Skip to main content
Log in

How and when should we (not) speak?: Ethical knowledge production about the Russia–Ukraine war

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Relations and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine poses significant challenges for researchers from diverse academic traditions. On one hand, the reactions of various societies to the unfolding events require immediate consideration and conceptualisation. On the other, the conflict poses significant ethical and methodological difficulties due to its sensitivity and the positionality of researchers interested in studying it. Based on our experiences conducting both qualitative and quantitative research since 24 February 2022, this paper explores the ethical implications of producing and disseminating authoritative knowledge about the war. We begin by reflecting on our obligations as scholars—both to our participants and ourselves—when studying war and conflict. We then consider our epistemological positions and responsibilities within the context of the Russia–Ukraine war. From there, we outline key methodological deliberations around research design and data collection necessary for speaking sensitively, transparently, and rigorously about the conflict. We conclude that the production of knowledge about the war requires an elevation of ethics above research outputs to protect our participants, ourselves, and the larger communities affected by the conflict. At its core, this paper thus underscores that ethical knowledge production sometimes requires scholars to remain silent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akesson, Bree, David A. ‘Tony’ Hoffman, Samia El Joueidi, and Dena Badawi (2018) ‘So the World Will Know Our Story’: Ethical Reflections on Research with Families Displaced by War’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 19(3).

  • Artiukh, Volodymyr (2022) ‘US-plaining is not enough. To the Western left, on your and our mistakes’, Ukraine Solidarity Campaign, 1 March 2022, available at https://ukrainesolidaritycampaign.org/2022/03/01/us-plaining-is-not-enough-to-the-western-left-on-your-and-our-mistakes/ (25 July 2023).

  • Berger, Roni (2015) ‘Now I See It, Now I don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.' Qualitative research 15(2): 219–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Shine, Natália Maria Félix de Souza, Amy Lind, Swati Parasha, Elisabeth Prügl and Marysia Zalewski (2022) ‘Questioning war’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 24(2): 193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Nissim and Arieli, Tamar (2011) ‘Field Research in Conflict Environments: Methodological Challenges and Snowball Sampling’, Journal of Peace Research 48(4):423–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill (1989) ‘The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14(4): 745–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, Lee Ann (2010) ‘Shades of Truth and Lies: Interpreting Testimonies of War and Violence’, Journal of Peace Research 47(2): 231–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, Lee Ann (2012) ‘Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities’, PS: Political Science and Politics 45(4): 717–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, Marilys and Lynn Gillam (2004) ‘Ethics, Reflexivity, and ‘Ethically Important Moments’ in Research’, Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 261–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, Karen, and Loren B. Landau (2003) ‘The Dual Imperative in Refugee Research: Some Methodological and Ethical Considerations in Social Science Research on Forced Migration’, Disasters 27(3): 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khromeychuk, Olesya (2022) ‘Where is Ukraine?’, RSA Journal 168(2(5589): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, Eleanor (2019) ‘Beyond the Field: Ethics After Fieldwork in Politically Dynamic Contexts’, Perspectives on Politics 17(1): 140–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konken, Lauren, and Marnie Howlett (2022) ‘When ‘Home’ Becomes the ‘Field:’ Ethical Considerations in Digital and Remote Fieldwork’, Perspectives on Politics.

  • Kühner, Angela, Andrea Ploder and & Phil C. Langer (2016) Introduction to the special issue: European contributions to strong reflexivity. Qualitative Inquiry 22(9): 699–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarenko, Valeria, Anastasiia Bobrova, Yelyzaveta Khassai, Liliana Filipchuk, Elena Syrbu, Natalia Lomonosova and Yulia Nazarenko (2022) ‘The First Days of Full-Scale War in Ukraine: Thoughts, Feelings, Actions’, Cedos, 31 March, available at: https://cedos.org.ua/en/researches/the-first-days-of-full-scale-war-in-ukraine-thoughts-feelings-actions-analytical-note-containing-initial-research-results_/ (20 February 2023).

  • Luff, Donna (1999) ‘Dialogue Across the Divides: ‘Moments of Rapport’ and Power in Feminist Research with Anti-Feminist Women’, Sociology 33(4): 687–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, William (2013) ‘The Problem of Extraterritorial Legality’, In: Interview Research in Political Science, ed. Mosley, Layna, 159–180. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Smolénski, Jan and Jan Dutkiewicz (2022) ‘The American Pundits Who Can’t Resist ‘Westsplaining’ Ukraine’, The New Republic, 4 March, available at https://newrepublic.com/article/165603/carlson-Russia-Ukraine-imperialism-nato (25 July 2023).

  • Thompson, Becky (1995) ‘Ethical Dimensions in Trauma Research’, The American Sociologist 26(2): 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Hella Von (2021) ‘Ethical Reflexivity as Research Practice’, Historical Social Research 46(2): 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorbrugg, Alexander and Jevgeniy Bluwstein (2022) ‘Making Sense of (the Russian War in) Ukraine: On the Politics of Knowledge and Expertise’, Political Geography 98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Elisabeth Jean (2006) ‘The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones’, Qualitative Sociology 29(3): 373–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers, in addition to Eleanor Knott, Rachel Valbrun, Madlen Pilz, and Emma Mateo for providing comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Significant thanks is also due to Olga Burlyuk and Vjosa Musliu for their support and inspiration. 

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marnie Howlett.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howlett, M., Lazarenko, V. How and when should we (not) speak?: Ethical knowledge production about the Russia–Ukraine war. J Int Relat Dev 26, 722–732 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00305-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00305-2

Keywords

Navigation