Abstract
Irrigation water is required for increased crop yield and production to satisfy global food demand. However, irrigation also has negative impacts, including the production of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from groundwater pumping. To lessen this environmental problem, management methods that minimize agricultural GHG emissions from groundwater pumping should be identified. This work aims to compare measures that decrease agricultural groundwater withdrawal GHG emissions. A comparison among different energy supply and demand management choices for groundwater pumping was made to identify the most effective measure. Results indicated that the best agricultural groundwater pumping energy management practices are affected by the type of pump (e.g., electric or natural gas operated) and for electric pumps, the electric grid energy mix (e.g., coal, natural gas, oil, wind, solar). Due to their higher operational pump efficiency (OPE), electric pumps consume less energy than natural gas pumps to extract an equal volume of groundwater under similar conditions. Nevertheless, natural gas pumps produce less GHG emissions than electric pumps using the US Central and Southern Plains electricity mix. Hence, groundwater pumping energy demand management through improving the OPE of natural gas pumps will save more GHG emissions (7600 kg CO2-eq year−1) than switching to electric pumps using the electricity mix applied to this study (2800 kg CO2-eq year−1). Additionally, switching to cleaner energy sources (wind and solar) can save significantly higher amounts of carbon than just improving OPE. This analysis can guide policymakers and individuals to assist in meeting global GHG emission reduction goals and targets while satisfying increasing food demand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya S, George B, Aye L, Nair S, Nawarathna B, Malano H (2015) Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission analysis of groundwater-based irrigation systems. Irrig Drain 64:408–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1896
Alsaleh A, Sattler M (2019) Comprehensive life cycle assessment of large wind turbines in the US. Clean Techn Environ Policy 21:887–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01678-0
Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Lo Brano V (2008) Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12:200–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.013
Bhattacharyya P, Pathak H, Pal S (2020) Climate Smart Agriculture: Concepts, Challenges, and Opportunities. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9132-7
Bowman DMJS, Williamson GJ, Abatzoglou JT, Kolden CA, Cochrane MA, Smith AMS (2017) Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events. Nature Ecol Evol 1:0058. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0058
Brar D, Kranz WL, Lo TH, Irmak S, Martin DL (2019) Energy conservation using variable frequency drives for center-pivot irrigation systems equipped with corner watering attachments. Transact ASABE 62:1395–1408
Constantino G, Freitas M, Fidelis N, Pereira M (2018) Adoption of photovoltaic systems along a sure path: a life-cycle assessment (LCA) study applied to the analysis of GHG emission impacts. Energies 11:2806. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102806
Dolan SL, Heath GA (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of utility-scale wind power: systematic review and harmonization. J Ind Ecol 16:S136–S154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00464.x
Falcon WP, Naylor RL, Shankar ND (2022) Rethinking global food demand for 2050. Popul Dev Rev 48:921–957
Follett RF (2001) Soil management concepts and carbon sequestration in cropland soils. Soil Tillage Res 61:77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00180-5
Foltz ME, Zilles JL, Kaloutsou-Vakakis S (2019) Prediction of N2O emissions under different field management practices and climate conditions. Sci Total Environ 646:872–879
Garrett P, Rønde K (2013) Life cycle assessment of wind power: Comprehensive results from a state-of-the-art approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0445-4
Guezuraga B, Zauner R, Pölz W (2012) Life cycle assessment of two different 2 MW class wind turbines. Renewable Energy 37:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.008
Hagedorn G, Hellriegel E (1992) Environmental impact statements in the case of research projects-the example of photovoltaic energy conversion. Vol. 5. Environmentally relevant material balances in the production of different types of solar cells; Umweltvorsorgepruefung bei Forschungsvorhaben-am Beispiel von Photovoltaik. Bd. 5. Umweltrelevante Stoffstroeme bei der Herstellung verschiedener Solarzellen. Germany: N.p.
Handa D, Frazier R, Taghvaeian S, Warren J (2019) The efficiencies, environmental impacts and economics of energy consumption for groundwater-based irrigation in Oklahoma. Agriculture 9:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9020027
Hansen J, Ruedy R, Sato M, Lo K (2010) Global surface temperature change. Rev Geophy. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000345
He G, Cui Z, Ying H, Zheng H, Wang Z, Zhang F (2017) Managing the trade-offs among yield increase, water resources inputs and greenhouse gas emissions in irrigated wheat production systems. J Clean Prod 164:567–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.085
Hsu DD, O’Donoughue P, Fthenakis V, Heath GA, Kim HC, Sawyer P, Choi J-K, Turney DE (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of crystalline silicon photovoltaic electricity generation: systematic review and harmonization. J Ind Ecol 16:S122–S135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00439.x
Jolly WM, Cochrane MA, Freeborn PH, Holden ZA, Brown TJ, Williamson GJ, Bowman DMJS (2015) Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nat Commun 6:7537. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8537
Karimi P, Qureshi AS, Bahramloo R, Molden D (2012) Reducing carbon emissions through improved irrigation and groundwater management: A case study from Iran. Agric Water Manag 108:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.09.001
Khan MA, Khan MZ, Zaman K, Arif M (2014) Global estimates of energy-growth nexus: Application of seemingly unrelated regressions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.088
Khand K, Taghvaeian S, Gowda P (2017) The Impact of Drought on Vegetation Water Use in Different Climatic Divisions across Oklahoma. 2017: Technical Reports for 2017, Oklahoma Water Resources Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK
Kommalapati R, Kadiyala A, Shahriar MT, Huque Z (2017) Review of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from different photovoltaic and concentrating solar power electricity generation systems. Energies 10:350
Li C, Wang Y, Qiu G (2013) Water and energy consumption by agriculture in the Minqin oasis region. J Integr Agric 12:1330–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60542-0
Luc J-P, Tarhouni J, Calvez R, Messaoud L, Sablayrolles C (2006) Performance indicators of irrigation pumping stations: Application to drill holes of minor irrigated areas in the Kairouan plains (Tunisia) and impact of malfunction on the price of water. Irrig Drain 55:85–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.210
Masasi B, Frazier RS, Taghvaeian S (2017) Review and Operational Guidelines for Portable Ultrasonic Flowmeters. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Publication BAE-1535.
McGill BM, Hamilton SK, Millar N, Robertson GP (2018) The greenhouse gas cost of agricultural intensification with groundwater irrigation in a Midwest U.S. row cropping system. Glob Change Biol 24:5948–5960. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14472
McMahon JE, Price SK (2011) Water and energy interactions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:163–191
Mitar J, Agarski B, Karanovic V, Orošnjak M, Ilic Micunovic M, Ostojic G, Stankovski S (2019) LCA/LCC model for evaluation of pump units in water distribution systems. Symmetry 11:1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11091181
Mora M, Vera J, Rocamora C, Abadia R (2013) Energy efficiency and maintenance costs of pumping systems for groundwater extraction. Water Resour Manage 27:4395–4408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0423-z
Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) (2014) 2013 Oklahoma Groundwater Report—Beneficial Use Monitoring Program (p. 83). Oklahoma Water Resources Board.
Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) (2018) 2018 Oklahoma Groundwater Report—Beneficial Use Monitoring Program (p. 84). Oklahoma Water Resources Board. https://www.owrb.ok.gov/quality/monitoring/GMAP.php
Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) (2022) Oklahoma Groundwater Data. https://www.owrb.ok.gov/maps/pmg/owrbdata_GW.html
Ozoemena M, Cheung WM, Hasan R (2018) Comparative LCA of technology improvement opportunities for a 1.5-MW wind turbine in the context of an onshore wind farm. Clean Technol Environ Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1466-2
Pacca S, Sivaraman D, Keoleian GA (2007) Parameters affecting the life cycle performance of PV technologies and systems. Energy Policy 35:3316–3326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.003
Patle GT, Singh DK, Sarangi A, Khanna M (2016) Managing CO2 emission from groundwater pumping for irrigating major crops in trans indo-gangetic plains of India. Clim Change 136:265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1624-2
Perea RG, Ballesteros R, Munera Á, Ortega JF, Moreno MÁ (2021) Carbon_in_WaterDSS: A new tool to determine GHG emissions in quasi-real time for irrigation systems. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129640
Pereira LG, Cavalett O, Bonomi A, Zhang Y, Warner E, Chum HL (2019) Comparison of biofuel life-cycle GHG emissions assessment tools: The case studies of ethanol produced from sugarcane, corn, and wheat. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 110:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.043
Pradeleix L, Roux P, Bouarfa S, Jaouani B, Lili-Chabaane Z, Bellon-Maurel V (2015) Environmental impacts of contrasted groundwater pumping systems assessed by life cycle assessment methodology: contribution to the water-energy nexus study. Irrig Drain 64:124–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1865
Qiu GY, Zhang X, Yu X, Zou Z (2018) The increasing effects in energy and GHG emission caused by groundwater level declines in North China’s main food production plain. Agric Water Manag 203:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.003
Raadal HL, Gagnon L, Modahl IS, Hanssen OJ (2011) Life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the generation of wind and hydro power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:3417–3422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.001
Raadal HL, Vold BI, Myhr A, Nygaard TA (2014) GHG emissions and energy performance of offshore wind power. Renewable Energy 66:314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.075
Rajan A, Ghosh K, Shah A (2020) Carbon footprint of India’s groundwater irrigation. Carbon Management 11(3):265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2020.1750265
Shah T (2009) Climate change and groundwater: India’s opportunities for mitigation and adaptation. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035005
Sheffield J, Wood EF, Roderick ML (2012) Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature 491:435–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11575
Singh Dhillon M, Kaur S, Sood A, Aggarwal R (2018) Estimation of carbon emissions from groundwater pumping in central Punjab. Carbon Management 9:425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1518107
Trenberth KE, Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Parsons DB (2003) The changing character of precipitation. Bull Am Meteor Soc 84(9):1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1997) Ross-1997-National Engineering Handbook; Irrigation Guide; USDA- Beltsville, MD, USA, 1997.pdf.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2019). 2018 Irrigation and Water Management Survey, Volume 3 Special Studies Part 1, AC-17-SS-1. Washington D.C.: Census of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2023). Cash receipts by commodity State ranking. data.ers.usda.gov/reports.aspx?ID=17844, Accessed 20 July 2023.
United States Energy Information Administration (US EIA) (2022) What is U.S. electricity generation by energy source? https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3. Accessed 13 December 2022.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2016) Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance. 24.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2022) Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. Accessed 25 February 2022
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2023). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2021. EPA 430-R-23–002.
United State Geological Survey (USGS) (2022) USGS Groundwater Data for Oklahoma. National Water Information System: Web Interface. https://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/ok/nwis/gw
Wang J, Rothausen SGSA, Conway D, Zhang L, Xiong W, Holman IP, Li Y (2012) China’s water–energy nexus: Greenhouse-gas emissions from groundwater use for agriculture. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014035
Warren J, Byrd S, Taghvaeian S (2019) Understanding Cotton Irrigation Requirements in Oklahoma [Fact Sheet]. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Publication PSS-2409.
Water in the West (WW) (2013). Water and Energy Nexus: A Literature Review. Section I. Energy for Water (p. 146). Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment and Bill Lane Center for the American West.
Zhou Y, Gholizadeh H, LaVanchy GT, Hasan E (2020) Inspecting the food–water nexus in the Ogallala Aquifer region using satellite remote sensing time series. Remote Sensing 12:2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142257
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Ali Mirchi, Scott Frazier, and Saleh Taghvaeian for assistance in developing the conception and scope of this research work.
Funding
This study was funded in part by the National Science Foundation Office of Integrative Activities (NSF-OIA) Award Number 1946093, the Oklahoma State University Graduate College and the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station in the Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources at Oklahoma State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study conception, design, data analysis, and first draft of this manuscript were made by RK. All authors revised and edited previous drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Koushki, R., Warren, J. & Krzmarzick, M.J. Carbon footprint of agricultural groundwater pumping with energy demand and supply management analysis. Irrig Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00885-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00885-4