Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Melt Flow Characteristics in Large Bottom-Blowing Furnace Strengthened by Oxygen Lance Jet at Different Positions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of large-scale bottom-blowing furnaces, the oxygen lance jet and the smelting effect are more and more closely linked. The reasonable setting of the oxygen lance jet has become a significant problem that hinders the development of large oxygen bottom-blowing furnaces. This paper uses ANSYS series software to numerically simulate the melt flow characteristics in a large bottom-blowing furnace under nine operating conditions. The results indicate that the oxygen lance jet at different positions significantly impacts the stirring of the molten pool surface and the longitudinal direction of the molten pool center, thereby affecting the smelting reaction process. When the oxygen lance jet is at 9° and 24° from opposite sides, the effective stirring rate of the molten pool surface is 45.8%, and the longitudinal penetration depth is 1.76 m. The molten pool gas content rate, average melt velocity, and average turbulence energy of melt are relatively high. It is a suitable oxygen lance arrangement method, which provides good kinetic conditions for the smelting process of the large bottom-blowing furnace.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coursol P, Mackey PJ, Kapusta JPT, Valencia NC (2015) Energy consumption in copper smelting: a new ASIAN horse in the race. JOM 67(5):1066–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1380-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson A, Kumar V, Rao VM, Grogan J (2022) A review of computational capabilities and requirements in high-resolution simulation of nonferrous pyrometallurgical furnaces. JOM 74(4):1543–1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05169-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang DX, Liu Y, Zhang ZM, Shao P, Zhang TA (2016) Dimensional analysis of average diameter of bubbles for bottom blown oxygen copper furnace. Math Probl Eng 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4170371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nikolić IP, Milošević IM, Milijić NN, Mihajlović IN (2019) Cleaner production and technical effectiveness: multi-criteria analysis of copper smelting facilities. J Clean Prod 215:423–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao BJ, Liao JF (2022) Development of bottom-blowing copper smelting technology: a review. Metals 12(2):190. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12020190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Song KZ, Jokilaakso A (2022) Transport phenomena in copper bath smelting and converting processes—a review of experimental and modeling studies. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 43(1):107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2020.1806835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang QM, Guo XY, Tian QH (2017) Copper smelting mechanism in oxygen bottom-blown furnace. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 27(4):946–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60110-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt A, Montenegro V, Wehinger GD (2021) Transient CFD modeling of matte settling behavior and coalescence in an industrial copper flash smelting furnace settler. Metall Mater Trans B 52(1):405–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-020-02026-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao HL, Lu TT, Yin P, Mu ZL, Liu FQ (2019) An experimental and simulated study on gas-liquid flow and mixing behavior in an ISASMELT furnace. Metals 9(5):565. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu YT, Yang TZ, Chen Z, Zhu ZY, Huang Q (2020) Experiment and numerical simulation of two-phase flow in oxygen enriched side-blown furnace. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 30(1):249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65196-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Song KZ, Jokilaakso A (2021) CFD modeling of multiphase flow in an SKS furnace: the effect of tuyere arrangements. Metall Mater Trans B 52:1772–1788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02145-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xi WL, Niu LP, Song JB, Liu SH (2022) Numerical simulation of flow field in large bottom-blown furnace under different scale-up criteria. JOM 75(2):437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05628-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li SW, Wang SB, Wang YH, Chen Q (2021) Strengthening mechanism analysis and evaluation methods of multi-channel bottom-blowing spray lance stirring. Fuel cells 21(1):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.202000065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang DX, Liu Y, Zhang ZM, Zhang TA, Li XL (2017) PIV measurements on physical models of bottom blown oxygen copper smelting furnace. Can Metall Q 56(5):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00084433.2017.1310362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Song KZ, Jokilaakso A (2022) The CFD modeling of multiphase flow in an SKS furnace: the effect of tuyere diameter and bath depth. JOM 74(4):1488–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05143-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shao P, Jiang LP (2019) Flow and mixing behavior in a new bottom blown copper smelting furnace. Int J Mol Sci 20(22):5757. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20225757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng J, Chen Z, Liu SX, Cheng LZ (2017) Numerical simulation and single factor influence analysis of multi-phase flow in copper top-blown furnace. The Chin J Process Eng 17(5):926–935. https://doi.org/10.12034/j.issn.1009-606X.217145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shui L, Cui ZX, Ma XD, Rhamdhani M, Nguyen AV, Zhao BJ (2016) Understanding of bath surface wave in bottom blown copper smelting furnace. Metall Mater Trans B 47(1):135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0466-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo XY, Wang S, Wang QM, Yan SY, Tian QH (2018) Simulation research of bubble growth behavior in oxygen bottom blowing smelting process. The Chin J Nonferrous Metals 28(6):1204–1215. https://doi.org/10.19476/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2018.06.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liao JF, Tan KQ, Zhao BJ (2023) Enhanced productivity of bottom-blowing copper-smelting process using plume eye. Metals 13(2):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13020217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U20A20273), Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan Province (No. 2022JJ10078), Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (No. 2021RC3005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinmeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

The contributing editor for this article was Yongxiang Yang.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, B., Guo, X. & Wang, Q. Analysis of Melt Flow Characteristics in Large Bottom-Blowing Furnace Strengthened by Oxygen Lance Jet at Different Positions. J. Sustain. Metall. 9, 1704–1715 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-023-00759-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-023-00759-1

Keywords

Navigation