Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment Approaches to Optimum Surface Hardening Parameters of Stress Concentrator-Bearing Structures

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

The assessment of optimum surface hardening parameters of stress concentrator-bearing components is examined. Mechanics and mathematical model approaches were used to set the variational statement of the problem to find such a nonlocal (gradient) distribution of mechanical properties in the surface layers of components with stress concentrators that would improve the serviceability of structures as a whole. The functional was chosen as the optimality criterion that describes the contact strength of the structure and can assess the impact of strength parameters and stress concentrator characteristics on the product performance. The problem was solved with a free FEniCS finite element analysis package in Python. For a computer-processable software package, the algorithm is offered to evaluate the stress-strain state of a body with stress concentrators in contact interaction. The applied two-dimensional problem to assess the performance parameters of plasma-hardened locomotive tires with elliptic stress concentrators in view of their geometry is considered. A set of numerical experiments demonstrated that the geometric concentrator characteristics had a much greater impact on the product reliability than the size of such a defect. The concentrator radii ratio effect on the contact strength of a wheel tire was established. Elliptic concentrators with a major axis radii ratio greater than 40 were found to be most dangerous since just in the vicinity of their vertices, the stress state exhibits the worst performance parameters. Practical recommendations were advanced as regards the modified plasma-hardened layer depth to ensure adequate reliability of the rolling surfaces of railway wheels with an examined type of stress concentrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strength of Metals and Structures: Series of monographs, Vol. 2: Fatigue of Metals. Effect of the Surface Condition and Contact Interaction [in Russian], Pisarenko Institute of Problems of Strength, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev (2009).

  2. S. P. Timoshenko, Statistical and Dynamic Problems of the Theory of Elasticity [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. N. Savin, Stress Concentration near Holes [in Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. N. Savin, Distribution of Stresses near Holes [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. N. Savin and V. I. Tulchii, Handbook on Stress Concentrations [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. N. Guz (Ed.), Nonclassical Problems of Fracture Mechanics [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. S. Pisarenko, Strength of Materials [in Russian], Vyshcha Shkola, Kiev (1986).

  8. V. T. Troshchenko (Ed.), Strength of Materials and Structures [in Russian], Akademperiodika, Kiev (2005).

  9. Y. Murakami, Theory of Elasticity and Stress Concentration, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Pluvinage, Fracture and Fatigue Emanating from Stress Concentrators, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. D. Pilkey, D. F. Pilkey, and Z. Bi, Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors, John Wiley & Sons, New York (2020).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Kharchenko (Ed.), Optimization of Coating Technology by Strength and Wear Resistance Criteria [in Russian], Pisarenko Institute of Problems of Strength, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev (2010).

  13. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1302/2014 of November 18, 2014 Concerning a Technical Specification for Interoperability Relating to the ‘Rolling Stock – Locomotives and Passenger Rolling Stock’ Subsystem of the Rail System in the European Union.

  14. EN 12663-1:2010. Railway Applications. Structural Requirements of Railway Vehicle Bodies. Part 1. Locomotives and Passenger Rolling Stock (and Alternative Method for Freight Wagons), CEN (2010).

  15. Z. A. Stotsko, O. A. Kuzin, M. O. Kuzin, and V. A. Mechnik, “Estimation of strength properties of functionally graded structures with elliptical stress,” Arch Mater Sci Eng, 113, No. 1, 35–41 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. A. Lyashenko, Z. A. Stotsko, O. A. Kuzin, and M. O. Kuzin, “The use of computational contact mechanics approaches to assess the performance of parts bearing stress concentrators,” J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng, 103, No. 1, 25–32 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Kuzin, “A mathematical model describing the variation in material properties,” Int Appl Mech, 51, No. 4, 474–479 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. A. Lebedev and V. P. Shvets, “Assessment of damage in structural steels by the parameters of scatter of hardness characteristics in loaded and unloaded states,” Strength Mater, 40, No. 3, 302–307 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-008-9017-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guidelines to Best Practices for Heavy Haul Railway Operations: Wheel and Rail Interface Issues, IHHA, Virginia (2001).

  20. V. L. Popov, Contact Mechanics and Friction. Physical Principles and Application, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg (2017).

  21. S. I. Bulychev, “Correlation between reduced and unreduced hardness in nanomicroindentation testing,” Zh. Tekh. Fiz., 69, No. 7, 42–48 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. O. V. Katok, V. V. Kharchenko, A. V. Drozdov, et al., “Determination of mechanical properties of steels by continuous indentation,” in: Reliability and Durability of Machines and Structures [in Ukrainian], Issue 31, Kyiv (2008), pp. 208–213.

  23. H. P. Langtangen and A. Logg, Solving PDEs in Python. The FEniCS Tutorial I, Springer, Berlin (2017).

  24. R. Johansson, Numerical Python: Scientific Computing and Data Science Applications with Numpy, SciPy and Matplotlib, Apress, CA (2019).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Kuzin.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Mitsnosti, No. 4, pp. 47 – 55, July – August, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luchko, Y.Y., Kuzin, O.A., Kopylov, V.I. et al. Assessment Approaches to Optimum Surface Hardening Parameters of Stress Concentrator-Bearing Structures. Strength Mater 55, 720–726 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00561-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00561-0

Keywords

Navigation