Abstract
Motivated by the recent experimental realization of minimal Kitaev chains using quantum dots, we investigate the Majorana zero modes (MZM) in Y-shape Kitaev wires. We solve the associated Kitaev models analytically at the sweet spot (thβ=βΞ) and derive the exact form of MZM wave-functions in this geometry. We observed exotic multi-site MZMs located near the junction center, on the nearby edge sites of each leg. This result is important for potential braiding of Majoranas and the performance of Y-junctions made from arrays of quantum dots. Furthermore, we study the stability of local (single-site) and multi-site MZMs modes in the presence of Coulomb repulsion, using density matrix renormalization group theory. Our local density-of-states calculation shows that these multi-site MZMs are as equally topologically protected as the single-site MZMs when in the presence of Coulomb repulsion or when away from the sweet-spot.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Majorana zero modes (MZMs) are charge-neutral non-Abelian quasiparticles1,2. They have attracted much interest because of their potential application in fault-tolerant topological quantum computing2,3,4,5. The occurrence of zero-bias peaks in tunneling spectroscopy is one of the experimental signatures of MZMs6. A promising platform to realize MZMs are semiconductor nanowires proximitized to superconductors7, and magnet-superconductor hybrid systems8,9,10,11, where MZMs are expected to develop at both ends of the wire. However, in these materials the so-called βsweet spotβ in couplings, where Kitaev theory is primarily developed, is difficult to reach. Recently, the realization of MZMs was also proposed in quantum-dot-superconductor linear arrays12,13,14. These quantum-dots systems15,16,17,18,19,20 are expected to reduce the problem of random-disorder potential, as compared to the proximitized semiconductor nanowires where the effect of disorder is strong12 and may create false signals of MZMs in tunneling spectra21. Interestingly, the experimental realization of a minimal Kitaev chain has been demonstrated using two quantum dots coupled through a short superconducting-semiconductor hybrid (InSb nanowire)22. Remarkably, in this experiment22, two localized MZMs were observed in tunneling conductance measurements at the sweet spot thβ=βΞ. Very recently the experimental realization of a three-site Kitaev chain geometry in a quantum-dot system has been reported23, opening the doors towards the realization of longer Kitaev chains using many coupled quantum dots.
In topological quantum computation, it is required to move and perform braiding operations of the MZMs24,25. A strict 1D geometry is not sufficient to perform such braiding operations, because in 1D the MZMs can fuse during their exchange process26,27. To realize non-Abelian statistics (or braiding), T and Y-shaped wires geometry have been proposed24,28,29,30,31,32. It has been shown that the MZMs in T-shape nanowires can be transformed under exchange, similarly to 2D pβ+βip superconducting systems, displaying non-Abelian statistics24. Braiding-based gates with MZMs using quantum dot arrays were recently proposed32.
This paper focuses on finding MZM modes near the junction of interacting Y-shaped quantum dots near the sweet-spot (th=Ξ), important for braiding and for demonstrating the non-Abelian statistics of MZMs. However, in the context of proximity-induced semiconductor nanowires (in the limit of Ξββͺβth), there are only a few studies related to ground states of T-shaped or Y-shaped wires33,34,35. The sub-gap properties of a three-terminal Josephson junction (composed of effective spinless p-wave superconductors), joined into a T-shaped normal-metallic region, has been studied using the scattering matrix approach in the non-interacting limit34. They found that depending upon the superconducting phase of each arm, the Majorana zero mode extended into the metallic region of either all three legs or two legs of the T-shape wire. In Ref. 36 the existence of a zero-energy parafermionic mode was proposed in multi-legged star junctions of quantum Hall states. However, in these studies the precise form of the Majorana wave functions and the effect of Coulomb interactions were not addressed33,34. The repulsive Coulomb interaction is expected to suppress the pairing-induced bulk-gap and can affect the stability of Majorana modes13,37.
Motivated by the above described recent progress in the realization of minimal Kitaev chains using quantum dots22,23, we study the Majorana zero modes in Y-shaped interacting Kitaev wires. We address the exact form of Majorana wavefunctions near the junction and its dependency on the superconducting phases at each wire. Assuming each arm of the Y-shape wire can take different values for the superconducting (SC) phase (see Fig. 1a), we solve exactly the Kitaev model for Y-shapes wires working at the sweet spot thβ=βΞ. Remarkably, in terms of Majorana operators, we are able to write four independent commuting Hamiltonians, consisting of the three arms (I,βII,βIII) and one central region (IV), as shown in Fig. 1b. This allow us to diagonalize the full system independently for each region and solve exactly at the sweet spot. We find the expected three single-site localized MZMs on the edge sites of the Y-shape wire. Surprisingly, depending on the SC phase values, we also find exotic multi-site MZMs near the central region, not bounded to be on only one site as in the Kitaev model38. Instead they are located on two or three edge sites of the different legs of the Y-shape wire. Note that this is conceptually totally different from the standard exponential decay of the Majorana wave function away from the sweet spot or under non-ideal conditions. The multi-site nature of the MZMs unveiled here is an intrinsic, previously unknown, property of the Y-geometry system at the sweet spot.
Furthermore, we perform much needed unbiased simulations of the Majorana zero modes in Y-shaped interacting Kitaev wires, using density matrix renormalization group (DMRG)39,40. In the non-interacting limit, we find peaks in the site-dependent local density-of-states (LDOS) at the exact locations predicted by our analytical calculations. In order to compare the stability of single-site vs. multi-site MZMs, we examine the electron and hole components of the LDOS separately41,42, against the increase in repulsive Coulomb interactions. Interestingly, the LDOS(Ο,βj) calculations indicate the multi-site MZMs are as equally stable as the single-site MZMs residing at the ends of the Y-shaped wire.
The Hamiltonian for the Y-shaped Kitaev model, with superconducting phases Ο1, Ο2, and Ο3 at each arm, can be divided into four different parts. The Hamiltonian for each leg can be written as:
Moreover, the Hamiltonian for the central site lβ+β1 joining each leg edge site can be written as:
Results
Description of analytical method
We noticed that the Y-shape Kitaev model can be solved analytically at the sweet spot thβ=βΞ and Vβ=β0, and we will focus on three different sets of superconducting phases: (i) Ο1β=βΟ, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0, (ii) Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0, and (iii) Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=βΟ/2. First, we divide the system Hamiltonian into four different parts in terms of spinless fermionic operators. Then, we rewrite the system Hamiltonian in terms of Majorana operators, using the transformation \({c}_{j}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i\frac{{\phi }_{k}}{2}}\left({\gamma }_{j}^{A}+i{\gamma }_{j}^{B}\right)\)1, where k refers to each of the legs. In terms of the Majorana operators, remarkably the system can be written as four independent commuting Hamiltonians: (1) the three independent 1D wires (I,βII,βIII) (see Fig. 1b) and (2) the central region (IV), consisting only of five Majorana operators (two from the central site and three from the near edge sites of each leg), as shown in Fig. 1b. As already expressed, this procedure allows us to solve the Y-shape Kitaev model exactly at the sweet spot thβ=βΞ and Vβ=β0, for any values of the SC phases of each arm (for the exact solution of 1D Kitaev chain with Ο-junction, see Supplementary Note II). For all three cases of SC phases discussed above, we find there is one Majorana zero mode at the outer edge (single-site) of each arm (purple color in Fig. 1b), as expected intuitively. Our main finding is that depending on the phase values of each arm, in addition to the above mentioned outer edge MZMs, we find at the central region either (i) only one multi-site MZM (Ο) or (ii) two multi-site MZMs (Ο) accompanied with one single-site MZM (Ξ³). These multi-site MZMs (Ο) are located at the edge sites (near the central region) of each arm in the crucial limit of th=Ξ that allows for the analytic solution. These exotic multi-site MZMs could be realized in quantum dot experiments, by changing the phases of each arm in a Y-shape geometry of quantum dots arrays.
In terms of Majorana operators, the Hamiltonian of each leg is independent of the SC phases (Ο1,βΟ2,βΟ3). Using the transformations \({c}_{j}^{I}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i{\phi }_{1}/2}\left({\gamma }_{A,j}^{I}+i{\gamma }_{B,j}^{I}\right)\), \({c}_{j}^{II}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i{\phi }_{2}/2}\left({\gamma }_{A,j}^{II}+i{\gamma }_{B,j}^{II}\right)\) and \({c}_{j}^{III}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i{\phi }_{3}/2}\left({\gamma }_{A,j}^{III}+i{\gamma }_{B,j}^{III}\right)\), the Hamiltonian for the three legs HI,βHII and HIII can be written in terms of Majorana operators as:
where we have used the sweet-spot property thβ=βΞ. In these equations, the Majorana operators \({\gamma }_{A,1}^{I}\), \({\gamma }_{B,2l+1}^{II}\), and \({\gamma }_{B,3l+1}^{III}\) are absent24, and commute with these Hamiltonians, which indicates the presence of three single-site MZMs at the edge sites of the Y-shape Kitaev wire (see Fig. 1b), similarly as in the original Kitaev chain exact solution. For the central region, the Hamiltonian HIV depends upon the SC phases. To illustrate the physics unveiled here, we solve HIV for three different cases, in order to understand the nature of the central MZMs.
The case Ο 1β=βΟ, Ο 2β=β0, and Ο 3β=β0
To explain the exact solution of Majorana wave functions in Y-shape geometries, we start with phase values Ο1β=βΟ, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0 on arms I,βII,βand III, respectively. For these phase values, the pairing term at each arm preserves the rotational symmetry of the system, as under 120Β° rotation around the central sites lβ+β1, the system Hamiltonian remains invariant due to the Ο phase in arm I (see Supplementary Note I, for more detail)43,44.
For the central sites, using the relations \({c}_{l}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i{\phi }_{1}/2}\left({\gamma }_{A,l}^{I}+i{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}\right)\), \({c}_{l+1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left({\gamma }_{A,l+1}^{IV}+i{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\right)\), \({c}_{l+2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i{\phi }_{2}/2}\left({\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}+i{\gamma }_{B,l+2}^{II}\right)\), and \({c}_{2l+2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{e}^{-i{\phi }_{3}/2}\left({\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}+i{\gamma }_{B,2l+2}^{III}\right)\), the sector HIV (with Ο1β=βΟ, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0) can be transformed in terms of Majorana operators as:
Note that in Eq. (8) the Majorana operator \({\gamma }_{A,l+1}^{IV}\) at the central site lβ+β1 is absent, signaling the presence of a single-site MZM at site jβ=β16 (for a Lβ=β46 sites system). Next, we write Eq. (8) in terms of a 4βΓβ4 matrix in the basis of \(\left({\gamma }_{B,l}^{I},{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II},{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III},{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\right)\) and obtained four eigenvalues (\(-\sqrt{3},\sqrt{3},0,0\)). The last two eigenvalues (e3, e4) are zero denoting MZMs, and the associated eigenvectors \({\chi }_{3}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}\) and \({\chi }_{4}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}+\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}\) emerge, with properties \({{\chi }^{{\dagger} }}_{3}={\chi }_{3}^{{\dagger} }\) and \({{\chi }^{{\dagger} }}_{4}={\chi }_{4}^{{\dagger} }\). In addition, Ο3 and Ο4 also commute with HIV, and its amplitude splits into multiple sites (i.e. not bounded at only one site); these properties confirm the presence of two multi-site MZMs in the central region. The MZM Ο3 is located on two sites jβ=β15 and jβ=β32 with equal amplitude, whereas the MZM Ο4 is distributed on three sites jβ=β15,β17 and 32 with different amplitudes (see Fig. 2a). Note that this is unrelated to exponential decaying wave functions, as it occurs away from the sweet spot. There is no βtailβ in these multi-site wave functions but instead the core is fully spread into a relatively small number of sites. The diagonalized Hamiltonian for the central site can be written as
where \({\chi }_{2}=\frac{i}{\sqrt{6}}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}+\frac{i}{\sqrt{6}}{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}+\frac{i}{\sqrt{6}}{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\) is an ordinary fermion.
The other remaining Hamiltonians for each arm can be diagonalized using fermionic operators \({d}_{k,j}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left({\gamma }_{B,j}^{k}+i{\gamma }_{A,j+1}^{k}\right)\), where kβ=βI,βII, or III. The diagonalized Hamiltonian HI, HII, and HIII are:
In conclusion, our analytical calculations predict a total of six MZMs, a surprisingly large number, for the case of Ο1β=βΟ, Ο2β=β0 and Ο3β=β0. These six MZMs lead to eight fold-degeneracy in the ground state of the system, after including the result of Majorana fusion4, which we also find is fully consistent with our numerical Lanczos calculations (see Supplementary Note III, for more details).
Next, we analyze the stability of MZMs in the presence of a nearest-neighbor interaction HIβ=βVnjnj+1, where nj is the electronic density at site j. We calculate the LDOS, using DMRG for a Y-shaped geometry with system size Lβ=β46. As shown in Fig. 2a, the site dependent LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) shows sharp peaks for the edge sites jβ=β1, 31, and 46, indicating three single-site localized MZMs at each edge of the arms. At the central site lβ+β1, there is a sharp peak with same height as for the edge sites, showing the presence of a single-site MZM Ξ³4 at site jβ=β16, as already discussed. Interestingly, there are three other peaks in that LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) on sites jβ=β15,β17,βand 32. From the expressions of Ο3 and Ο4 presented in the previous page, it can be deduced that the height should be exactly 2/3 for sites jβ=β15,β17,βand 32 as compared to the edge sites. These three peaks signal the presence of two multi-site MZMs, distributed over three central sites (jβ=β15,β17, and 32).
Increasing the interaction strength to Vβ=β2, the Majoranas are no longer strictly localized at a single site j. Now the MZMs are decaying over a few more sites and consequently the peak height of the LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) decreases (Fig. 2a). This shows that the Majorana zero modes are topologically protected against moderate values of the Coulomb interaction.
To compare the topological protection against V, for single-site and multi-site MZMs, we calculate the electron and hole parts of LDOS(Ο,βj), separately for the edge and central sites (right panel of Fig. 2). In Figs. 2b, c, we show the electron and hole part of LDOS(Ο,βj) for the central site jβ=β16. With increasing V, the peak height of the electron and hole portions of the LDOS(Ο) at Οβ=β0 decrease to the same values, showing the preservation of its MZM nature (Ξ³β=βΞ³β )41. Due to the rotational symmetry of the system, sites near the center jβ=β15,β17, and 32 are equivalent and they behave very similarly increasing V. In Figs. 1d, e, we show the electron and hole parts of LDOS(Ο,βj) for site jβ=β17. As discussed previously, the two multi-site MZMs Ο3 and Ο4 are distributed on sites (jβ=β15 and 32) and (jβ=β15,β17, and 32), with total amplitude 2/3 on each site (jβ=β15,β17, and 32), which leads to a spectral weight 2/3 (compared to the single-site MZMs with weight 1) in the LDOS(Ο,βj) for site jβ=β17 (also for jβ=β15 and 32 at Vβ=β0). Figure 2f, g shows the electron and hole part of LDOS(Ο,βj) for the edge site jβ=β31 with increasing V (note: sites jβ=β1 and 46 are equivalent). The rate of decrease in peak height in electron and hole part of LDOS(Ο,βj), for multi-site MZMs at site jβ=β17 and single-site MZM at edge site jβ=β31 are almost identical when increasing V (in the range Vβ€2). The LDOS(Ο,βj) of the local MZM at the central site jβ=β16 decreases with a slightly faster rate because it develops a finite overlap with Ο3 and Ο4, with increasing V.
The case Ο 1β=β0, Ο 2β=β0, and Ο 3β=β0
Let us consider now the same Y-shape geometry but with the same phase Οβ=β0 on each arm. Surprisingly, for the Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0 case, the pairing term in the Hamiltonian breaks rotational symmetry, as after a 120Β° anti-clockwise rotation around the central sites lβ+β1, the pairing term in leg I changes its sign (becomes negative due fermionic anticommutations) (see also Supplementary Note I, for details). Arms II and III have reflection symmetry around the central site lβ+β1. Using the same transformations as previously discussed, the HI, HII and HIII of each arm in terms of Majorana operators can be written in similar form as described using Eqs. (5), (6), (7). Again, in these equations, the Majorana operators \({\gamma }_{A,1}^{I}\), \({\gamma }_{B,2l+1}^{II}\), and \({\gamma }_{B,3l+1}^{III}\) are absent, indicating the presence of three edge single-site MZMs at sites jβ=β1,β31, and 46 of a Y-junction with a total of 46 sites. The Hamiltonian for the central region HIV can be transformed as:
In the above equation, HIV has a reflection symmetry \(\left[{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}\leftrightarrow {\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}\right]\). Thus, defining the operators
the Hamiltonian HIV further simplifies as
In Eq. (14) the operator R2 is absent and has the properties \({{R}_{2}}={R}_{2}^{\,{\dagger} }\), and [HIV,βR2]β=β0, indicating R2 is a Majorana zero mode. The Majorana zero mode \({R}_{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left({\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}-{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}\right)\) is equally distributed on sites 17 (II leg) and 32 (III leg) (see Fig. 3a), showing that R2 is indeed a multi-site MZM. Next, we write Eq. (14) in terms of a 4βΓβ4 matrix in the basis of \(\left[{\gamma }_{A,l+1}^{IV},{R}_{1},{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV},{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}\right]\) and obtain four eigenvalues (\(-\sqrt{2},\sqrt{2},-1,1\)). The central region diagonal Hamiltonian can be written in terms of ordinary fermions Ο2 and Ο4 as
with \({\chi }_{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(i{R}_{1}+{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\right)\) and \({\chi }_{4}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(i{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}+{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}\right)\) (see Supplementary Note IV, for more detail). The diagonalized Hamiltonian HI, HII, and HIII takes similar form as Eqs. (10), (11), (12), in terms of the ordinary dk,j fermionic operators. In summary, our analytical calculation finds a total of four MZMs (three single-site at the edge sites and one multi-site MZM near the center region). These four MZMs results in fourfold degeneracy in the ground state of the system, which is also consistent with our full-diagonalization numerical results.
Figure 3 shows DMRG results for Lβ=β46 sites at thβ=βΞ and for different values of the Coulomb interaction V. At Vβ=β0, the site dependent LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) shows sharp localized peaks at the edge sites jβ=β1,β31,βand 46, indicating three single-site MZMs on those edge sites, as expected. Near the center, the LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) displays two peaks at sites jβ=β17 and 32, with height 1/2 compared to the edge sites, suggesting the presence of a multi-site MZM. With increase in interaction (Vβ=β2), these MZMs remain exponentially localized over a few sites (Fig. 3a). To compare the stability of single-site and multi-site MZMs, we calculate the electron and hole parts of LDOS(Ο,βj) for different values V. The peak values for LDOSe(Ο) (Fig. 3b, f) and LDOSh(Ο) (Fig. 3c, g) at Οβ=β0, for edge sites jβ=β1 and 31, decrease to the same values with increase in V. This shows that the characteristic features of the single-site MZM remain and the spectral weight of electron and hole part of LDOS(Ο,βj) are equal41, at moderate values of Vβ€2.
Interestingly, the spectral weight of electron and hole of LDOS(Ο) for site jβ=β17, takes value half (compared to the single-site MZMs on edge sites) at Vβ=β0. This is because the multi-site MZM \({R}_{2}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left({\gamma }_{A,17}^{II}-{\gamma }_{A,32}^{III}\right)\) is equally distributed at sites jβ=β17 and 32. Increasing the repulsion strength V, the peak values of LDOSe(Ο) (Fig. 3d) and LDOSh(Ο) (Fig. 3e) are reduced (but still take the same values). The rate of decrease in peak height for single- and multi-site MZMs are almost the same, which suggests these Majorana modes are equally topologically protected against V.
Figure 4 shows the numerical Bogoliuvov-de Gennes (BdG)1,2 results for Lβ=β46 sites at Vβ=β0 and for different values of the pairing amplitude Ξ, to analyze what occurs away from the sweet spot. At Ξβ=βthβ=β1, the three edge MZMs are single-site localized on one end site of each leg, and do not decay exponentially, whereas the only multi-site MZM (R2), is localized at sites jβ=β17 and 32 (with equal peak height in LDOS(Ο,βj)). At Ξ/thβ=β0.6 the four MZMs are quite stable and exponentially decay to a few sites. On the other hand, for even smaller values of Ξ/th, such as 0.2, the edge sites MZMs decay exponentially over many sites45. Note that the multi-site Majorana also decays exponentially over many sites of arms II and III. For that reason, for Ξβ=β0.2, the multi-site Majorana (R2) overlaps with the edge MZMs (Ξ³2 and Ξ³2) on arms II and III (see Fig 4). The overlap of central MZM to edge MZMs could give rise to interesting features in electron transport experiments35.
The case Ο 1β=β0, Ο 2β=β0, and Ο 3β=βΟ/2
Finally, we consider the Y-shape Kitaev wires with phases Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=βΟ/2. This limit is also equivalent to two perpendicular Kitaev chains with phase difference of Ο/2 (T-shape wire)24,46. The Hamiltonian for three legs HI,βHII, and HIII takes the same form as Eqs. (5), (6), (7), in terms of Majorana operators. As expected, in these equations the Majorana operators \({\gamma }_{A,l}^{I}\), \({\gamma }_{B,2l+1}^{II}\), and \({\gamma }_{B,3l+1}^{III}\) are absent, indicating the presence of three single-site MZMs at the edge sites of the Y-shape Kitaev wire (see Fig. 5). The central region, HIV, in terms of Majorana operators becomes:
Equation (16) can be written as a 5βΓβ5 matrix in the basis \(\left[{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II},{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III},{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I},{\gamma }_{A,l+1}^{IV},{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\right]\). After diagonalizing HIV, we obtained five eigenvalues \(\left(-\sqrt{2},\sqrt{2},-1,1,0\right)\) (see Supplementary Note V, for more details). The last eigenvalue e5β=β0 and its eigenvector \({\chi }_{5}=-\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}+\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}\) has the property \({{\chi }_{5}}={\chi }_{5}^{\,{\dagger} }\), and \([{H}^{IV},{\chi }_{5}^{}]=0\), confirming the presence of a spread MZM near the junction. The MZM Ο5 is distributed on three sites jβ=β15, 17, and 32, showing the multi-site nature of Ο5 (see Fig. 5). The central region HIV can be written in a diagonal form as:
where \({\chi }_{2}=\frac{i}{2\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}+\frac{i}{2}{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}-\frac{i}{2\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}+\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{A,l+1}^{IV}+\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\) and \({\chi }_{4}=\frac{i}{2}{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}+\frac{i}{2}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}-\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{A,l+1}^{IV}+\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{B,l+1}^{IV}\). Note that the diagonalized system Hamiltonian, in case of the SC phase (Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=βΟ/2) and (Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0) take a similar form (see Eqs. (15) and (17)), which lead to the same energy spectrum for both cases, although the multi-site Majoranas wavefunctions are quite different for these two cases. The remaining Hamiltonians HI, HII, and HIII, after diagonalizing in terms of the ordinary dk,j fermionic operators, take similar forms as Eqs. (10), (11), (12)). In conclusion, our analytical calculations find a total of 4 MZMs. The three single-site MZMs are located at edge sites in their natural positions, while a multi-site MZM Ο5 is situated near the central region. These four MZMs results in fourfold degeneracy in the ground state of the system.
In Fig. 5, we present the DMRG calculations with Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=βΟ/2 for different values of V using a system size Lβ=β46. Similarly to the previous cases, the LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) shows sharp peaks for the edge sites jβ=β1,β31,βand 46, indicating three single-site localized edge MZMs. Interestingly, near the center the LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) shows three peaks with heights 1/4, 1/4, and 1/2 (compared to the edge sites) at sites jβ=β15,β17,βand 32, respectively. These peaks in the LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) indicate the presence of a multi-site MZM near the central site. The peak height can be explained by the special form of the multi-site MZM wavefunction \({\chi }_{5}=-\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{A,l+2}^{II}+\frac{1}{2}{\gamma }_{B,l}^{I}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}{\gamma }_{A,2l+2}^{III}\), showing that Ο5 is distributed on sites jβ=β15,β17,βand 32 with amplitudes exactly 1/4, 1/4, and 1/2, respectively. Increasing the repulsion V, the peak height of LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) decreases for different sites and these MZMs become exponentially localized over a few sites (Fig. 5). We find that the peak height of the electron and hole portions of LDOS(Οβ=β0,βj) take the same values even for Vβ=β2, indicating the MZMs are quite stable against repulsive interaction for Vβ€2.
Discussion
In this publication, we studied the Y-shaped interacting Kitaev chains using analytical and DMRG methods for different superconducting phases at each arm. The Y-shape quantum wires are potentially important to perform braiding experiments in topological quantum computations. We predict the unexpected presence of multi-site Majorana zero modes, in coexistence with the standard single-site Majoranas of the Kitaev model. Based on our analytical and DMRG results: (i) For Ο1β=βΟ, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0, we predict a total of six MZMs, a large number. There are three single-site MZMs on each edge sites, one single-site MZM at the central site, and also there are two multi-site MZMs near the central region, which results in three peaks at sites l (arm I), lβ+β1 (arm II), and 2lβ+β2 (arm III), with heights 2/3 (as compared to the edge sites with height 1), in the site-dependent LDOS calculations. (ii) For Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=β0, we find a total of four MZMs, three single-site localized at the edge sites and one multi-site MZM near the central site. The latter is equally distributed at sites lβ+β2 (arm II) and 2lβ+β2 (arm III), leading to two peaks with height 1/2 (compared to the edge sites) as unveiled by the site-dependent LDOS. (iii) For Ο1β=β0, Ο2β=β0, and Ο3β=βΟ/2, we find a total of four MZMs as well: three single-site localized at the edge sites and one multi-site MZM near the center. This multi-site MZM is distributed on sites l (arm I), lβ+β2 (arm II), and 2lβ+β2 (arm III), leading to three peaks with heights 1/4, 1/4, and 1/2 in the LDOS calculation.
Our work is motivated by recent progress on quantum dot experiments, where the MZM modes appears at the sweet spot thβ=βΞ. Consequently, working in this idealized limit is no longer an abstract idea addressed by theory but it has an associated reality in actual experiments. In this limit for the one-dimensional quantum-dots chain, the edge sites MZMs are fully localized at one site, to be compared to the semiconducting nanowires where Ξββͺβth, and the MZMs decay over many sites. For this reason, the Y-shape array of quantum-dots can provide the opportunity to perform braiding experiments using only a few sites, compared to the semiconducting nanowires that need a larger system. As expressed before, we found the surprising result that some MZMs are multi-site near the junction of the Y geometry. This is not the canonical exponential decay when away from the sweet spot or when adding correlations, but the MZM is spread over a small number of sites as in a βboxβ with sharp boundaries. We found the exotic result that some sites contain 1/2 of a Majorana, some 1/4 of a Majorana, and others 2/3 of a Majorana. This conclusion is in agreement with exact analytical results at the sweet spot and confirmed numerically.
The knowledge of the multi-site Majorana wave-function shape is essential when we exchange the MZMs near the junction in such quantum dot systems. Braiding requires that the Majorana wave functions do not overlap. Near the central region of Y-shape quantum wire, the junction can be also made by three dots mutually coupled to each other in a triangular geometry47 (instead of three wires coupled to one central quantum dots). Interestingly, we find that the multi-site Majorana modes will still appear near the junction (with different form). Readers are referred to the Supplementary Note VI, for more detail.
Furthermore, we compare the stability of single- and multi-site MZMs against the repulsive interaction V, by calculating the electron and hole part of LDOS(Ο,βj) separately. Our DMRG results shows the single-site edge MZMs and multi-site MZMs are equally stable, as the peak values of LDOS(Ο,βj) reduce with similar rate, for moderate values of repulsive interaction. We also checked the stability of MZMs away from the sweet spot. For Ξ/th not too different from 1, the MZMs are quite stable and almost localized on the same sites as in the sweet spot. For the smaller values of Ξ, as in semiconducting nanowires, the central MZMs decays exponentially at each center over many sites and overlap with the exponentially decaying edge MZMs.
We believe that our finding of multi-site MZMs, and its stability against the Coulomb repulsion and deviation from sweet-spot, will be useful to build fully functional Y-shape junction made from array of quantum-dots22,23. The multi-site MZMs should be observed in quantum-dots experiments, close to the sweet spots, using just seven quantum dots in a Y-shape geometry in the tunneling-conductance measurements22. In this paper, we primarily focused on finding the physical location of the MZMs in a Y-shape geometry Kitaev chain in the Ξ = th limit realizable in quantum dots. In the near future, it will be also interesting to study MZMs in the X-shaped Kitaev wire, and analyze the effect of disorder and temperature on these systems. A recent study shows the X-shape wire is also quite important for the braiding process in quantum wires48,49.
Methods
DMRG method
In order to solve numerically the Y-shaped Kitaev Hamiltonian and measure observables, we have used the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method50,51 with DMRG++39. We performed our DMRG calculations within the two-site DMRG approach, for a system size Lβ=β46 sites and employing mβ=β1500 states, with truncation error β€10β10.
Local density-of-states
We have calculated the local density-of-states LDOS(Ο,βj) as a function of frequency Ο and site j, via the Krylov-space correction vector DMRG; for a technical review see40. The electron part of the LDOS(Ο,βj) is41:
and the hole part of LDOS(Ο,βj) is41:
where ci is the fermionic annihilation operator while \({c}_{j}^{{\dagger} }\) is the creation operator, and Eg is the ground state energy. We use as broadening parameter Ξ·β=β0.1 as in previous studies26,52. The total local density-of-states is defined as LDOS(Ο,βj)= LDOSe(Ο,βj) + LDOSh(Ο,βj). For the Majorana zero mode, it is expected that the peak values of LDOSe(Ο,βj) and LDOSh(Ο,βj) be at or very close to Οβ=β0.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability
The computer codes used in this study are available at https://g1257.github.io/dmrgPlusPlus/.
References
Kitaev, A. Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
Kitaev, A. Y. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. (NY) 303, 2 (2003).
Sarma, S., Freedman, M. & Nayak, C. Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation. npj Quantum Inf 1, 15001 (2015).
Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M. & Sarma, S. D. Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev Mod Phys 80, 1083 (2008).
Scheurer, M. S. & Shnirman, A. Nonadiabatic processes in Majorana qubit systems. Phys. Rev. B 88, 064515 (2013).
Law, K. T., Lee, P. A. & Ng, T. K. Majorana fermion induced resonant andreev reflection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 237001 (2009).
Lutchyn, R. M., Sau, J. D. & Das Sarma, S. Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010).
Crawford, D. et al. Majorana modes with side features in magnet-superconductor hybrid systems. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 117 (2022).
Wong, K. H. et al. Higher order topological superconductivity in magnet-superconductor hybrid systems. npj Quantum Mater. 8, 31 (2023).
Huang, Z. et al. Dual topological states in the layered titanium-based oxypnictide superconductor BaTi2Sb2O. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 70 (2022).
Mascot, E. et al. Topological superconductivity in skyrmion lattices. npj Quantum Mater. 6, 6 (2021).
Sau, J. & Sarma, S. Realizing a robust practical Majorana chain in a quantum-dot-superconductor linear array. Nat Commun. 3, 964 (2012).
Tsintzis, A., Souto, R. S. & Leijnse, M. Creating and detecting poor manβs Majorana bound states in interacting quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B. 106, L201404 (2022).
Mills, A. R. et al. Shuttling a single charge across a one-dimensional array of silicon quantum dots. Nat Commun. 10, 1063 (2019).
Leijnse, M. & Flensberg, K. Introduction totopological superconductivity and Majorana fermions. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 124003 (2012).
GΓ³rski, G., BaraΕski, J., Weymann, I. & DomaΕski, T. Interplay between correlations and Majorana mode in proximitized quantum dot. Sci Rep. 8, 15717 (2018).
Hofstetter, L., Csonka, S., NygΓ₯rd, J. & SchΓΆnenberger, C. Cooper pair splitter realized in a two-quantum-dot Y-junction. Nature. 461, 960β963 (2009).
Deng, M. T. et al. Majorana bound state in a coupled quantum-dot hybrid-nanowire system. Science 354, 1557β1562 (2016).
Liu, C.-X., Wang, G., Dvir, T. & Wimmer, M. Tunable superconducting coupling of quantum dots via Andreev bound states in semiconductor-superconductor nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267701 (2022).
RanΔiΔ, J. M., Hoffman, S., Schrade, C., Klinovaja, J. & Loss, D. Entangling spins in double quantum dots and Majorana bound states. Phys. Rev. B. 99, 165306 (2019).
Stanescu, T. D., Lutchyn, R. M. & Das, Sarma,S. Majorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires. Phys. Rev. B. 84, 144522 (2011).
Dvir, T. et al. Realization of a minimal Kitaev chain in coupled quantum dots. Nature . 614, 445β450 (2023).
Bordin, A. et al. Crossed Andreev reflection and elastic co-tunneling in a three-site Kitaev chain nanowire device. arXiv . 2306, 07696 (2023).
Alicea, J. et al. Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks. Nature Phys. 7, 412β417 (2011).
Aasen, D. et al. Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing. Phys. Rev. X. 6, 031016 (2016).
Pandey, B., Mohanta, N. & Dagotto, E. Out-of-equilibrium Majorana zero modes in interacting Kitaev chains. Phys. Rev. B. 107, L060304 (2023).
Zhou, T. et al. Fusion of Majorana bound states with mini-gate control in two-dimensional systems. Nat Commun. 13, 1738 (2022).
van Heck, B., Akhmerov, A. R., Hassler, F., Burrello, M. & Beenakker, C. W. J. Coulomb-assisted braiding of majorana fermions in a josephson junction array. New J. Phys. 14, 035019 (2012).
Sekania, M., Plugge, S., Greiter, M., Thomale, R. & Schmitteckert, P. Braiding errors in interacting Majorana quantum wires. Phys. Rev. B. 96, 094307 (2017).
Harper, F., Pushp, A. & Roy, R. Majorana braiding in realistic nanowire Y-junctions and tuning forks. Phys. Rev. Research. 1, 033207 (2019).
Giuliano, D., Nava, A. & Sodano, P. Tunable Kondo screening length at a Y-junction of three in homogeneous spin chains. Nuclear Physics B. 960, 115192 (2020).
Boross, P. & PΓ‘lyi, A., Braiding-based quantum control of a Majorana qubit built from quantum dots. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08464arXiv:2305.08464 (2023).
Zhou, Y. & Wu, M. W. Majorana fermions in T-shaped semiconductor nanostructures. J. Phys. 26, 065801 (2014).
SpΓ₯nslΓ€tt, C. & Ardonne, E. Extended Majorana zero modes in a topological superconducting-normal T-junction. J. Phys. 29, 105602 (2017).
Deb, O., Thakurathi, M. & Sen, D. Transport across a system with three p-wave superconducting wires: effects of Majorana modes and interactions. Eur. Phys. J. B. 89, 19 (2016).
Khanna, U., Goldstein, M. & Gefen, G. Parafermions in a multilegged geometry: Towards a scalable parafermionic network. Phys. Rev. B. 105, L161101 (2022).
Stoudenmire, E. M., Alicea, J., Starykh, O. A. & Fisher, M. P. A. Interaction effects in topological superconducting wires supporting Majorana fermions. Phys. Rev. B. 84, 014503 (2011).
Nagae, U., Schnyder, A. P., Tanaka, Y., Asano, Y. & Ikegaya, S. Multi-locational Majorana Zero Modes. arXiv 2306, 13291 (2023).
Alvarez, G. The density matrix renormalization group for strongly correlated electron systems: A generic implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1572β1578 (2009).
Nocera, A. & Alvarez, G. Spectral functions with the density matrix renormalization group: Krylov-space approach for correction vectors. Phys. Rev. E 94, 053308 (2016).
Herbrych, J., Εroda, M., Alvarez, G. & Dagotto, E. Interaction-induced topological phase transition and Majorana edge states in low-dimensional orbital-selective Mott insulators. Nat Commun. 12, 2955 (2021).
Thomale, R., Rachel, S. & Schmitteckert, P. Phys. Rev. B. 88, 161103(R) (2013).
Dagotto, E., Moreo, A. & Barnes, T. Hubbard model with one hole: Ground-state properties. Phys. Rev. B. 40, 6721 (1989).
Dagotto, E., Fradkin, E. & Moreo, A. SU(2) gauge invariance and order parameters in strongly coupled electronic systems. Phys. Rev. B. 38, 2926(R) (1988).
Boross, P. & PΓ‘lyi, A. Dephasing of Majorana qubits due to quasistatic disorder. Phys. Rev. B. 105, 035413 (2022).
Weithofer, L., Recher, P. & Schmidt, T. L. Electron transport in multiterminal networks of Majorana bound states. Phys. Rev. B. 90, 205416 (2014).
Luna, J. T. D., Kuppuswamy, S. R. & Akhmerov, A. R., Design of a Majorana trijunction. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03299arXiv:2307.03299. (2023).
Fornieri, A. et al. Evidence of topological superconductivity in planar Josephson junctions. Nature 569, 89β92 (2019).
Zhou, T. et al. Phase control of majorana bound states in a topological X junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 137001 (2020).
White, S. R. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992).
SchollwΓΆck, U. The density-matrix renormalization group. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005).
Pandey, B. et al. Prediction of exotic magnetic states in the alkali-metal quasi-one-dimensional iron selenide compound Na2FeSe2. Phys. Rev. B. 102, 035149 (2020).
Acknowledgements
The work of B.P., N.K., and E.D. was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. G. A. was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Quantum Science Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.P. and E.D. designed the project. N.K. and B.P. carried out the analytical calculations for the Y-shaped Kitaev model. B.P performed the numerical DMRG calculations. G.A. developed the DMRG++ computer program. B.P., N.K., and E.D. wrote the manuscript. All co-authors provided useful comments and discussion on the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisherβs note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articleβs Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the articleβs Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, B., Kaushal, N., Alvarez, G. et al. Majorana zero modes in Y-shape interacting Kitaev wires. npj Quantum Mater. 8, 51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-023-00584-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-023-00584-5