contact of US newspaper chains: circulation competition and market coordination. Inf Econ Policy 15(4):501–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentelsaz L, Gómez J (2006) Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets. Strateg Manag J 27(5):477–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayle PG, Thomas T (2015) Product quality effects of international airline alliances, antitrust immunity, and domestic mergers. Rev Netw Econ 14(1):45–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayle PG, Yimga JO (2018) How much do consumers really value air travel on-time performance, and to what extent are airlines motivated to improve their on-time performance? Econ Transp 14:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno J, Woo CY (1999) Multimarket contact, economies of scope, and firm performance. Acad Manag J 42(3):239–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsbee A, Petrin A (2004) The consumer gains from direct broadcast satellites and the competition with cable TV. Econometrica 72(2):351–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara CA (2015) Critical assessment of five methods to correct for endogeneity in discrete-choice models. Transp Res A Policy Pract 82:240–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara CA, Ben-Akiva M (2006) Endogeneity in residential location choice models. Transp Res Rec 1977(1):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara-Cue CA (2010) Endogeneity and sampling of alternatives in spatial choice models. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Doctoral dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman HA, Nonnemaker L (2000) Competition in multiple geographic markets: The impact on growth and market entry. Adm Sci Q 45(2):232–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA (1996) Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. In: Gordon RJ, Bresnahan TF (eds) The economics of new goods. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 207–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1978) Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46:931–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes K, Oughton C (1993) Diversification, multi-market contact and profitability. Economica 60:203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito H, Lee D (2007) Domestic code sharing, alliances, and airfares in the US airline industry. J Law Econ 50(2):355–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Jans I, Rosenbaum DI (1997) Multimarket contact and pricing: Evidence from the US cement industry. Int J Ind Organ 15(3):391–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani A, Wernerfelt B (1985) Multiple point competition. Strateg Manag J 6(1):87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasman S, Kasman A (2016) Multimarket contact, market power and financial stability in the Turkish banking industry. Empirical Economics 50(2):361–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim EH, Singal V (1993) Mergers and market power: evidence from the airline industry. Am Econ Rev 83:549–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, McCarthy IM (2018) Multimarket contact in health insurance: evidence from medicare advantage (No. w24486). National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumbower S, Garrow LA, Higgins MJ (2014) Estimating flight-level price elasticities using online airline data: a first step toward integrating pricing, demand, and revenue optimization. Transp Res A Policy Pract 66:196–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker PM, Röller LH (1997) Collusive conduct in duopolies: multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industry. RAND J Econ 28:304–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J Mark Res 47(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince JT, Simon DH (2009) Multimarket contact and service quality: Evidence from on-time performance in the US airline industry. Acad Manag J 52(2):336–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M (2018) Multimarket contact in the hospital industry. Am Econ J Econ Pol 10(3):361–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JT (1982) Multimarket contact and economic performance. Rev Econ Stat 64:368–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnolo G (1999) Social relations and cooperation in organizations. J Econ Behav Organ 38(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Train KE, Winston C (2007) Vehicle choice behavior and the declining market share of US automakers. Int Econ Rev 48(4):1469–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1999) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Manage Sci 45(10):1324–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Werden GJ, Joskow AS, Johnson RL (1991) The effects of mergers on price and output: Two case studies from the airline industry. Manag Decis Econ 12(5):341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Yimga J (2020) The Impact of Airline Code-sharing on Product Quality. J Transp Econ Policy 54(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou L, Yu C, Dresner M (2012) Multimarket contact, alliance membership, and prices in international airline markets. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 48(2):555–565

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jules Yimga.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Correlation Matrix
Table 7 Estimation of Nested Logit Demand Equations
Table 8 GMM Estimation Results
Table 9 Two-Stage Least Squares Estimation Results of Baseline Model – Weighted MMC
Table 10 Market Power Effects of MMC among full service carriers (fsc)
Table 11 Market Power Effects of MMC among Low-cost Carriers (lcc)
Table 12 Market Power Effects of MMC among Carriers with Nonstop Service
Table 13 Market Power Effects of MMC among Carriers with Connecting Service
Table 14 Estimation of Price Equations

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yimga, J. Multimarket Contact and Market Power Implications in the US Airline Industry. Netw Spat Econ 23, 985–1024 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-023-09601-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-023-09601-3

Keywords

Navigation