Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the effect due wall interference on the flow around airfoil in the T-128 wind tunnel

  • Published:
Thermophysics and Aeromechanics Aims and scope

Abstract

Within the framework of linear subsonic theory, the problem of determining the effect due to wall interference on the flow around airfoil according to the pressure distributions measured on the airfoil and on the wind-tunnel test section walls is solved. For the test case (testing a BGK1 airfoil in the IAR1.5m wind tunnel), we compared the wall interference corrections to freestream Mach number and airfoil angle-of-attack that were obtained using our method and in the works by other authors. For an OSPB-77 airfoil model tested in the T-128 wind tunnel for two values of wall permeability, f = 0 and 3 %, corrections to distributed data and integral loads were applied in the range of Mach numbers from 0.2 to 0.78. The application of those corrections has made it possible to bring the results for f = 0 and f = 3 % in closer agreement up to the angles of attack at which flow separation occurs on the airfoil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. S.A. Glazkov and V.M. Ivanova, Investigation of induction of permeable wind-tunnel walls according to known flow parameters near them, Uchenye. Zap.TsAGI, 1982, Vol. XIII, No. 4, P. 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.A. Glazkov, Subsonic flow around a thin airfoil in a channel with perforated walls, Uchenye Zap. TsAGI, Vol. XXII, No. 2, 1991, P. 3–12.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S.A. Glazkov, Determination of the influence of wind-tunnel walls on the parameters of the flow near them, Uchenye Zap. TsAGI, 1988, Vol. XIX, No. 3, P. 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.F. Lo, Tunnel interference assessment by boundary measurements, AIAA J., 1978, Vol. 16, No. 4, P. 411–412.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Capelier, J.P. Chevallier, and F. Bouniol, Nouvelle méthode de correction des effets de parois en courant plan, Rech. Aérospatiale, 1978, P. 1–11.

  6. R. Gopinath, Wall Interference evaluation from pressure measurements on control surfaces, J. Aircraft, 1982, Vol. 19, No. 2, P. 1097–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Mokry and L.H. Ohman, Application of the fast fourier transform to two-dimensional wind tunnel wall interference, J. Aircraft, 1980, Vol. 17, P. 402- 408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E.M. Kraft and W.J.A. Dahm, Direct assessment of wall interference in a two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel, AIAA Paper, 1982, No. 82–0187, P. 1–10.

  9. S.A. Glazkov, A.R. Gorbushin, A.I. Ivanov, and A.V. Semenov, Recent experience in improving the accuracy of wall interference corrections in TsAGI T-128 wind tunnel, Progress in Aerospace Sci., 2001, Vol. 37, P. 263–298.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Mokry, Subsonic wall corrections in the air 1.5 m wind tunnel, Report LR-AL-2006-0056, 2006, P. 1–112.

  11. S.A. Velichko, Yu.B. Lifshits, V.M. Neyland, I.A. Solntsev, and A.V. Sorokin, Numerical modeling of transonic flow past an airfoil in a wind tunnel, Comp. Maths. and Math. Phys., 1995, Vol. 35, No. 10, P. 1221–1235.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. F.D. Gakhov, Boundary-Value Problems, Moscow, Nauka, 1977, P. 264–343.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Bosnyakov, S. Glazkov, A. Ivanov, S. Matyash, and V. Neyland, Conception of electronic wind tunnel and first results of its implementation, Progress in Aerospace Sci., 2001, Vol. 37, No. 2, P. 121–145.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. I.A. Kursakov, S.M. Bosnyakov, S.A. Glazkov, S.A. Gorbushin, A.V. Lysenkov, S.V. Matyash, A.V. Semenov, and J. Quest, A numerical approach for assessing slotted wall interference using the CRM model at ETW, CEAS Aeronaut J., 2018, Vol. 9, P. 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Smith, Measured boundary conditions methods for 2D flow, AGARD CP-335, 1982, P. 9.1–9.15.

  16. H. Sawada, General correction method of the interference in 2-dimensional wind tunnels with ventilated walls, Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sci., 1978, Vol. 21, P. 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W.B. Kemp, Transonic assessment of two-dimensional wind tunnel wall interference using measured wall pressures, Advanced Technology Airfoil Research, NASA CP-2045, 1978, Vol. 1, P. 473–486.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V.I. Biryukov, S.A. Glazkov, A.R. Gorbushin, A.I. Ivanov, and A.V. Semenov, Experimental investigation of the effect of nozzle shape and test-section perforation on the stationary and non-stationary characteristics of flow field in the large transonic TsAGI wind tunnel, Aeronautical J., 2005, Vol. 109, Iss. 1092, P. 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Pankhurst and D. Holder, Wind-Tunnel Techniques, Moscow, Foreign Language Publishing House, 1955, P. 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S.A. Glazkov, A.R. Gorbushin, and A.V. Semenov, Development of computational and experimental methods for improving test accuracy, Trudy TsAGI, 2019, Iss. No. 2783, P. 127–164.

  21. B. Rasuo, Scaling between wind tunnels-results accuracy in two-dimensional testing, Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci., 2012, Vol. 55, No. 2, P. 109–115.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. V.I. Kornilov and V.V. Popkov, Blockage effect induced by an airfoil model in a low-velocity wind-tunnel test section, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 2020, Vol. 27, No. 3, P. 359–369.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. A. Glazkov or A. V. Semenov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glazkov, S.A., Semenov, A.V. Determination of the effect due wall interference on the flow around airfoil in the T-128 wind tunnel. Thermophys. Aeromech. 30, 459–474 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S086986432303006X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S086986432303006X

Keywords

Navigation