Skip to main content
Log in

Does ICAO’s climate change mitigation policy based on international agreements reflect global environmental justice?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to answer the question, does ICAO’s mitigation policy on climate change based on international agreements reflect global environmental justice? This study adopts a qualitative research design through the process of descriptive analysis. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) mitigation policies on climate change are one of ICAO’s efforts in achieving global environmental justice. The slogan “No Country Left Behind” is an ICAO initiative to ensure better implementation of SARPs can be harmonized globally so that all countries gain access to socioeconomic benefits resulting from safe and reliable air transportation. However, there is skepticism about ICAO global governance because, throughout the years, the policies introduced by ICAO are considered to be unsuccessful in carrying out The Kyoto Protocol’s mandates. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether the ICAO policy already reflects global environmental justice since its dimensions play an important role in global governance effectiveness. Data were collected by performing literature analysis and interviewing: (1) The ICAO Headquarters representative in Montreal via email; (2) The Indonesian government officer responsible for ICAO environmental policy; and (3) An expert on air and space law. The data were analyzed using the environmental justice dimensions of David Schlosberg, namely the distribution of environmental risks, recognition, and participation. The result shows that ICAO’s mitigation policy on climate change still needs to be improved because it does not fully reflect environmental justice dimensions. The limited features and scope of the CORSIA scheme, the unequal aviation technology advancements, and the supply of sustainable aviation fuels are the three major problems identified when it comes to the related dimensions of environmental risk distribution. The representation of ICAO-CAEP (Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection) membership does not reflect the dimensions of recognition and participation because are more favorable toward developed countries. ICAO was also criticized because the policy-making process and negotiation are more subservient to the interest of the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Source: Beard (2017)

Fig. 3

Source: ICAO (n.d.-n)

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable for that specific section.

Abbreviations

AAF:

Alternative aviation fuels

ACT:

Assistance, capacity-building and training

ARC:

Airworthiness review certificates

CBDR:

Common but differentiated responsibilities

CORSIA:

Carbon offsetting and reduction scheme for international aviation

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

EU:

European Union

EUR:

Europe

GEF:

Global environment facility

IATA:

International air transport association

ICAO:

International Civil Aviation Organization

ICSA:

International coalition for sustainable aviation

LCD:

Least developed country

MBM:

Market-based measurement

MNC:

Multinational corporation/company

MRO:

Maintenance, repair and overhaul

NDC:

Nationally determined contribution

NGO:

Non-Governmental Organization

SAF:

Sustainable aviation fuels

SARPs:

Standards and recommended practices

UNFCCC:

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

WACAF:

West & Central Africa

WBG:

World Bank Group

WWF:

World Wide Fund

References

Download references

Funding

Not applicable for that specific section.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DK has made substantial contributions which are data collection, interpreting and analyzing data, and writing the article. DA performed data collection and literature study related to environmental justice concept. MS performed data collection and literature study in technical aspects of aviation related to climate change. RB contributed to data analyzing and interpreting. Z contributed to editing text and performed literature study related to international law and ICAO policies on climate change.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinar Dewi Kania.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable for that specific section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable for that specific section.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 164 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kania, D.D., Arubusman, D.A., Sari, M. et al. Does ICAO’s climate change mitigation policy based on international agreements reflect global environmental justice?. Int Environ Agreements 23, 449–466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09619-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09619-5

Keywords

Navigation