Skip to main content
Log in

Space–Time Distribution of Trichloroethylene Groundwater Concentrations: Geostatistical Modeling and Visualization

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a geostatistical approach to model and visualize the space–time distribution of groundwater contaminants. It is illustrated using data from one of the world’s largest plume of trichloroethylene (TCE) contamination, extending over 23 km2, which has polluted drinking water wells in northern Michigan. A total of 613 TCE concentrations were recorded at 36 wells between May 2003 and October 2018. To account for the non-stationarity of the spatial covariance, the data were first projected in a new space using multidimensional scaling. During this spatial deformation the domain is stretched in regions of relatively lower spatial correlation (i.e., higher spatial dispersion), while being contracted in regions of higher spatial correlation. The range of temporal autocorrelation is 43 months, while the spatial range is 11 km. The sample semivariogram was fitted using three different types of non-separable space–time models, and their prediction performance was compared using cross-validation. The sum-metric and product-sum semivariogram models performed equally well, with a mean absolute error of prediction corresponding to 23% of the mean TCE concentration. The observations were then interpolated every 6 months to the nodes of a 150 m spacing grid covering the study area and results were visualized using a three-dimensional space–time cube. This display highlights how TCE concentrations increased over time in the northern part of the study area, as the plume is flowing to the so-called Chain of Lakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner W, Miksch S, Mueller W, Schumann H, Tominski C (2007) Visualizing time-oriented data: a systematic view. Comput Graph 31:401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrienko N, Andrienko G, Gatalsky P (2003) Exploratory spatio-temporal visualization: an analytical review. J Vis Lang Comput 14:503–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer NP, Bradford CM, Villanacci JF, Crain NE, Corsi RL, Chambers DM, Burk T, Blount BC (2015) Relationship between vapor intrusion and human exposure to trichloroethylene. J Environ Sci Health A 50(13):1360–1368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron K, Hunter P (2002) Using spatial models and kriging techniques to optimize long-term groundwater monitoring networks: a case study. Environmetrics 13:629–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappello C, De Iaco S, Posa D (2018) Testing the type of non-separability and some classes of space–time covariance function models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappello C, De Iaco S, Posa D (2020) Covatest: an R package for selecting a class of space–time covariance functions. J Stat Softw 94:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC (2020) Trichloroethylene—ToxFAQs™. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tfacts19.pdf Accessed 6 July 2023

  • Cressie N, Huang HC (1999) Classes of nonseparable, spatio-temporal stationary covariance functions. J Am Stat Assoc 94:1330–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cesare L, Myers DE, Posa D (2002) FORTRAN programs for space–time modeling. Comput Geosc 28:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Iaco S (2010) Space–time correlation analysis: a comparative study. J Appl Stat 37:1027–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Iaco S, Myers DE, Posa D (2001) Space–time analysis using a general product-sum model. Stat Probab Lett 52:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Iaco S, Posa D, Cappello C, Maggio S (2019) Isotropy, symmetry, separability and strict positive definiteness for covariance functions: a critical review. Spat Stat 29:89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV (1993) Kriging in a finite domain. Math Geol 25:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) Geostatistical software library and user guide. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos R, Luo X (1994) Spatiotemporal modeling: covariances and ordinary kriging systems. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Geostatistics for the next century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 88–93

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2023) TCE Consumer Fact Sheet. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/fact-sheet-trichloroethylene-tce. Accessed 6 July 2023

  • Fouedjio F (2017) Second-order non-stationary modeling approaches for univariate geostatistical data. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 31:1887–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouedjio F, Desassis N, Romary T (2015) Estimation of space deformation model for non-stationary random functions. Spat Stat 13:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting T (2002) Nonseparable, stationary covariance functions for space–time data. J Am Stat Assoc 97:590–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting T, Genton MG, Guttorp P (2007) Geostatistical space–time models, stationarity, separability and full symmetry. In: Finkenstaedt B, Isham V, Held L (eds) Statistics of spatio-temporal systems. Monographs in statistics and applied probability. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 151–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (2010) Three-dimensional visualization, interactive analysis and contextual mapping of space–time cancer data. In: Painho M, Santos MY, Pundt H (eds) Proceedings AGILE 2010: the 13th AGILE international conference on geographic information science. Springer Verlag, Guimarães, Portugal

  • Guo L, Lei L, Zeng Z (2015) Evaluation of spatio-temporal variogram models for mapping Xco2 using satellite observations: a case study in China. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 8:376–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink GBM, Griffith DA (2010) Space–time geostatistics for geography: a case study of radiation monitoring across parts of Germany. Geogr Anal 42:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez GM, Goovaerts P, Kaufmann A, Rommel R (2014) SpaceStat 4.0 user manual: software for the space–time analysis of dynamic complex systems, 4th ed. BioMedware, Ann Arbor. https://www.biomedware.com/files/SpaceStat_4.0_Documentation.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2023

  • Johnson PD, Goldberg SJ, Mays MZ, Dawson BV (2003) Threshold of trichloroethylene contamination in maternal drinking waters affecting fetal heart development in the rat. Environ Health Perspect 111(3):289–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Júnez-Ferreira HE, Hernández-Hernández MA, Herrera GS, González-Trinidad J, Cappello C, Maggio S, De Iaco S (2023) Assessment of changes in regional groundwater levels through spatio-temporal kriging: application to the southern Basin of Mexico aquifer system. Hydrogeol J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02681-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi H, Sarukkalige R, Shao Q (2021) Evaluation of non-uniform groundwater level data using spatiotemporal modelling. Groundw Sustain Dev 15:100659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean MI (2018) Spatio-temporal models for the analysis and optimisation of groundwater quality monitoring networks. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/38975/

  • Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, Wikes Manufacturing TCE Plume (2020) https://www.michigan.gov/egle/0,9429,7-135-3311_4109_9846_30022-385691--,00.html. Accessed 3 Feb 2023

  • Montero JM, Fernandez-Aviles G, Mateu J (2015) Spatial and spatio-temporal geostatistical modeling and kriging. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porcu E, Furrer R, Nychka D (2021) 30 Years of space–time covariance functions. Wires Comput Stat 13:e1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautman CA, Istok JD (1996) Probabilistic assessment of ground-water contamination: 1. Geostat Framew Ground Water 34:899–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2008) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihana-Abdallah A, Pang Y (2019) Fate and transport of a TCE groundwater contamination plume. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) North-Central Section conference. https://asee-ncs.org/proceedings/2019/1/71.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2023

  • Ruybal CJ, Hogue TS, McCray JE (2019) Evaluation of groundwater levels in the Arapahoe aquifer using spatiotemporal regression kriging. Water Resour Res 55:2820–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson PD, Guttorp P (1992) Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. J Am Stat Assoc 87:108–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2011) SAS/STAT 9.3 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominski C, Schulze-Wollgast P, Schuman H (2005) 3D information visualization for time dependent data on maps. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on information visualisation. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2005.3

  • Van Driel JN (1989) Three dimensional display of geologic data. In: Raper J (ed) Three dimensional applications in Geological Information System. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Varouchakis EA, Hristopulos DT (2017) Comparison of spatiotemporal variogram functions based on a sparse dataset of ground-water level variations. Spat Stat 34:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Varouchakis EA, Theodoridou PG, Karatzas GP (2019) Spatiotemporal geostatistical modeling of groundwater levels under a Bayesian framework using means of physical background. J Hydrol 575:487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varouchakis EA, Guardiola-Alber C, Karatzas GP (2022) Spatiotemporal geostatistical analysis of groundwater level in aquifer aystems of complex hydrogeology. Water Resour Res 58(3):e2021WR029988

  • Wackernagel H (1998) Multivariate geostatistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Grant 2 R44 ES031875-02 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIEHS. A free 1-year license of the commercial software SpaceStat can be downloaded at https://biomedware.com/products/spacestat/

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Goovaerts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goovaerts, P., Rihana-Abdallah, A. & Pang, Y. Space–Time Distribution of Trichloroethylene Groundwater Concentrations: Geostatistical Modeling and Visualization. Math Geosci 56, 437–464 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10107-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-023-10107-4

Keywords

Navigation