Skip to main content
Log in

Subject-Matter and Intensional Operators II: Applications to the Theory of Topic-Sensitive Intentional Modals

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In frameworks in which topic-theoretic considerations—e.g., tracking subject-matter or topic—are given equal importance with veridical considerations, assigning topics to formulae in a satisfactory way is of critical importance. While intuitions are more-or-less solid for extensional formulae in a propositional language, arriving at a compelling account of the subject-matter of intensional formulae, i.e., formulae including intensional operators, is more challenging. This paper continues previous work on modeling topics of intensional formulae in William Parry’s logic of analytic implication, adapting the general techniques to the framework of topic-sensitive intentional modals (TSIMs) championed by Francesco Berto and his collaborators. As illustrations, we introduce variations on Berto and Peter Hawke’s logic of knowability relative to information (\(\pmb {\textsf{KRI}}\)), including a refinement sensitive to topic-theoretic distinctions between knowledge and belief and a refinement capable of internalizing its own properties. Finally, subsystems of Aybüke Ozgun and Berto’s logic of plain hyperintensional belief (\(\pmb {\textsf{PHB}}\)) are introduced in which fine-grained distinctions in subject-matter are possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferguson, T. M. (2023). Subject-matter and intensional operators I: Conditional-agnostic analytic implication. Philosophical Studies, 180(7), 1849–1879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berto, F. (2019). The theory of topic-sensitive intentional modals. In I. Sedlár & M. Blicha (Eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2018 (pp. 31–56). College Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berto, F. (2022). Topics of Thought. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Berto, F., & Hawke, P. (2021). Knowability relative to information. Mind, 130(517), 1–33

  5. Berto, F. (2019). Simple hyperintensional belief revision. Erkenntnis, 84(3), 559–575

  6. Özgün, A., & Berto, F. (2021). Dynamic hyperintensional belief revision. Review of Symbolic Logic, 14(3), 766–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berto, F. (2018). Aboutness in imagination. Philosophical Studies, 175, 1871–1886

  8. Parry, W. T. (1933). Ein Axiomensystem für eine neue Art von Implikation (analytische Implikation). Ergebnisse Eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parry, W.T. (1968). The logic of C. I. Lewis. In: P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. The Library of Living Philosophers, pp. 115–154. Open Court

  10. Angell, R.B. (1977). Three systems of first degree entailment. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 42(1), 147

  11. Fine, K. (1986). Analytic implication. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 27(2), 169–179

  12. Fine, K. (2016). Angellic content. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45(2), 199–226

  13. Ferguson, T. M. (2017). Meaning and Proscription in Formal Logic. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Ryle, G. (1933). About. Analysis, 1(1), 10–12

  16. Goodman, N. (1961). About. Mind, 70(277), 1–24

  17. Lewis, D. (1988). Statements partly about observation. Philosophical Papers, 17(1), 1–31

  18. Yablo, S. (2017). Open knowledge and changing the subject. Philosophical Studies, 174 (4), 1047–1071

  19. Yalcin, S. (2018). Belief as question-sensitive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(1), 23–47

  20. Badura, C., & Wansing, H. (2023). STIT-logic for imagination episodes with voluntary input. Review of Symbolic Logic, 16(3), 813–861

  21. Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hawke, P., Özgün, A., & Berto, F. (2020). The fundamental problem of logical omniscience. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49(4), 727–766

  23. Parry, W. T. (1989). Analytic implication: Its history, justification, and varieties. In J. Norman & R. Sylvan (Eds.), Directions in Relevant Logic Reason and Argument (pp. 101–118). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hawke, P. (2018). Theories of aboutness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(4), 697–723

  26. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dutant, J. (2015). The legend of the justified true belief analysis. Philosophical Perspectives, 29(1), 95–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge?. Analysis, 23(6), 121–123

  29. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D. (1986) Knowledge, belief and time. In: L. Kott (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium on Automata Languages and Programming, pp. 186–195. Springer

  30. Meyer, J.-J.C. (2003). Modal epistemic and doxastic logic. In: D.M. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic vol. 10, 2nd edn., pp. 1–38. Kluwer

  31. Berto, F. & Özgün, A. (2023). The logic of framing effects. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Print to appear

  32. Ferguson, T.M. (2021). The subject-matter of intensional conditionals. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Smirnov Readings in Logic, pp. 59–63. Russian Society of History and Philosophy of Science Publishing House

  33. Gödel, K. (1933). Eine Interpretation des intuitionistischen Aussagenkalküls. Ergebnisse Eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ferguson, T.M. (2023). Subject-matter and intensional operators III: State-sensitive subject-matter and topic sufficiency. Review of Symbolic Logic To appear

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper owes a great deal to the constructive and insightful comments provided by referees for this journal and I appreciate their sharing their expertise with me. This paper is an outcome of the project Logical Structure of Information Channels, no. 21-23610M, supported by the Czech Science Foundation and carried out at the Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Macaulay Ferguson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferguson, T.M. Subject-Matter and Intensional Operators II: Applications to the Theory of Topic-Sensitive Intentional Modals. J Philos Logic 52, 1673–1701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-023-09722-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-023-09722-7

Keywords

Navigation