Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Thirty Days Isolation on Attention Networks: A Behavioral and Event-related Potential Study

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Kandarpa K, Schneider V, Ganapathy K. Human health during space travel: An overview. Neurol India 2019, 67: S176–S181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strangman GE, Sipes W, Beven G. Human cognitive performance in spaceflight and analogue environments. Aviat Space Environ Med 2014, 85: 1033–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler B, Bock O, Comfort D. Is dual-task performance necessarily impaired in space? Hum Factors 2000, 42: 318–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Palinkas LA, Suedfeld P. Psychological effects of polar expeditions. Lancet 2008, 371: 153–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Petersen SE, Posner MI. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci 2012, 35: 73–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacubowski A, Abeln V, Vogt T, Yi B, Choukèr A, Fomina E. The impact of long-term confinement and exercise on central and peripheral stress markers. Physiol Behav 2015, 152: 106–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider S, Abeln V, Popova J, Fomina E, Jacubowski A, Meeusen R, et al. The influence of exercise on prefrontal cortex activity and cognitive performance during a simulated space flight to Mars (MARS500). Behav Brain Res 2013, 236: 1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber J, Klein T, Abeln V. Shifts in broadband power and alpha peak frequency observed during long-term isolation. Sci Rep 2020, 10: 17987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Piechowski S, Johannes B, Pustowalow W, Arz M, Mulder E, Jordan J, et al. Visual attention relates to operator performance in spacecraft docking training. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2022, 93: 480–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Supolkina N, Yusupova A, Shved D, Gushin V, Savinkina A, Lebedeva SA, et al. External communication of autonomous crews under simulation of interplanetary missions. Front Physiol 2021, 12: 751170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Q, Liu Y, Leng X, Han J, Xia F, Chen H. Impact of chronic stress on attention control: Evidence from behavioral and event-related potential analyses. Neurosci Bull 2020, 36: 1395–1410.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber J, Javelle F, Klein T, Foitschik T, Crucian B, Schneider S, et al. Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and cognitive effects of 30 days of isolation. Exp Brain Res 2019, 237: 1563–1573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi M, Gao H, Liu G. The effect of mild acute psychological stress on attention processing: An ERP study. Exp Brain Res 2018, 236: 2061–2071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Annanmaki T, Palmu K, Murros K, Partanen J. Altered N100-potential associates with working memory impairment in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2017, 124: 1197–1203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Larson MJ, Clayson PE, Clawson A. Making sense of all the conflict: A theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol 2014, 93: 283–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heidlmayr K, Kihlstedt M, Isel F. A review on the electroencephalography markers of Stroop executive control processes. Brain Cogn 2020, 146: 105637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen CY, Zhang JX, Li L, Wang R. Bilingual memory representations in less fluent Chinese-English bilinguals: An event-related potential study. Psychol Rep 2015, 116: 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao H, Wang X, Huang M, Qi M. Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2022, 22: 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huster RJ, Westerhausen R, Pantev C, Konrad C. The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 2010, 31: 1260–1271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First of all, we would like to thank the six participants who completed the experiment with high quality and provided valuable data. Special thanks also go to the team at the Shenzhen Institute of Space Science and Technology, which is responsible for the operation and security of this experiment. Thanks to Minister Bingmu Xin, Ying Chen, and Cheng Zhang for their work and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weifen Huang or Yinghui Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors claim that there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 464 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, J., Wu, B., Cao, Z. et al. Effects of Thirty Days Isolation on Attention Networks: A Behavioral and Event-related Potential Study. Neurosci. Bull. 40, 127–132 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-023-01136-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-023-01136-4

Navigation