Skip to main content
Log in

Dextromethorphan-Bupropion for the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
CNS Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A significant proportion of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to treatments which are currently used in clinical practice such as first-generation monoamine-based antidepressants.

Objectives

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of AXS-05, a combination of the NMDA-receptor antagonist dextromethorphan with bupropion, in adults with MDD.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov for current studies reporting on efficacy and/or safety of AXS-05 in patients with MDD. The search terms included: “AXS-05” OR “dextromethorphan and bupropion” AND “depression”. Studies from database inception to January 2023 were evaluated. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results

The search yielded 54 studies of which 5 were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Depression severity, measured with the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) significantly decreased as early as 1-week post-treatment from baseline when compared to a placebo-controlled group (LS mean difference 2.2; 95% CI 0.6–3.9; p = 0.007) and at 2 weeks compared to an active control group (LS mean difference 4.7; 95% CI 0.6–8.8; p = 0.024). Treatment efficacy could be maintained for up to 12 months with mean MADRS score reduction of 23 points from baseline. Clinical remission and response rates also improved at week 1 and were maintained for 12 months. The treatment was well-tolerated, with some transient adverse events reported.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that the combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion is a well-tolerated, rapid-acting treatment option for adults with MDD. Initial success with AXS-05 supports the mechanistic role of glutamatergeric and sigma 1 signaling in the pathophysiology of MDD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedrich MJ. Depression is the leading cause of disability around the world. JAMA. 2017;317:1517. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.3826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lam RW, McIntosh D, Wang J, Enns MW, Kolivakis T, Michalak EE, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 1. Disease Burden and Principles of Care. Can J Psychiatry. 2016;61:510–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716659416.

  4. Maj M, Stein DJ, Parker G, Zimmerman M, Fava GA, De Hert M, et al. The clinical characterization of the adult patient with depression aimed at personalization of management. World Psychiatry. 2020;19:269–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20771.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhee TG, Steffens DC. Major depressive disorder and impaired health-related quality of life among US older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35:1189–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5356.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McIntyre RS, Millson B, Power GS. Burden of Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) in patients with major depressive disorder in Ontario using Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) databases: economic burden and healthcare resource utilization. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:30–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berton O, Nestler EJ. New approaches to antidepressant drug discovery: beyond monoamines. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:137–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermida AP, Glass OM, Shafi H, McDonald WM. Electroconvulsive therapy in depression: current practice and future direction. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018;41:341–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2018.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rhee TG, Shim SR, Forester BP, Nierenberg AA, McIntyre RS, Papakostas GI, et al. Efficacy and safety of ketamine vs electroconvulsive therapy among patients with major depressive episode: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 2022;79:1162–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.3352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McIntyre RS, Filteau M-J, Martin L, Patry S, Carvalho A, Cha DS, et al. Treatment-resistant depression: definitions, review of the evidence, and algorithmic approach. J Affect Disord. 2014;156:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhdanava M, Pilon D, Ghelerter I, Chow W, Joshi K, Lefebvre P, et al. The prevalence and national burden of treatment-resistant depression and major depressive disorder in the United States. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021;82:20m13699. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20m13699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaffe DH, Rive B, Denee TR. The humanistic and economic burden of treatment-resistant depression in Europe: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:247. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2222-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Diazgranados N, Ibrahim L, Brutsche NE, Newberg A, Kronstein P, Khalife S, et al. A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:793–802. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofmann SG, Curtiss J, Carpenter JK, Kind S. Effect of treatments for depression on quality of life: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2017;46:265–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.1304445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McIntyre RS, Cha DS, Soczynska JK, Woldeyohannes HO, Gallaugher LA, Kudlow P, et al. Cognitive deficits and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: determinants, substrates, and treatment interventions. Depress Anxiety. 2013;30:515–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alnefeesi Y, Chen-Li D, Krane E, Jawad MY, Rodrigues NB, Ceban F, et al. Real-world effectiveness of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;151:693–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.04.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcantoni WS, Akoumba BS, Wassef M, Mayrand J, Lai H, Richard-Devantoy S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of intravenous ketamine infusion for treatment resistant depression: January 2009–January 2019. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:831–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, Sanacora G, Murrough JW, Berk M, et al. Synthesizing the evidence for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: an international expert opinion on the available evidence and implementation. Am J Psychiatry. 2021;178:383–99. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yavi M, Lee H, Henter ID, Park LT, Zarate CA. Ketamine treatment for depression: a review. Discov Ment Health. 2022;2:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-022-00012-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Majeed A, Xiong J, Teopiz KM, Ng J, Ho R, Rosenblat JD, et al. Efficacy of dextromethorphan for the treatment of depression: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2021;26:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2021.1898588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen L, Thomas KL, Lucke-Wold BP, Cavendish JZ, Crowe MS, Matsumoto RR. Dextromethorphan: an update on its utility for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;159:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.01.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hole K, Arnestad M, Molden E, Haslemo T. Dose-dependent inhibition of cYP2D6 by bupropion in patients with depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021;41:281–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Gorman C, Jones A, Tabuteau H. AXS-05 (Dextromethorphan/Bupropion): psychopharmacology and the potential for therapeutic application in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29:S458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.11.686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tabuteau H, Jones A, Anderson A, Jacobson M, Iosifescu DV. Effect of AXS-05 (Dextromethorphan-Bupropion) in major depressive disorder: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179:490–9. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21080800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Iosifescu DV, Jones A, O’Gorman C, Streicher C, Feliz S, Fava M, et al. Efficacy and safety of AXS-05 (Dextromethorphan-Bupropion) in patients with major depressive disorder: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial (GEMINI). J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83:21m14345. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones A, O'Gorman C, Clayton AH, Tabuteau H. Analysis of Efficacy of AXS-05 in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder Based on Gender, Race, and Prior Antidepressant Use [Poster Presentation]. ISCTM Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA; April 6-9 2021. https://isctm.org/public_access/17th_Annual/Poster/Jones_poster.pdf.

  28. O'Gorman C, Jones A, Kennon K, Niecestro R, Iosifescu DV, Stahl S, et al. AXS-05 for Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Scientific Rationale and Clinical Development [Poster Presentation]. ASCP Annual Meeting, Miami Beach, FL, USA. May 29-June 1 2018. https://d3dyybxyjb4kyh.cloudfront.net/pdfs/Axsome_AXS_05_Poster_ASCP_5_2018.pdf.

  29. O'Gorman C, Jones A, Tabuteau H. Sustained Efficacy with Long-term Treatment if AXS-05: Results from the COMET Phase 3 Trial, a Long-term, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of AXS-05 for the Treatment of MDD [Poster Presentation]. American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA. June 1-4 2021. https://d3dyybxyjb4kyh.cloudfront.net/pdfs/ASCP+2021+COMET+overall+poster+FINAL.pdf

  30. Matveychuk D, Thomas RK, Swainson J, Khullar A, MacKay M-A, Baker GB, et al. Ketamine as an antidepressant: overview of its mechanisms of action and potential predictive biomarkers. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020;10:2045125320916657. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125320916657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rodrigues NB, McIntyre RS, Lipsitz O, Cha DS, Lee Y, Gill H, et al. Changes in symptoms of anhedonia in adults with major depressive or bipolar disorder receiving IV ketamine: results from the Canadian Rapid Treatment Center of Excellence. J Affect Disord. 2020;276:570–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Siu A, Drachtman R. Dextromethorphan: a review of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist in the management of pain. CNS Drug Rev. 2007;13:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-3458.2007.00006.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zanger UM, Raimundo S, Eichelbaum M. Cytochrome P450 2D6: overview and update on pharmacology, genetics, biochemistry. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2004;369:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-003-0832-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Xue C, Zhang X, Cai W. Prediction of drug–drug interactions with bupropion and its metabolites as CYP2D6 inhibitors using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model. Pharmaceutics. 2017;10:1. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10010001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Garnock-Jones KP. Dextromethorphan/quinidine: in pseudobulbar affect. CNS Drugs. 2011;25:435–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor CP, Traynelis SF, Siffert J, Pope LE, Matsumoto RR. Pharmacology of dextromethorphan: relevance to dextromethorphan/quinidine (Nuedexta®) clinical use. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;164:170–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.04.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schadel M, Wu D, Otton SV, Kalow W, Sellers EM. Pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan and metabolites in humans: influence of the CYP2D6 phenotype and quinidine inhibition. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995;15:263–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004714-199508000-00005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pechnick RN, Poland RE. Comparison of the effects of dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, and levorphanol on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;309:515–22. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.060038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Miller SC. Dextromethorphan to dextrorphan: a pathway towards abuse liability. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011;26:89–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.1164. (author reply 91).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schatzberg AF. Understanding the efficacy and mechanism of action of a dextromethorphan-bupropion combination: where does it fit in the NMDA versus mu-Opioid story? Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179:448–50. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20220434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zawertailo LA, Kaplan HL, Busto UE, Tyndale RF, Sellers EM. Psychotropic effects of dextromethorphan are altered by the CYP2D6 polymorphism: a pilot study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998;18:332–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004714-199808000-00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schoedel KA, Morrow SA, Sellers EM. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of dextromethorphan/quinidine in the treatment of pseudobulbar affect. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:1161–74. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S30713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zawertailo LA, Tyndale RF, Busto U, Sellers EM. Effect of metabolic blockade on the psychoactive effects of dextromethorphan. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010;25:71–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.1086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones A, Anderson A, Tabuteau H. 40. Efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in the prevention of relapse in patients with treatment-resistant depression: results from the MERIT trial. In: Poster presented at: annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 2022 May 20–24; New Orleans (LA).

  45. Moriguchi S, Takamiya A, Noda Y, Horita N, Wada M, Tsugawa S, et al. Glutamatergic neurometabolite leve1ls in major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:952–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0252-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Onaolapo AY, Onaolapo OJ. Glutamate and depression: reflecting a deepening knowledge of the gut and brain effects of a ubiquitous molecule. World J Psychiatry. 2021;11:297–315. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i7.297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sanacora G, Treccani G, Popoli M. Towards a glutamate hypothesis of depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for mood disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sarawagi A, Soni ND, Patel AB. Glutamate and GABA homeostasis and neurometabolism in major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:637863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.637863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Duman RS, Sanacora G, Krystal JH. Altered connectivity in depression: GABA and glutamate neurotransmitter deficits and reversal by novel treatments. Neuron. 2019;102:75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Banasr M, Dwyer JM, Duman RS. Cell atrophy and loss in depression: reversal by antidepressant treatment. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:730–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.09.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Adell A. Brain NMDA receptors in schizophrenia and depression. Biomolecules. 2020;10:947. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10060947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chan SY, Matthews E, Burnet PWJ. ON or OFF? Modulating the N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor in major depression. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;9:169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2016.00169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sattar Y, Wilson J, Khan AM, Adnan M, Azzopardi Larios D, Shrestha S, et al. A review of the mechanism of antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor by ketamine in treatment-resistant depression. Cureus. 2018;10:e2652. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Nguyen L, Matsumoto RR. Involvement of AMPA receptors in the antidepressant-like effects of dextromethorphan in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2015;295:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Amidfar M, Woelfer M, Réus GZ, Quevedo J, Walter M, Kim Y-K. The role of NMDA receptor in neurobiology and treatment of major depressive disorder: evidence from translational research. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;94:109668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou W, Wang N, Yang C, Li X-M, Zhou Z-Q, Yang J-J. Ketamine-induced antidepressant effects are associated with AMPA receptors-mediated upregulation of mTOR and BDNF in rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Eur Psychiatry. 2014;29:419–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.10.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lee S-Y, Wang T-Y, Chen S-L, Chang Y-H, Chen P-S, Huang S-Y, et al. Combination of dextromethorphan and memantine in treating bipolar spectrum disorder: a 12-week double-blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020;8:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-019-0174-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Nguyen L, Robson MJ, Healy JR, Scandinaro AL, Matsumoto RR. Involvement of sigma-1 receptors in the antidepressant-like effects of dextromethorphan. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Ren P, Wang J, Li N, Li G, Ma H, Zhao Y, et al. Sigma-1 receptors in depression: mechanism and therapeutic development. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:925879. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.925879.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang D, Noda Y, Tsunekawa H, Zhou Y, Miyazaki M, Senzaki K, et al. Role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in antidepressant-like effects of sigma 1 receptor agonist 1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenethyl)-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride (SA-4503) in olfactory bulbectomized rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;322:1305–14. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.107.124685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fishback JA, Robson MJ, Xu Y-T, Matsumoto RR. Sigma receptors: potential targets for a new class of antidepressant drug. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;127:271–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Mandelli L, Wang S-M, Han C, Lee S-J, Patkar AA, Masand PS, et al. The impact of a single nucleotide polymorphism in SIGMAR1 on depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Adv Ther. 2017;34:713–24. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.107.124685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Skuza G, Rogóz Z. Antidepressant-like effect of PRE-084, a selective sigma1 receptor agonist, in Albino Swiss and C57BL/6J mice. Pharmacol Rep. 2009;61:1179–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1734-1140(09)70181-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rosen DA, Seki SM, Fernández-Castañeda A, Beiter RM, Eccles JD, Woodfolk JA, et al. Modulation of the sigma-1 receptor-IRE1 pathway is beneficial in preclinical models of inflammation and sepsis. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaau5266. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Stahl SM. Dextromethorphan/Bupropion: a novel oral NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) receptor antagonist with multimodal activity. CNS Spectr. 2019;24:461–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852919001470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Stahl SM, Pradko JF, Haight BR, Modell JG, Rockett CB, Learned-Coughlin S. A review of the neuropharmacology of bupropion, a dual norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitor. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;6:159–66. https://doi.org/10.4088/pcc.v06n0403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Dhir A, Kulkarni SK. Possible involvement of sigma-1 receptors in the anti-immobility action of bupropion, a dopamine reuptake inhibitor. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2008;22:387–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00605.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bagdas D, AlSharari S, Roni MA, Campbell VC, Muldoon PP, Carroll FI, et al. Blockade of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor enhances the responsiveness to bupropion in the mouse forced swim test. Behav Brain Res. 2019;360:262–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2018.12.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger S. McIntyre.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Taeho Gregory Rhee was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) through Yale School of Medicine (#T32AG019134) in the past 3 years. Dr. Rhee has also been funded by the NIA (#R21AG070666), National Institute of Mental Health (#R21MH117438) and Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP) of the University of Connecticut. Dr. Rhee serves as a review committee member for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and has received honoraria payments from PCORI and SAMHSA. Dr. Rhee has also served as a stakeholder/consultant for PCORI and received consulting fees from PCORI. Dr. Rhee serves as an advisory committee member for International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders (IAMHRF). Dr. Rhee is currently a co-editor-in-chief of Mental Health Science and has received honorarium payments annually from the publisher, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kayla M. Teopiz has received personal fees from Braxia Scientific Corp. Dr. Roger S. McIntyre has received research grant support from CIHR/GACD/National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Milken Institute; speaker/consultation fees from Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes,Neumora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim,Sage,Biogen,Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals,Viatris, Abbvie, Atai Life Sciences. Dr. Roger McIntyre is a CEO of Braxia Scientific Corp. Drs Akbar, Ceban, Ho, Cao, Subramaniapillai, Kwan and Rosenblat have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Availability of data and material

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

DA: data curation, investigation, project administration, visualization, writing—original draft. TGR: writing—review and editing. FC: writing—review and editing. RH: writing—review and editing. KMT: writing—review and editing. BC: writing—review and editing. MS: writing—review and editing. ATHK: writing—review and editing. JDR: writing—review and editing. RSM: conceptualization, project administration, visualization, supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and approve the final version of this manuscript and agree to be accountable for the work.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbar, D., Rhee, T.G., Ceban, F. et al. Dextromethorphan-Bupropion for the Treatment of Depression: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials. CNS Drugs 37, 867–881 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01032-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01032-5

Navigation