Abstract
Novelty, the creation of new information, has been the hallmark of Juri M. Lotman’s thought. This issue resurfaces in the discussion of his now famous article “On the semiosphere,” in which Lotman, drawing on Vernadsky, identifies the principles of symmetry, asymmetry, and enantiomorphism as pivotal aspects of the semiotic mechanism of the semiosphere. Specular phenomena and mirror reflections have not only found a prominent place in contemporary semiotic theories of different scholarly traditions – from general semiotics (Eco, Volli) to cognitive semiotics (Sonesson) and to the semiotics of culture (Lotman, Levin) – but they also nail down a key element of the inner mechanism of Lotman’s concept of the semiosphere. By using the analogy of the face reflecting in a mirror, Lotman remarks: “It is also like a face, which, wholly reflected in a mirror, is also reflected in any of its fragments, which, in this form, represents the part and yet remains similar to the whole mirror.” By capitalizing on this excerpt, this study unpacks the significance of Lotman’s idea of specular mechanisms as generators of meaning within the semiosphere.
-
Research funding: This publication results from a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 819649 – FACETS).
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2021. A che punto siamo? L’epidemia come politica. Padova: Quodlibet.Search in Google Scholar
Alexandrov, Vladimir E. 2000. Biology, semiosis, and cultural difference in Lotman’s semiosphere. Comparative Literature 52(4). 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1215/-52-4-339.Search in Google Scholar
Augustine. 1953. The soliloquies, J. H. S. Burleigh (trans.). In Augustine: Earlier writings (Library of Christian Classics 6), 17–23. Philadelphia: Westminster.Search in Google Scholar
Babcock, Barbara. 1980. Special issue: Signs about signs. The semiotics of self-reference. Semiotica 30(1/2).Search in Google Scholar
Bacchini, Fabio. 1995. Riflessioni sugli specchi. Il Cannocchiale 3. 211–224.Search in Google Scholar
Bacchini, Fabio. 2017. Lo status semiosico dei fenomeni speculari. Rivista di Filosofia del Linguaggio 11(1). 43–58.Search in Google Scholar
Baltrusaitis, Jurgis. 1981. Lo specchio. Milano: Adelphi.Search in Google Scholar
Baltrusaitis, Jurgis. 1990. Anamorfosi o magia artificiale degli effetti meravigliosi. Milano: Adelphi.Search in Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio. 1992. La maschera, il doppio e il ritratto. Strategie dell’identità. Roma & Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Han-Liang. 2003. Is language a primary modeling system? On Juri Lotman’s concept of semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 31(2). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2003.31.1.01.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Wilma Anne. 2010. Lotman’s semiosphere: A systems thinking approach to students’ meaning-making practices with digital texts. Ph.D Diss. University of London.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1968. La struttura assente. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1973. Segno. Milan: Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1975. Trattato di semiotica generale. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1983. Catottrica e semiotica. Rassegna 13(1). 5–20.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1985. Sugli specchi e altri saggi. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1986. Semiotics and philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1997. Kant e l’ornitorinco. Milan: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel Y. 2009. The mirror, the window, and the telescope: How Renaissance linear perspective changed our vision of the universe. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.10.1007/978-3-0346-0518-2_9Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, Martin. 1967. The ambidextrous universe. London: Penguin Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gherlone, Laura. 2014. Dopo la semiosfera: Con saggi inediti di Jurij M. Lotman. Milan & Udine: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas J. 1989. The veridiction contract. New Literary History 20(3). 651–660. https://doi.org/10.2307/469359.Search in Google Scholar
Gregory, Richard. 1997. Mirrors in mind. Oxford & New York: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar
Grishakova, Marina. 2012. The models of space, time and vision in V. Nabokov’s fiction: Narrative strategies and cultural frames. Tartu: Tartu University Press.10.26530/OAPEN_421498Search in Google Scholar
Hall, Jason Yarwood. 1978. The lineaments of character: Physiognomy from Lavater to Lombroso. Ph.D. Diss. University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1997. Signs and meanings in the universe. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2002. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling, and skill. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav V. 1978. Chet i nechet: Asimmetriya mozga i znakovyh sistem. Мoskva: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar
Kassner, Rudolf. 1997. I fondamenti della fisiognomica. Il carattere delle cose. Vicenza: Neri Pozza.Search in Google Scholar
Keppler, Carl F. 1972. The literature of the second self. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kotov, Kaie. 2002. Semiosphere: A chemistry of being. Sign Systems Studies 30(1). 41–55. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2002.30.1.04.Search in Google Scholar
Kull, Kalevi. 2011. Juri Lotman in English: Bibliography. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4). 343–356. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2011.39.2-4.14.Search in Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1966. Ecrits. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Search in Google Scholar
Leone, Massimo. 2022. Volti della semantica, semantiche del volto. Blytiri 11(1–2). 119–143.Search in Google Scholar
Lepik, Peet. 2008. Universals in the context of Juri Lotman’s semiotics (Tartu Semiotics Library 7). Tartu: Tartu University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Jury. 1997. Lo specchio come potenziale oggetto semiotico. In Margherita De Michiel & Romeo Galassi (eds.), Il simbolo e lo specchio. Scritti della scuola semiotica di Mosca-Tartu, 127–129. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Search in Google Scholar
Lobaccaro, Luigi & Martina Bacaro. 2021. What is in the mirror? On mirror self-recognition, semiotics, and material engagement. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi 1. 103–124.Search in Google Scholar
Lorusso, Anna Maria. 2015. Cultural semiotics: For a cultural perspective in semiotics. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137546999Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1973. Il problema del segno e del sistema segnico nella tipologia della cultura russa prima del XX secolo. In Jurij M. Lotman & Boris A. Uspenskij (eds.), Ricerche semiotiche. Nuove tendenze delle scienze umane nell’URSS, 40–61. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1978. La bambola nel sistema della cultura. In Simonetta Salvestroni (ed.), Testo e contesto. Semiotica dell’arte e della cultura, 145–150. Roma & Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1984. O semiosfere. Trudy po znakovym sistemam 17. 5–23.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1988. Text within a text. Soviet Psychology 26(3). 32–51. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405260332.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1989. The semiosphere. Soviet Psychology 27(1). 40–61. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405270140.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington & Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1994. Cercare la strada. Modelli della cultura. Venezia: Marsilio.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 1997. La semiotica dello specchio e della specularità. In Margherita De Michiel & Romeo Galassi (eds.), Il simbolo e lo specchio. Scritti della scuola semiotica di Mosca-Tartu, 127–129. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. & Wilma Clark. 2005. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 205–229. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2005.33.1.09.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij M. 2009. Culture and explosion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218473Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Mihhail. 2002a. Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 30(1). 33–40. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2002.30.1.03.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Mihhail. 2002b. Atomistic versus holistic semiotics. Sign Systems Studies 30(2). 513–527. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2002.30.2.10.Search in Google Scholar
Magli, Patrizia. 1988. Ancient physiognomics. Versus 50–51. 39–55.Search in Google Scholar
Magli, Patrizia. 1995. Il volto e l’anima. Fisiognomica e passioni. Milano: CDE spa.Search in Google Scholar
Mandelker, Amy. 1995. Logosphere and semiosphere: Bakhtin, Russian organicism, and the semiotics of culture. In Amy Mandelker (ed.), Bakhtin in contexts across the disciplines, 177–190. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Markoš, Anton. 2014. Biosphere as semiosphere: Variations on Lotman. Sign Systems Studies 42(4). 487–498. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2014.42.4.03.Search in Google Scholar
Marras, Cristina. 2013. Structuring multidisciplinary knowledge: Aquatic and terrestrial metaphors. Knowledge Organization 40(6). 392–399. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-6-392.Search in Google Scholar
Melchior-Bonnet, Sabine. 2002. The mirror: A history. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Merrell, Floyd. 2008. Lotman’s semiosphere, Peirce’s signs, and cultural processes. Russian Journal of Communication 1(4). 372–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2008.10756726.Search in Google Scholar
Monticelli, Daniele. 2019. Borders and translation: Revisiting Juri Lotman’s semiosphere. Semiotica 230(1/4). 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0125.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 1990. Alice’s adventures in semiosis (Working papers and pre-publications 195 series B). Urbino: Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e Linguistica.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 2015. The topography of Yuri Lotman’s semiosphere. International Journal of Cultural Studies 18(1). 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877914528114.Search in Google Scholar
Patoine, Pierre-Louis & Jonathan Hope. 2015. The semiosphere: Between informational modernity and ecological postmodernity. Recherches Sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 35(1). 11–26. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050984ar.Search in Google Scholar
Piras, Antonio. 2010. Le parole del volto. Spigolature storico-linguistiche ai margini di un campo semantico. In Daniele Vinci (ed.), Il volto nel pensiero contemporaneo, 47–63. Trapani: Il Pozzo di Giacobbe.Search in Google Scholar
Portis-Winner, Irene. 1998. Lotman’s semiosphere: Some comments. In Jacek J. Jadacki & Witold Strawiński (eds.), In the world of signs: Essays in honour of professor Jerzy Pelc, 235–244. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004457621_027Search in Google Scholar
Salvestroni, Simonetta. 1985. Nuove chiavi di lettura del reale alla luce del pensiero di Lotman e dell’epistemologia contemporanea. In Simonetta Salvestroni (ed.), La semiosfera. L’asimmetria e il dialogo nelle strutture pensanti, 7–46. Venezia: Marsilio.Search in Google Scholar
Semenenko, Aleksei. 2016. Homo polyglottus: Semiosphere as a model of human cognition. Sign Systems Studies 44(4). 494–510. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2016.44.4.02.Search in Google Scholar
Scheibe, Karl. 1979. Mirrors, masks, lies, and secrets: The limits of human predictability. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Shiller, Devon. 2023. Face in the mirror, what do you see? Catoptric autoexperimentation and the physiognomic gaze. Chinese Semiotic Studies 19(3). 481–510.10.1515/css-2023-2017Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Kim. 1981. The sign status of specular reflections. In John Deely & Margot Lenhart (eds.), Semiotics 1981, 73–81. Berlin: Springer.10.5840/cpsem198130Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2003. Why the mirror is a sign – and why the television picture is no mirror: Two episodes in the critique of the iconicity critique. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 15(2–4). 217–232.Search in Google Scholar
Sonesson, Göran. 2015. The mirror in-between picture and mind: A phenomenologically inspired approach to cognitive semiotics. Chinese Semiotic Studies 11(2). 59–180. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2015-0009.Search in Google Scholar
Spassova, Kamelia. 2018. Authentic and heterogeneous mimesis: Reflection and self-reflexivity in Todor Pavlov and Yuri Lotman. Slavica Tergestina 20. 70–96.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, Lina. 2011. For humanity’s sake: The Bildungsroman in Russian culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442696082Search in Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek & Peeter Torop (eds.). 2022. The companion to Juri Lotman: A semiotic theory of culture. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350181649Search in Google Scholar
Toporov, Vladimir. 1998. La metafora dello specchio (con nota di Alessandro Niero). Strumenti Critici 3. 399–408.Search in Google Scholar
Torop, Peeter. 2003. Semiospherical understanding: Textuality. Sign Systems Studies 31(2). 323–339. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2003.31.2.01.Search in Google Scholar
Torop, Peeter. 2005. Semiosphere and/as the research object of semiotics of culture. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 159–173. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2005.33.1.06.Search in Google Scholar
Torop, Peeter. 2022. Semiosphere. In Marek Tamm & Peeter Torop (eds.), The companion to Juri Lotman: A semiotic theory of culture, 296–307. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350181649.0030Search in Google Scholar
Tymms, Ralph. 1949. Doubles in literary psychology. Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes.Search in Google Scholar
Viola, Marco. 2022. Seeing through the shades of situated affectivity: Sunglasses as a socio-affective artifact. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2118574.Search in Google Scholar
Volli, Ugo. 1972. Some possible developments of the concept of iconism. Versus 3. 14–30.Search in Google Scholar
Volli, Ugo. 1983. La forma della simmetria. Rassegna 13(1). 24–34.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
