Skip to main content
Log in

Compactification of the Energy Surfaces for \(n\) Bodies

  • Published:
Regular and Chaotic Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

For \(n\) bodies moving in Euclidean \(d\)-space under the influence of a homogeneous pair interaction we compactify every center of mass energy surface, obtaining a \(\big{(}2d(n-1)-1\big{)}\)-dimensional manifold with corners in the sense of Melrose. After a time change, the flow on this manifold is globally defined and nontrivial on the boundary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Change history

  • 29 October 2023

    The numbering issue has been changed to 4-5.

Notes

  1. We don’t touch upon the question about the limits \(E\to\pm\infty\).

  2. Any compact connected \(N\)-manifold arises as the compactification of Euclidean \(N\)-space

  3. A stratification of a manifold is a locally finite partition into smooth submanifolds. See, for example, [30, p. 83].

  4. See Dereziński and Gérard [4, Section 5.10].

  5. In the case of smooth bounded pair potentials that are \(\alpha\)-homogeneous for large distances, a positive solution of the asymptotic completeness problem for an arbitrary number \(n\) of particles is expected, too. In the present setting, however, the motion is not asymptotically complete for \(n>3\) because of the existence of noncollision singularities.

  6. We set \(C^{(\alpha)}:=C^{k,\alpha^{\prime}}\) with \(k:=\lceil\alpha\rceil-1\in{\mathbb{N}}_{0}\) and \(\alpha^{\prime}:=\alpha-k\) for \(\alpha\in(0,\infty)\).

  7. Definition (Melrose [23, Lemma 1.6.2]): A boundary defining function on a manifold with corners \(X\) is a function \(\rho\in C^{\infty}(X,{\mathbb{R}})\) with \(\rho|_{\partial X}=0\), \(\rho|_{X\setminus\partial X}>0\) and in local coordinates at \(p\in\partial_{k}X\), \(\rho(x)=a(x)x_{1}\cdot\ldots\cdot x_{k}\) with \(a(p)>0\) and \(a\) smooth.

  8. Definition [20]: Let \(\psi\) be a flow on a complete metric space \(X\). Suppose there is a continuous function \(g:X\to{\mathbb{R}}\) such that \(g(\psi(x,t))<g(x)\) if \(t>0\) unless \(x\) is a rest point. Suppose further that the rest points of \(\psi\) are isolated. Then \(g\) is called gradient-like. We use this definition, although in our case the rest points are not isolated.

  9. Here we use a simplified notation for the values of observables along orbits.

  10. In general, (4.23) is a nontrivial bundle. However, here we argue only semilocally, so that this does not play a role in our analysis.

  11. In Fig. 3 for collisions these correspond to the twelve dark green points near the outer circle. For escape to spatial infinity, they are represented by the twelve points on that circle.

References

  1. Aigner, M., Combinatorial Theory, Berlin: Springer, 1997.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ammann, B., Mougel, J., and Nistor, V., A Comparison of the Georgescu and Vasy Spaces Associated to the \(N\)-Body Problems and Applications, Ann. Henri Poincaré, 2022, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1141–1203.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Devaney, R. L., Singularities in Classical Mechanical Systems, in Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 1: Proc. of the Special Year at the University of Maryland (College Park, Md., 1979/80), A. Katok (Ed.), Progr. Math., vol. 10, Boston, Mass.: Birkhäuser, 1981, pp. 211–333.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dereziński, J. and Gérard, Ch., Scattering Theory of Classical and Quantum \(N\)-Particle Systems, Berlin: Springer, 1997.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Duignan, N., Moeckel, R., Montgomery, R., and Yu, G., Chazy-Type Asymptotics and Hyperbolic Scattering for the \(n\)-Body Problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 2020, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 255–297.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Elbialy, M. S., Collision Singularities in Celestial Mechanics, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 1990, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1563–1593.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleischer, S. and Knauf, A., Improbability of Collisions in \(n\)-Body Systems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 2019, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 1007–1039.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Féjoz, J., Knauf, A., and Montgomery, R., Lagrangian Relations and Linear Point Billiards, Nonlinearity, 2017, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1326–1355.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Graf, G. M., Asymptotic Completeness for \(N\)-Body Short-Range Quantum Systems: A New Proof, Comm. Math. Phys., 1990, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 73–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Heggie, D. C., A Global Regularisation of the Gravitational \(N\)-Body Problem, Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron., 1974, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 217–241.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirsch, M. W., Differential Topology, Grad. Texts in Math., vol. 33, New York: Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knauf, A. and Krapf, M., The Non-Trapping Degree of Scattering, Nonlinearity, 2008, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2023–2041.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackman, C., Knauf, A. and Montgomery, R., Compactifying the Three-Body Problem, in preparation (2023).

  14. Knauf, A., Mathematical Physics: Classical Mechanics, Unitext, vol. 109, Berlin: Springer, 2018.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacomba, E. A. and Ibort, L. A., Origin and Infinity Manifolds for Mechanical Systems with Homogeneous Potentials, Acta Appl. Math., 1988, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 259–284.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacomba, E. A. and Simó, C., Boundary Manifolds for Energy Surfaces in Celestial Mechanics, Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron., 1982, vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 37–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lemaître, G., Regularization of the Three Body Problem, Vistas Astron., 1955, vol. 1, pp. 207–215.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Levi-Civita, T., Sur la résolution qualitative du problème restreinte des trois corps, Acta Math., 1906, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 305–327.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mather, J. N. and McGehee, R., Solutions of the Collinear Four Body Problem Which Become Unbounded in Finite Time, in Dynamical Systems, Theory and Applications (Rencontres, Battelle Res. Inst., Seattle, Wash., 1974), J. Moser (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Phys., vol. 38, Berlin: Springer, 1975, pp. 573–597.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. McGehee, R., Triple Collision in the Collinear Three-Body Problem, Invent. Math., 1974, vol. 27, pp. 191–227.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. McGehee, R., Double Collisions for a Classical Particle System with Nongravitational Interactions, Comment. Math. Helv., 1981, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 524–557.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. McGehee, R., A Stable Manifold Theorem for Degenerate Fixed Points with Applications to Celestial Mechanics, J. Differential Equations, 1973, vol. 14, pp. 70–88.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Melrose, R., Differential Analysis on Manifolds with Corners, in preparation (1996)

  24. Moeckel, R. and Montgomery, R., Symmetric Regularization, Reduction and Blow-Up of the Planar Three-Body Problem, Pacific J. Math., 2013, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 129–189.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Moser, J., Regularization of Kepler’s Problem and the Averaging Method on a Manifold, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 1970, vol. 23, pp. 609–636.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson, C., Homoclinic Orbits and Oscillation for the Planar Three-Body Problem, J. Differential Equations, 1984, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 356–377.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Vasy, A., Propagation of Singularities in Three-Body Scattering, Astérisque, vol. 262, Paris: Soc. Math. France, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Waldvogel, J., A New Regularization of the Planar Problem of Three Bodies, Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron., 1972, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 221–231.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Q. D., The Global Solution of the \(n\)-Body Problem, Celest. Mech. Dynam. Astron., 1991, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 73–88.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wall, C. T. C., Differential Topology, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., vol. 156, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We dedicate this article to Alain Chenciner, our guiding star, on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

AK thanks Eva Miranda (Barcelona) for motivating discussions.

RM thanks the Simons Foundation for travel support.

We both thank the anonymous referee for useful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andreas Knauf or Richard Montgomery.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

MSC2010

70F15, 70F16, 70F10

APPENDIX. MANIFOLDS WITH CORNERS

We follow [2] and [23] in our presentation. Manifolds with corners are modeled on the \(m\)-dimensional cylinders

$${\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}:=[0,\infty)^{k}\times{\mathbb{R}}^{m-k}\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\qquad(k\leqslant m\in{\mathbb{N}}_{0}).$$
Their subsets
$$L_{I}:=\{x=(x_{1},\ldots,x_{m})\in{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\mid x_{i}=0\mbox{ if }i\in I\}\qquad(I\subseteq\{1,\ldots,m\})$$
(A.1)
will be used to define submanifolds.

Definition 3

Let \(U\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\) and \(V\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}^{m^{\prime}}_{k^{\prime}}\) be open, and \(f:U\to V\).

  • \(f\) is called smooth if for some open neighborhood \(\tilde{U}\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}^{m}\) of \(U\) there exists \(\tilde{f}\in C^{\infty}\big{(}\tilde{U},{\mathbb{R}}^{m^{\prime}}\big{)}\) with \(\tilde{f}|_{U}=f\).

  • \(f\) is called a diffeomorphism if it is a smooth bijection with \(f^{-1}\) smooth.

Definition 4 (manifolds with corners)

Let \(X\) be a Hausdorff space.

  • An \((\) \(m\) -dimensional \()\) corner chart \((U,\phi)\) on \(X\) is a homeomorphism \(\phi:U\to V\) , with \(V\) open in \({\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\) .

  • Corner charts \((U_{1},\phi_{1})\) and \((U_{2},\phi_{2})\) on \(X\) are compatible if for \(U:=U_{1}\cap U_{2}\)

    $$\phi_{2}\circ\phi_{1}^{-1}:\phi_{1}(U)\to\phi_{2}(U)$$

    is a diffeomorphism.

  • A (corner) atlas \(\{(U_{i},\phi_{i})\mid i\in I\}\) on \(X\) is a family of pairwise compatible charts \((U_{i},\phi_{i})\) on \(X\) of equal dimension with \(\bigcup_{i\in I}U_{i}=X\) .

  • Corner atlases on \(X\) are equivalent if their union is a corner atlas on \(X\) . A corner structure on \(X\) is an equivalence class of corner atlases of \(X\) .

  • A paracompact Hausdorff space \(X\) with a corner structure consisting of \(m\) -dimensional corner charts is an ( \(m\) -dimensional) manifold with corners .

  • For \(\partial_{\ell}{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}:=\{x\in{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\mid\mbox{of }x_{1},\ldots,x_{k},\mbox{ exactly }\ell\mbox{ vanish}\}\) ,

    $$\partial_{\ell}X:=\{p\in X\mid\mbox{coordinates at }p\mbox{ map to }\partial_{\ell}{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\}$$

    and the boundary \(\partial X:=\partial^{1}X\) of \(X\) for \(\partial^{\ell}X:=\overline{\partial_{\ell}X}\) .

Unlike for manifolds with boundary, the Cartesian product of two manifolds with corners is naturally a manifold with corners.

Definition 5 (submanifolds of manifolds with corners)

  • A subset \(S\subseteq X\) of an \(m\) -dimensional manifold with corners is a weak submanifold if for every \(x\in S\) there exist \(k\in\{1,\ldots,m\}\) and a corner chart \(\phi:U\to\Omega\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\) with \(x\in U\) such that \(\phi(S\cap U)\) is a submanifold of \({\mathbb{R}}^{m}\) . Then the dimension of \(S\) at \(x\) is \(\dim\big{(}\phi(S\cap U)\big{)}\) at \(\phi(x)\) .

  • A weak submanifold \(S\subseteq X\) is a submanifold \((\) in the sense of manifolds with corners \()\) if, additionally, there are integers \(m^{\prime}\leqslant m\) and \(k^{\prime}\leqslant m^{\prime}\) , and a matrix \(G\in{\rm GL}(m,{\mathbb{R}})\) such that

    1. (a)

      \(G\cdot\big{(}{\mathbb{R}}^{m^{\prime}}_{k^{\prime}}\times\{0\}\big{)}\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}^{m}_{k}\) ;

    2. (b)

      the chart \(\phi\) maps \(S\cap U\) bijectively to the intersection of this linear submanifold with \(\Omega\) , in other words, \(\phi(S\cap U)=G\cdot\big{(}{\mathbb{R}}^{m^{\prime}}_{k^{\prime}}\times\{0\}\big{)}\cap\Omega\) .

  • A submanifold \(S\subseteq X\) is a \(p\)-submanifold if for \(x\in X\) there exists a corner chart \((U,\phi)\) at \(x\) and \(I\subseteq\{1,\ldots,m\}\) with (see Definition (A.1))

    $$\phi(S\cap U)=L_{I}\cap\phi(U).$$

    Then \(|I|\) is the codimension of \(S\) at \(x\) and \(|I\cap\{1,\ldots,k\}|\) is the boundary depth of \(S\) at \(x\).

So a \(p\)-submanifold \(S\) of \(X\) is a closed submanifold that has a tubular neighborhood: \(S\subseteq U\subseteq X\) that is locally of product form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knauf, A., Montgomery, R. Compactification of the Energy Surfaces for \(n\) Bodies. Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 28, 628–658 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354723040081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354723040081

Keywords

Navigation