Abstract
In frameworks in which topic-theoretic considerations—e.g., tracking subject-matter or topic—are given equal importance with veridical considerations, assigning topics to formulae in a satisfactory way is of critical importance. While intuitions are more-or-less solid for extensional formulae in a propositional language, arriving at a compelling account of the subject-matter of intensional formulae, i.e., formulae including intensional operators, is more challenging. This paper continues previous work on modeling topics of intensional formulae in William Parry’s logic of analytic implication, adapting the general techniques to the framework of topic-sensitive intentional modals (TSIMs) championed by Francesco Berto and his collaborators. As illustrations, we introduce variations on Berto and Peter Hawke’s logic of knowability relative to information (\(\pmb {\textsf{KRI}}\)), including a refinement sensitive to topic-theoretic distinctions between knowledge and belief and a refinement capable of internalizing its own properties. Finally, subsystems of Aybüke Ozgun and Berto’s logic of plain hyperintensional belief (\(\pmb {\textsf{PHB}}\)) are introduced in which fine-grained distinctions in subject-matter are possible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferguson, T. M. (2023). Subject-matter and intensional operators I: Conditional-agnostic analytic implication. Philosophical Studies, 180(7), 1849–1879.
Berto, F. (2019). The theory of topic-sensitive intentional modals. In I. Sedlár & M. Blicha (Eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2018 (pp. 31–56). College Publications.
Berto, F. (2022). Topics of Thought. Oxford University Press.
Berto, F., & Hawke, P. (2021). Knowability relative to information. Mind, 130(517), 1–33
Berto, F. (2019). Simple hyperintensional belief revision. Erkenntnis, 84(3), 559–575
Özgün, A., & Berto, F. (2021). Dynamic hyperintensional belief revision. Review of Symbolic Logic, 14(3), 766–811.
Berto, F. (2018). Aboutness in imagination. Philosophical Studies, 175, 1871–1886
Parry, W. T. (1933). Ein Axiomensystem für eine neue Art von Implikation (analytische Implikation). Ergebnisse Eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4, 5–6.
Parry, W.T. (1968). The logic of C. I. Lewis. In: P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. The Library of Living Philosophers, pp. 115–154. Open Court
Angell, R.B. (1977). Three systems of first degree entailment. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 42(1), 147
Fine, K. (1986). Analytic implication. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27(2), 169–179
Fine, K. (2016). Angellic content. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(2), 199–226
Ferguson, T. M. (2017). Meaning and Proscription in Formal Logic. Springer.
Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton University Press.
Ryle, G. (1933). About. Analysis, 1(1), 10–12
Goodman, N. (1961). About. Mind, 70(277), 1–24
Lewis, D. (1988). Statements partly about observation. Philosophical Papers, 17(1), 1–31
Yablo, S. (2017). Open knowledge and changing the subject. Philosophical Studies, 174 (4), 1047–1071
Yalcin, S. (2018). Belief as question-sensitive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(1), 23–47
Badura, C., & Wansing, H. (2023). STIT-logic for imagination episodes with voluntary input. Review of Symbolic Logic, 16(3), 813–861
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.
Hawke, P., Özgün, A., & Berto, F. (2020). The fundamental problem of logical omniscience. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49(4), 727–766
Parry, W. T. (1989). Analytic implication: Its history, justification, and varieties. In J. Norman & R. Sylvan (Eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic Reason and Argument (pp. 101–118). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hawke, P. (2018). Theories of aboutness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(4), 697–723
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.
Dutant, J. (2015). The legend of the justified true belief analysis. Philosophical Perspectives, 29(1), 95–145.
Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge?. Analysis, 23(6), 121–123
Kraus, S., Lehmann, D. (1986) Knowledge, belief and time. In: L. Kott (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Automata Languages and Programming, pp. 186–195. Springer
Meyer, J.-J.C. (2003). Modal epistemic and doxastic logic. In: D.M. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic vol. 10, 2nd edn., pp. 1–38. Kluwer
Berto, F. & Özgün, A. (2023). The logic of framing effects. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Print to appear
Ferguson, T.M. (2021). The subject-matter of intensional conditionals. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Smirnov Readings in Logic, pp. 59–63. Russian Society of History and Philosophy of Science Publishing House
Gödel, K. (1933). Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls. Ergebnisse Eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4, 39–40.
Ferguson, T.M. (2023). Subject-matter and intensional operators III: State-sensitive subject-matter and topic sufficiency. Review of Symbolic Logic To appear
Acknowledgements
This paper owes a great deal to the constructive and insightful comments provided by referees for this journal and I appreciate their sharing their expertise with me. This paper is an outcome of the project Logical Structure of Information Channels, no. 21-23610M, supported by the Czech Science Foundation and carried out at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, T.M. Subject-Matter and Intensional Operators II: Applications to the Theory of Topic-Sensitive Intentional Modals. J Philos Logic 52, 1673–1701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-023-09722-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-023-09722-7