Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A model for the autoclave consolidation of prepregs during manufacturing of complex curvature parts

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autoclave consolidation is used to manufacture continuous fiber composites in applications that have strict part porosity requirements. The applied positive pressure in this process is attractive for reduction in part porosity. However, some part geometries can cause porosity issues even under positive pressure. One is the concave corner seen in an L-bracket geometry. Higher porosity is seen in areas of high curvature, hindering part quality. Since the autoclave process takes several hours and prepreg material is expensive, trial-and-error methods of resolving issues are not practical. In this work, a unique physics-based viscoelastic model is proposed to describe the mechanical behavior of uncured continuous fiber thermoset prepreg undergoing consolidation under hydrostatic pressure. This model considers stress due to compaction of the fiber network, compression of voids in the resin, and viscous stress from resin flow relative to fibers. The constitutive expressions for these are coupled to important mechanisms that occur during autoclave consolidation. The viscoelastic model is incorporated into the finite element analysis software ABAQUS/Standard using a UMAT subroutine. Numerical results are validated by analytic solutions and experimental comparison for flat and L-bracket geometries. A parametric study identifies important process and material parameters that influence the quality of the manufactured part.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hassan MH, Othman AR, Kamaruddin S (2017) A review on the manufacturing defects of complex-shaped laminate in aircraft composite structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:4081–4094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0096-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hubert P, Poursartip A (1998) A review of flow and compaction modelling relevant to thermoset matrix laminate processing. J Reinf Plast Compos 17:286–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li M, Li Y, Zhang Z, Gu Y (2008) Numerical simulation of two-dimensional flow and compaction during the consolidation of laminated composites. Polym Compos 29:560–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Y, Li M, Gu Y, Zhang Z (2009) Numerical and experimental study on the effect of lay-up type and structural elements on thickness uniformity of L-shaped laminates. Appl Compos Mater 16:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-009-9080-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li M, Tucker CL III (2002) Modeling and simulation of two-dimensional consolidation for thermoset matrix composites. Composites: Part A 33:877–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00017-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shuler SF, Advani SG (1996) Transverse squeeze flow of concentrated aligned fibers in viscous fluids. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 65(1):47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baran I, Cinar K, Ersoy N, Akkerman R, Hattel JH (2017) A review on the mechanical modeling of composite manufacturing processes. Arch Computat Methods Eng 24:365–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9167-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White SR, Hahn HT (1992) Process modelling of composite materials: residual stress development during cure. Part I. Model formulation. J Compos Mater 26:2423–2453. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202601604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. White SR, Hahn HT (1992) Process modelling of composite materials: residual stress development during cure. Part II. Experimental validation. J Compos Mater 26:2423–2453. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202601605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Belnoue JP-H, Nixon-Pearson OJ, Ivanov D, Hallett SR (2016) A novel hyper-viscoelastic model for consolidation of toughened prepregs under processing conditions. Mech Mater 97:118–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barari B, Simacek P, Yarlagadda S, Crane RM, Advani SG (2020) Prediction of process-induced void formation in anisotropic fiber-reinforced autoclave composite parts. IntJ Mater Form 13:143–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gutowski TG, Cai Z, Bauer S, Boucher D (1987) Consolidation experiments for laminate composites. J Compos Mater 21:650–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutowski TG, Dillon G (1992) The elastic deformation of lubricated carbon fiber bundles: comparison of theory and experiments. J Compos Mater 26:2330–2347. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839202601601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Barbic J (2014) Stable orthotropic materials. ACM SIGGRAPH Symp Comput Animation. https://doi.org/10.2312/sca.20141121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klopffer MH, Flaconneche B (2001) Transport properties of gases in polymers: bibliographic review. Oil Gas Sci Technol 56:223–244. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2001021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong B, Zhang Z, Handa P (1998) High-precision gravimetric technique for determining the solubility and diffusivity of gases in polymers. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 36:2025–2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19980915)36:12%3c2025::AID-POOLB2%3e3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam RC, Kardos J (1991) The permeability and compressibility of aligned and cross-plied carbon fiber beds during processing of composites. Polym Eng Sci 31:1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1002/PEN.760311411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nedanov PB, Advani SG (2002) Numerical computation of the fiber preform permeability tensor by the homogenization method. Polym Compos 23(5):758–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hwang WR, Advani SG (2010) Numerical simulations of Stokes-Brinkman equations for permeability prediction of dual scale fibrous porous media. Phys Fluids 22:113101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3484273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blackwell C (2021) A model for the autoclave consolidation of prepregs during manufacturing of complex curvature parts. University of Delaware ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 28315676.

  21. Hubert P, Poursartip A (2001) A method for the direct measurement of the fibre bed compaction curve of composite prepregs. Composites: Part A 32:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00143-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farhang L, Fernlund G (2015) Void and porosity characterization of uncured and partially cured prepregs. J Compos Mater 50:937–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Erland S, Dodwell TJ, Butler R (2015) Characterisation of inter-ply shear in uncured carbon fibre prepreg. Composites: Part A 77:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The material presented is based upon work supported by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), under Award Number N68335-15–0224. The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Composites Automation LLC, Newark, DE, USA

    Christopher Blackwell, Roger Crane & Shridhar Yarlagadda

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Center for Composite Materials, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    Pavel Simacek, Shridhar Yarlagadda & Suresh G. Advani

Authors
  1. Christopher Blackwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavel Simacek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roger Crane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shridhar Yarlagadda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suresh G. Advani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh G. Advani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blackwell, C., Simacek, P., Crane, R. et al. A model for the autoclave consolidation of prepregs during manufacturing of complex curvature parts. Int J Mater Form 16, 61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01784-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01784-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation