Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the Capabilities of Distributed Acoustic Sensing with a Helical Fiber for Cross-Well Seismic Survey

  • PHYSICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR ECOLOGY, MEDICINE, AND BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Instruments and Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To expand the possibilities of solving geophysical problems using fiber-optic distributed systems for recording acoustic waves, a comparison was made of the signals obtained by traditional hydrophones and a distributed fiber-optic system using a cable containing straight and helical fibers. The studies were carried out by the method of cross-well seismic survey. The possibility of separating direct and refracted head waves recorded by a distributed fiber-optic system and using them to obtain geological and geophysical information about the state of the massif is considered. It is shown that, when using a helically wound fiber, the first arrivals of a direct longitudinal wave can be traced to conduct cross-well seismic of the rock massif and evaluate the velocity distribution by the method of cross-well time-travel tomography on direct waves. For both straight and helical fibers, the stacking of the head waves makes it possible to obtain sufficiently clear arrivals of the head wave even in the dry part of the well and use it to determine the velocities of compressional waves of the near-borehole massif. The composition of the cross-well wave field depends on the radiation patterns of both the source and the receiver of acoustic waves. The use of multiple overlap systems makes it possible to vary the composition of the recorded wave field due to the mutual arrangement of the receiving and exciting lines depending on the tasks being solved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mateeva, A., Mestayer, J., Cox, B., Kiyashchenko, D., Wills, P., Lopez, J., Grandi, S., Hornman, K., Lumens, P., Franzen, A., Hill, D., and Roy, J., in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2012, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0739.1

  2. Cai, Z., Yu, G., Zhang, Q., Zhao, Y., Chen, Y., Jin, Y., and Zhao, H., Proc. SEG Global Meeting 2016 Workshop “Rock Physics and Borehole Geophysics,” Beijing, 2016, p. 81. https://doi.org/10.1190/RP2016-022

  3. Sudakova, M.S., Belov, M.V., Ponimaskin, A.O., Pirogova, A.S., Tokarev, M.Yu., and Kolubakin, A.A., Russ. Geophys., 2021, no. 6, pp. 110–118.

  4. Gorshkov, B.G., Alekseev, A.E., Simikin, D.E., Taranov, M.A., Zhukov, K.M., and Potapov, V.T., Sensors, 2022, vol. 22, p. 9482. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239482

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bakulin, A., Golikov, P., Smith, R., Erickson, K., Silvestrov, I., and Al-Ali, M., in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2018, p. 201. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2995883.1

  6. Chugaev, A.V., Sanfirov, I.A., and Tarantin, M.V., Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2023, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 243–255. https://doi.org/10.2113/RGG20214406

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chugaev, A.V. and Kuznetsov, A.I., Gornoe Ekho, 2022, no. 3 (88), p. 42. https://doi.org/10.7242/echo.2022.3.7

  8. Bona, A., Dean, T., Correa, J., Pevzner, R., Tertyshnikov, K.V., and Van Zaanen, L., Proc. 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017, Paris, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201701200

  9. Parker, T., Shatalin, S., and Farhadiroushan, M., First Break, 2014, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 61. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.2013034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuvshinov, B.N., Geophys. Prospect., 2016, vol. 64, no. 3, p. 671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12303

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Innanen, K., in SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017, p. 926. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17664060.1

  12. Egorov, A., Charara, M., Alfataierge, E., and Bakulin, A. Proc. 1st Int. Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy Expanded, Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2021, p. 184. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2021-3576626.1

  13. Chugaev, A.V. and Tarantin, M.V., Min. Sci. Technol., 2023, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2022-06-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Correa, J., Egorov, A., Tertyshnikov, K., Bona, A., Roman, R., Dean, T., Freifeld, B., and Marshall, S., Leading Edge, 2017, vol. 36, p. 962. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36120994a1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chugaev, A.V., Sanfirov, I.A., Tarantin, M.V., and Tomilov, K.Yu., Russ. Geophys., 2020, no. 5, pp. 4–13.

Download references

Funding

The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and Perm krai, project no. 20-45-596032.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. V. Chugaev.

Additional information

International Conference “Optical Reflectometry, Metrology, & Sensing 2023,ˮ Russia, Perm, May 24–26, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chugaev, A.V., Kuznetsov, A.I. Evaluation of the Capabilities of Distributed Acoustic Sensing with a Helical Fiber for Cross-Well Seismic Survey. Instrum Exp Tech 66, 868–874 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441223050081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441223050081

Navigation