Skip to main content
Log in

Voltage Control Ancillary Service Through Grid-Connected Microgrid, Its Pricing by Optimized Active Power and Reactive Power Management Using IEHO-TOPSIS Approach

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the distribution level, the traditional approach of pricing for voltage control ancillary service shows certain disadvantages as it considers only production costs. For the optimized procurement and pricing of active power and reactive power provision from reactive power compensating devices (RPCDs) such as APFCs, D-STATCOM and converter-controlled distributed generators (CCDGs), its location, availability, as well as its capability, are of utmost importance. For better pricing signals, the pricing structure for active power and reactive power compensation service needs to consider all major cost components like depreciation cost, cost of losses, capital cost, and balance of system cost. In this work, an attempt has been made to address the procurement and pricing issues at distribution level, by proposing optimized active power and reactive power management (OARPM) and developing ‘Extended Nodal Pricing Function' (‘ENPF’) for its pricing. This is specially developed for pricing the optimized active power and reactive power provision cost through RPCDs and CCDGs installed in grid-connected microgrid at distribution level achieving system performance improvement and bring economic savings. To test the impact of proposed OARPM and ENPF, five different cases are analyzed using Indian real-time distribution system data. The impact of proposed methodology is observed on 5 aspects of system performance that are dispatch of active power and reactive power, power losses minimization, objective function cost minimization, active power and reactive power DLMP and voltage control. The methodology is generic to implemented for pricing in any electricity market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Abinaya K, Danalakshmi D, Kannan S (2014) Cost analysis of reactive power using marginal cost theory in electricity markets. In: International conference on circuit, power and computing technologies 20–21 March, Nagercoil, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPCT.2014.7055055

  • Alsokhiry F, Adam GP, Lo KL (2012) Contribution of distributed generation to ancillary services. In: 47th international Universities power engineering conference (UPEC), 4–7 Sept, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2012.6398451

  • Ameri AA, Ounissa A, Nichita C, Djamal A (2017) Power loss analysis for wind power grid integration based on weibull distribution. Energies 10(4):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Wang J, Wang C, Li CF (2017) Distribution locational marginal pricing for congestion management and voltage support. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(4):4061–4073. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2767632

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Barquin Gil J, San Roman TG, Alba Rios JJ, Martin PS (2000) Reactive power pricing a conceptual framework for remuneration and charging procedures. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):483–489. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.867129

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Borissov B, Kirsch LD, Alvarado F, Christensen LR (2003) Reactive power as an identifiable ancillary service. Transmission Administrator of Alberta Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun M (2006) Technological control capabilities of DER to provide future ancillary services. Int J Distrib Energy Resour 3(3):191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (2022). https://cercind.gov.in

  • Gaur K, Rathour HK, Agarwal PK, Baba KVS, Soonee SK (2016) Analysing the electricity demand pattern. In: 19th National power systems conference, 19–21 Dec, Bhubaneswar, India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313869435_

  • Haghighat H, Kennedy SW (2010) A model for reactive power pricing and dispatch of distributed generation. In: Power and energy society general meeting, 25–29 July. IEEE, Minneapolis, MN, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5589576

  • Hao S, Papalexopoulos A (1997) Reactive power pricing and management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(1):95–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.574928

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Havells (2019) www.havells.com

  • Kirby B, Hirst E (1997) Ancillary services details voltage control. Energy Division, U.S Department of Energy

  • Kirschen DS, Strbac G (2019) Fundamentals of power system economics. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishore JK, Ram BVS (2016) The ancillary reactive power pricing in a deregulated electricity market. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 4(11):422–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Kumar P (2011) Locational marginal prices with SVC in Indian electricity market. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3(3):9–24. https://doi.org/10.4314/IJEST.V3I3.68417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurundkar K, Vaidya (2021) Optimal placement of reactive power compensation devices in distribution network by IEHO-TOPSIS approach. In: International virtual conference on emerging trends in engineering and management science, 23–24 July, Pune

  • Meena NK, Parashar S, Swarnkar A, Gupta N, Niazi KR (2018) Improved elephant herding optimization for multi objective DER accommodation in distribution systems. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 14(3):1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2748220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Chowdhury B (2011) Distribution LMP based economic operation for future smart grid. In: IEEE, power and energy conference, 25–26 Feb, Illinois, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/PECI.2011.5740485

  • Ramos JLM, Marcolini AM, Lopez FPG, Yravedra FA, Oneny A, Yoldasy Y, Khiatz M, Ghomriz L, Fragalex N (2018) Provision of ancillary services by a smart microgrid an OPF approach. In: International conference on smart energy systems and technologies. IEEE (SEST), 10–12 Sept, Sevilla, Spain. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEST.2018.8495883

  • Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z (2002) Market operations in electric power systems. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Bansal R, Singh A, Naidoo R (2018) Multi-objective optimization of hybrid renewable energy system using reformed electric system cascade analysis for islanding and grid connected modes of operation. IEEE Access 6:47332–47354. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2867276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetz T, Appen V, Braun M, Wirth G (2011) Cost-optimal inverter sizing for ancillary services field experience in Germany and future considerations. In: 26th European photovoltaic solar energy conference. https://doi.org/10.4229/26THEUPVSEC2011-4DP.2.2

  • Suzlon (2021) Suzlon powering a greener tomorrow. https://www.suzlon.com/

  • TANGEDCO (2022) Tamil Nadu Generation and distribution Corporation Limited

  • Wang H, Murillo-Sanchez CE, Zimmerman RD, Thomas RJ (2007) On computational issues of market-based optimal power flow. Power Syst IEEE Trans 22(3):1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2007.901301

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Deb S, Coelho LDS (2015) Elephant herding optimization. In: 3rd International symposium on computational and business intelligence (ISCBI), 7–9 Dec, Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCBI.2015.8

  • Weather Data (2020), https://sam.nrel.gov/weather-data.html

  • Zhao Y, Irving MR, Song Y (2005) A Cost allocation and pricing method for reactive power service in the new deregulated electricity market environment. In: IEEE/PES transmission and distribution, conference & exhibition: Asia and Pacific 18 August, Dalian, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC.2005.1547186

  • Zhong J, Bhattacharya K (2002) Reactive power pricing and management in deregulated markets a review. In: IEEE power engineering society winter meeting, 27–31 Jan

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kalyani M. Kurundkar.

Appendices

Appendix 1

General data

 The period of analysis (T)

24 h

 Time step (t)

1 h

 Life of plant (\(ls\))

25 years

 Rate of interest (rin)in %

0.12

PV module

 Type

Monocrystalline

 Peak power rating

250 Wp

 Area per unit (A)

1.1 m2

 Rated module efficiency (\({\eta }_{\rm{PV}})\)

15%

 Temperature coefficient of efficiency (β)

0.0045

 Normal operating cell temperature (NOCT)

55 °C

 Temperature at rated efficiency

25 °C

 Solar radiance at NOCT

800 W/m2

 Capital cost per unit

0.70 $/W

 Operation and maintenance cost

0.04 $/W

 Balance of system cost

0.8 $/W

 Depreciation cost

0.004 $/h

 Lifespan

25 years

 Number of PV modules (\({N}_{PV})\)

17

Wind energy conversion system

 Make

SUZLON

 Rated power

600 kW

 Cut in speed \({(W}_{cin})\)

4 m/s

 Cut out speed \({(W}_{CO})\)

20 m/s

 Rated speed \({(W}_{Nor}\))

13 m/s

 Hub height

90 m

 Rotor diameter

20 m

 Hellman coefficient used

0.35

 Calculated WECS efficiency (\({\eta }_{ws}\))

30%

 Capital cost per unit

0.67 $/W

 Operation and  maintenance cost

0.04 $/W

Lifespan (\(ls\))

25 Years

 Number of wind turbines (\({N}_{ws}\))

6

D-STATCOM

 Rated reactive power capacity (\({Q}_{\rm{DSt}})\)

1.5 MVAr

 Coefficients of loss curve whose values (\(\alpha\))

0.0067 (MW/MVAr2)

 Coefficients of loss curve in \((\beta\))

0.0018 (MW)

 HEP (wholesale energy Price)

100 $/MW

Automatic Power Factor Controllers (APFCs)

 Number of Capacitors

6

 Make

Havells

 Rating of each capacitor

250 kVAr

 Supply Frequency

50 Hz ± 3%

 Switching

Thyristorised

(automated)

 Voltage

415 V

Appendix 2

Real-Time Indian 31 Bus Radial Distribution System (RDS):

Bus data

Branch data

Bus no.

Pd (kW)

Qd (kVAr)

Branch no.

From bus

To bus

R (Ω)

X (Ω)

1

0.000

0.000

1

1

2

0.089

0.026

2

25.000

0.000

2

2

3

0.080

0.077

3

48.000

8.000

3

3

4

0.089

0.047

4

80.000

47.000

4

4

5

0.081

0.052

5

0.000

44.000

5

5

6

0.090

0.014

6

15.000

153.000

6

6

7

0.080

0.021

7

25.000

109.000

7

7

8

0.080

0.047

8

7

10

0.029

0.029

8

1772.000

374.000

9

8

9

0.011

0.086

9

90.000

44.000

     

10

225.000

109.000

10

10

11

0.091

0.100

11

10

13

0.099

0.080

11

225.000

109.000

12

11

12

0.091

0.093

12

90.000

44.000

     

13

90.000

44.000

13

13

14

0.099

0.045

14

13

15

0.091

0.030

14

1537.000

745.000

     

15

90.000

44.000

15

15

16

0.090

0.192

16

450.000

218.000

16

16

17

0.029

0.190

17

16

20

0.090

0.140

17

495.000

240.000

18

17

18

0.021

0.915

18

90.000

44.000

19

18

19

0.020

0.770

19

90.000

44.000

     

20

225.000

159.000

20

20

21

0.076

0.011

21

225.000

159.000

21

21

22

0.018

0.005

22

21

25

0.029

0.014

22

1874.000

907.000

23

22

23

0.015

0.013

23

180.000

157.000

24

23

24

0.039

0.050

24

274.000

139.000

     

25

225.000

109.000

25

25

26

0.071

0.038

26

25

27

0.076

0.040

26

405.000

216.000

     

27

225.000

119.000

27

27

28

0.028

0.025

28

315.000

163.000

28

28

29

0.029

0.026

29

225.000

109.000

29

29

30

0.025

0.020

30

90.000

44.000

30

30

31

0.027

0.016

31

90.000

44.000

     

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurundkar, K.M., Vaidya, G.A. Voltage Control Ancillary Service Through Grid-Connected Microgrid, Its Pricing by Optimized Active Power and Reactive Power Management Using IEHO-TOPSIS Approach. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 48, 229–250 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-023-00655-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-023-00655-0

Keywords

Navigation