Abstract
The steady growth in the scale and dynamics of the use of aerial weapons in the course of various conflicts necessitates the formulation and solution of the problems of building realistic systems to detect them. It should be noted that the priorities in the development of detection sensors is changing from solving problems to improve their characteristics to optimization and adaptability in controlling them. As an object, a heterogeneous grouping of sensors, which solves the problem of detecting a moving airborne object, is considered. The subject is the methodology for constructing control models for heterogeneous detection sensors. Based on the analysis of the antagonistic interaction of a heterogeneous grouping and airborne objects, as well as the processes of their functioning, a geometric approach to solve the problem of detecting a moving object (MO) is proposed, which uses an adapted and improved risk functional as one of the possible indicators for the further synthesis of the control algorithms. The practical effectiveness of the application of this functionality is substantiated and compared with other performance indicators through simulation modeling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. A. Galyaev, E. P. Maslov, and E. Ya. Rubinovich, “On a motion control problem for an object in a conflict environment,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 48 (3), 458–464 (2009).
A. A. Galyaev and E. P. Maslov, “Optimization of the law of moving object evasion from detection under constraints,” Autom. Remote Control (Engl. Transl.) 73 (6), 992–1004 (2012).
T. G. Abramyants, E. P. Maslov, and V. P. Yakhno, “Mobile object evasion from detection by a group of observers,” Autom. Remote Control (Engl. Transl.) 72 (7), 1527–1536 (2011).
M. Zabarankin, S. Uryasev, and P. Pardalos, “Optimal risk path algorithms,” in Cooperative Control and Optimization, Ed. by R. Murphey and P. M. Pardalos (Springer, Boston, Mass., 2002), pp. 273–298.
M. Yu. Petrov, “Low-altitude aircraft routing,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 58 (3), 467–473 (2019).
M. E. Shaikin, “On statistical risk functional in a control problem for an object moving in a conflict environment,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 50 (1), 22–31 (2011).
A. Dogan and Z. Ugur, “Unmanned aerial vehicle dynamic-target pursuit by using probabilistic threat exposure map,” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 29 (4), 944–954 (2006).
A. N. Voronin, Yu. K. Ziatdinov, A. Yu. Permyakov, and I. D. Varlamov, “Synthesis of compromise–optimal trajectories of mobile objects in a conflict medium,” Suchasni Inf. Tekhnol. Sferi Bezpeki Oboroni, No. 1, 40–49 (2015).
G. N. Kumar, S. Dadarya, A. Verandani, A. K. Sarkar, and S. E. Talole, “Cruise missile mission planning using genetic algorithm,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Modern Research in Aerospace Engineering (Noida, NCR, Delhi, 2018), pp. 353–362.
M. Zabarankin, S. Uryasev, and R. Murphey, “Aircraft routing under the risk of detection,” Nav. Res. Logistics 53, 728–747 (2006).
Z. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Dai, and C. He, “A novel real-time penetration path planning algorithm for stealth UAV in 3D complex dynamic environment,” IEEE Access 8, 122757–122771 (2020).
E. Dijkstra, “A note of two problems in connection with graphs,” Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959).
J.-J. Shin and H. Bang, “UAV path planning under dynamic threats using an improved PSO algorithm,” Int. J. Aerospace Eng. 10, 8820284 (2020).
B. Miller, K. Stepanyan, A. Miller, and M. Andreev, “3D path planning in a threat environment,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control and European Control Conf. (Orlando, Fla., 2011), pp. 6864–6869.
G. V. Ezhov, “Path finding algorithms: Comparison and visualization using the Unity engine,” Molodoi Uch., No. 50, 15–24 (2020).
P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, and B. A. Raphael, “Formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. 4 (2), 100–107 (1968).
V. N. Evdokimenkov, M. N. Krasil’shchikov, and N. A. Lyapin, “Guaranteeing UAV trajectory control when approaching a maneuvering air target,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 57 (5), 789–800 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230718050040
V. N. Evdokimenkov, M. N. Krasil’shchikov, and G. G. Sebryakov, “Distributed intelligent control system for a group of unmanned aerial vehicles: Architecture and scientific software,” Sist. Upr. Svyazi Bezop., No. 3, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24411/24109916201910301
Aerospace Defense Officer’s Handbook, Ed. by S. K. Burmistrov (VA VKO, Tver’, 2006) [in Russian].
V. N. Tyapkin, A. N. Fomin, E. N. Garin, et al., Fundamentals of Building Radar Stations for Radio Engineering Troops: A Textbook, Ed. by V. N. Tyapkin (Sib. Fed. Univ., Krasnoyarsk, 2016) [in Russian].
D. G. Pantenkov and N. V. Gusakov, “Computer simulation of an active phased array antenna,” Kosm. Tekh. Tekhnol., No. 1, 34–39 (2013).
https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
K. P. Valavanis and G. J. Vachtsevanos, Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Springer, Dordrecht, 2015).
Funding
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundationn, grant no. 21-19-00481; https://rscf.ru/project/21-19-00481/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyukov, V.A., Kazantsev, A.M., Makushev, I.Y. et al. Optimization of the Risk Functional to Control the Composition and Structure of a Heterogenous Grouping of Detection Sensors in Three-Dimensional Space. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 62, 335–353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230723020077
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230723020077