Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening with Pap Test by Disability Types

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research has found that women with disabilities have often experienced disparities in receipt of cervical cancer screening. However, there is a research gap regarding receipt of cervical cancer screening by types of disability. This study examined the differences in receiving cervical cancer screening through self-reported Pap testing among women by disability type. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2016, 2018, and 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor and Surveillance System (BRFSS). The relative risk of cervical cancer screening through self-reported Pap tests received within the past three years among women aged 21–65 by disability type was compared using modified Poisson regression with robust error variance. A total of 307,142 women from across the USA were sampled. In every disability group, older women were significantly less likely to receive Pap tests than their counterparts without disabilities. Women with multiple disabilities (aRR=0.91; 95% CI, 0.89–0.94) and those with ambulatory disabilities (aRR=0.93; 95% CI, 0.91–0.97) reported being less likely to receive Pap tests than women with no disability. Ambulatory disability and multiple disabilities are associated with a lower likelihood of cervical cancer screening with Pap test, increasing the need to eliminate disability-specific disparities in Pap testing. Future efforts should focus on improving cancer education programs tailored to the needs of women with disabilities, addressing barriers related to mobility and access to healthcare services, and ensuring equitable access to preventive screenings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is publicly available for download from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Abbreviations

RR:

Risk ratio

aRR:

Adjusted risk ratio

BRFSS:

Behavioral Risk Factor and Surveillance System

USPSTF:

US Preventive Services Task Force

References

  1. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC. Cervical Cancer Statistics. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/statistics/index.htm

  2. American Cancer Society ACS. Key statistics for cervical cancer. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervical-cancer/about/key-statistics.html

  3. Small W Jr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A et al (2017) Cervical cancer: A global health crisis. Cancer 123(13):2404–2412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW et al (2012) American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. J Low Genit Tract Dis 16(3):175–204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK et al (2018) Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 320(7):674–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. American Cancer Society ACS. HPV and HPV testing. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/healthy/cancer-causes/infectious-agents/hpv/hpv-and-hpv-testing.html

  7. Healthy People 2020. Cancer. Available at: https://wayback.archiveit.org/5774/20220414131934/https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/cancer/objectives.

  8. Healthy People 2030, Office of disease prevention and health promotion. Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer — C-09. Available at: https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/cancer/increase-proportion-females-who-get-screened-cervical-cancer-c-09

  9. Parekh T, Gimm G, Kitsantas P (2023) Sexually transmitted infections in women of reproductive age by disability type. Am J Prev Med 64(3):393–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Merten JW, Pomeranz JL, King JL, Moorhouse M, Wynn RD (2015) Barriers to cancer screening for people with disabilities: a literature review. Disabil Health J 8(1):9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bustamante G, Reiter PL, McRee AL (2021) Cervical cancer screening among sexual minority women: findings from a national survey. Cancer Causes Control 32(8):911–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oladeru OT, Ma SJ, Miccio JA et al (2022) Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities in transgender people. Am J Clin Oncol 45(3):116–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Andresen EM, Iezzoni LI (Jan-Feb 2014) Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities associated with disability severity. Womens Health Issues 24(1):e147–e153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Drew JA, Short SE (Dec 2010) Disability and pap smear receipt among U.S. women, 2000 and 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 42(4):258–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iezzoni LI, Kurtz SG, Rao SR (feb 2016) Trends in pap testing over time for women with and without chronic disability. Am J Prev Med 50(2):210–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okoro CA, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, Griffin-Blake S (2018) Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67(32):882–887

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Courtney-Long EA, Carroll DD, Zhang QC et al (2015) Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults--United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64(29):777–783

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Namkung EH, Carr D (Jun 2020) The psychological consequences of disability over the life course: assessing the mediating role of perceived interpersonal discrimination. J Health Soc Behav 61(2):190–207

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Iezzoni LI (2015) Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities. Womens Health Issues 25(3):246–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Office of the Surgeon G, Office on D. Reports of the surgeon general. The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Improve the Health and Wellness of Persons with Disabilities. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2005

  21. Steele CB, Townsend JS, Courtney-Long EA, Young M (2017) Prevalence of cancer screening among adults with disabilities, United States, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis 14:E09

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Iezzoni LI, Rao SR, Agaronnik ND, El-Jawahri A (2021) Associations between disability and breast or cervical cancers, accounting for screening disparities. Med Care 59(2):139–147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Andresen EM, Peterson-Besse JJ, Krahn GL, Walsh ES, Horner-Johnson W, Iezzoni LI (2013) Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: a systematic review. Womens Health Issues 23(4):e205–e214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Baruch L, Bilitzky-Kopit A, Rosen K, Adler L (2022) Cervical cancer screening among patients with physical disability. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 31(8):1173–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nosek MA, Howland CA (1997) Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78(12 Suppl 5):S39–S44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Lee JC, Andresen EM (2014) Disparities in health care access and receipt of preventive services by disability type: analysis of the medical expenditure panel survey. Health Serv Res 49(6):1980–1999

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Orji AF, Sodeyi MY, Anoke CI, Cevasco KE, Orji BC (2023) Disparities in cervical cancer screening by disability types: a systematic review. J Cancer Educ

  28. BRFSS. The BRFSS data user guide. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_documentation/pdf/UserguideJune2013.pdf

  29. BRFSS (2017) LLCP 2017 codebook report. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2017/pdf/codebook17_llcp-v2-508.pdf

  30. BRFSS (2019) LLCP 2019 codebook report. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2019/pdf/codebook19_llcp-v2-508.HTML

  31. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2016 Summary data quality report. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2016/pdf/2016-sdqr.pdf

  32. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC (2017) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2016 Summary data quality report

  33. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2020 summary data quality report. . Available at:https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2020/pdf/2020-sdqr-508.pdf

  34. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system comparability of data BRFSS 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2020/pdf/compare-2020-508.pdf

  35. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance System. Complex sampling weights and preparing 2020 BRFSS module data for analysis. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2020/pdf/Complex-Smple-Weights-Prep-Module-Data-Analysis-2020-508.pdf

  36. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC. Behavioral risk factor surveillance System: complex sampling weights and preparing 2020 BRFSS module data for analysis. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2020/pdf/Complex-Smple-Weights-Prep-Module-Data-Analysis-2020-508.pdf

  37. Moyer VA (2012) U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):852. Ebell, Mark [added]]. Ann Intern Med 156(12):880–W312. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Division of Human Development and Disability. Disability and Health Data System (DHDS) frequently asked questions. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/dhds/faqs.html#anchor_data-source

  39. Haas JS, Vogeli C, Yu L et al (2021) Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening. Prev Med Rep 23:101468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Akinlotan MA, Weston C, Bolin JN (2018) Individual- and county-level predictors of cervical cancer screening: a multi-level analysis. Public Health 160:116–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Urbute A, Kjaer SK, Kesmodel US, Frederiksen K, Thomsen LT (2022) Women with obesity participate less in cervical cancer screening and are more likely to have unsatisfactory smears: Results from a nationwide Danish cohort study. Prev Med 159:107072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cofie LE, Hirth JM, Wong R (2018) Chronic comorbidities and cervical cancer screening and adherence among US-born and foreign-born women. Cancer Causes Control 29(11):1105–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Limmer K, LoBiondo-Wood G, Dains J (2014) Predictors of cervical cancer screening adherence in the United States: a systematic review. J Adv Pract Oncol 5(1):31–41

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Miles-Richardson S, Allen S, Claridy MD, Booker EA, Gerbi G (2017) Factors associated with self-reported cervical cancer screening among women aged 18 years and older in the United States. J Community Health 42(1):72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zou G (2004) A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 159(7):702–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Thierry JM (2000) Increasing breast and cervical cancer screening among women with disabilities. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 9(1):9–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Smeltzer SC, Sharts-Hopko NC, Ott BB, Zimmerman V, Duffin J (2007) Perspectives of women with disabilities on reaching those who are hard to reach. J Neurosci Nurs 39(3):163–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ramjan L, Cotton A, Algoso M, Peters K (2016) Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disability: A review. Women Health 56(2):141–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vincent HK, Vincent KR, Lamb KM (2010) Obesity and mobility disability in the older adult. Obes Rev 11(8):568–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gnade CM, Hill EK, Botkin HE et al (2020) Effect of obesity on cervical cancer screening and outcomes. J Low Genit Tract Dis 24(4):358–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Varadaraj V, Deal JA, Campanile J, Reed NS, Swenor BK (2021) National prevalence of disability and disability types among adults in the US, 2019. JAMA Netw Open 4(10):e2130358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Orji AF, Yamashita T (2021) Racial disparities in routine health checkup and adherence to cancer screening guidelines among women in the United States of America. Cancer Causes Control 32(11):1247–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. McDaniel CC, Hallam HH, Cadwallader T, Lee HY, Chou C (2021) Persistent racial disparities in cervical cancer screening with Pap test. Prev Med Rep. Dec 24:101652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention CDC: 1 in 4 US adults live with a disability. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2018/p0816-disability.html

  55. Fontham ETH, Wolf AMD, Church TR et al (2020) Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 70(5):321–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. AFO: conceptualization, methodology, software, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—manuscript preparation, writing—original draft preparation, and reviewing and editing. AAR: supervision and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amarachukwu F. Orji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orji, A.F., Roess, A.A. Assessing Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening with Pap Test by Disability Types. J Canc Educ 39, 39–49 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02373-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-023-02373-x

Keywords

Navigation