Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technology transfer for sustainable rural development: evidence from homestead withdrawal with compensation in Chengdu–Chongqing

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This empirical study explores the factors influencing farmers’ decisions to withdraw from homesteads with compensation in the Chengdu–Chongqing area. Based on survey data from rural households, a structural equation model was constructed to investigate the relationships between individual characteristics of farmers, household characteristics, and the characteristics of farmers’ homesteads and their impact on farmers’ employment, life, and income. The results indicate that household characteristics influence farmers’ willingness to quit homestead with compensation, significantly impacting the proportion of non-agricultural employment, stability of non-agricultural employment, agricultural income, and per capita annual income. Furthermore, higher education levels, younger age, and a fondness for urban life also influence farmers’ willingness to withdraw from homesteads. The study highlights the importance of reasonable compensation calculation methods and modes in promoting homestead withdrawal. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers in designing more effective compensation programs and other policies to promote sustainable rural development in the Chengdu–Chongqing area. This study underscores the importance of technology transfer in rural development and highlights the potential of homestead withdrawal policies as a form of technology transfer. The findings have significant theoretical and managerial implications for policymakers to design more effective compensation programs and other policies promoting sustainable rural development in the Chengdu–Chongqing area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., & Anwar, A. (2020). Transition pathways for malaysian paddy farmers to sustainable agricultural practices: An integrated exhibiting tactics to adopt green fertilizer. Land Use Policy, 90, 104255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alananga Sanga, S., & Mwasumbi, A. N. (2019). Land and housing transactions in Tanzania: An evaluation of title risk vulnerabilities in Kinondoni Municipality Dar es Salaam. Urban Forum (pp. 261–287). Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arshad, M. N. (2020). Google Earth engine-based visual/qualitative investigation on urbanization: Quick urban sprawl visualization in Beijing, China. In Examining international land use policies, changes, and conflicts. IGI Global.

  • Asfaw, A., Simane, B., Hassen, A., & Bantider, A. (2017). Determinants of non-farm livelihood diversification: Evidence from rainfed-dependent smallholder farmers in northcentral Ethiopia (Woleka sub-basin). Development Studies Research, 4(1), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, H. S., Taylor, S. F., & St. James, Y. (2005). Migrating” to new service providers: Toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(1), 96–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaerts, T., Williamson, I. P., & Fendel, E. M. (2002). The role of land administration in the accession of central european countries to the European Union. Land Use Policy, 19(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branca, G., Lipper, L., Neves, B., Lopa, D., & Mwanyoka, I. (2011). Payments for watershed services supporting sustainable agricultural development in Tanzania. The Journal of Environment & Development, 20(3), 278–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, C., & Song, W. (2022). Discerning spatiotemporal patterns and policy drivers of rural settlement changes from 1962 to 2020. Land, 11(8), 1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, I. C., Liu, C. C., & Chen, K. (2014). The push, pull and mooring effects in virtual migration for social networking sites. Information Systems Journal, 24(4), 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. (2012). Factors of peasants’ willingness to return residential lands – an empirical study with survey data from 1012 rural households in the “two-wing” area of Chongqing. China Rural Survey, 3, 26–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Zhao, L., & Zhao, Z. (2017). Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to withdraw from rural homesteads: A survey in Zhejiang, China. Land Use Policy, 68, 524–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Long, H., Liao, L., Tu, S., & Li, T. (2020). Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence. Land Use Policy, 92, 104465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Wang, Y., Li, N., Xu, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhan, X., & Li, Q. (2023). The impact of farmland use transition on rural livelihood transformation in China. Habitat International, 135, 102784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., & Cheng, L. (2021). Factors affecting farmers’ satisfaction with contemporary China’s land allocation policy—the Link Policy: Based on the empirical research of Ezhou. Contemporary China’s Land Use Policy: The Link Policy, 117–142.

  • Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, W., & Zhang, L. (2019). Does cognition matter? Applying the push-pull‐mooring model to chinese farmers’ willingness to withdraw from rural homesteads. Papers in Regional Science, 98(6), 2355–2369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Q. (2019). Progress Report on China’s Rural Land Property Rights Reform in 2016. In Chinese research perspectives on society (vol. 6, pp. 289–306). Brill.

  • Gao, J., & Li, S. (2014). Analysis of influence factors of farmers’ willingness to quit right of contractual and management of rural land in progress of urbanization. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(6), 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., Song, G., & Liu, S. (2022). Factors influencing farmers’ willingness and behavior choices to withdraw from rural homesteads in China. Growth and Change, 53(1), 112–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, H., Ling, Y., Shen, T., & Yang, L. (2020). How does rural homestead influence the hukou transfer intention of rural-urban migrants in China? Habitat International, 105, 102267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. S., & Lin, W. (2019). Transforming rural housing land to farmland in Chongqing, China: The land coupon approach and farmers’ complaints. Land Use Policy, 83, 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2006). Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(2), 142–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossinger, S., Block, J., Chen, X., & Werner, A. (2021). Venture creation patterns in academic entrepreneurship: The role of founder motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–58.

  • Hou, A. C., Chern, C. C., Chen, H. G., & Chen, Y. C. (2011). Migrating to a new virtual world’: Exploring MMORPG switching through human migration theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1892–1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2018). Land use policy as an instrument of rural resilience–the case of land withdrawal mechanism for rural homesteads in China. Ecological Indicators, 87, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFPRI (2020). In Exploring farmer adoption of conservation agriculture using a lab-in-the-field approach. Retrieved from https://www.ifpri.org/blog/exploring-farmer-adoption-conservation-agriculture-using-lab-field-approach.

  • Jackson, L. M. (2022). Twenty-four hour party people: A transnational history of communist bodies, 1919–1943 (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz).

  • Jedwab, R., Christiaensen, L., & Gindelsky, M. (2017). Demography, urbanization and development: Rural push, urban pull and… urban push? Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, G., He, X., Qu, Y., Zhang, R., & Meng, Y. (2016). Functional evolution of rural housing land: A comparative analysis across four typical areas representing different stages of industrialization in China. Land Use Policy, 57, 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Zhong, S., Huang, C., Guo, X., & Zhao, J. (2022). Blessing or curse? The impacts of non-agricultural part-time work of the large farmer households on agricultural labor productivity. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(1), 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, S., & Deininger, K. (2009). Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation: Productivity and equity impacts from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(4), 629–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, E., Birchfield, M., De Moura, N., Heer, J., & Just, R. (2022). Hypothesis formalization: Empirical findings, software limitations, and design implications. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 29(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, J., Han, H., & Oh, M. (2017). Travelers’ switching behavior in the airline industry from the perspective of the push-pull-mooring framework. Tourism Management, 59, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M. (2003). Long-term trends and a sustainability transition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8062–8067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, P., Tian, Y., & Zou, Y. (2018). A novel framework for rural homestead land transfer under collective ownership in China. Land Use Policy, 78, 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung, J. K. S. (2002). Off-farm labor markets and the emergence of land rental markets in rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(2), 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3465–3472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of demography. Demography, 3, 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyk, S., Gaughan, A. E., Adamo, S. B., de Sherbinin, A., Balk, D., Freire, S., & Pesaresi, M. (2019). The spatial allocation of population: A review of large-scale gridded population data products and their fitness for use. Earth System Science Data, 11(3), 1385–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Liu, Y., Long, H., & Cui, W. (2014). Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocation can help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agricultural areas of China: Evidence from Dancheng County, Henan Province. Land Use Policy, 39, 188–198.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Wu, W., & Liu, Y. (2018). Land consolidation for rural sustainability in China: Practical reflections and policy implications. Land Use Policy, 74, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, F., Lin, C., & Lin, S. H. (2022). Farmers’ livelihood, risk expectations, and homestead withdrawal policy: Evidence on JinJiang pilot of China. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 26(1), 56–71.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Cities without slums? China’s land regime and dual-track urbanization. Cities, 101, 102652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., Yu, C., Jiang, J., Huang, Z., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Farmer differentiation, generational differences and farmers’ behaviors to withdraw from rural homesteads: Evidence from Chengdu, China. Habitat International, 103, 102231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., Jiang, J., Yu, C., Rodenbiker, J., & Jiang, Y. (2021). The endowment effect accompanying villagers’ withdrawal from rural homesteads: Field evidence from Chengdu, China. Land Use Policy, 101, 105107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Li, G., & Wang, K. (2022). Homestead reduction, economic agglomeration and rural economic development: Evidence from Shanghai, China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 14(2), 274–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, H., Tu, S., Ge, D., Li, T., & Liu, Y. (2016). The allocation and management of critical resources in rural China under restructuring: Problems and prospects. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 392–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., Xie, H., & Yao, G. (2019). Impact of land fragmentation on marginal productivity of agricultural labor and non-agricultural labor supply: A case study of Jiangsu, China. Habitat International, 83, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Peng, W., Huang, X., Fu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Homestead management in China from the “separation of two rights” to the “separation of three rights”: Visualization and analysis of hot topics and trends by mapping knowledge domains of academic papers in China National Knowledge infrastructure (CNKI). Land Use Policy, 97, 104670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu, L., Wu, W., Hu, H., & Huang, R. (2019). An evolving regional innovation network: Collaboration among industry, university, and research institution in China’s first technology hub. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 659–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick, B. (2019). The nexus between socio-ecological system, livelihood resilience, and migration decisions: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Sustainability, 11(12), 3332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markussen, T., Fibæk, M., Tarp, F., & Tuan, N. D. A. (2018). The happy farmer: Self-employment and subjective well-being in rural Vietnam. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 1613–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., Dwyer, J., Reed, M., & Short, C. (2017). Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values, 34, 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montri, D., Chung, K., & Behe, B. (2021). Farmer perspectives on farmers markets in low-income urban areas: A case study in three Michigan cities. Agriculture and Human Values, 38, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, B. (1995). Paradigms in migration research: Exploring’moorings’ as a schema. Progress in Human Geography, 19(4), 504–524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morantz, A. D. (2006). There’s no place like home: Homestead exemption and judicial constructions of family in Nineteenth-Century America. Law and History Review, 24(2), 245–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., & Daziano, R. A. (2016). The increasing role of latent variables in modelling bicycle mode choice. Transport Reviews, 36(6), 737–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, A., Peters, J. C., & Schmidke, A. (2020). Spatial sorting of innovative firms and heterogeneous effects of agglomeration on innovation in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(5), 1343–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, C. S. (2013). The influence of the cognition of the property right of the rural residential land on the withdrawal intention of the homesteads: Based on an empirical analysis of the questionnaire survey on the 1413 farmers of six counties in Anhui, China. China Rural Survey, 1, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, C. S., & Fan, Z. Y. (2012). The analysis of the rural homesteads withdrawal willingness and its influencing factors based on the empirical research of 1413 farmers from 6 counties in Anhui Province. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2, 154–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, W., Li, Z., & Yin, C. (2022). Response mechanism of farmers’ livelihood capital to the compensation for rural homestead withdrawal—empirical evidence from Xuzhou City, China. Land, 11(12), 2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X., Li, Y., Lu, Z., & Pan, W. (2020). What makes better village economic development in traditional agricultural areas of China? Evidence from 338 villages. Habitat International, 106, 102286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing, A. R., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010). Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and interventions. World Development, 38(4), 581–592.

  • Rawal, V. (2001). Agrarian reform and land markets: A study of land transactions in two villages of West Bengal, 1977–1995. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(3), 611–629.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., Marcotullio, P. J., Munroe, D., Olah, B, & Simon, D. (2012). Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Vol. 109, no. 20, pp. 7687–7692).

  • Shanks, T. R. (2005). The Homestead Act: A major asset-building policy in American history. Inclusion in the American Dream: Assets, Poverty, and Public Policy, 20–41.

  • Shi, P., Vanclay, F., & Yu, J. (2022). Post-resettlement support policies, psychological factors, and farmers’ homestead exit intention and behavior. Land, 11(2), 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, L., Lyu, P., & Cao, Y. (2021). Multi-party game and simulation in the withdrawal of rural homestead: Evidence from China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 13(3), 614–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2015). In Opinions on further deepening rural land system reform. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-08/27/content_10158.htm.

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1986). The new development economics. World Development, 14(2), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, K., Wu, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, Z., & Yang, Q. (2022). The functional value evolution of rural homesteads in different types of villages: Evidence from a Chinese traditional agricultural village and homestay village. Land, 11(6), 903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Factors influencing farmer’s decision-making behavior on rural construction land transformation. Sustainability, 10(11), 4288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., Hao, P., & Huang, X. (2016). Land conversion and urban settlement intentions of the rural population in China: A case study of suburban Nanjing. Habitat International, 51, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsikata, D., & Yaro, J. A. (2014). When a good business model is not enough: Land transactions and gendered livelihood prospects in rural Ghana. Feminist Economics, 20(1), 202–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. (2006). China's urban and rural old age security system: Challenges and options. China & World Economy, 14(1), 102–116.

  • Wang, X., & Kang, J. (2023). Decision making and influencing factors in withdrawal of rural residential land-use rights in Suzhou, Anhui Province, China. Land, 12(2), 479.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Chen, L., & Long, K. (2018). Farmers’ identity, property rights cognition and perception of rural residential land distributive justice in China: Findings from Nanjing, Jiangsu Province. Habitat International, 79, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Xin, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). How farmers’ non-agricultural employment affects rural land circulation in China? Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30, 378–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Li, G., & Liu, H. (2021). Porter effect test for construction land reduction. Land Use Policy, 103, 105310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Yang, Y., & Guo, T. (2021). Measurement of urban–rural integration level in suburbs and exurbs of big cities based on land-use change in Inland China: Chengdu. Land, 10(5), 474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Zhao, K., Cui, Y., & Cao, H. (2022). Formal and Informal Institutions in Farmers’ Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads in China: Heterogeneity analysis based on the Village Location. Land, 11(10), 1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. U., Bencheng, L. I. U., & Jinping, S. O. N. G. (2016). A study on farmers’ willingness to quit rural residential lands and its influencing factors. Geographical Research, 35(3), 551–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Gu, N., & He, D. (2010). The usages and expectations of multilingual information access in Chinese academic digital libraries. In The Fifth Annual iConference, Champaign, IL (pp. 317–322).

  • Wu, Y., Mo, Z., Peng, Y., & Skitmore, M. (2018). Market-driven land nationalization in China: A new system for the capitalization of rural homesteads. Land Use Policy, 70, 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, R., Alvarado, R., Méndez, P., & Tillaguango, B. (2023). Impact of informational and cultural globalization, R&D, and urbanization on Inequality. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–37.

  • Xia, M., Lin, S. M., & Guo, G. C. (2016). Influential factors of farmers’ willingness in rural residential land quittance in different economic developed areas in Jiangsu Province. Resources Science, 38(4), 728–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Zhao, J. W., Zhou, H. W., Ren, S. H., & Zhang, R. X. (2020). Secondary utilizations and perspectives of mined underground space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 96, 103129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Yang, Q., Su, K., Bi, G., & Li, Y. (2022). Farmers’ willingness to gather homesteads and the influencing Factors—An empirical study of different geomorphic areas in Chongqing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., & Qian, Z. (2021). Resettlement with chinese characteristics’: The distinctive political-economic context, (context, (in) voluntary urbanites, and three types of mismatch. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(3), 496–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiming, Y. (2017). The dynamic evolution of China’s special economic zones and their practice. Studies on China’s Special Economic Zones, 13–22.

  • Yuan, Z., Fu, C., Kong, S., Du, J., & Li, W. (2022). Citizenship ability, homestead utility, and rural homestead transfer of “Amphibious” farmers. Sustainability, 14(4), 2067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, Z., Li, S., Lian, J. W., Li, J., Chen, T., & Li, Y. (2021). Switching behavior in the adoption of a land information system in China: A perspective of the push–pull–mooring framework. Land Use Policy, 109, 105629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., LeGates, R., & Zhao, M. (2016). Understanding China’s urbanization: The great demographic, spatial, economic, and social transformation. In Understanding China’s urbanization. Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Zhang, B., Sun, P., Jiang, G., Zhang, R., & Gao, J. (2019). Rural land use transition of mountainous areas and policy implications for land consolidation in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29, 1713–1730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Westlund, H., & Klaesson, J. (2020). Report from a chinese village 2019: Rural homestead transfer and rural vitalization. Sustainability, 12(20), 8635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Geng, Y., Yin, C., Deng, Y., Ma, Y., & Chen, W. (2022). Simulation of Homestead Reform based on “Potential constraint-probability Decision”. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 38(18). (In Chinese).

  • Zhao, Y., Cloutier, S., & Li, H. (2020). Farmers’ economic status and satisfaction with homestead withdrawal policy: Expectation and perceived value. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Ma, W., Guo, Y., & Zhou, X. (2022). Interactive relationship between non-farm employment and mechanization service expenditure in rural China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 14(1), 84–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects. Land Use Policy, 91, 104330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Ou, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2021). Exploring the relationship between leisure and sustainability in a chinese Hollow Village. Sustainability, 13(18), 10031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., & Chen, W. (2010). The settlement intention of China’s floating population in the cities: Recent changes and multifaceted individual-level determinants. Population Space and Place, 16(4), 253–267.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M., & Dong, Y. (2022). Institutional Supply, digital governance and homestead exit in Megacity. In 2022 2nd International conference on business administration and data science (BADS 2022) (pp. 934–941). Atlantis Press.

  • Zou, W., Wang, Z., Xu, B., & Zhang, B. (2017). Study on the impacts of rural household differentiation on the rural residential land exit: Based on the empirical research of 1456 rural households in Jiangsu Province. China Land Sciences, 31(5), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Social Science Fund Project “a study on the distribution of value-added income from operational transfer of the right to use homestead in the separation of the three rights” (20BJY120); National Natural Science Fund Project “Management Honeypot Theory Exploration and Simulation Practice (70907080)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China

    Tao Xia & Elias G. Carayannis

  2. School of Business, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052, USA

    Elias G. Carayannis

  3. School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece

    Stavros Sindakis

  4. Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China

    Stavros Sindakis

  5. Institute of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Education for Growth, Athens, Greece

    Saloome Showkat

  6. School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Nikos Kanellos

Authors
  1. Tao Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elias G. Carayannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stavros Sindakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saloome Showkat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nikos Kanellos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias G. Carayannis.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, T., Carayannis, E.G., Sindakis, S. et al. Technology transfer for sustainable rural development: evidence from homestead withdrawal with compensation in Chengdu–Chongqing. J Technol Transf 49, 303–333 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10019-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10019-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation