Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of RC buildings after Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: lessons toward performance based design

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two simultaneous earthquakes occurred in the Kahramanmaraş-Pazarcık and Kahramanmaraş-Elbistan districts of Turkey on February 6, 2023, and with magnitudes of 7.7 and 7.6, respectively. These events caused the highest estimated loss recorded in Turkey within the last century from natural disasters. The key reason for the extensive loss was the proximity of eleven cities to the earthquake epicenters. Middle East Technical University teams investigated the building sites in Gaziantep, Kahramanmaras, Hatay, Adiyaman and Adana. The ground motion recordings revealed that in certain locations of Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş and Hatay, the ground motion levels exceeded the maximum credible earthquake level defined for a return period of 2,475 years in the Turkish Earthquake Code. Residential building performance was investigated with respect to the construction year, which is a good indicator of compliance with modern seismic codes and inspection procedures. About 97% of the collapsed buildings were constructed prior to 2000, whereas over 5,000 buildings, which were built after 2000, collapsed or required urgent demolition. Most of the buildings with minor or greater structural damage sustained heavy infill wall damage rendering occupancy impossible. Aside from damage in older construction with significant structural deficiencies, the damage in some of the more recent and better constructed buildings was observed to be surprisingly poor. This can be attributed to the level of ground motion, significant ductility demands, poor material and workmanship and damage to non-structural elements. With the estimated total loss of above 100 billion dollars and over 50,000 casualties, the current seismic design criterion based on ductility and acceptance of structural damage should be re-evaluated to ensure a more resilient urban environment in high seismic regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI (2017), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-17) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute. AFAD (2020), Turkish Accelerometric Database and Analysis System (TADAS), Ankara. URL: https://tadas.afad.gov.tr

  • Akkar S, Yazgan U and Gülkan P (2005), “Drift Estimates in Frame Buildings Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(7): 1014–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE/SEI 7–22 (2022), “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures,” Technical Report, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ay BO and Akkar S (2008), “A Simplified Procedure for Estimating the Inelastic Drift Demands on Frame Structures,” Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.

  • Bayraktar A, Altunisik AC, Turker TO, Erdogdu H, Angin S, Angin Z and Özsahin TS (2015), “Structural Performance Evaluation of 90 RC Buildings Collapsed During the 2011 Van, Turkey, Earthquakes,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(6): 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boduroglu H, Ozdemir P, Binbir E and Ilki A (2013), “Seismic Damage Assessment Methodology Developed for Turkish Compulsory Insurance System”, Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure Renewal and Reconstruction, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Gülkan P, Koçyiğit A, Yücemen MS, Doyuran V and Başöz N (1993), “Earthquake Zoning Map of Turkey Based on Most Recent Data,” METU Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. 93-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan AF and Sozen MA (1997), “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low-Rise Buildings in Regions with Infrequent Earthquakes,” ACI Structural Journal, 94(1): 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilki A, Halici OF, Kupcu E, Comert M and Demir C (2020), “Modifications on Seismic Damage Assessment System of TCIP Based on Reparability”, Proceedings of the 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sendai, Japan.

  • Kurum M (2023), “Yıkılan Binaların Yüzde 98’i 1999 öncesine Ait,” https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2023/02/23/bakan-kurum-acikladi-yikilanbinalarin-yuzde-98i-1999-oncesine-ait, Ankara.

  • METU (2011a), A Report on the 19 May 2011 Kütahya-Simav Earthquake (Preliminary Report), Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • METU (2011b), Report on Seismic and Structural Observations from Mw5.6 November 9 2011 Van-Edremit Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • METU (2011c), Report on Seismic and Structural Observations from Mw7.2 October 23 2011 Van Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • METU (2020a), The Elaziğ-Sivrice Earthquake (24 January 2020 Mw=6.8) Field Observations on Seismic and Structural Damage, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • METU (2020b), The October 30, 2020 İzmir-Seferihisar Offshore (Samos) Earthquake (Mw=6.66) Reconnaissance Observations and Findings, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • METU (2023), Preliminary Reconnaissance Report on February 6, 2023, Pazarcık Mw=7.7 and Elbistan Mw=7.6, Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scawthorn C (2000), “The Marmara, Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999: Reconnaissance Report,” Technical Report MCEER, 00-0001, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER); Buffalo, New York, U.S., 190 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence R, Bommer J, Del Re D, Bird J, Aydinoğlu N and Tabuchi S (2003), “Comparing Loss Estimation with Observed Damage: A Study of the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1: 83–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TBEC (2018), Turkish Building Earthquake Code, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC (1975), Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Public Works and Settlements, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC (1998), Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Public Works and Settlements, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEC (2007), Turkish Earthquake Code-Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Government of Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Public Works and Settlements, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakut A, Sucuoğlu H, Binici B, Canbay E, Donmez C, İlki A, Caner A, Celik, OC and Ay BÖ (2022), “Performance of Structures in İzmir After the Samos Island Earthquake,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20: 7793–7818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baris Binici.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binici, B., Yakut, A., Kadas, K. et al. Performance of RC buildings after Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: lessons toward performance based design. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 22, 883–894 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2206-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2206-8

Keywords

Navigation