Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of Cultivars and Productivity Improvement Practices in White Mustard

  • PLANT BREEDING, PLANT PROTECTION, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

The goal of the research was to study the effect of presowing and foliar treatment with microelement fertilizers on the productivity of white mustard and to comparatively assess its varieties (cultivars) in the conditions of the forest-steppe of the Middle Volga region. Experimental work was carried out on the experimental field of the Penza Research Institute of Agriculture in 2020–2022. The first experiment investigated nine varieties of white mustard of various breeding included in the State Register of Breeding Achievements. Efficiency of treatment of white mustard seeds and plants at the vegetative phase with microfertilizers at a rate of 1 L/t and 1 L/ha, respectively, were studied in the second and third experiments. The experimental design provided for eight microelement formulations, specifically, Gumat +7, Agroverm, Izagri Vita, Megamiks, Zircon, Tsitovit, BlekDzhek, and Izagri Force as well as a variant without fertilization. On average over 3 years, the productivity of mustard seeds varied within 1.32–1.61 t/ha depending on the variety. The highest yield in the experiment was recorded from the varieties Lyutsiya (1.57 t/ha) and Svetlanka (1.61 t/ha), which exceeded the average value for the experiment by 0.10–0.14 t/ha. The maximum oil content in the experiment was noted in the varieties Lyutsiya and Omega (30.02 and 30.48%); the content was the lowest in the varieties Passion and Bracco (25.05 and 26.24%, respectively). At the same time, all varieties exhibited a high level of agronomic stability indicator (78.33–85.82%), which characterizes their value for production. An upward trend was observed in the mustard productivity as a result of the use of microfertilizers. In foliar feeding of the mustard plants, Izagri Vita and Agroverm proved to be the most efficient fertilizers, which contributed to formation of high yields of 1.69 and 1.67 t/ha, respectively. The maximum oil content in the experiment (29.72 and 29.7%) was recorded from the seeds of the plants treated with BlekDzhek and Isagri Force formulations. Presowing treatment of seeds with microelement fertilizers promoted oil accumulation in the seeds up to 27.75–29.46% compared to 27.87% in the control. Variants with seed treatment with Izagri Vita and BlekDzhek formulations demonstrated the highest yield in the experiment (1.71 and 1.72 t/ha), which exceeded the control by 0.17–0.18 t/ha. Additionally, the studied formulations had an effect on fatty acid composition, in that their concentration decreased or increased. Foliar feeding with Tsitovit promoted an increase in the concentration of erucic acid up to 30.1%, whereas presowing treatment of seeds with this formulation reduced its concentration to 25.3%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Kartamysheva, E.V., Luchkina, T.N., and Zbrailova, L.P., Ecological plasticity and stability of Sareptana mustard varieties of VNIIMK selection in the insufficient moisture conditions of the Rostov region, Tr. Kuban. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2019, no. 80, pp. 139–144.

  2. Prakhova, T.Ya. and Prakhov, V.A., Evaluation of varieties mustard of Sarepta in the conditions of forest-steppe Middle Volga region, Tr. Kuban. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2020, no. 85, pp. 203–208.

  3. Vinogradov, D.V., Mazhaiskii, Yu.A., Novikova, A.V., et al., Productivity of flax varieties of varieties depending on the seeding time in the Non-Black-Zone of Russia, Ross. S-kh. Nauka, 2021, no. 1, pp. 17–20.

  4. Prakhova, T.Ya., Kshnikatkina, A.N., Prakhov, V.A., et al., Influence of growth stimulants and microfertilizers on the productivity of Crambe abyssinica, Agrar. Nauchn. Zh., 2020, no. 6, pp. 34–37.

  5. Naumtseva, K.V., Non-root top dressing in agrocenoses of white mustard in the conditions of the Non-Chernozem Zone of Russia, Vestn. Ryazan. Gos. Agrotekhnol. Univ. im. P. A. Kostycheva, 2021, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 62–67.

  6. Kiryushin, V.I., Scientific and innovative support of priorities of agricultural development, Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, 2019, no. 3, pp. 5–10.

  7. Vinogradov, D.V., Naumtseva, K.V., and Lupova, E.I., Use of biological fertilizers in white mustard crops in the non-Chernozem zone of Russia, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2019, vol. 341, p. 012204. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337288206. Cited March 13, 2023.

  8. Donskaya, M.V., Velkova, N.I., and Naumkin, V.P., Leguminous crops (lathyrus, vetch, pea) in mixed plantings with white mustard, Zemledelie, 2019, no. 4, pp. 25–28.

  9. Rostova, E.N., The effect of technology elements on weediness and productivity of brown mustard (Brassica juncea) sowings, Zernovoe Khoz. Ross., 2021, vol. 3, no. 75, pp. 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhirnykh, S.S., White and sarept mustard seed productivity in the Udmurt republic, Vestn. Krasnoyarsk. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2021, vol. 12, no. 177, pp. 17–24.

  11. Yesilyurt, M.K., Arslan, M., and Eryilmaz, T., Application of response surface methodology for the optimization of biodiesel production from yellow mustard (Sinapis alba L.) seed oil, Int. J. Green Energy, 2019, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toigil'din, A.L., Podsevalov, M.I., and Ostin, V.N., Prospects for usage of oil crops in crop rotations of the forest-steppe zone of the Volga region, Vestn. Ul’yanovsk. Gos. S-kh. Akad., 2021, vol. 2, no. 54, pp. 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Metodika provedeniya polevykh i agrotekhnicheskikh opytov s maslichnymi kul’turami (Method of Field Agricultural Experiments with Oil Crops), Krasnodar: Vseross. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Maslichn. Kul’t., 2010.

  14. Nettevich, E.D., Yield potential of spring wheat and barley varieties recommended for cultivation in the Central region of the Russian Federation and its implementation under production conditions, Dokl. Ross. Akad. S-kh. Nauk, 2001, no. 3, pp. 50–55.

  15. Kil'chevskii, A.V. and Khotyleva, L.V., Ekologicheskaya selektsiya rastenii (Ecological Plant Breeding), Minsk: Tekhnalogiya, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of the State Assignment to FGBNU Federal Scientific Center of Bast-Fiber Crops, topic no. FGSS‑2022–0008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T. Ya. Prakhova or N. R. Taishev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by E. Kuznetsova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prakhova, T.Y., Taishev, N.R. Characteristics of Cultivars and Productivity Improvement Practices in White Mustard. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 49, 355–360 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367423040122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367423040122

Keywords:

Navigation