Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of marital status on tumor aggressiveness, treatment, and screening among black and white men diagnosed with prostate cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the association of marital status with prostate cancer outcomes in a racially-diverse cohort.

Methods

The study population consisted of men (1010 Black; 1070 White) with incident prostate cancer from the baseline North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer (PCaP) cohort. Marital status at time of diagnosis and screening history were determined by self-report. The binary measure of marital status was defined as married (including living as married) vs. not married (never married, divorced/separated, or widowed). High-aggressive tumors were defined using a composite measure of PSA, Gleason Score, and stage. Definitive treatment was defined as receipt of radical prostatectomy or radiation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of marital status with (1) high-aggressive tumors, (2) receipt of definitive treatment, and (3) screening history among Black and White men with prostate cancer.

Results

Black men were less likely to be married than White men (68.1% vs. 83.6%). Not being married (vs. married) was associated with increased odds of high-aggressive tumors in the overall study population (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 1.56; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.20–2.02) and both Black and White men in race-stratified analyses. Unmarried men were less likely to receive definitive treatment in the overall study population (aOR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54–0.85). In race-stratified analyses, unmarried Black men were less likely to receive definitive treatment. Both unmarried Black and White men were less likely to have a history of prostate cancer screening than married men.

Conclusion

Lower rates of marriage among Black men might signal decreased support for treatment decision-making, symptom management, and caregiver support which could potentially contribute to prostate cancer disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from PCaP management team. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data.

References

  1. National Cancer Institute (2021) Cancer stat facts: prostate cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html. Accessed May 6,

  2. DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG et al (2016) Cancer statistics for African americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 66:290–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan S, Hicks V, Rancilio D, Langston M, Richardson K, Drake BF (2018) Predictors of Follow-Up visits Post Radical Prostatectomy. Am J Men’s Health 12:760–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akinyemiju T, Wiener H, Pisu M (2017) Cancer-related risk factors and incidence of major cancers by race, gender and region; analysis of the NIH-AARP diet and health study. BMC Cancer 17:597

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D et al (2018) Factors influencing men’s choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk Prostate Cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol 74:261–280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Shaughnessy PK, Laws TA, Esterman AJ (2015) The Prostate cancer journey: results of an online survey of men and their partners. Cancer Nurs 38:E1–E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Capistrant BD, Lesher L, Kohli N et al (2018) Social Support and Health-Related Quality of Life among Gay and bisexual men with Prostate Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 45:439–455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Drake BF, Lewis-Thames MW, Brown A, Rancilio D, Hicks V (2019) An evaluation of Follow-Up activities of participants from an urban Prostate Cancer screening event. Am J Men’s Health 13:1557988319844353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Z-H, Yang K-B, Zhang Y-Z et al (2021) Assessment of Modifiable Factors for the Association of Marital Status with Cancer-Specific Survival. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2111813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao H, Tan F, Goovaerts P (2011) Racial and geographic disparities in late-stage Prostate cancer diagnosis in Florida. J Health Care Poor Underserved 22:187–199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schymura MJ, Kahn AR, German RR et al (2010) Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized Prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR patterns of Care Study (PoC1). BMC Cancer 10:152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kan CK, Qureshi MM, Gupta A et al (2018) Risk factors involved in treatment delays and differences in treatment type for patients with Prostate cancer by risk category in an academic safety net hospital. Adv Radiat Oncol 3:181–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Denberg TD, Beaty BL, Kim FJ, Steiner JF (2005) Marriage and ethnicity predict treatment in localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 103:1819–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aizer AA, Chen MH, McCarthy EP et al (2013) Marital status and survival in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3869–3876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiao H, Warrick C, Huang Y (2009) Prostate cancer treatment patterns among racial/ethnic groups in Florida. J Natl Med Assoc 101:936–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Montiel Ishino FA, Rowan C, Das R et al (2020) Identifying risk profiles of malignant Prostate Cancer Surgical Delay using a person-centered Approach to understand Prostate Cancer disparities: the Constellation of Health determinants using latent class analysis on Cancer Registry Data. Am J Mens Health 14:1557988320984282

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan S, Nepple KG, Kibel AS et al (2019) The association of marital status and mortality among men with early-stage Prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: insight into post-prostatectomy survival strategies. Cancer Causes Control 30:871–876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R et al (2011) The effect of marital status on stage and survival of Prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a population-based study. Cancer Causes Control 22:1085–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burns RM, Sharp L, Sullivan FJ, Deady SE, Drummond FJ, C ON (2014) Factors driving inequality in Prostate cancer survival: a population based study. PLoS ONE 9:e106456

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Du KL, Bae K, Movsas B, Yan Y, Bryan C, Bruner DW (2012) Impact of marital status and race on outcomes of patients enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Prostate cancer trials. Support Care Cancer 20:1317–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. King AJ, Evans M, Moore TH et al (2015) Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men’s experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 24:618–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tyson MD, Andrews PE, Etzioni DA et al (2013) Marital status and Prostate cancer outcomes. Can J Urol 20:6702–6706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Donachie K, Cornel E, Pelgrim T et al (2022) What interventions affect the psychosocial burden experienced by Prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance? A scoping review. Support Care Cancer 30:4699–4709

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufman G, Goldscheider F (2007) Do men need a spouse more than women? Perceptions of the importance of marriage for men and women. Sociol Q 48:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Umberson D, Donnelly R, Pollitt AM (2018) Marriage, Social Control, and Health Behavior: a dyadic analysis of same-sex and different-sex couples. J Health Soc Behav 59:429–446

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schroeder JC, Bensen JT, Su LJ et al (2006) The North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP): methods and design of a multidisciplinary population-based cohort study of racial differences in Prostate cancer outcomes. Prostate 66:1162–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Weinberg CR, Sandler DP (1991) Randomized recruitment in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 134:421–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salmon C, Song L, Muir K et al (2021) Marital status and Prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium. Eur J Epidemiol 36:913–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanske J, Meyer CP, Sammon JD et al (2016) The influence of marital status on the use of breast, cervical, and Colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 89:140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tangen CM, Goodman PJ, Till C, Schenk JM, Lucia MS, Thompson IM Jr (2016) Biases in recommendations for and acceptance of prostate biopsy significantly affect assessment of Prostate cancer risk factors: results from two large randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 34:4338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J, Xu H, Zheng L et al (2020) Determinants of participation and detection rate of Colorectal cancer from a population-based screening program in China. Front Oncol 10:1173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Salmon C, Parent M, Quesnel-Vallée A, Barnett TA (2022) A scoping review of social relationships and Prostate cancer screening. Prev Med 154:106892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Franks MM, Stephens MAP, Rook KS, Franklin BA, Keteyian SJ, Artinian NT (2006) Spouses’ provision of health-related support and control to patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation. J Fam Psychol 20:311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Harlan LC, Potosky A, Gilliland FD et al (2001) Factors associated with initial therapy for clinically localized Prostate cancer: Prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1864–1871

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoffman RM, Harlan LC, Klabunde CN et al (2003) Racial differences in initial treatment for clinically localized Prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med 18:845–853

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Okoro O, Rutherford C, Witherspoon S (2018) Leveraging the family influence of women in Prostate cancer efforts targeting African American men. J Racial Ethnic Health Disparities 5:820–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Allen JD, Akinyemi IC, Reich A, Fleary S, Tendulkar S, Lamour N (2018) African American women’s involvement in promoting informed decision-making for Prostate cancer screening among their partners/spouses. Am J Men’s Health 12:884–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bergner EM, Cornish EK, Horne K, Griffith DM (2018) A qualitative meta-synthesis examining the role of women in African American men’s Prostate cancer screening and treatment decision making. Psycho‐oncology 27:781–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Aughinbaugh A, Robles O, Sun H (2013) Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment. Monthly Lab Rev 136:1

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2007) Marriage and divorce: changes and their driving forces. J Economic Perspect 21:27–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Griffith DM, Mason MA, Rodela M et al (2007) A structural approach to examining Prostate cancer risk for rural southern African American men. J Health Care Poor Underserved 18:73–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hammond WP, Mohottige D, Chantala K, Hastings JF, Neighbors HW, Snowden L (2011) Determinants of usual source of care disparities among African American and Caribbean Black men: findings from the National Survey of American Life. J Health Care Poor Underserved 22:157–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hammond WP, Matthews D, Corbie-Smith G (2010) Psychosocial factors associated with routine health examination scheduling and receipt among African American men. J Natl Med Assoc 102:276–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Imm KR, Williams F, Housten AJ et al (2017) African American Prostate cancer survivorship: exploring the role of social support in quality of life after radical prostatectomy. J Psychosoc Oncol 35:409–423

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff, advisory committees and research subjects participating in the PCaP study for their important contributions.

Funding

The North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP) is carried out as a collaborative study supported by the Department of Defense contract DAMD 17-03-2-0052. SK is supported by the Foundation of Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Siteman Cancer Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SK: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. LF: conceptualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. ML: conceptualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. YH: conceptualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. JXM: conceptualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. KG: conceptualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. SS: methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. JTB: funding acquisition, project administration, resources, writing-review and editing. JLM: funding acquisition, resources, writing-review and editing. ETHF: funding acquisition, writing-review and editing. LS: conceptualization, project administration, writing-review and editing. MWL-T: conceptualization, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saira Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, S., Fuzzell, L., Langston, M. et al. The impact of marital status on tumor aggressiveness, treatment, and screening among black and white men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control 35, 531–539 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01821-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01821-9

Keywords

Navigation