Skip to main content
Log in

Generalizations of Mock Theta Functions and Appell–Lerch Sums

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ramanujan named and first studied mock theta functions which can be represented by Eulerian forms, Appell–Lerch sums, Hecke-type double sums, and Fourier coefficients of meromorphic Jacobi forms. In this paper, we investigate some generalizations of mock theta functions and express them in terms of Appell–Lerch sums. For instance, one result proved in the present paper is that for any positive integer r, \(|q|<1\), and x, so that no denominators vanish

$$\begin{aligned}&\big (1+x^{-1}\big ) \sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\dfrac{(-q;q)_{2n+2r-2}q^{n+1}}{(xq^{2r-1},x^{-1}q^{2r-1};q^2)_{n+1}}\\&\qquad =\dfrac{1}{(q,q,q^2;q^2)_\infty }\sum _{j=0}^{2r-2}q^{1-j} \dfrac{(q^2;q^2)_{2r-2}}{(q^2;q^2)_j(q^2;q^2)_{2r-2-j}}\sum _{n=-\infty }^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^nq^{n(n+2)}}{1-xq^{2n+2r-2j-1}}. \end{aligned}$$

In addition, we generalize not only two of Ramanujan’s universal mock theta functions \(g_2(x,q)\) and \(g_3(x,q)\), but also two identities recorded by Ramanujan in his lost notebook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Andrews, G.E.: Mordell integrals and Ramanujan’s “lost” notebook. Lecture Notes in Math, vol. 899. Springer, Berlin (1981)

  2. Andrews, G.E.: The fifth and seventh order mock theta functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 293, 113–134 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, G.E.: \(q\)-orthogonal polynomials, Rogers–Ramanujan identities, and mock theta functions. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 276, 21–32 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, Part I Springer, New York (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews, G.E., Berndt, B.C.: Ramanujan’s Lost Notebook, Part II Springer, New York (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews, G.E., Hickerson, D.R.: Ramanujan’s “lost’’ notebook VII: The sixth order mock theta functions. Adv. Math. 89, 60–105 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Berkovich, A., Garvan, F.G.: Some observations on Dyson’s new symmetries of partitions. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 100, 61–93 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Berndt, B.C.: Number Theory in the Spirit of Ramanujan. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Berndt, B.C., Chan, S.H.: Sixth order mock theta functions. Adv. Math. 216, 771–786 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bringmann, K., Folsom, A., Rhoades, R.C.: Partial theta functions and mock modular forms as \(q\)-hypergeometric series. Ramanujan J. 29, 295–310 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Bringmann, K., Hikami, K., Lovejoy, J.: On the modularity of the unified WRT invariants of certain Seifert manifolds. Adv. Appl. Math. 46, 86–93 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Carroll, G., Corbett, J., Folsom, A., Thieu, E.: Universal mock theta functions as quantum Jacobi forms. Res. Math. Sci. 6, Paper No. 6, 15 pp (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, D., Wang, L.: Representations of mock theta functions. Adv. Math. 365, 107037, 72pp (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi, Y.-S.: Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook. Invent. Math. 136, 497–569 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, Y.-S.: Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook II. Adv. Math. 156, 180–285 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi, Y.-S.: Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook. IV. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 354, 705–733 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi, Y.-S.: Tenth order mock theta functions in Ramanujan’s lost notebook. III. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 94, 26–52 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, Y.-S.: The basic bilateral hypergeometric series and the mock theta functions. Ramanujan J. 24, 345–386 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui, S.-P., Gu, N.S.S.: Some new mock theta functions. Adv. Appl. Math. 131, 102267, 21pp (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Cui, S.-P., Gu, N.S.S., Hou, Q.-H., Su, C.-Y.: Three-parameter mock theta functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 515, 126459, 22pp (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Dyson, F.J.: Some guesses in the theory of partitions. Eureka Camb. 8, 10–15 (1944)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Garvan, F.G.: Universal mock theta functions and two-variable Hecke-Rogers identities. Ramanujan J. 36, 267–296 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Gasper, G., Rahman, M.: Basic Hypergeometric Series, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Gordon, B., McIntosh, R.J.: Some eighth order mock theta functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 62, 321–335 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gordon, B., McIntosh, R.J.: A survey of classical mock theta functions, in “Partitions, \(q\)-series, and modular forms’’. Dev. Math. 23, 95–144 (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Hickerson, D.R.: On the seventh order mock theta functions. Invent. Math. 94, 639–660 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Hickerson, D.R.: A proof of the mock theta conjectures. Invent. Math. 94, 661–677 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Hickerson, D.R., Mortenson, E.: Hecke-type double sums, Appell-Lerch sums, and mock theta functions, I. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 109, 382–422 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ji, K.Q., Zhao, A.X.H.: The Bailey transform and Hecke-Rogers identities for the universal mock theta functions. Adv. Appl. Math. 65, 65–86 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang, S.-Y.: Mock Jacobi forms in basic hypergeometric series. Compos. Math. 145, 553–565 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Lovejoy, J.: Rank and conjugation for the Frobenius representation of an overpartition. Ann. Comb. 9, 321–334 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Lovejoy, J.: On identities involving the sixth order mock theta functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 138, 2547–2552 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Lovejoy, J., Osburn, R.: \(M_2\)-rank differences for partitions without repeated odd parts. J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux. 21, 313–334 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. McIntosh, R.J.: Second order mock theta functions. Can. Math. Bull. 50, 284–290 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. McIntosh, R.J.: Some identities for Appell-Lerch sums and a universal mock theta function. Ramanujan J. 45, 767–779 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Mortenson, E.: On the three third order mock theta functions and Hecke-type double sums. Ramanujan J. 30, 279–308 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Mortenson, E.: On the dual nature of partial theta functions and Appell-Lerch sums. Adv. Math. 264, 236–260 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramanujan, S., Papers, C., Univ, C., Press,: Reprinted, p. 1962. Chelsea, New York (1927)

  39. Ramanujan, S.: The Lost Notebook and Other Unpublished Papers. Narosa, New Delhi (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Watson, G.N.: The final problem: an account of the mock theta functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 11, 55–80 (1936)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Watson, G.N.: The mock theta functions (2). Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 42, 274–304 (1937)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to two anonymous referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and many constructive suggestions, which improved the quality of the paper to a great extent. Su-Ping Cui was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12001309) and the Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund of Qinghai (Grant No. 2022-ZJ-972Q). Nancy S. S. Gu was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12171255). Dazhao Tang was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12201093), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing CSTB (No. CSTB2022NSCQ–MSX0387), the Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (No. KJQN202200509), and the Doctoral Start-Up Research Foundation (No. 21XLB038) of Chongqing Normal University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dazhao Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Communicated by Amir Akbary.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, SP., Gu, N.S.S. & Tang, D. Generalizations of Mock Theta Functions and Appell–Lerch Sums. Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 49, 71 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-023-00817-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-023-00817-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation