Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic fragility analysis of clay-pile-pier systems considering the optimization of ground motion intensity measures

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of clay-pile-pier system under earthquake shaking was comprehensively examined via three-dimensional finite element analyses, in which the complex stress-strain relationships of a clay and piled pier system were depicted by a hyperbolic-hysteretic and an equivalent elastoplastic model, respectively. One hundred twenty ground motions with varying peak accelerations were considered, along with the variations in bridge superstructure mass and pile flexural rigidity. Comprehensive comparison studies suggested that peak pile-cap acceleration and peak pile-cap velocity are the optimal ground motion intensity measures for seismic responses of the pier and the pile, respectively. Furthermore, based on two optimal ground motion intensity measures and using curvature ductility to quantify different damage states, seismic fragility analyses were performed. The pier generally had no evident damage except when the bridge girder mass was equal to 960 t, which seemed to be comparatively insensitive to the varying pile flexural rigidity. In comparison, the pile was found to be more vulnerable to seismic damage and its failure probabilities tended to clearly reduce with the increment of pile flexural rigidity, while the influence of the bridge girder mass was relatively minor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azizkandi AS, Baziar MH and Yeznabad AF (2018), “3D Dynamic Finite Element Analyses and 1 g Shaking Table Tests on Seismic Performance of Connected and Nonconnected Piled Raft Foundations,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(5): 1750–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Goh SH and Lee FH (2014), “Earthquake-Induced Bending Moment in Fixed-Head Piles in Soft Clay,” Géotechnique, 64(6): 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya S, Tokimatsu K, Goda K, Sarkar R, Shadlou M and Rouholamin M (2014), “Collapse of Showa Bridge During 1964 Niigata Earthquake: A Quantitative Reappraisal on the Failure Mechanisms,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 65: 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Curras CJ, Kutter BL, Wilson DW and Abghari A (1999), “Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction Experiments and Analyses,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(9): 750–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley BA, Cubrinovski M, Dhakal RP and Macrae GA (2009), “Intensity Measures for the Seismic Response of Pile Foundations,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(6): 1046–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenberg SJ, Kashighandi P, Zhang J, Huo Y and Zhao M (2011), “Fragility Functions for Bridges in Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreads,” Earthquake Spectra, 27(3): 683–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen LW, Wu XY and Tang C (2022), “Simplified Prediction Method for PGA Amplification Factors Corrected by Site Conditions,” Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(1): 173–181. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi ES, Desroches R and Nielson B (2004), “Seismic Fragility of Typical Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones,” Engineering Structures, 26(2): 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell AC, Jalayer F and Hamburger RO (2002), “Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(4): 526–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehghanpoor A, Thambiratnam D, Taciroglu E and Chan T (2019), “Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction Effects in Seismically Isolated Bridges Under Combined Vertical and Horizontal Strong Ground Motions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 126: 105753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drygala IJ, Dulinska JM and Wazowski M (2017), “Seismic Performance of a Cable-Stayed Footbridge Using a Concrete Damage Plasticity Model,” Procedia Engineering, 193: 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • GB 50011-2010 (2010), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang H, Jernigan JB and Lin YW (2000), “Evaluation of Seismic Damage to Memphis Bridges and Highway Systems,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 5(4): 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowiak T and Łodygowski T (2005), “Identification of Parameters of Concrete Damage Plasticity Constitutive Model,” Foundation of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 6(1): 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li YR, Zhang J, Chen HB, Qiang DF and Wang YZ (2022), “Study on the Dynamic Response Characteristics and p–y Curve of Straight and Inclined Pile Groups in Saturated Sands,” Applied Sciences, 12(5): 2363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari BK, Truman KZ, El Naggar MH and Gould PL (2004), “Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Analysis for Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(4): 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayoral JM, Alberto Y, Mendoza MJ and Romo MP (2009), “Seismic Response of an Urban Bridge-Support System in Soft Clay,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(5): 925–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meymand PJ (1998), “Shaking Table Scale Model Test of Nonlinear Soil-Pile-Superstructure Interaction in Soft Clay,” PhD Thesis, Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty P, Xu D, Biswal S and Bhattacharya S (2021), “A Shake Table Investigation of Dynamic Behavior of Pile Supported Bridges in Liquefiable Soil Deposits,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylonakis G, Syngros C, Gazetas G and Tazoh T (2006), “The Role of Soil in the Collapse of 18 Piers of Hanshin Expressway in the Kobe Earthquake,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(5): 547–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell R (2007), “On Ground Motion Intensity Indices,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(1): 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett JE, Nielson BG and DesRoches R (2008), “Selection of Optimal Intensity Measures in Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Highway Bridge Portfolios,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(5): 711–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha R, Haldar S and Dutta SC (2015), “Influence of Dynamic Soil-Pile Raft-Structure Interaction: An Experimental Approach,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(4): 625–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafieezadeh A, Ramanathan K, Padgett JE and DesRoches R (2012), “Fractional Order Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand Modeling Applied to Highway Bridges,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 41(3): 391–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Qian C, Qian YJ, Bao H and Lin PZ (2019), “Canonical Correlation Analysis of Selecting Optimal Ground Motion Intensity Measures for Bridges,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(7): 2958–2970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C and Chen LW (2020), “Probability Modelling of PGA Amplification Factors Corrected by Site Conditions,” Engineering Mechanics, 37(12): 99–113. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Ling XZ, Xu PJ, Gao X and Wang DS (2010), “Shake Table Test of Soil-Pile Groups-Bridge Structure Interaction in Liquefiable Ground,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 9(1): 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Zhang XY, Ling XZ, Li H and Ju NP (2016), “Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Dynamic Response of Pile Group in Liquefying Ground,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(1): 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares DH, Suescun JR, Paultre P and Padgett JE (2013), “Seismic Fragility of a Highway Bridge in Quebec,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(11): 1131–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinawi R, Sarrazin M and Filiatrault A (1993), “Influence of Soft Clays on the Response Spectra for Structures in Eastern Canada,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 12(8): 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsinidis G, Rovithis E, Pitilakis K and Chazelas JL (2016), “Seismic Response of Box-Type Tunnels in Soft Soil: Experimental and Numerical Investigation,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 59: 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang QA, Wu ZY and Liu SK (2012), “Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges Considering MultiDimensional Performance Limit State,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 11(2): 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Ye A and Ji B (2019), “Fragility-Based Sensitivity Analysis on the Seismic Performance of Pile-Group-Supported Bridges in Liquefiable Ground Undergoing Scour Potentials,” Engineering Structures, 198: 109427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu XY, Chen LW and Yuan XM (2021), “Characteristics of Long-Period Displacement Spectra Based on Strong Ground-Motion Records,” Journal of Building Structures, 42(5): 195–205. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakhchalian M, Nicknam A and Amiri GG (2015), “Optimal Vector-Valued Intensity Measure for Seismic Collapse Assessment of Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(1): 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CSW, Werner SD and DesRoches R (2015), “Seismic Fragility Analysis of Skewed Bridges in the Central Southeastern United States,” Engineering Structures, 83(1): 116–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Yang M and Chen HB (2019), “Influence of Pile Spacing on Seismic Response of Piled Raft in Soft Clay: Centrifuge Modeling,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 18(4): 719–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M and Yang J (2016), “Centrifuge Tests on Seismic Response of Piled Raft Foundation with Large Spacing,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 38(12): 2184–2193. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelaschi C, Monteiro R and Pinho R (2019), “Critical Assessment of Intensity Measures for Seismic Response of Italian RC Bridge Portfolios,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 23(6): 980–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Huo Y, Brandenberg SJ and Kashighandi P (2008), “Effects of Structural Characterizations on Fragility Functions of Bridges Subject to Seismic Shaking and Lateral Spreading,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7(4): 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Li YR, Yan ZX, Huang D, Rong X and Liang Y (2022), “Experimental Study of Vertical and Batter Pile Groups in Saturated Sand Using a Centrifuge Shaking Table,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 21(1): 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Goh SH and Liu HB (2017a), “Seismic Response of Pile-Raft-Clay System Subjected to a Long-Duration Earthquake: Centrifuge Test and Finite Element Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92: 488–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Goh SH and Yi JT (2017b), “A Centrifuge Study of the Seismic Response of Pile-Raft Systems Embedded in Soft Clay,” Géotechnique, 67(6): 479–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L and Liu HB (2017), “Seismic Response of Clay-Pile-Raft-Superstructure Systems Subjected to Far-Field Ground Motions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 101: 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang PP, Xu DS and Zhou T (2021), “Seismic Damage Analysis of Piled Pier System Constructed on Soft Clay Ground,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 26(3): 04020133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Jeon JS, Shao YH and Chen L (2019), “Optimal Intensity Measures in Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Cable-Stayed Bridges Subjected to PulseLike Ground Motions,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(2): 04018118.1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, Pang YT and Yuan WC (2016), “Evaluation of Optimal Intensity Measures in Fragility Analysis of Cable-Stayed Bridges,” Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 44(9): 1340–1346, 1370. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors greatly acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52178353, 51808421) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT: 2020III043).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Zhang.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 52178353, 51808421 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT: 2020III043)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, P., Zhang, L. & Zhang, Z. Seismic fragility analysis of clay-pile-pier systems considering the optimization of ground motion intensity measures. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 22, 965–977 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2214-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2214-8

Keywords

Navigation