Skip to main content
Log in

Association between hypertension grades and cancer mortality among Japanese men and women

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to examine the association between hypertension grades and the risk of total and site-specific cancer mortality among Japanese men and women.

Methods

In the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study, 27,332 participants aged 40–79 years were enrolled and followed up with their mortality until 2009. According to the measured blood pressure (BP) at baseline, we classified the participants into four BP categories based on 2018 European guidelines. The Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of total and site-specific cancer mortality according to the hypertension category.

Results

During the 18.5 years of median follow-up, 1,927 cancer deaths were documented. Grade 1 (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140–159 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90–99 mmHg) and grade 2–3 hypertension (SBP ≥ 160 mmHg or DBP ≥ 100 mmHg) were associated with an increased risk of total cancer mortality; the multivariable HRs were 1.17 (1.04–1.32) for grade 1, and 1.27 (1.09–1.47) for grade 2–3 hypertension compared to optimal and normal BP (SBP < 130 mmHg and DBP < 85 mmHg). Linear and positive associations were observed between SBP and DBP 10 mmHg increment and the risk of total cancer mortality; HRs were 1.06 (1.03–1.08) for SBP and 1.07 (1.02–1.11) for DBP of 10 mmHg increment. The excess risk was primarily found for esophageal, liver, and pancreatic cancer; the respective multivariable HRs of grade 2–3 hypertension vs optimal and normal BP were 2.57 (1.10–6.04) for esophageal, 1.67 (1.01–2.77) for liver, and 1.95 (1.17–3.23) for pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion

Hypertension was associated with the increased risk of total cancer mortality, primarily of esophageal, liver, and pancreatic cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA et al (2021) Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 398:957–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J (2020) The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol 16:223–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K et al (2016) Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation 134:441–450

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM et al (2020) Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 396:1223–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, Snyder JK (2015) A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med 373:2103–2116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miura K, Dyer AR, Greenland P, Daviglus ML, Hill M, Liu K et al (2001) Pulse pressure compared with other blood pressure indexes in the prediction of 25-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality rates: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study. J Hypertension 38:232–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, McGee DL, Dawber TR, McNamara P, Castelli WP et al (1981) Systolic blood pressure, arterial rigidity, and risk of stroke. The Framingham study. JAMA 245:1225–1229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stocks T, Van Hemelrijck M, Manjer J, Bjørge T, Ulmer H, Hallmans G et al (2012) Blood pressure and risk of cancer incidence and mortality in the metabolic syndrome and cancer project. J Hypertension 59:802–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrelli F, Ghidini A, Cabiddu M, Perego G, Lonati V, Ghidini M et al (2021) Effects of hypertension on cancer survival: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Invest 51:e13493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Batty GD, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG, Davey Smith G, Whitehall Study (2003) Blood pressure and site-specific cancer mortality: evidence from the original Whitehall study. Br J Cancer 89:1243–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin CN, Yu CM, Sun JP, Fang F, Wen YN, Liu M et al (2013) The healthcare burden of hypertension in Asia. Heart Asia 5:238–243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamakoshi A, Ozasa K, Fujino Y, Suzuki K, Sakata K, Mori M et al (2013) Cohort profile of the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study at final follow-up. J Epidemiol 23:227–232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamagishi K, Sawachi S, Tamakoshi A, Iso H, JACC Study Group (2019) Blood pressure levels and risk of cardiovascular disease mortality among Japanese men and women: the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study for Evaluation of Cancer Risk (JACC Study). J Hypertens 37:1366–1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M et al (2018) 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertension 36:1953–2041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harding JL, Sooriyakumaran M, Anstey KJ, Adams R, Balkau B, Brennan-Olsen S et al (2016) Hypertension, antihypertensive treatment, and cancer incidence and mortality: a pooled collaborative analysis of 12 Australian and New Zealand cohorts. J Hypertension 34:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Christakoudi S, Kakourou A, Markozannes G, Tzoulaki I, Weiderpass E, Brennan P et al (2020) Blood pressure and risk of cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer 146:2680–2693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindgren AM, Nissinen AM, Tuomilehto JO, Pukkala E (2005) Cancer pattern among hypertensive patients in North Karelia, Finland. J Hum Hypertension 19:373–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sohn W, Lee HW, Lee S, Lim JH, Lee MW, Park CH et al (2021) Obesity and the risk of primary liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 27:157–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park EJ, Lee JH, Yu GY, He G, Ali SR, Holzer RG et al (2010) Dietary and genetic obesity promote liver inflammation and tumorigenesis by enhancing IL-6 and TNF expression. Cell 22:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ben Q, Xu M, Ning X, Liu J, Hong S, Huang W et al (2011) Diabetes mellitus and risk of. pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer 47:1928–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pollak M (2008) Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer 8:915–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sipahi I, Debanne SM, Rowland DY, Simon DI, Fang JC (2010) Angiotensin-receptor blockade and risk of cancer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol 11:627–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bommareddy K, Hamade H, Lopez-Olivo MA, Wehner M, Tosh T, Barbieri JS (2022) Association of spironolactone use with risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 158:275–328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all staff members involved in this study for their valuable help in conducting the baseline survey and follow-up.

Funding

This study has been supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT) (MonbuKagaku-sho); Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas of Cancer; and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas of Cancer Epidemiology from MEXT (Nos. 61010076, 62010074, 63010074, 1010068, 2151065, 3151064, 4151063, 5151069, 6279102, 11181101, 17015022, 18014011, 20014026, 20390156, 26293138), and JSPS KAKENHI No.16H06277. This research was also supported by Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Health and Labor Sciences research grants, Japan (Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular Disease and Life-Style Related Diseases: H20-Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-013; H23–Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-005); an Intramural Research Fund (22-4-5) for Cardiovascular Diseases of National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center; Comprehensive Research on Cardiovascular Diseases and Life-Style Related Diseases (H26-Junkankitou [Seisaku]-Ippan-001) and H29–Junkankitou [Seishuu]-Ippan-003 and 20FA1002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TT conceived the idea for the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft. MT, KS, AT, and HI provided critical revision. All authors approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyasu Iso.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The JACC study protocol conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committees of Hokkaido University (Reference number: 14-044), Nagoya University (Reference number: 177 and 227) and Osaka University (Reference number: 14285-8).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 35 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanabe, T., Teramoto, M., Shirai, K. et al. Association between hypertension grades and cancer mortality among Japanese men and women. Cancer Causes Control 35, 497–508 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01797-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01797-6

Keywords

Navigation