Abstract
If we are to understand the premises at the core of debates regarding the philosophy of technology, as in the works of several prominent figures such as Marcuse, Ellul, and Habermas, we must confront Heidegger's philosophical legacy. Based on a broad overview of early and later Heidegger, and some of his notable followers, we argue that Heidegger's philosophy of technology created a problematic intellectual legacy. This resulted not only from his well-known political involvement with the Nazi regime but arguably from the philosophical structure that enables such political views to be grounded in his thought. We argue that Heidegger's understanding of technology as possessing an essence [Wesen], which arises from his interpretation of metaphysics as onto-theology, continues to serve as the point of departure for technological discourse. This article traces the infrastructure of ‘Heideggerian Intellectualism’ that accepts the totality of technology as a form of thinking and yet entails multiple fluctuations regarding how we are coerced to engage with metaphysics, making it difficult to evaluate its contributions or limits. In the framework of the rapid technological changes underway at present and the concerns regarding them, there is a tendency to once again delve into Heidegger's thought on this matter. This article attempts to demonstrate that such a tendency also entails a certain degree of danger.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Materials
It is not relevant for the current study.
References
Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
Belu, D. S., & Feeberg, A. (2010). Heidegger’s aporetic ontology of technology. Inquiry, 1(53), 1–19.
Borgmann, A. (2006). Technology as a cultural force: For Alena and Griffin. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 31(3), 351–360.
Davis, B. W. (2010). Translator’s foreword. In M. Heidegger, Country path conversations (pp. Vii–xxii). Indiana University Press.
De Beistegui, M. (1998). Heidegger and the political. Routledge.
De Beistegui, M. (2002). Heidegger and the political: Dystopias. Routledge.
De Beistegui, M. (2005). The new Heidegger. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Derrida, J. (1989). Of spirit: Heidegger and the question. (G. Bennington, & R. Bowlby, Trans.) University of Chicago Press.
Di Cesare, D. (2018). Heidegger and the Jews: The black notebooks. Polity.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1984). Between technē and technology: The ambiguous place of equipment in Being and Time. Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 32, 23–35.
Dyer, R. (1997). White: Essays on race and culture. Routledge.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. (J. Wilkinson, Trans.) Vintage Books.
Ellul, J. (1980). The technological system. (J. Neugroschel, Trans.) Continuum.
Fagenblat, M. (2016). “Heidegger” and the Jews. In I. Farin & J. Malpas (Eds.), Reading Heidegger’s Black Notebooks 1931–1941 (pp. 145–168). MIT Press.
Faye, E. (2009). Heidegger, the introduction of Nazism into philosophy. Yale University Press.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. Routledge.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Harvard University Press.
Gribbin, J. (2002). Science: A history 1534–2001. Penguin.
Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics. (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.) Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). Toward a rational society. Polity Press.
Heidegger, M. (1973). The end of philosophy. (J. Stambaugh, Trans.) Harper and Row.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. (W. Lovitt, Trans.) Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1981). "Only a God can save us": The Spiegel interview (1966). In T. Sheehan (Ed.), Heidegger: The man and the thinker (W. J. Richardson, Trans., pp. 45–67). Precedent Publishing.
Heidegger, M. (1992). Parmenides. Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1993). Letter on humanism. (F. A. Capuzzi, Trans.) Harper.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. (J. Stambaugh, Trans.) State Univeristy of New York Press.
Heidegger, M. (1998). Introduction to "What is metaphysics?" In Pathmarks. Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2000). Introduction to metaphysics. (G. Fried, & R. Polt, Trans.) Yale University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Bremen and Freiburg lectures. (A. J. Mitchell, Trans.) Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1966). Discourse on thinking. Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1969). Identity and difference. Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (2003). Only a God can save us: Der Spiegel’s interview. In M. Heidegger & M. Stassen (Eds.), Martin Heidegger: Philosophical and Political Writings (pp. 24–48). Continuum.
Horkheimer, M. (2004). Eclipse of reason. Continuum.
Huxley, A. (1969). Letters of Aldous Huxley. (G. Smith, Ed.) Chatto & Windus.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. SUNY Press.
Ihde, D. (2010). Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives. Fordham University Press.
Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. The University of Chicago Press.
Kittler, F. (2009). Towards an ontology of media (pp. 23–31). Culture and Society.
Lapidot, E. (2020). Is technology Jewish? A conversation with Heidegger. The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 28(1), 95–120.
Lapidot, E., & Brumlik, M. (Eds.). (2017). Heidegger and Jewish thought: Difficult others. Rowman & Littlefield.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
Lewin, D. (2011). Technology and the philosophy of religion. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lyotard, J. F. (1990). Heidegger and "the Jews". (A. Michel, & M. S. Roberts, Trans.) University of Minnesota Press.
Marcuse, H. (2009). Negations: Essays in critical theory. (J. Shapiro, Trans.) Penguin Press.
Marcuse, H. (1968). One-dimensional man. Beacon Press.
Marx, K. (1955). The poverty of philosophy. Progress Publishers.
Misa, T. J. (1994). Retrieving sociotechnical change from technological determinism. In M. R. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? (pp. 115–142). MIT Press.
Mumford, L. (1970). The myth of the machine: The pentagon of power. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Offe, C. (1988). Technology and one-dimensionality: a version of the technocracy thesis? In R. Pippin, A. Feenberg, C. Webel, & (Eds.), Marcuse: critical theory and the promise of utopia (pp. 215–224). Macmillan Education.
Philipse, H. (1999). Heidegger and ethics. Inquiry, 42(3–4), 439–474.
Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artefacts. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press.
Postman, N. (1986). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin Books.
Rojcewicz, R. (2006). The gods and technology: A reading of Heidegger. SUNY Press.
Shapin, S. (1998). The scientific revolution. University of Chicago Press.
Smith, M. R. (1994). Technological determinism in American culture. In M. R. Smith & L. Mark (Eds.), Does technology drive history? The Dilemma of technological determinism. MIT Press.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of epimetheus. Stanford University Press.
Thomson, I. (2005). Heidegger on ontotheology: Technology and the politics of education. Cambridge University Press.
Vioulac, J. (2021). Apocalypse of truth: Heideggerian meditations. (M. J. Peterson, Trans.) The University of Chicago Press.
Weber, M. (2004). The vocation lectures. (D. Owen, T. B. Strong, Eds., & R. Livingstone, Trans.) Hacket Publishing Company.
White, L. (1962). Medieval technology and social change. Oxford University Press.
Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. MIT Press.
Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press.
Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3), 362–378.
Winner, L. (1997). Technology today: Utopia or dystopia? Social Research, 64(3), 989–1017.
Wolin, R. (2015). Heidegger’s children. Princeton University Press.
Wolin, R. (2023). Heidegger in ruins: Between philosophy and ideology. Yale University Press.
Funding
It is not relevant for the current study. There is not any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors are equal contributors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
It is not relevant for the current study.
Consent for Publication
I agree to publish this paper.
Competing Interests
There is not any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ataria, Y., Tamir, L. Why Overcoming Heideggerian Intellectualism Should Precede Overcoming Metaphysics. Hum Stud (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09689-z
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09689-z