Abstract
An adjustable pump speed drive is commonly employed to control the speed of the pump motor, achieve the appropriate flow rate, and maintain the fluid level. The electrical motor, power electronics converter, and control are the main elements of the pump motor drive (PMD). In terms of energy efficiency and reliability, pump drives with permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) and sensorless control have more alluring qualities. To increase the efficiency of PMSM-PMD, the optimum controls including loss minimization and modified grey wolf optimizer (mGWO) are employed. The model reference adaptive system (MRAS) control is often employed for sensorless PMSM-PMD owing to its simplicity, reliability, and good response. The PMSM core loss equivalent parameters are precisely analyzed in this article. Also, the loss model that considers core loss is used to calculate the link between power loss and reference d-axis stator current (Ids). Further, for enhancing the efficiency, an optimal Ids* value is injected in field orientation control (FOC). This proposed scheme increases the efficiency of the PMSM pump drive by up to 1.5 percent as compared to the conventional FOC strategy. A 2.2-kW PMSM drive is tested with the proposed control strategy using real-time interfacing controller dSPACE 1202 MicroLabBox. Also, the obtained results are validated in Matlab/Simulink environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- P hy :
-
Hydraulic power (kW)
- P m :
-
Mechanical power (kW)
- ρ :
-
Fluid density (\(\mathrm{kg}/{\mathrm{M}}^{3}\))
- g :
-
Gravity constant 9.8 \(\mathrm{m}/{\mathrm{S}}^{2}\)
- Q :
-
Flow rate of fluid (m3/s)
- H :
-
Pressure
- T m :
-
Motor torque (Nm)
- ω e :
-
Motor speed (rad/sec)
- V ds , V qs :
-
Stator voltage on the d- and q axis (V)
- I ds , I qs :
-
Stator current on the d- and q axis (A)
- L ds , L qs :
-
Inductances in the d- and q-axis (H)
- R s :
-
Stator resistance (Ω)
- Z n :
-
Number of poles
- Ψ ds, Ψ qs :
-
Flux of stator on d- and q-axis
- Ψ s :
-
Resultant stator flux (Wb)
- Ψ f :
-
Permanent magnet flux (Wb)
- E b :
-
Back-emf voltage
- R i :
-
Core loss resistance (Ω)
- R io :
-
Core loss resistance at no load (Ω)
- ω eo :
-
Reference angular speed at no load (rad/sec)
- R iofl :
-
Core loss resistance at full load (Ω)
- Ψ o :
-
No-load linkage flux (Wb)
- Ψ ofl :
-
Full load linkage flux (Wb)
- P io :
-
No load core loss
- P cu :
-
Copper loss (W)
- P i :
-
Iron loss (W)
- P ro :
-
Rotational loss (W)
- P TL :
-
Total power losses (W)
- ω r :
-
Rotor speed (rad/sec)
- I di, Iqi:
-
Core loss resistance current on d and q axis (A)
- I qso , I qso :
-
Output stator current on the d and q axis (A) with considering core loss resistance
- \({I}_{dpm}\), \({I}_{d-sat}\) :
-
Maximum flux-weakening current of PMSM, d-axis saturation current
- I * ds, I * qs :
-
Reference current on the d- and q-axis for MRAS model (A)
- I ’ ds, I’ qs :
-
Adaptive model estimated current on the d- and q-axis for (A)
- ω ’ r, θ’r :
-
Estimated speed and angle by MRAS-based
- P ls :
-
Switching loss (W)
- E on , E off :
-
Turn-on and turn-off energy of the switch
- E off ,d :
-
Turn-off energy of the power diode due to reverse recovery current
- V dc :
-
DC-link voltage
- I l :
-
Peak line current (A)
- f s :
-
VSI switching frequency (kHz)
- P lc :
-
Conduction loss
- M :
-
Modulation index
- δ :
-
Displacement angle
- t, T :
-
Current iteration, max. no. of iterations
- \(\overrightarrow{D, } {\overrightarrow{X}}_{P}\) :
-
Prey’s movement vector, position vector
- \(\overrightarrow{A}\) , \(\overrightarrow{C}\) :
-
Coefficient of vector
- \(\overrightarrow{a}\) :
-
Reducing the value from 2 to 0 throughout the iteration
- \(\overrightarrow{{r}_{1}}, \overrightarrow{{r}_{2}}\) :
-
Random vectors
- PMD:
-
Pump motor drive
- PMSM:
-
Permanent magnet synchronous motor
- VSPD:
-
Variable speed pump drive
- FOC:
-
Field-oriented control
- MRAS:
-
Model reference adaptive system
- MTPA:
-
Maximum torque per ampere
- LMC:
-
Loss model control
- SC:
-
Search control
- GWO:
-
Grey wolf optimizer
- mGWO:
-
Modified grey wolf optimizer
- VSI:
-
Voltage source inverter
- GSM:
-
Golden search method
References
Alkarrami F, Iqbal T, Pope K, Rideout G (2020) Dynamic modelling of submersible pump based solar water-pumping system with three-phase induction motor using MATLAB, pp 20–64. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2020.82002
Arun Shankar VK, Umashankar S, Paramasivam S (2016) Performance evaluation of fuzzy DTC based PMSM for pumping applications. Indian J Sci Technol 9(38):1–10. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i38/101949
Aygun H, Aktas M (2020) LMC-based DTC for efficiency improvement of IM drives and their electric vehicle applications. J Power Electron 20(5):1232–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43236-020-00116-5
Borisevich A (2015) Numerical method for power losses minimization of vector controlled induction motor. Int J Power Electron Drive Syst 6(3):486–497. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v6.i3.pp486-497
Cavallaro C, Di Tommaso AO, Miceli R, Raciti A, Galluzzo GR, Trapanese M (2005) Efficiency enhancement of permanent-magnet synchronous motor drives by online loss minimization approaches. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 52(4):1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2005.851595
Chen Z, Li W, Shu X, Shen J, Zhang Y, Shen S (2021) Operation efficiency optimization for permanent magnet synchronous motor based on improved particle swarm optimization. IEEE Access 9:777–788. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047257
Erdoǧan H, Özdemir M (2017) Neural network approach on loss minimization control of a PMSM with core resistance estimation. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci 25(3):1643–1656. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1505-101
Fernández-Bernal F, García-Cerrada A, Faure R (2000) Model-based loss minimization for dc and ac vector-controlled motors including core saturation. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 36(3):755–763. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.845050
Gecić M, Kapetina M, Marčetić D (2016) Energy efficient control of high speed IPMSM drives - a generalized PSO approach. Adv Electr Comput Eng 16(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.4316/AECE.2016.01004
Guo Q, Zhang C, Li L, Zhang J, Wang M (2016) Maximum efficiency per torque control of permanent-magnet synchronous machines. Appl Sci (switzerland) 6(12):2135–2143. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6120425
Gürbüz R (2010) Controlling flow rate and fluid level by variable frequency drive unit. Arch Mech Eng 57(4):393–404. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10180-010-0022-y
Hesari S, Noruziazghandi M, Shojaei AA, Neyestani M (2018) Investigating the intelligent methods of loss minimization in induction motors. Telkomnika (telecommun Comput Electron Control) 16(3):1034–1053. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v16i3.8293
Jegha ADG, Kumar NM, Subramaniam U, Sanjeevikumar P (2020) A high gain DC-DC converter with grey wolf optimizer based MPPT algorithm for PV Fed BLDC motor drive. Appl Sci 10(8):2797
Jeyashanthi J, Santhi M (2019) Improved efficiency of direct torque controlled induction motor drive by golden section. Revis Facul De Ingen, Univ De Antioquia. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n91a04
Kabalcı E, Boyar A (2021) Chapter 7 - Multilevel inverter applications for electric vehicle drives. In: Kabalcı E (Ed), Multilevel Inverters (pp 185–208). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90217-5.00006-X
Kazerooni M, Hamidifar S, Kar NC (2013) Analytical modelling and parametric sensitivity analysis for the PMSM steady-state performance prediction. IET Electr Power Appl 7(7):586–596. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2011.0281
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2006) Improving Pumping System Performance. U.S. Department of Energy, 117.http://energy.gov/eere/amo/downloads/improving-pumping-system-performance-sourcebook-industry-second-edition
Lai C, Feng G, Tian J, Li Z, Zuo Y, Balamurali A, Kar NC (2020) PMSM drive system efficiency optimization using a modified gradient descent algorithm with discretized search space. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif 6(3):1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2020.3004463
Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer 1.1. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
Mittal N, Singh U, Sohi BS (2016) Modified grey wolf optimizer for global engineering optimization. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7950348
Mutluer M, Şahman MA, Çunkaş M (2020) Heuristic optimization based on penalty approach for surface permanent magnet synchronous machines. Arab J Sci Eng 45(8):6751–6767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04689-y
Nadweh S, Khaddam O, Hayek G, Atieh B, Haes H (2020) Heliyon Steady state analysis of modern industrial variable speed drive systems using controllers adjusted via grey wolf algorithm & particle swarm optimization. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05438
Saad NH, El-Sattar AA, Gad MA (2017) Sensorless Field Oriented Control based on improved MRAS speed observer for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor drive. In: 2016 18th international middle-east power systems conference, MEPCON 2016 - Proceedings, Mar 2017, pp 991–998.https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON.2016.7837017
Shankar VKA, Umashankar S, Paramasivam S (2018) ANFIS-DTC based solar PV water pumping using synchronous reluctance motor. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE international conference on technological advancements in power and energy: exploring energy solutions for an intelligent power grid, TAP Energy 2017, 4, pp 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/TAPENERGY.2017.8397374
Yadav D, Verma A (2018) Comperative performance analysis of PMSM drive using MPSO and ACO techniques. Int J Power Electron Drive Syst (IJPEDS) 9(4):1510. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v9.i4.pp1510-1522
Yan J, Kong H, Man Z (2020) An improved Hopfield Lagrange network with application on motor efficiency optimization. Asian J Control 24(2022):1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.2507
Yang Y, He Q, Fu C, Liao S, Tan P (2020) Efficiency improvement of permanent magnet synchronous motor for electric vehicles. Energy 213:118859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118859
Zhou G, Ahn JW (2009) A novel efficiency optimization strategy of IPMSM for pump applications. J Electr Eng Technol 4(4):515–520. https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2009.4.4.515
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kalel, D., Raja Singh, R. Energy-Efficient Sensorless PMSM Pump Drive with mGWO and Loss Model for Field Orientation Control Strategy. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 48, 1–16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-023-00663-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-023-00663-0