Skip to main content
Log in

“This Is Not a Riot”: Activists’ Responses to Accusations of Violence in the Ferguson Unrest

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement in the last decade has gained widespread support for protests against police brutality targeting African Americans. However, some people during these protests have resorted to violence, mostly against property, creating an opening for opponents to shift the debate from protesters’ grievances to the nature of the protests by labeling them as “riots” and depicting protesters as criminals. In recent years, activists have turned to social media networks such as Twitter to counter these claims. The following study draws upon Stanley Cohen’s work on official accounts of denial to analyze how activists during the Ferguson unrest of August 2014 responded to attempts to delegitimize their protests. Based on a qualitative analysis of 4201 tweets by three leading activists who participated in these protests, it shows how they used interpretive and implicatory denial as well as positive representations of events to create a counternarrative that allowed them to garner public support as well as focus attention on protesters’ grievances. Through its examination of these discursive strategies, this study offers a theoretical and methodological framework of analysis that can be applied to different struggles and contentious repertoires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The analysis did not include video content that French and Mckesson uploaded via Vine (a total of 479 tweets). Vine users could post up to six-second videos and share them on Twitter and other social media platforms.

References

  • Abu-Lughod, J. L. 2007. Race, Space, and Riots in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles. Oxford University Press.

  • Al Weswasi, E. 2019. Spending blood for oil in Nigeria: a frame analysis of Shell’s neutralisation of acts that led to corporate-initiated state crime. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 3, 280–296.

  • Blackstone, G. E., Cowart, H. S., & Saunders, L. M. 2017. TweetStorm in #ferguson: How News Organizations Framed Dominant Authority, Anti-Authority, and Political Figures in a Restive Community. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 61. Routledge: 597–614. Accessed 08/09/2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2017.1344670.

  • Bryant, E., Schimke, E. B., Brehm, H. N., & Uggen, C. 2018. Techniques of neutralization and identity work among accused genocide perpetrators. Social Problems, 65(4), 584–602.

  • Buchanan, L., Fessenden, F., Lai, K. K. R., Park, H., Parlapiano, A., Tse, A., Wallace, T., Watkins, D., & Yourish, K. 2015. What Happened in Ferguson? The New York Times. Accessed 08/07/2022. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/08/13/us/ferguson-missouri-town-under-siege-after-police-shooting.html

  • Carr, D. 2014. View of #Ferguson Thrust Michael Brown Shooting to National Attention. The New York Times. Accessed 09/08/2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/business/media/view-of-ferguson-thrust-michael-brown-shooting-to-national-attention.html?smid=tw-nytimes%26_r=0

  • Cohen, S. 2001. States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Polity Press.

  • Department of Justice Report Regarding the Criminal Investigation into The Shooting Death of Michael Brown by Ferguson, Missouri Police Officer Darren Wilson. 2015. Accessed 07/08/2022. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown_1.pdf

  • Gerbaudo, P. 2012. Tweets and the Streets: Social media and Contemporary activism. Pluto Press.

  • Glaude, E. S. Jr. 2014. A Requiem for Michael Brown/A Praisesong for Ferguson. Theory & Event, 17(3). Accessed 07/17/2022. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/559370

  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday Anchor Books.

  • Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order (Second). Basic Books.

  • Hanna, P., & Adams, M. 2019. Positive self-representations, sustainability and socially organised denial in UK tourists: discursive barriers to a sustainable transport future. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(2), 189–206.

  • Institute for Intergovernmental Research. 2015. After-Action Assessment of the Police Response to the August 2014 Demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri. Accessed 08/08/2022. https://cops.usdoj.gov/ric/Publications/cops-p317-pub.pdf

  • Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. 2015. Accessed 07/08/2022. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf.

  • Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. 2016. #Ferguson is everywhere: initiators in emerging counter public networks. Information Communication and Society, 19(3), 397–418. Accessed 08/09/2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106571.

  • Kaulingfreks, F. 2008. “Fuck Normalization”: Young urban ‘troublemakers’ as meaningful political actors. Resistance Studies Magazine, 3, 35–51.Accessed 10/20/2023. https://resistance-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/rsm-03-2008.pdf#page=35

  • Kawalerowicz, J., & Biggs, M. 2015. Anarchy in the UK: Economic Deprivation, Social Disorganization, and Political Grievances in the London Riot of 2011. Social Forces, 94(2), 673–698. Accessed 07/17/2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/SF/SOV052.

  • LeFebvre, R. K., & Armstrong, C. 2018. Grievance-based social movement mobilization in the #Ferguson Twitter storm. New Media and Society, 20(1), 8–28. Accessed 07/17/2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816644697.

  • Mandaro, L. 2014. 300 Ferguson tweets: A day’s work for Antonio French. USA Today. Accessed 05/18/2022. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/08/25/antonio-french-twitter-ferguson/14457633/?utm_content=buffer952c0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer.

  • Marx, G. T. 1970. Issueless Riots. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 391, 21–33.

  • Millitzer, J., & Culley, V. 2014. Chief Jackson: The convenience store robbery and Michael Brown shooting not connected. FOX 2. Accessed 07/08/2022. https://fox2now.com/news/live-updates-ferguson-police-chief-tom-jackson-speaks-at-a-press-conference/.

  • Moody-Ramirez, M., Fears, L., Randle, B., Smith, C., & Tait, G. 2016. Citizen framing of #Ferguson on Twitter. The Journal of Social Media in Society5(3), 37–69.

  • Neumayer, C., & Rossi, L. 2018. Images of protest in social media: Struggle over visibility and visual narratives: New Media & Society, 20(11), 4293–4310.

  • Orbuch, T. 1997. People’s accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology 23(1), 455–478.

  • Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. 2012. Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282.

  • Penney, J., & Dadas, C. 2014. (Re)Tweeting in the service of protest: Digital composition and circulation in the Occupy Wall Street movement. New Media and Society, 16(1), 74–90.

  • Rane, H., & Salem, S. 2012. Social media, social movements and the diffusion of ideas in the Arab uprisings. The Journal of International Communication, 18(1), 97–111

  • Schneider, C. L. 2014. Police power and race riots: Urban unrest in Paris and New York. University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Schoultz, I., & Flyghed, J. 2016. Doing business for a “higher loyalty”? How Swedish transnational corporations neutralise allegations of crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 66(2), 183–198.

  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. 1968. Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.

  • Shoham, E. 2012. Techniques of Denial towards Excessive Use of Force by the Police among Israeli Talkbacks. Journal of Politics and Law, 5(4), 172–184.

  • Siddiqui, J., Mehjabeen, M., & Rahman, S. S. 2019. Accountability and labour governance in a ‘State of denial.’ In W. Pauline & I. Tsalavoutas (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Accounting in Emerging Economies (pp. 221–232). Routledge.

  • Siddiqui, S., & McCormack, S. 2015. Here’s A Timeline of The Events in Ferguson Since Michael Brown’s Death. Huffington Post. Accessed 07/08/2022. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ferguson-timeline_n_6220166.

  • Smith, M. 2014. Affect and Respectability Politics. Theory & Event, 17(3). Accessed 07/17/2022. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/559376.

  • Sokhi-Bulley, B. 2015. Performing Struggle: Parrhēsia in Ferguson. Law and Critique, 26(1), 7–10. Accessed 07/20/2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10978-015-9152-1.

  • Sokhi-Bulley, B. 2016. Re-reading the Riots: Counter-Conduct in London 2011. Global Society, 30(2), 320–339. Accessed 07/20/2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1143348.

  • State of Missouri v. Darren Wilson. 2014. Accessed 07/08/2022. https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1370736/grand-jury-volume-5.pdf.

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. 1957. Techniques of Neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

  • They Helped Make Twitter Matter in Ferguson Protests. 2015. New York Times. Accessed 05/18/2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/11/us/twitter-black-lives-matter-ferguson-protests.html.

  • Tyler, I. 2013. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. In Revolting Subjects. Zed Books Ltd.

  • Vinthagen, S. 2006. Political Undergrounds-Can Raging Riots and Everyday Theft become Politics of Normality?

  • Waddington, D. P. 2010. Applying the flashpoints model of public disorder to the 2001 bradford riot. British Journal of Criminology, 50(2), 342–359. Accessed 07/17/2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp082.

  • Wahlström, M. 2011. Taking Control or Losing Control? Activist Narratives of Provocation and Collective Violence. Social Movement Studies, 10(4), 367–385. Accessed 07/17/2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.614107.

  • Whyte, D. 2016. It’s common sense, stupid! Corporate crime and techniques of neutralization in the automobile industry. Crime, Law and Social Change, 66(2), 165–181.

  • Yassan, Y. 2021. Reactive, cost-beneficial or undermining legitimacy: How disempowered protestors explain their part in violent clashes with the state. Social Movement Studies, 20(4), 478–494. Accessed 07/20/2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1772046.

Twitter

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Michal Givoni and Lynn Schler for their critique and insights at the early stages of this work. I also greatly appreciate the thoughtful insights of the anonymous reviewers and editors of Society. A special thanks to Ron Dudai for his support, encouragement, and valuable feedback on previous versions of this manuscript.

Funding

Partial financial support was received from The Tamar Golan Africa Centre at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmit Wolberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolberg, C. “This Is Not a Riot”: Activists’ Responses to Accusations of Violence in the Ferguson Unrest. Soc 60, 1024–1033 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00925-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00925-x

Keywords

Navigation