Skip to main content
Log in

What really matters: prioritizing youth mental health in an age of growing uncertainty

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 December 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

The data on youth mental health show an alarming decline for several decades. Uncertainties generated by existential threats such as climate change, pandemics, and geopolitical and military conflicts as well as the rapid social and economic disruptions wrought by the digital revolution have contributed to this decline. Students seeking mental health services have overwhelmed the capacities of educational institutions to serve them. Globally, youth suicide rates have continued to rise. Currently, much of the attention of the public and media is focused on the learning loss that occurred during the pandemic. The crisis in youth mental health deserves at least as much, if not more, attention. Yet, school systems in many countries appear to be returning to the status quo ante, reverting to the neoliberal policies that have played a major role in increasing the pressures and stress that many students report feeling. Required to pursue a standardized curriculum and facing high-stakes tests, students typically have few opportunities to explore and discover their interests and talents that could lead to understanding themselves as efficacious individuals capable of impacting an uncertain world. We could relieve some of the pressure with greater personalization and by replacing high-stakes assessments with approaches to evaluating learning that focus on students’ ability to apply knowledge and enable them to assess their own understanding. Such approaches can help improve their self-efficacy, self-image, confidence, and sense of control over their circumstances, thereby mitigating their sense of uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. For our purposes, we are adopting Harvey’s (2005) definition of neoliberalism as a “theory of economic practices that proposes that human-well-being can best be advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterized by strong private property right, free markets, and free trade.”

  2. Black and Wiliam (1998) found effect sizes of 0.4 to 0.7 for students whose teachers taught them how to assess their own understanding. Black and Wiliam (2018) also claim that enabling students to provide and receive feedback collaboratively improves their learning. Such conversations and collaborative inquiry with teachers serving, judiciously, as observers and resources generates information about student learning for both teachers and students.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Williamson McDiarmid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Missing ethics declaration is included.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McDiarmid, G.W. What really matters: prioritizing youth mental health in an age of growing uncertainty. Educ Res Policy Prac (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09359-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09359-y

Keywords

Navigation