Abstract
Embedded value is commonly used by life insurers to measure the realistic valuation of their consolidated shareholders’ interest. Previous studies use market price as a yardstick for measuring the value relevance of embedded value. This study challenges that view by examining the market price to embedded value gap. We explain it by testing the intellectual capital hypothesis and the investor sentiment hypothesis. While the intellectual capital hypothesis asserts that the difference between market price and embedded value is due to the omission of intellectual capital in the calculation of embedded value, the investor sentiment hypothesis asserts that the market price to embedded value gap is driven by the bias of investor sentiment on market price. Drawing on a sample of European public life insurers, we find that insurers with market prices higher than their embedded values have lower future stock returns. Using the Heckman two-stage regression to control for life insurers’ endogenous decision to disclose embedded values, we also find that the market price to embedded value (PEV) ratio is not related to future financial performance, but is negatively associated with our crisis sentiment index in the short term. In addition, the PEV ratio is positively associated with analysts’ overestimation of long-term earnings. Such results support the investor sentiment hypothesis instead of the intellectual capital hypothesis. Our findings provide a better understanding of the gap between embedded value and market price.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams M, Hardwick P, Zou H (2008) Reinsurance and corporate taxation in the United Kingdom life insurance industry. J Bank Financ 32(1):101–115
Arena M (2008) Does insurance market activity promote economic growth? A cross-country study for industrialized and developing countries. J Risk Insur 75(4):921–946
Baker M, Wurgler J, Yuan Y (2012) Global, local, and contagious investor sentiment. J Financ Econ 104(2):272–287
Basu S, Grace MF (2022) Insurance: in or out of the too difficult box? Account Bus Res 52(5):510–535
Berg M, Marrewijk C, Tamminen S (2018) Trade, productivity and profitability: on profit levels and profit margins. World Econom 41(8):2149–2174
Born P (2001) Insurer profitability in different regulatory and legal environments. J Regul Econ 19(3):211–237
Brown G, Cliff M (2005) Investor sentiment and asset valuation. J Bus 78(2):405–440
Chen M, Cheng S, Hwang Y (2005) An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and firm performance. J Intellect Cap 6(2):159–176
Chen T, Tseng Y, Hung Y, Lin C (2021) Embedded value reporting quality and credit risk: evidence from life insurance companies. Account Bus Res 51(1):96–125
Choi B, Weiss M (2005) An empirical investigation of market structure, efficiency, and performance in property-liability insurance. J Risk Insur 72(4):635–673
Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J Financ 66(5):1461–1499
Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2015) The sum of all FEARS: investor sentiment and asset prices. Rev Financ Stud 28(1):1–32
Dang T, Xu Z (2018) Market sentiment and innovation activities. J Financ Quantit Anal 53(3):1135–1161
Dumay J (2012) Grand theories as barriers to using IC concepts. J Intellect Cap 13(1):4–15
Edvinsson L, Malone M (1997) Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. Harper Business, New York
Elango B, Ma Y, Pope N (2008) An investigation into the diversification–performance relationship in the US property-liability insurance industry. J Risk Insur 75(3):567–91
El-Gazzar S, Jacob R, McGregor S (2022) Unregulated corporate financial disclosure and analysts’ forecast properties: the case of embedded value reporting by life insurers. J Acc Audit Financ. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X211063262
El-Gazzar S, Jacob R, McGregor S (2015) The relative and incremental valuation effects of embedded value disclosure by life insurers: evidence from cross-listed firms in the US. Account Horiz 29(2):327–39
Forte W, Tucker J, Matonti G, Nicolo G (2017) Measuring the intellectual capital of Italian listed companies. J Intellect Cap 18(4):710–732
Halek M, Eckles D (2010) Effects of analysts’ ratings on insurer stock returns: evidence of asymmetric responses. J Risk Insur 77(4):801–827
Harewood N, LaSorella K, Frasca R, Garvin J, Jarrett E, Matson P, Norman J, Walton J, Zimmerman D (2009) Practice note on embedded value (EV) reporting. https://www.actuary.org/sites/default/files/files/publications/Practice_Note_Practice_note_to_assist_actuaries_working_for_life_insurance_companies_with_the_calculation_of_embedded_values_may2009.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2021
He G (2022) How do insider trading incentives shape nonfinancial disclosures? Rev Quantit Financ Account, Evidence from product and business expansion disclosures. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01093-5
Horton J (2007) The value relevance of “realistic reporting”: Evidence from UK life insurers. Account Bus Res 37(3):175–197
Horton J, Macve R (1998) Planned changes in accounting principles for UK life insurance companies: a preliminary investigation of stock market impact. J Bus Financ Acc 25(1–2):69–101
Hribar P, Mclnnis J (2012) Investor sentiment and analysts’ earnings forecast errors. Manage Sci 58(2):293–307
Irresberger F, Mühlnickel J, Weiß G (2015) Explaining bank stock performance with crisis sentiment. J Bank Financ 59:311–329
Irresberger F, Kӧnig F, Weiß G (2017) Crisis sentiment in the US insurance sector. J Risk Insur 84(4):1295–330
Jacob R, El-Gazzar S, McGregor S (2017) Evolution of financial reporting of life insurers: the predominance of unregulated embedded value disclosure. J Financ Regul Compliance 25(1):56–72
Karim K, Pinsker R, Robin A (2013) Firm size and the voluntary disclosure of nonfinancial information by private versus public firm managers. Manag Audit J 28(9):866–892
Kasznik R, Lev B (1995) To warn or not to warn: management disclosures in the face of an earnings surprise. Account Rev 70(1):113–134
Leung S, Srinidhi B (2006) The effect of the private securities litigation reform act on analyst forecast properties: the impact of firm size and growth opportunities. J Bus Financ Acc 33(5–6):767–792
Li Z, Wang B, Zhou D (2022) Financial experts of top management teams and corporate social responsibility: evidence from China. Rev Quant Financ Acc 59(4):1335–1386
Liu X (2014) Venture capitalists and portfolio companies’ real activities manipulation. Rev Quant Financ Acc 43(1):173–210
Ma Y, Pope N, Yeung R (2013) Foreign participation and its relationship with non-life insurer performance in the northeast Asian markets. Geneva Papers Risk Insur: issues Pract 38(1):43–61
Malafronte I, Starita M, Pereira J (2018) The effectiveness of risk disclosure practices in the European insurance industry. Rev Acc Financ 17(1):130–147
Marzo G (2013) The market-to-book value gap and the accounting fallacy. J Intellect Cap 14(4):564–581
Milliman (2017) 2016 Embedded Value Results: Europe. https://www.milliman.com/en/insight/2016-embedded-value-results-europe. Accessed 20 June 2021
Nimtrakoon S (2015) The relationship between intellectual capital, firms’ market value and financial performance: Empirical evidence from the ASEAN. J Intellect Cap 16(3):587–618
Pooser D, Browne M (2018) The effects of customer satisfaction on company profitability: evidence from the property and casualty insurance industry. Risk Manage Insur Rev 21(2):289–308
Pooser D, Ping W, Barrese J (2017) A governance study of corporate ownership in the insurance industry. J Insur Issues 40(1):23–60
Prefontaine J, Desrochers J, Godbout L (2009) The information content of voluntary embedded value (EV) financial disclosures by Canadian life insurance companies. Int Business Econom Res J 8(12):1–16
Saenz J (2005) Human capital indicators, business performance and market-to-book ratio. J Intellect Cap 6(3):374–384
Sardo F, Serrasqueiro Z (2017) A European empirical study of the relationship between firms’ intellectual capital, financial performance and market value. J Intellect Cap 18(4):771–788
Sardo F, Serrasqueiro Z (2018) Intellectual capital, growth opportunities, and financial performance in European firms: dynamic panel data analysis. J Intellect Cap 19(4):747–767
Serafeim G (2011) Consequences and institutional determinants of unregulated corporate financial statements: evidence from embedded value reporting. J Account Res 49(2):529–571
Shim J (2011) Mergers and acquisitions, diversification and performance in the US property-liability insurance industry. J Financ Serv Res 39(3):119–44
Sommer D (1996) The Impact of firm risk on property-liability insurance prices. J Risk Insur 63(3):501–514
Stambaugh R, Yu J, Yuan Y (2012) The short of it: investor sentiment and anomalies. J Financ Econ 104(2):288–302
Thien TH, Hung NX (2023) Intellectual capital and investment efficiency: the mediating role of strategic management accounting practices. Cogent Business Manage 10:2207879
Walther B, Willis R (2013) Do investor expectations affect sell-side analysts’ forecast bias and forecast accuracy? Rev Acc Stud 18(1):207–227
Wu R, Hsu A (2011) Value relevance of embedded value and IFRS 4 insurance contracts. Geneva Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 36(2):283–303
Xu J, Liu F (2021) Nexus between intellectual capital and financial performance: an investigation of Chinese manufacturing industry. J Bus Econ Manag 22(1):217–235
Zimmermann J, Veith S, Schymczyk J (2015) Measuring risk premiums using financial reports and actuarial disclosures. Geneva Papers Risk Insur Issues Pract 40(2):209–31
Funding
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1 Definitions of variables
Appendix 1 Definitions of variables
Variable | Definition (Codes of Thomson Reuters Datastream items in brackets) |
---|---|
Profitability measures | |
Net profit margin (%) | \(\frac{{{\text{Net}}\;{\text{income}}\left( {{\text{WC01751}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Premium earned }}\left( {{\text{WC}}01002} \right)}} \times 100\%\) |
Return on assets (%) | \(\frac{{\text{Net\;income}}_{\text{t}} \left({\text{WC01751}}\right)}{{\text{Total\;assets}}_{t} \left({\text{WC}}02999\right)+{\text{Total\;assets}}_{t-1} \left({\text{WC}}02999\right) }\times 2\times 100\%\) |
Return on equity (%) | \(\frac{{\text{Net\;income}}_{\text{t}} \left({\text{WC01751}}\right)}{{\text{Book\;value\;of\;equity}}_{t} \left({\text{WC}}03995\right)+{\text{Book\;value\;of\;equity}}_{t-1} \left({\text{WC}}03995\right) }\times 2\times 100\%\) |
Firm characteristics | |
Capital asset ratio | The ratio of capital to assets (WC15121) |
EV dummy (1/0) | A dummy variable equal to 1 if the insurer discloses embedded value on a group basis and 0 otherwise |
Firm size | Logarithm of total assets (WC02999) |
Income growth | \(\frac{{\text{Net\;income}}_{\text{t}} \left({\text{WC01751}}\right)-{\text{Net\;income}}_{\text{t-1}} \left({\text{WC01751}}\right)}{\left|{Net\;income}_{t-1} \left(WC01751\right)\right|}\) |
Insurance penetration | The ratio of total premium written in the country to gross domestic product |
Liquidity | \(\frac{{{\text{Cash}}\;{\text{and}}{\mkern 1mu} {\text{equivalent}}\left( {{\text{WC02005}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{assets}}\left( {{\text{WC02999}}} \right)}}\) |
Market share | \(\frac{{{\text{Premium}}\;{\text{earned}}\left( {{\text{WC01002}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{premium}}\;{\text{written}}\;{\text{in}}\;{\text{the}}\;{\text{country}}}}\) |
Non-insurance activities | \(\frac{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{liabilities}}\left( {{\text{WC03351}}} \right) - {\text{Insurance}}\;{\text{reserves}}\left( {{\text{WC03030}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{liabilities}}\left( {{\text{WC}}03351} \right)}}\) |
PEV ratio | \(\frac{{{\text{Market}}\;{\text{Value}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{Equity}}({\text{MV}})}}{{{\text{Embedded}}\;{\text{value}}}}\) |
Premium growth | \(\frac{{{\text{Premium}}\;{\text{earned}}_{t} \left( {{\text{WC01002}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Premiume}}\;{\text{arned}}_{{t - 1}} \left( {{\text{WC01002}}} \right)}} - 1\) |
Use of reinsurance | \(\frac{{{\text{Reinsurance}}\;{\text{premium}}\left( {{\text{WC01005}}} \right)}}{{{\text{Premium}}\;{\text{earned}}\left( {{\text{WC01002}}} \right)}}\) |
Determinants of embedded value disclosure | |
Firm size | Logarithm of total assets (WC02999) |
Hostile takeover | Five-year average of \(\frac{{{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{life}}\;{\text{insurer}}\;{\text{hostile}}\;{\text{take}}\;{\text{overs}}\;{\text{announced}}}}{{{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{life}}\;{\text{insurers}}\;{\text{in}}\;{\text{the}}\;{\text{country}}}}\) |
Product market regulation index | The Product Market Regulation Index developed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development |
Inverse mills ratio | The selection bias correction term to control for the possibility that the insurer’s decision to disclose embedded value is endogenously determined |
Crisis sentiment measure | |
Crisis sentiment index | The first principal component of the search volume for the terms “financial crisis,” “credit crisis,” “bank crisis,” and “subprime crisis” on Google |
Analysts’ forecast errors | |
1-year forecast errors (%) | \(\frac{{12{\text{month}}\;{\text{forward}}\;{\text{earnings}}\;{\text{per}}\;{\text{share}}_{t} \left( {{\text{EPS1FD12}}} \right) - 12{\text{month}}\;{\text{trailing}}\;{\text{earnings}}\;{\text{per}}\;{\text{share}}_{{t + 1}} ({\text{EPS}}1{\text{TR}}12)}}{{{\text{Stock}}\;{\text{price}}_{t} \left( P \right)}} \times 100\%\) |
t-year forecast errors (%) for t ≥ 2 | Cumulative 1-year earnings forecast errors in the subsequent t years |
Stock returns | |
Unadjusted return | Raw return of life insurers |
Market-adjusted return | We regress the unadjusted returns of life insurers on the returns of the MSCI Europe Index and construct the market-adjusted returns as the residuals of the regression |
PB-adjusted return | We regress the unadjusted returns of life insurers on the price to book value ratios and construct the PB-adjusted returns as the residuals of the regression |
Size-adjusted return | We regress the unadjusted returns of life insurers on the logarithm of market prices and construct the size-adjusted returns as the residuals of the regression |
Market-, PB-, and size-adjusted returns | We regress the unadjusted returns of life insurers on the returns of the MSCI Europe Index, price to book value ratios, and logarithm of market prices and construct the market-, PB-, and size-adjusted returns as the residuals of the regression |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fung, D.W.H., Yang, C.C. & Yeh, J.J.H. The market price to embedded value gap: an analysis of European life insurers. Rev Quant Finan Acc 62, 69–96 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01196-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01196-7
Keywords
- Embedded value accounting
- Intellectual capital
- Investor sentiment
- Value relevance
- Market price to embedded value gap