Skip to main content
Log in

What Are They Measuring? Testing the Convergent Validity of State and Trait Mindfulness Measures Across Two Independent Samples

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness has become increasingly popular over the years. In both clinical and research settings, mindfulness has been efficacious in reducing stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, and increasing overall quality of life and well-being. While numerous self-report measures aim to assess components of mindfulness, concerns have been raised surrounding the conceptualization, definition, and measurement of mindfulness. The present study examines the concurrent validity among both state and trait mindfulness measures, including the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS), State Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (State MAAS), Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI), and Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale Revised (CAMS-R). Two independent samples of 500 adults in the general U.S. population (Mage = 33.75) and 509 college students (Mage = 19.66), respectively, were recruited. All participants completed the aforementioned self-report measures online. With few exceptions, results were consistent across both samples and indicated strong convergent validity between self-report trait mindfulness measures and weak convergent validity between self-report state mindfulness measures. In addition, the FFMQ Observing and Nonreactivity subscales displayed poor construct validity among other measures purported to assess similar components of mindfulness. Findings from the present study demonstrate strong convergent validity across self-report trait mindfulness measures. However, results displayed weak convergent validity among self-report state mindfulness measures, thus raising questions regarding the overall validity of these measures. Results further suggest review of the FFMQ Observing and Nonreactivity facets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Alex H. Buhk and Heather Schultz. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Heather Schultz and Alex H. Buhk. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approve the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex H. Buhk.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buhk, A.H., Schultz, H. & Bullock, W.A. What Are They Measuring? Testing the Convergent Validity of State and Trait Mindfulness Measures Across Two Independent Samples. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 45, 1107–1118 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10091-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10091-3

Keywords

Navigation