Abstract
Surface coal extraction exerts substantial influences on the structure and function of ecosystems throughout the central Appalachian Mountains of eastern North America. In particular, the flattening of local terrain following surface mining predisposes many areas to incidental wetland formation, with other wetlands being intentionally constructed on former surface mines for stormwater control and mine drainage remediation. Past work has examined local-scale patterns in the water quality, floral assemblages, and wildlife use of mine-associated wetlands, although little to no information currently exists on landscape-scale patterns of wetland formation in response to surface mining. We inventoried naturally-occurring wetlands and wetlands associated with surface mining in the Guest River watershed in Wise County, Virginia, USA, one of the most heavily surface-mined watersheds in the Virginia coalfields. We found evidence of substantial wetland creation as a result of surface mining at the landscape scale, with mine-associated wetlands being located at significantly higher elevations, in different vegetative contexts, and significantly closer to nearby wetlands than unmined wetlands in the same watershed. Our results suggest that surface mining is a major source of wetland creation across the central Appalachian coalfields with potentially significant, landscape-scale implications for hydrological patterns, wetland-associated wildlife, and the distribution of wetland flora.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The full habitat dataset for all 506 wetlands analyzed as part of this study is provided with this manuscript as Supplementary Information (Online Resource 2), as is the full ground-truthing dataset used to field-verify wetland conditions (Online Resource 3).
References
Amrani CR, Samuel DL (1988) Habitat use by selected small mammals occurring in surface mine cattail marshes. P Am Soc Min Recl 1988:125–132. https://doi.org/10.21000/jasmr88020125
Appalachian Land Ownership Task Force (2014) Who owns Appalachia? Landownership and its impact. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Atkinson RB, Cairns J (1994) Possible use of wetlands in ecological restoration of surface mined lands. J Aquat Eco Health 3:139–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042943
Atkinson RB, Daniels WL, Cairns J (1996) Ontogeny of accidental wetlands and hydric soil development in surface mined landscapes. In: Daniels WL, Burger JA, Zipper CE (eds) Successes and failures: applying research results to insure reclamation success. American Society for Surface Mining and Reclamation, Knoxville, Tennessee
Atkinson RB, Perry JE, Cairns J (2005) Vegetation communities of 20-year-old created depressional wetlands. Wetl Ecol Manag 13:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-2000-y
Balcombe CK, Anderson JT, Fortney RH, Rentch JS, Grafton WN, Kordek WS (2005) A comparison of plant communities in mitigation and reference wetlands in the Mid-appalachians. Wetlands 25:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0130:ACOPCI]2.0.CO;2
Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA (2011) The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central appalachians. Ann N York Aca Sci 1223:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05986.x
Blackburn M, Wayland J, Smith WH, McKenna JH, Harry M, Hamed MK, Gray MJ, Miller DL (2015) First report of ranavirus and batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in green salamanders (Aneides aeneus) from Virginia, USA. Herpetol Rev 46:357–361
Branduzzi AM, Barton CD, Lovell A (2020) First-year survival of Native Wetland Plants in created vernal pools on an Appalachian Surface Mine. Ecol Rest 38:70–73. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.38.2.70
Braun EL (1942) Forests of the Cumberland Mountains. Ecol Mono 12:413–447
Brooks RP, Hill JB (1987) Status and trends of freshwater wetlands in the coal-mining region of Pennsylvania, USA. Env Manag 11:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867176
Brooks AC, Ross MRV, Nippgen F, McGlynn BL, Bernhardt ES (2019) Excess Nitrate Export in Mountaintop removal coal mining watersheds. JGR Biosci 124:3867–3880. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005174
Buehler DA, Percy K (2012) Coal mining and wildlife in the eastern United States: a literature review. Report to the Appalachian Wildlife Habitat Foundation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: user Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, United Kingdom
Daniels KN, LaBar JA, McDonald LM (2021) Acid Mine Drainage in Appalachia: sources, legacy, and treatment. In: Zipper CE, Skousen J (eds) Appalachia’s coal-mined landscapes. Springer, New York
Drayer AN, Richter SC (2016) Physical wetland characteristics influence amphibian community composition differently in constructed wetlands and natural wetlands. Ecol Eng 93:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.028
Dvorett D, Bidwell J, Davis C, DuBois C (2012) Developing a Hydrogeomorphic Wetland Inventory: reclassifying National wetlands Inventory polygons in Geographic Information systems. Wetlands 32:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0247-7
Fleming GP, Patterson KD (2017) The Natural communities of Virginia: ecological groups and community types, vol Natural Heritage Technical Report 17–07. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia
Four-Toed Salamanders (Hemidactylium scutatum) in Natural and Constructed Upland-embedded wetlands on the Appalachian Plateau, Kentucky. Diversity 14:995. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14110995
Giam X, Olden JD, Simberloff D (2018) Impact of coal mining on stream biodiversity in the US and its regulatory implications. Nat Sus 1:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0048-6
Green NB (1952) A Study of the Life History of Pseudacris brachyphona (Cope) in West Virginia with Special Reference to Behavior and Growth of Marked Individuals. Dissertation. The Ohio State University
Grushecky ST, Harris KJ, Strager MP, Wang J, Mesa AN (2022) Land Cover Change Associated with unconventional oil and Gas Development in the Appalachian Region. Env Manag 70:869–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01702-y
Guidugli-Cook M, Richter SC, Scott BJ, Brown DR (2017) Field-based assessment of wetland condition, wetland extent, and the National Wetlands Inventory in Kentucky, USA. Wetl Ecol Manag 25:517–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9533-3
Guo M, Li J, Sheng C, Xu J, Wu L (2017) A review of Wetland Remote sensing. Sensors 17:777. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040777
Hammer DA (2020) Constructed wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial and Agricultural. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
Hayes C, Livingston E, Mullins C, Smith WH (2020) Pseudotriton montanus. Habitat Herpetol Rev 51:294–295Mud Salamander
Hill K, Smith WH (2020) A baseline inventory of waterfowl from surface mine wetlands in the Virginia coalfields. Banisteria 54:44–56
Ingrao C, Failla S, Arcidiacono C (2020) A comprehensive review of environmental and operational issues of constructed wetland systems. Curr Opin Env Sci Heal 13:35045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.10.007
King SK, Richter SC (2022) Reproductive Ecology and Nesting Site Characteristics of
Lacki MJ, Hummer JW, Webster HJ (1991) Avian diversity patterns at a constructed wetland: use of ecological theory in the evaluation of a mine land reclamation technique. Int J Sur Min Rec Env 2:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09208119108944293
Lambert M, Drayer AN, Leuenberger W, Price SJ, Barton C (2021) Evaluation of created wetlands as amphibian habitat on a reforested surface mine. Ecol Eng 171:106386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106386
Li J, Zipper CE (2015) Reconstructing disturbance history for an intensively mined region by timeseries analysis of Landsat imagery. Environ Monit Assess 187:557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4766-1
Lindberg TT, Bernhardt ES, Bier R, Di Giulio RT (2011) Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed. P Natl a Sci 108:20929–20934. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112381108
Lituma CM, Cox JJ, Spear SF, Edwards JW, de la Cruz JL, Muller LI, Ford WM (2020) Terrestrial Wildlife in the post-mined Appalachian Landscape: Status and opportunities. In: Zipper CE, Skousen J (eds) Appalachia’s coal mined landscapes: resources and communities in a New Energy Era. Springer, New York, pp 135–166
Matthews JW, Skultety D, Zercher B, Ward MP, Benson TJ (2016) Field Verification of Original and updated National wetlands Inventory maps in three Metropolitan Areas in Illinois, USA. Wetlands 36:1155–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0836-6
Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: less Conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet 7:783–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y
O’Neil GL, Goodall JL, Behl M, Saby L (2020) Deep learning using physically-informed Input Data for Wetland Identification. Env Mod Soft 126:104665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104665
Pat-Espadas AM, Portales RL, Amabilis-Sosa LE, Gomez G, Vidal G (2018) Review of constructed wetlands for Acid Mine Drainage Treatment. Water 10:1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111685
Pericak AA, Thomas CJ, Kroodsma DA, Wasson MF, Ross MRV, Clinton NE, Campagna DJ, Franklin Y, Bernhardt ES, Amos JF (2018) Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using Landsat and Google Earth Engine. PLoS ONE 13:e0197758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197758
Romans I, Smith WH (2022) Amphibian Diversity Associated with High-Elevation wetlands within the Cumberland Mountains Physiographic Province. J Ken Acad Sci 83:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3101/kyac-83-01-05
Ross MRV, McGlynn BL, Bernhardt ES (2016) Deep impact: effects of Mountaintop Mining on Surface Topography, Bedrock structure, and downstream Waters. Envir Sci Tech 50:2064–2074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04532
Schwartzman G (2022) Climate rentierism after coal: forests, carbon offsets, and post-coal politics in the Appalachian coalfields. J Peasant Stud 49:924–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2078710
Smith WH, Hamed MK (2020) Trade-offs in moving citizen‐based anuran call surveys online during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: lessons from rural Appalachia, USA. Ecol Evol 10:12465–12471. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6654
Stiles RM, Swan JW, Klemish JL, Lannoo MJ (2017) Amphibian habitat creation on postindustrial landscapes: a case study in a reclaimed coal strip-mine area. Can J Zool 95:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2015-0163
Strain GF, Turk PJ, Helmick J, Anderson JT (2017) Amphibian reproductive success as a gauge of functional equivalency of created wetlands in the Central appalachians. Wildl Res 44:354–364. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR15177
Thompson RL, Vogel WG, Wade GL, Rafaill BL (1986) Development of natural and planted vegetation on surface mines in southeastern Kentucky. Proc Am Soc Min Recl 1986:145–154. https://doi.org/10.21000/jasmr86010145
Thompson Y, Sandefur BC, Miller JO, Karathanasis AD (2007) Hydrologic and edaphic characteristics of three mountain wetlands in southeastern Kentucky, USA. Wetlands 27:174–188. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[174:HAECOT]2.0.CO;2
Tiner RW (2005) Assessing cumulative loss of wetland functions in the Nanticoke River watershed using enhanced National wetlands Inventory data. Wetlands 25:405–419. https://doi.org/10.1672/15
Townsend PA, Helmers DP, Kingdon CC, McNeil BE, Beurs KMD, Eshleman KN (2009) Changes in the extent of surface mining and reclamation in the Central appalachians detected using a 1976–2006 landsat time series. Proc Spie 113:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.08.012
United States Geological Survey (2019) USGS Hydrography (NHD). https://hydro.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/nhd/MapServer. Accessed 7 June 2022
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2001) National wetlands Inventory website. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. https://www.fws.gov/program/national-wetlands-inventory Accessed 7 June 2022
Vymazal J (2011) Constructed wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: five decades of experience. Envir Sci Tech 45:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101403q
Wieder RK (1989) A survey of constructed wetlands for acid coal mine drainage treatment in the Eastern United States. Wetlands 9:299–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160750
Wise County Virginia Geographic Information Systems Office (2021) GIS Database. https://wisecova.interactivegis.com/map/. Accessed 7 September 2023
Acknowledgements
Jennifer Neuwald with Colorado State University’s Natural Science Education program aided in discussions surrounding the early conceptual development of this study. Hunter Hill and Garrett Stiltner assisted with data collection performed as part of ground-truthing visits to field-verify wetland conditions.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection was performed by David Goodman, with data analysis performed by Walter H. Smith and David Goodman. The first draft of the manuscript was written by David Goodman, and Walter H. Smith and David Goodman contributed to revisions for the final manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
13157_2023_1750_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Material 1: Online Resource 1: Visual example of comparisons of (a) pre-mining (1995) versus (b) contemporary (2021) orthoimagery used to confirm wetlands’ association with landscape disturbance from surface coal extraction. Blue circles denote the location of present-day wetlands on orthoimagery from each date.
13157_2023_1750_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Material 2: Online Resource 2: Habitat data for 506 wetlands surveyed across the Guest River Watershed, Wise County, Virginia, USA in 2022. Refer to the “Metadata” tab for a description of each habitat variable.
13157_2023_1750_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Material 3: Online Resource 3: Summary of habitat assessments performed using contemporary orthoimagery and ground-truthing site visits at a subsample of 31 National Wetlands Inventory-listed wetlands in the Guest River Watershed, Wise County, Virginia, USA. “Vegetation” refers to predominant vegetation type (1 = open water, 2 = emergent, 3 = forested), “Stream” refers to degree of wetland isolation (1 = stream-associated, 2 = isolated from surface streams), “Landscape” refers to predominant upland vegetation within a 100 m buffer of each wetland (1 = barren/developed, 2 = field/grassland, 3 = scrub/shrub, 4 = forested), and “Disturbance” refers to the presence of indicators anthropogenic disturbance (1 = indicators of disturbance present, 2 = indicators of disturbance absent). Fields marked “n.a.” refer to one site that was ditched/drained prior to field visits for ground-truthing.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Goodman, D.C., Smith, W.H. A Landscape-Scale Comparison of Wetlands Associated with Surface Coal Extraction and Naturally-Occurring Wetlands in the Central Appalachian Mountains, USA. Wetlands 43, 101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01750-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01750-y