Skip to main content
Log in

Crime and Features of the Built Environment Predicting Risk of Fatal Overdose: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Ohio Counties with Risk Terrain Modeling

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

For nearly half of the period between 1999 and 2019, rates of rural overdose death surpassed those in urban areas. Despite this substantial increase, little attention has been given to rural overdose or the contextual factors that predict risk of fatal overdose in rural vs. urban communities.

Methods

Risk terrain modeling was used to assess 2016–2017 overdose deaths in two urban and two rural Ohio counties. Spatial models incorporated criminal incidents and features of the built environment that have been previously associated with fatal overdose. The efficacy of spatial models was evaluated through the Predictive Accuracy Index (PAI) and Predictive Efficiency Index (PEI*).

Results

Spatial models in rural counties were more influenced by past instances of crime, whereas risk in urban counties was determined by both crime and the built environment. Taken together, models accurately predicted 76% of 2018 overdoses. Rural models were overall more accurate, primarily in the areas predicted as having the highest risk of future overdose deaths. The predictive accuracy and efficiency of rural models varied more than those of urban models.

Conclusions

It is feasible to apply risk terrain modeling to predict fatal overdose in rural areas. Though the underlying contextual risk factors and patterns of predicted risk differ between rural and urban areas, both can be utilized to place treatment and prevention resources more accurately for targeted intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The current study does not delve into the differences in spatial approaches to predict crime. There are numerous approaches to spatially predicting crime with prior studies focusing on comparisons. This is beyond the scope but there is extant literature on comparing approaches on the predictive ability (see e.g., Drawve, 2016; Ohyama & Amemya, 2018; Wheeler and Steenbeek, 2021) along with NIJ’s Crime Forecasting Challenge in general.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith R. Chichester.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

The study described in this manuscript was approved by University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Institutional Review Board with a Not Human Subjects Research Designation and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of APA.

Informed consent

As this study uses aggregate decedent data with no identifying information or imagery, informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chichester, K.R., Drawve, G., Sisson, M. et al. Crime and Features of the Built Environment Predicting Risk of Fatal Overdose: A Comparison of Rural and Urban Ohio Counties with Risk Terrain Modeling. Am J Crim Just 49, 230–254 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-023-09739-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-023-09739-3

Keywords

Navigation