Skip to main content
Log in

The Minimum Wage and Natural Rate of Unemployment

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unemployment theory of Pissarides-Mortensen-Diamond is applied to the close-by geographic comparison identification strategy to analyze the effect of the minimum wage in New York State. The increase in the minimum wage in 2018 is estimated to raise the natural rate of unemployment almost 20 percent. The elasticity of the unemployment rate with respect to the minimum wage is 2.11 in New York City and 3.3 in the suburbs. To account for varying local labor market conditions, the minimum wage rise was phased in and geographically differentiated, which permits a within-state comparison. A labor market matching function and a Beveridge-type market tightness equation are estimated in an environment of low and falling unemployment rates, thus posing a strong natural experiment test of the hypothesis that the minimum wage causes negligible employment effects. It is estimated that the higher two of the three wage tiers caused a loss of about 39,000 jobs, which is in contrast to the dominant narrative of no effect when using the geographic comparison technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used in this paper is available from the author upon request.

Notes

  1. The three were awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2010.

  2. Proponents of higher minimum wages frequently refer to the need of a living-wage as necessary to support a family, the inference being that other family members might, therefore, be induced to work less, for example.

  3. Muehlemann and Leiser (2018) estimated hiring costs at about 16 weeks of wages across a range of industries in Switzerland.

  4. The fast-food wage rates are accompanied by a detailed set of regulations involving, among other things, what sort of food may be served to employees to count as an allowance against the minimum wage.

  5. New York has 22.3% of its labor force belonging to a union, second highest in the U.S. (Hirsch & Macpherson, 2019).

  6. The Minimum Wage Order for the Building Service Industry 141 runs to 17 pages and carefully stipulates permitted allowances for employer-provided apartments, utilities, tools, uniforms, tips, for example (12NYCRR141). (New York State Department of Labor, 2017)

  7. Thus only unemployed workers search for jobs. Allowing for on-the-job search does not materially affect the results (Pissarides, 2000, p. 5).

  8. Hiring cost k is typically assumed as flow per unit of time until the job is filled.

  9. Adding capital to the model with a real return of r, the discount factor in (4) is r + λ.

  10. A t-test for comparing the means of paired populations is \(t=[({\overline{x} }_{1}-{\overline{x} }_{2})-0]/(s/\sqrt{n})=1.56\) versus a two-tail critical value of 1.96 (P = 0.025), where s is the square root of the variance and n = 62 is the sample size. (Kanji, 1993, p. 30).

  11. Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data is based on place of employment (establishment data).

  12. In correspondence with the author, the Bureau of Labor Statistics says its estimates are not comparable to Census QWI estimates of separations due to differences in data and methodology used. The Bureau does not report separations by county.

  13. The NYC civilian labor force in 2018 was 3.908 million, downstate 1.970 million and rest of state 3.625 million.

  14. The five-year average replacement rate was used to mitigate endogeneity of current benefits relative to wages.

  15. Local Area Unemployment Statistics are based on place of residence, based on household surveys, Current Employment Statistics and unemployment insurance claims.

  16. The matching function and the theta equation were tested for spatial autocorrelation. The hypothesis of no spatial autocorrelation was not rejected for the Theta model (Moran’s I =0.444, Prob. = 0.65). The matching function did exhibit spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I = 3.658, Prob. = 0.003). The latter was re-estimated with a correction for spatial autocorrelation, and the estimated \(\Delta u\) for NYC = 0.007 and downstate = 0.006. Thus, spatial effects have no measureable impact. This contradicts Dube et al. (2010) who argued the finding of a negative employment effect is largely due to failure to control for spatial autocorrelation.

References

  • Bhattacharya, Arghya, Jackson, Paul, & Jenkins, Brian C. (2018). Revisiting unemployment in intermediate macroeconomics: A new approach for teaching Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides. The Journal of Economic Education, 49(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. (2020). Beyond the numbers, 9(1), 1–7.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022a). Quarterly census of employment and wages annual data beginning 2000. (https://www.bls.gov/cew/downloadable-data-files.htm). Accessed February 16, 2022.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022b). Local area unemployment statistics. https://www.bls.gov/lau/data.htm. Accessed April 1, 2022.

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review, 84(4), 772–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Myth and measurement: The new economics of the minimum wage. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office. (2002). The effect of changes in labor markets on the natural rate of unemployment. U.S. Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • County Business Patterns. (2016). www.census.gov/data/datasets/2016/econ/cbp/2016-cbp-html. (Some data were imputed when census confidentiality restricted publication by The Upjohn Institute of Kalamazoo, MI and made available to the author.) Accessed March 9, 2022.

  • DeFreitas, G. (2022). The State of New York Unions 2022. Center for the Study of Labor and Democracy. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University. Available at: https://www.hofstra.edu/sites/default/files/2022-09/cld-state-of-new-york-unions-2022.pdf

  • Diamond, P. A. (1982). Wage determination and efficiency in search equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 49(2), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, A., Lester, T. W., & Reich, M. (2010). Minimum wage effects across state borders: Estimates using contiguous counties. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 945–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. (2022). Archival FRED. Available at: https://alfred.stlouisfed.org. Accessed February 22, 2022.

  • Feldstein, M., & Poterba, J. (1984). Unemployment insurance and reservation wages. Journal of Public Economics, 23(1–2), 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaquin, D., & Ryan, M. M. (Eds.). (2019). 2019 county and city extra data book (27th ed.). Bernan Press.

  • Greene, W. H. (2007). Nlogit5. Econometric Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B., & Macpherson, D. (2022). Union membership, coverage, and earnings from the CPS. Union Membership and Coverage Database. http://www.Unionstats.com. Accessed April 2, 2022.

  • Holzer, H. (1986). Reservation wages and their labor market effects for black and white male youth. Journal of Human Resources, 21(2), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanji, G. K. (1993). 100 statistical tests. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlemann, S., & Leiser, M. S. (2018). Hiring costs and labor market tightness. Labour Economics, 52, 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, D. T. (1986). Job search and labor market analysis. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. II, pp. 849–919). North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D. (2019). The econometrics and economics of the employment effects of minimum wages: Getting from known unknown to known knowns. German Economic Review, 20(3), 293–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D., & Shirley, P. (2022). Myth or measurement: What does the new minimum wage research say about minimum wages and job loss in the United States. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society61(4), 384–417. (https://www.nber.org/papers/w28388). Cambridge: MA.

  • New York State Department of Labor. (2017). Minimum wage order for the building service industry. (12NYCRR141). https://www.ny.gov/new-york-states-minimum-wage/new-york-states-minimum-wage. Accessed April 11, 2022.

  • New York State Department of Labor, Division of Research and Statistics. (2022). https://dol.ny.gov/new-york-state-data-center. Excel Table C-10 (unemployment insurance data). https://www.ny.gov/new-york-states-minimum-wage/new-york-states-minimum-wage. Accessed or received February 6, 2022.

  • Phelps, E. S. (1968). Money-wage dynamics and labor-market equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy, 76(4), 678–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrongolo, B., & Pissarides, C. A. (2001). Looking into the Black Box: A survey of the Matching Function. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIX (June), 390 – 431.

  • Pissarides, C. A. (2000). Equilibrium unemployment theory. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census. (2022). American community survey (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data.html). (2019 five year estimate, NY Counties, Table B28007). Accessed April 3, 2022.

Download references

Funding

The author has received no funding towards the preparation of this research, and is the sole author. This paper has not been submitted elsewhere for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald F. Vitaliano.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vitaliano, D.F. The Minimum Wage and Natural Rate of Unemployment. Atl Econ J 51, 189–202 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-023-09780-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-023-09780-x

Keywords

JEL

Navigation